Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Acura Cars / June 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Unofficial FAQ: Ignition corrections

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
TeGGeR® - 13 Jun 2005 01:41 GMT
http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/igniter-operation/index.html

Hopefully this is correct now.

Thanks to all for their help, especially Jim Yanik.

Signature

TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

r2000swler@hotmail.com - 13 Jun 2005 02:31 GMT
http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/igniter-operation/index.html

Hopefully this is correct now.

Thanks to all for their help, especially Jim Yanik.

--
TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
--------------------------------------
I think in the 1990 Honda Civic, the igniter also provides
for for some PWM control. It senses the back EMF and
kills the coil drive at the correct momment to insure a
hot spark. I played with an ignitor and couldn't get it
to because correctly until I connected to to a Honda
igntion coil. As I varied the frequency of the drive pulses,
all the same width, the output created wider pulse at higher
"RPM".  

Terry
jim beam - 13 Jun 2005 02:34 GMT
> http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/igniter-operation/index.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Terry

interesting!  i'd read that they did that, but just haven't had the time
to sit down & test for it.  thanks for the confirmation!
TeGGeR® - 13 Jun 2005 03:31 GMT
jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in news:o_-dnS91tZMHfzHfRVn-
rw@speakeasy.net:

>> http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/igniter-operation/index.html
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>> I think in the 1990 Honda Civic, the igniter also provides
>> for for some PWM control.

"PWM" control?

> It senses the back EMF and
>> kills the coil drive at the correct momment to insure a
>> hot spark.

Do you know the mechanism by which it sees the back EMF?

>> I played with an ignitor and couldn't get it
>> to because correctly until I connected to to a Honda
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> interesting!  i'd read that they did that, but just haven't had the time
> to sit down & test for it.  thanks for the confirmation!

So how come my news server has this message, but not Terry's?

And yes, that's one of the very nice features about electronic ignition
versus Kettering. With Kettering, the very moments you need a fat spark are
the very moments you get a weaker and weaker spark since the system has no
way of increasing dwell time to compensate for RPM.

Signature

TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

jim beam - 13 Jun 2005 04:43 GMT
> jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in news:o_-dnS91tZMHfzHfRVn-
> rw@speakeasy.net:
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Do you know the mechanism by which it sees the back EMF?

as the magnetic field decays inducing a current into the secondary [high
voltage] coil, the same is going on with the primary coil, but smaller.
 just need to measure it.  presumably the chips we see in graham's
photos either have a map or even calculate "dwell" based on what they
measure.  but i'm guessing, i don't know for sure.

>>>I played with an ignitor and couldn't get it
>>>to because correctly until I connected to to a Honda
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> So how come my news server has this message, but not Terry's?

ah!  news servers!  fickle things.

> And yes, that's one of the very nice features about electronic ignition
> versus Kettering. With Kettering, the very moments you need a fat spark are
> the very moments you get a weaker and weaker spark since the system has no
> way of increasing dwell time to compensate for RPM.

which is why people used to experiment with dual plugs and dual ignition
systems occasionally.  total pains in the rear and highly unreliable,
but it was a stab in the right direction.  but you're right, once
electronic ignition came in, and it wasn't unreliable or expensive,
suddenly, it was ok to go electronic with everything.  and that's been a
good thing up until recently.  i don't see current chip technology
physically having the longevity we've been so far used to.  and of
course, with increasing reliance on mysterious black box electronic
componentry, how do you know whether a manufacturer caves in to the
temptation to program in an end of life?  that already happens with ink
jet cartridges, regardless of their fill state.
Jim Yanik - 13 Jun 2005 17:11 GMT
> jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in news:o_-dnS91tZMHfzHfRVn-
> rw@speakeasy.net:
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> "PWM" control?

Pulse Width Modulation.

>> It senses the back EMF and
>>> kills the coil drive at the correct momment to insure a
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>>  all the same width, the output created wider pulse at higher
>>> "RPM".  

I suspect the IC inside the igniter controls coil current,by means of
varying the pulse width(that PWM).
I haven't looked for any IC app notes to see exactly what they're
doing,though.If anyone has a URL for an app note for these Ics,I'll go
look.

>>> Terry
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> fat spark are the very moments you get a weaker and weaker spark since
> the system has no way of increasing dwell time to compensate for RPM.

Signature

Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

Jim Yanik - 13 Jun 2005 17:07 GMT
jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in news:o_-dnS91tZMHfzHfRVn-
rw@speakeasy.net:

>> http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/igniter-operation/index.html
>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> interesting!  i'd read that they did that, but just haven't had the time
> to sit down & test for it.  thanks for the confirmation!

That is probably what the IC in the igniter does.(control PW.)
The ECU merely provides the trigger at the proper time.

