Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / 4x4 Cars / February 2005
All Wheel Drive Options?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
HotRod - 22 Feb 2005 16:40 GMT I'm looking for an "All Wheel Drive" system that I can start a build-up from, can anyone recommend a good starting point? Website for all wheel drive parts etc. or a car/truck model to have a look at.
I need something that can be stretched and handle up to 500hp. IDEAS? I want true All wheel drive not 4x4.
web1000@shaw.ca - 22 Feb 2005 17:00 GMT Audis Quattro comes to mind .. its true AWD (Torsen Diffs) and handles 430 HP of their V8 motor .... it should hold up to 500 HP at least for a reasonable period ..
It will be expensive though .. Matt
Erik-Jan Geniets - 22 Feb 2005 17:53 GMT > I'm looking for an "All Wheel Drive" system that I can start a build-up > from, can anyone recommend a good starting point? Website for all wheel > drive parts etc. or a car/truck model to have a look at. > > I need something that can be stretched and handle up to 500hp. IDEAS? I want > true All wheel drive not 4x4. You probably mean: not part-time 4x4 here ?
What about a Range Rover. The chassis makes it easy to built your own whatever on top and you have full time 4WD. Erik-Jan,
-- http://www.fotograaf.com/trooper
HotRod - 22 Feb 2005 19:20 GMT From what I've read and heard, Please correct me if I'm wrong, the difference between 4x4 and "All Wheel Drive" AWD is that on a 4x4 system the wheels always travel at the same speed like in my GM Trail Blazer. Great for rock crawling but not racing, I believe that AWD systems are viscous coupled and therefore each wheel is able to travel at it's own speed and I will get a lot better traction control in snow and rain???
I'm building a custom car and think I want AWD for rain and snow.
> I'm looking for an "All Wheel Drive" system that I can start a build-up > from, can anyone recommend a good starting point? Website for all wheel > drive parts etc. or a car/truck model to have a look at. > > I need something that can be stretched and handle up to 500hp. IDEAS? I > want true All wheel drive not 4x4. Erik-Jan Geniets - 22 Feb 2005 19:50 GMT > From what I've read and heard, Please correct me if I'm wrong, the > difference between 4x4 and "All Wheel Drive" AWD is that on a 4x4 system the > wheels always travel at the same speed like in my GM Trail Blazer. The open diffs, as in your GM, will allow the wheels to spin at different speeds. So go for this set-up. This will probably last longer with a 500HP engine compared to viscous coupled systems like in the Audi. If the wheels on your GM weren't able to spin at different speeds it would almost be impossible to take any corner with that car. For rockcrawling you need lockers in the front and rear diff. Will be horrible on ice and snow. Your car or a standard Range Rover does not have lockers. Kind regards, Erik-Jan.
Great for
> rock crawling but not racing, I believe that AWD systems are viscous coupled > and therefore each wheel is able to travel at it's own speed and I will get > a lot better traction control in snow and rain??? > > I'm building a custom car and think I want AWD for rain and snow. Mike Romain - 22 Feb 2005 21:34 GMT The system you just described can leave you with only one of any 4 potential drive tires spinning on ice.
At least with a 'part time' 4x4 you will always have one front and one back spinning and if you put limited slip or a manual locker front and rear, you can have all 4 goosing it if needed.
Even Jeeps that offer the select trac 'full time' or AWD 4x4 with a coupler front to rear still let you lock it up into part time 4x4 for real snow traction.
Mike 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> From what I've read and heard, Please correct me if I'm wrong, the > difference between 4x4 and "All Wheel Drive" AWD is that on a 4x4 system the [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > I need something that can be stretched and handle up to 500hp. IDEAS? I > > want true All wheel drive not 4x4. HotRod - 22 Feb 2005 20:49 GMT Any chance you can explain to me why when driving an AWD car the ride was nice and smooth, including sharp corners but on my 4x4 trail blazer taking a corner is tough, I tend to feel like I'm fighting the wheel the whole time?
Will - 22 Feb 2005 22:06 GMT > Any chance you can explain to me why when driving an AWD car the ride was > nice and smooth, including sharp corners but on my 4x4 trail blazer taking > a corner is tough, I tend to feel like I'm fighting the wheel the whole > time? Probably because your 4x4 has front and rear diffs, but not a diff in the transfer case. Right and left can move at different speeds, but the tires w/ power in the front and rear have to move at the same speed. And in a sharp turn, the front and rear travel a slightly different radius. And you're right, if you want to drive on ice and have four wheel drive on all the time, an AWD setup as you described (not traditional 4x4) is the way to go. But I could be wrong. I just learned/realized this a few months ago, so I'm no expert.
I would think a Subaru might be a good place start. Or an Eclipse (I know you could get older ones w/ AWD). Or an old AMC Eagle. Being older, it might be a ladder frame, or at least a frame that doesn't include the whole body like a new one, which could make it easier to build on. And they had a lot or ground clearance- like a sedan on a compact truck frame.
