Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Acura Cars / August 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

K&N filter for 1st Gen Legend

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Natman - 13 Aug 2004 17:05 GMT
http://www.knfilterchargers.com/search/product.aspx?Prod=E-0999

I got a response to an email requesting this filter 9 years ago! I
can't believe that K&N is finally releasing this filter, only 14 years
after production of the 1st gen stopped.
Doug Holtz NOSPAM in adress - 14 Aug 2004 02:32 GMT
> http://www.knfilterchargers.com/search/product.aspx?Prod=E-0999
>
> I got a response to an email requesting this filter 9 years ago! I
> can't believe that K&N is finally releasing this filter, only 14 years
> after production of the 1st gen stopped.

I need to change mine soon.  Glad to see this.  Now I hope I can find one
and afford it :)

Doug
Stuart Gordon - 19 Aug 2004 17:14 GMT
They are WASHABLE !
K&N filters MUST be degreased and re-oiled every year at least or they will
let tons of crap into your engine !!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > http://www.knfilterchargers.com/search/product.aspx?Prod=E-0999
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Doug
David H. - 19 Aug 2004 20:06 GMT
bullshit - K&N recommends washing and degreasing every 50,000 to 100,000
miles.

> They are WASHABLE !
> K&N filters MUST be degreased and re-oiled every year at least or they will
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> >
> > Doug
Stuart Gordon - 21 Aug 2004 05:59 GMT
Newgroups are a great source of misinformation, so here is something to
consider

The k&n filter is wire mesh with cotton element embedded across it. It is an
oil trap type filter so the actual pore size of the cotton is fairly large
but by giving it an oily coat the fine particulates will stick to the cotton
and create a filter bed as it collects more dirt. So the filter becomes more
effective as dirt builds up on the surface. Of course at some point it
becomes clogged and restricts air flow. The whole purpose of this filter is
to give you more air than the stock filter which will in turn give you more
power (doubtful). This is a trade off for allowing dirt in the engine for a
tiny increase in power or a cleaner engine and greater longitivity.

The standard air filter is a woven media that is pleated to increase
substantially the surface area of the filter. This allows for designing in
an absolute pore size in the material that is very small and still allowing
adequate air supply assisted by the pleating.

Abrasive material (also known as "dirt", "crud") that is sucked into the
engine will wear out the engine, both in the upper and lower end. Effective
air filtration and oil filtration determine the life of the car. My opinion
is that the goals of increased air flow for additional engine performance
and extending the life and reliability of the engine are somewhat
incompatible in this case.....the way the engine gets more air in this case
is by reducing the filtration capacity of the intake air filter. That lets
in more dirt....the mfgr. uses pleated filters to give large filtration area
and lots of protection and still allows for relatively hi rate of flow. The
pleated filter will not plug readily and pressure differential from indeed
to outfeed will remain constant for a long long time. A filter bed type
filter (like K & N) will tend to increase in pressure differential until it
becomes completely plugged (you would notice this as a loss in power, poor
mileage, poor idle and driveability). So it's "good" operating range is
narrow....new it lets in dirt, old it plugs up.

I took the K&N out of my Legend with no decrease in performance or gas
mileage. I have noticed when I change my oil, its cleaner with the OEM
filter that the K&N .... that's something to consider !

The oil you use on a K & N can ruin MAF sensors, but I think the Legend uses
MAP instead so may be less of a problem with oil contaminating sensors that
determine fuel/air ratios.

If you think a K&N filter is better, buy one, use it and enjoy it.  Or why
not disconnect the complete Legend intake (very restrictive) and add a short
ram or cold air intake and even more air (and dirt ) into your motor ....

> bullshit - K&N recommends washing and degreasing every 50,000 to 100,000
> miles.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> > >
> > > Doug
Doug Holtz NOSPAM in adress - 24 Aug 2004 19:19 GMT
Stuart;

It would help this group if you were to quote a reputable source on air
filtration, or give us your professional credentials, before you make a post
like this.

Doug

> Newgroups are a great source of misinformation, so here is something to
> consider
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
> > > >
> > > > Doug
Stuart Gordon - 25 Aug 2004 04:27 GMT
Doug ... don't you think if a $20 part (at manufactured cost) would increase
horsepower and improve filtration that the manufacturers would adopt it ?

Do you think the major manufacturers have a few more engineers on staff than
the folks at K&N ?  Or perhaps the folks at K&N are just so damn smart that
the have figured out how to change one small part in the induction system
and as a result deliver better filtration and engine performance ?

FYI, every race car, both on track and off-road, are not built to go 150,000
miles, all they want is horsepower and will sacrifice filtration. They also
run more modifications than only a K&N filter to get the horsepower ...

What are my qualifications ? They are sufficient so ignore me at your own
risk.

> Stuart;
>
[quoted text clipped - 91 lines]
> > > > >
> > > > > Doug
F2004: 12 of 13* - 25 Aug 2004 14:08 GMT
>Doug ... don't you think if a $20 part (at manufactured cost) would increase
>horsepower and improve filtration that the manufacturers would adopt it ?
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>What are my qualifications ? They are sufficient so ignore me at your own
>risk.

So...  Just your own unsubstantiated suspicions and untested theories,
along with a dose of conspiracy theories?

...That's helpful.
Stuart Gordon - 25 Aug 2004 22:40 GMT
there is no conspiracy .... and you are welcome for the help !  Now its up
to you to decided.

Best of luck whatever you decide.

> >Doug ... don't you think if a $20 part (at manufactured cost) would increase
> >horsepower and improve filtration that the manufacturers would adopt it ?
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> ...That's helpful.
Doug Holtz NOSPAM in adress - 26 Aug 2004 02:27 GMT
Stuart;

I don't deny the K&N are great products.  I just thought you went pretty far
postulating about the value of it vs. a factory or other aftermarket
disposable filter.

Doug

> Doug ... don't you think if a $20 part (at manufactured cost) would increase
> horsepower and improve filtration that the manufacturers would adopt it ?
[quoted text clipped - 120 lines]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Doug
Natman - 20 Aug 2004 16:57 GMT
>They are WASHABLE !
>K&N filters MUST be degreased and re-oiled every year at least or they will
>let tons of crap into your engine !!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm sorry, but that simply is not true. K&Ns are used in off road
racing where they see (and stop) more dirt than a street engine will
see in its entire life.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.