Signature

Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

jim beam - 14 Jun 2005 03:32 GMT
> jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in news:o_-dnS91tZMHfzHfRVn-
> rw@speakeasy.net:
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> That is probably what the IC in the igniter does.(control PW.)
> The ECU merely provides the trigger at the proper time.

so where does it adjust pulse width - has to be on the front end, right?
 if it was on the rear, the timing would be off.  or maybe the ecu
already knows what the igniter's timing characteristics are and adjusts
accordingly?...
TeGGeR® - 14 Jun 2005 03:50 GMT
>> jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in news:o_-dnS91tZMHfzHfRVn-
>> rw@speakeasy.net:
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> already knows what the igniter's timing characteristics are and
> adjusts accordingly?...

I think the ECU holds ground on Terminal 4 for the appropriate length of
time, which keeps the igniter driving the coil until ground is removed.
Once ground is removed from Pin 4, the IC switches off coil drive and the
field collapses.

The ECU decides when to apply ground and break it based on the inputs of
various sensors, such as the Crank Angle Sensor. It needs to know current
RPM, cylinder position and crank angle.

Terry is also indicating that the coil is allowed to charge for a longer
time at high RPMs to ensure a fatter spark under harsher conditions.

Signature

TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

jim beam - 14 Jun 2005 04:29 GMT
>>>jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in news:o_-dnS91tZMHfzHfRVn-
>>>rw@speakeasy.net:
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> Terry is also indicating that the coil is allowed to charge for a longer
> time at high RPMs to ensure a fatter spark under harsher conditions.

yes, but that longer time seems to be determined by the igniter, not the
ecu, if i understand jim yanik correctly.  it kind of has to be because
only the igniter is set up to meter the actual flyback, and that is
itself a function of the health of the system.
Jim Yanik - 14 Jun 2005 14:15 GMT
>>> jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in news:o_-dnS91tZMHfzHfRVn-
>>> rw@speakeasy.net:
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> removed. Once ground is removed from Pin 4, the IC switches off coil
> drive and the field collapses.

I do not believe this,as the IC inside the igniter monitors coil current.

> The ECU decides when to apply ground and break it based on the inputs
> of various sensors, such as the Crank Angle Sensor. It needs to know
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> longer time at high RPMs to ensure a fatter spark under harsher
> conditions.

Yes,coil current has to reach some preset point before the IC shuts off the
Darlington. That's the job of that IC.

The only way we will truly know for sure is to get a look at the IC's app
sheet,or scope the ECU signal to the igniter and see if it's pulse width
increases.If it does,then it controls the PW,not the IC.

Signature

Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

TeGGeR® - 14 Jun 2005 15:50 GMT
>>>> jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in news:o_-dnS91tZMHfzHfRVn-
>>>> rw@speakeasy.net:
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> I do not believe this,as the IC inside the igniter monitors coil
> current.

So I've read.

>> The ECU decides when to apply ground and break it based on the inputs
>> of various sensors, such as the Crank Angle Sensor. It needs to know
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> app sheet,or scope the ECU signal to the igniter and see if it's pulse
> width increases.If it does,then it controls the PW,not the IC.

Terry seems to have determined that there is evidence of this.

Signature

TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

r2000swler@hotmail.com - 15 Jun 2005 19:21 GMT
Jim Yanik wrote (in part):

Yes,coil current has to reach some preset point before the IC shuts off
the
Darlington. That's the job of that IC.

The only way we will truly know for sure is to get a look at the IC's
app
sheet,or scope the ECU signal to the igniter and see if it's pulse
width
increases.If it does,then it controls the PW,not the IC.

--
Jim Yanik
---------------------------

I have several "systems" pulled from cars to be crushed.
I rigged a 1990 ECM and sensors, with igniter to try
and figure out what was going on.

I am after a simple way to monitor the on time of the FIs.

I was kind of suprised to see the ignition pulse width
incrase with engine speed. I used a dual channel oscilloscope
and the output from the ECM stayed the same.

I experimented using a HP pulse generator to drive the igniter
by itself and found the same thing to be true. In my celica the PW
is directly controled by the ECM. I am asuming the IC monitors the
delta V, or rate of change and integrates the data to determine PW.

I will try to test my 1991 Civc this weekend. I have brought most of
the
ECM outputs and inputs via 1K isolation resistors to a breakout box
for testing.

I think it will be very usefull to measure on ratio of the FIs to
squeeze
every erg from the fuel for best MGP.

I can say that in many ways the ECM doesn't work the way I thought.
There are odd actions during the warm up period.

One important point is that it looks like Honda skimps on teh heat sink
compound.  Of course the engine runs hotter then the igniter, so I am
not at all sure that adding more thermal coupling will help. I have
thought
of adding a "heat pipe" tp remove heat from the igniter. I now consider
the
igniter a subsystem that is doomed to failure. It simply operates too
hot
for prolonged life.

Having said that, a friend's 1990 Civic has ~200K and is still on the
original igniter. Somewhere I have a motorola "designing for long
life of Si devices"(something like that) that says that for every 3
degree
rise in temp over 20C, the life will be cut in half. But based on that
the
~90 degrees C engine temp the igniter ought to fail in the first 100
miles.
There are many things I just don't understand here.

But I now carry a spare ECM and igniter "just in case".