-Will
-Will
Spud Demon - 24 Feb 2005 22:46 GMT "Will" <mightymouse64@REMOVEjuno.com> writes in article <cvgadn$65d$1@news-int2.gatech.edu> dated Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:06:48 -0500:
>> Any chance you can explain to me why when driving an AWD car the ride was >> nice and smooth, including sharp corners but on my 4x4 trail blazer taking [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >transfer case. Right and left can move at different speeds, but the tires w/ >power in the front and rear have to move at the same speed. That's not exactly right. An open diff matches the *sum* of the right and left angular velocity to the input angular velocity. That's why if you jack up both drive wheels on a 2WD vehicle and spin one of them with the engine off (but in gear), the other will spin in at an equal speed in the opposite direction.
So in the case of a regular 4x4 with 2 open diffs, you have
LF + RF = LR + RR = driveshaft
And yes, that does make it "fight" turns, because the 4 wheels travel in different paths. Some manufacturers have played with 4-wheel steering. If the rear wheels are steered exactly oppositely to the front wheels, you don't have that issue because LF=LR and RF=RR.
Chevy Suburbans have had an AWD option since the stone age.
-- spud_demon -at- thundermaker.net The above may not (yet) represent the opinions of my employer.
Erik-Jan Geniets - 24 Feb 2005 23:13 GMT > That's why if you jack > up both drive wheels on a 2WD vehicle and spin one of them with the engine > off (but in gear), the other will spin in at an equal speed in the opposite > direction. As far as I recall this will also happen in neutral ??? Erik-Jan.
Spud Demon - 25 Feb 2005 18:49 GMT Erik-Jan Geniets <ej@fotograaf.com> writes in article <421E5F9F.80A422DD@fotograaf.com> dated Fri, 25 Feb 2005 00:13:35 +0100:
>> That's why if you jack >> up both drive wheels on a 2WD vehicle and spin one of them with the engine [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >As far as I recall this will also happen in neutral ??? >Erik-Jan. In neutral the driveshaft can also spin freely. So you could spin one wheel and have somebody hold the other one still if you wanted.
In gear the driveshaft is locked to the engine speed (0), so the wheel speeds are equal and opposite.
-- spud_demon -at- thundermaker.net The above may not (yet) represent the opinions of my employer.
Will - 25 Feb 2005 04:31 GMT Yeah, you're right. I wasn't thinking about a diff right. Thanks.
-Will
> "Will" <mightymouse64@REMOVEjuno.com> writes in article > <cvgadn$65d$1@news-int2.gatech.edu> dated Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:06:48 -0500: [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > -- spud_demon -at- thundermaker.net > The above may not (yet) represent the opinions of my employer. Erik-Jan Geniets - 22 Feb 2005 23:08 GMT > Any chance you can explain to me why when driving an AWD car the ride was > nice and smooth, including sharp corners but on my 4x4 trail blazer taking a > corner is tough, I tend to feel like I'm fighting the wheel the whole time? Do not know about the specific set-up on your car. But is it possible the centre diff is still engaged? Or if it is part-time 4WD you forgot to change to 2WD mode? Something broken? Any other lockers present? Locked? Broken? Kind regards, Erik-Jan.
 Signature http://www.fotograaf.com/trooper
Mike Romain - 23 Feb 2005 01:05 GMT When you are in part time 4x4, the front and rear axles are locked together.
This means that one front tire has to scuff the ground or slip when you take a corner because the front tires physically travel farther than the rear when taking a corner.
With AWD or 'full time' 4x4, there is a limited slip of some sort in the middle so you can have slip between front and rear axles so when you corner the slip happens in the middle.
This is nice sometimes because all 4 wheels see equal torque. This is bad sometimes because like any open differential, when traction is uneven you can end up with only say the rear turning on ice because it has the least traction, then the rear open diff comes in and bingo, there you are sitting with one tire merrily spinning away and you going nowhere fast. All the makers have different systems so things vary.
I find in city driving on snow or slush when I use part time 4x4, I shift out just before a left turn so I track the corner, then hit 4x4 as I straighten out.
I think you are looking for something like the Jeep 'selec trac' system that has the AWD or 'full time' with the center diff for the rain and light snow with the 'part time' locked option available for the best traction.
Mike 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> Any chance you can explain to me why when driving an AWD car the ride was > nice and smooth, including sharp corners but on my 4x4 trail blazer taking a > corner is tough, I tend to feel like I'm fighting the wheel the whole time? Lon - 23 Feb 2005 03:45 GMT HotRod proclaimed:
> Any chance you can explain to me why when driving an AWD car the ride was > nice and smooth, including sharp corners but on my 4x4 trail blazer taking a > corner is tough, I tend to feel like I'm fighting the wheel the whole time? The best explanation I can offer is an analogy based on "never confuse the concept with the implementation."
There are girls, and there are sheep.
Some girls have more wool than the sheep, and not all of the girls are better looking than the sheep.
On this side of the pond, AWD is usually reserved for those vehicles which offer some sort of drive to 4 wheels but lack a low range and sometimes a transfer case. 4wd is those with a transfer case and usually a low range. There are full time and part time 4wd, and folks who leave the part-time 4wd engaged tend to have trouble with driving ease. Seen 2wd vehicles with the same issue, some of the old muscle cars that had been a bit too aggressively set up for street racing tended to hop pretty bad around corners, with a lot of drama and noise due to a too tightly set up rear limited slip or out and out locker.
Matt Mead - 22 Feb 2005 23:03 GMT >I'm looking for an "All Wheel Drive" system that I can start a build-up >from, can anyone recommend a good starting point? Website for all wheel >drive parts etc. or a car/truck model to have a look at. > >I need something that can be stretched and handle up to 500hp. IDEAS? I want >true All wheel drive not 4x4. If you are truly looking to "Hot Rod" something, I'd suggest either an Olds Bravado or GM AWD Astro/Safari van. (Hear me out before you start laughing!)
Both models, pre 99, used a tough viscous clutch AWD transfer case. Basically the same case that was used in the Syclone/Typhoon models. While the SyTys didn't come with 500hp, many folks have pushed them to that level and beyond. (In 99 they switched to an electronic clutch. The jury is still out on this transfer case, but it seems to be less dependable due to the required electronics.)
A small block V-8 will drop right in to the Astro/Safari AWD van with only oil pan mods and motor mounts being needed. (Two companies offer parts to do it.) Several folks have dropped big blocks into these vans, but I'm not aware of any running AWD.
The Bravada is probably a tight fit for a V-8 as I've read that is the case for the S-series trucks. Still, kits are out there to do it.
Of course you could also build your own Syclone/Typhoon type truck by swapping the above mentioned T-case into any of the S-series 4x4 trucks and SUVs. In fact, you could do the same to a fullsize GM truck or SUV, but you may need to carefully match transmission output shafts and the like.
As for the mention of AWD leaving you with only 1 wheel drive on ice, that isn't the case with this AWD system. The standard torque split is roughly 60/40 rear/front with it easily shifting to 50/50 when slip is detected. (The system is a viscous clutch and a speed difference between ends causes the fluid to heat and lock the clutch plates together. While it isn't "locked" like a true 4x4 system, you will NEVER experience 1 wheel drive. (I've been impressed how quickly the system reacts and in real-world conditions, you never notice any slip. My AWD van has over 160K miles on it and I used it as a snowmobile tow vehicle for many years in New Hampshire and Maine. It is still my preferred ride when the roads get slick.)
Matt 99 V-10 Super Duty, Super Cab 4x4 96 GMC Safari AWD Hi-Top Conversion Van
HotRod - 23 Feb 2005 18:42 GMT THANKS for the course on 4x4, I think what I'm looking for is fill time 4x4 or AWD, I really don't need the low range option. I'll keep hunting and keep everyone p[osted when I come up with a few more ideas. THANKS
Mike Romain - 23 Feb 2005 19:07 GMT I would be keeping to the simple if I could when wanting power. The more fancy parts involved, the more fancy (read expensive) things there are to blow out at full torque.
I think the strongest set up would be one for a 4x4 truck like a Jeep or some other which does have the low range. You don't need to use the low unless you like popping wheelies or something.....
Mike 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> THANKS for the course on 4x4, I think what I'm looking for is fill time 4x4 > or AWD, I really don't need the low range option. I'll keep hunting and keep > everyone p[osted when I come up with a few more ideas. THANKS Erik-Jan Geniets - 23 Feb 2005 21:05 GMT > You don't need to use the low > unless you like popping wheelies or something..... Or just to impress your friends while burning tires.... Do not tell them you have low range just convince them it is over 1000 HP. 4 wheels spinning in smoke....great.... Erik-Jan.
Mike Romain - 23 Feb 2005 21:57 GMT > > You don't need to use the low > > unless you like popping wheelies or something..... [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > HP. 4 wheels spinning in smoke....great.... > Erik-Jan. LOL! Could have some fun with that..... If manual or even a vacuum switched hubs, you can keep it in 2 low even with a switch.
Mike 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
David - 23 Feb 2005 19:06 GMT > I need something that can be stretched and handle up to 500hp. IDEAS? I want > true All wheel drive not 4x4. You'll find a lot of discussion of powerful AWD Subarus here:
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=79
400 hp isn't a problem for those. Dunno about 500, but nasioc is a good place to find out.
HotRod - 25 Feb 2005 14:47 GMT I think I'm going to go out and have a look at a suburban, I figure that they are readily available with a lot of engine options and apparently AWD. I actually like the option of being able to turn off AWD however I do not want a ton of transfer cases and such. I'd like to keep the car close to the ground. I think that possibly adding an air ride kit (air bags) would help with any ground clearance issues, does anyone have any experience on how they would affect the ride?
HotRod - 25 Feb 2005 17:59 GMT I think I'm going to go out and have a look at a suburban, I figure that they are readily available with a lot of engine options and apparently AWD. I actually like the option of being able to turn off AWD however I do not want a ton of transfer cases and such. I'd like to keep the car close to the ground. I think that possibly adding an air ride kit (air bags) would help with any ground clearance issues, does anyone have any experience on how they would affect the ride?
HotRod - 28 Feb 2005 14:44 GMT OK I know you guys will know the answer to this question.
1) Is there a transfer case that would allow me to select between FWD, RWD or Both? What vehicles are using them?
|
|
|