Terry
TeGGeR® - 15 Jun 2005 20:23 GMT
> I now consider the igniter a subsystem that is doomed to failure. It
> simply operates too hot for prolonged life.
>
> Having said that, a friend's 1990 Civic has ~200K and is still on the
> original igniter.

My '91 Integra has 248K miles and the interior of the distributor is
entirely original, except for the rotor which I change every few years.

I wonder if maintenance might be a factor in igniter longevity the way it
is with coil longevity. Since the igniter is doing a lot of monitoring as
well as current carrying, might a large enough deviation from design spec
in ignition system characteristics overload the igniter?

Signature

TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

Jim Yanik - 16 Jun 2005 00:50 GMT
>> I now consider the igniter a subsystem that is doomed to failure. It
>> simply operates too hot for prolonged life.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> from design spec in ignition system characteristics overload the
> igniter?

It might be related to spark plug wire condition,and spark plug
condition;if your wires are breaking down,it would place a greater load on
the coil,and if the plugs were gummed up,slagged,or carboned,that would
affect the coil voltage.
IMO,igniters fail because of transients and migration of metals in the
Darlington and IC.

One could conceivably use an electron microscope and examine failed igniter
semiconductors and see why they failed,but it would be an expensive
undertaking,unless you're a college student with access to an e-
microscope,and doing a thesis or paper.

Signature

Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

jim beam - 16 Jun 2005 03:06 GMT
>>>I now consider the igniter a subsystem that is doomed to failure. It
>>>simply operates too hot for prolonged life.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> IMO,igniters fail because of transients and migration of metals in the
> Darlington and IC.

there are two "migration" mechanisms - first is solid state diffusion.
that's where the bit about the life halving every 3 degrees comes in.

the other is a mass transportation effect at high current densities.

unfortunately, high current leads to heat, and semi conductors have high
current densities, so the only real way to know for sure about the
failure mechanism, as you say, is microscopy.

> One could conceivably use an electron microscope and examine failed igniter
> semiconductors and see why they failed,but it would be an expensive
> undertaking,unless you're a college student with access to an e-
> microscope,and doing a thesis or paper.

of the two igniter types tegger shows, the second is designed more for a
high temperature environment from what i can see.  the small scale
circuitry in the components of the first igniter have much smaller
diffusion paths.  the larger scale thick film device has, for
semiconductors at any rate, truly massive scale features.  these are bad
for speed, but even at 10,000 rpm, that's only 166Hz, not exactly a high
frequency challenge.
jim beam - 16 Jun 2005 02:49 GMT
> Jim Yanik wrote (in part):
>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> ECM outputs and inputs via 1K isolation resistors to a breakout box
> for testing.

that would be most excellent!

> I think it will be very usefull to measure on ratio of the FIs to
> squeeze
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Terry
Michael Pardee - 17 Jun 2005 23:22 GMT
> One important point is that it looks like Honda skimps on teh heat sink
> compound.  Of course the engine runs hotter then the igniter, so I am
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> hot
> for prolonged life.

I don't think the heat is too great for the ignitor. There apparently aren't
any electrolytic capacitors in it, and those are the big heat sensitive
worries.

The vulnerability of transistors to heat is related to junction temperature
and to collector voltage. When the collector junction gets hot enough, the
reverse voltage across it can make the dopants migrate and "blur" the
junction. That spot gets hotter and eventually melts, leading to the device
being shorted.

But the heat required to melt the junction without the voltage stress is
much higher than your engine compartment - the melting point of silicon is
over 2500 degrees F. The silicon chips are typically soldered to the heat
sink internally, and I have personally soldered a UHF power transistor to a
large copper heatsink with an acetylene torch.

Mike
r2000swler@hotmail.com - 18 Jun 2005 00:58 GMT
I don't think the heat is too great for the ignitor. There apparently
aren't
any electrolytic capacitors in it, and those are the big heat sensitive
worries.

The vulnerability of transistors to heat is related to junction
temperature
and to collector voltage. When the collector junction gets hot enough,
the
reverse voltage across it can make the dopants migrate and "blur" the
junction. That spot gets hotter and eventually melts, leading to the
device
being shorted.

But the heat required to melt the junction without the voltage stress
is
much higher than your engine compartment - the melting point of silicon
is
over 2500 degrees F. The silicon chips are typically soldered to the
heat
sink internally, and I have personally soldered a UHF power transistor
to a
large copper heatsink with an acetylene torch.

Mike
--------------------------------------
Yes, but you didn't put power to it until after it cooled down, and I
bet you moved a lot of air across that heatsink to keep it cool. In
service the
transisotr is switching at least 5A. I have the exact value in my
notes,
and yes it is a fast switch, the transistor is driven completly and
rapidly into full conduction so the Vec is about .5V for ~2mS every few
10s of aMsec.
Not a haeavy duty cydle by any means, but it runs, with "perfect"
heatsinking
to the block at ~195F. Those I measured actualy ran about 210~220F.

Somewhere I have the leakage versus temp from motorola and at +200F
we are getting too darn hot. I saw a Ducati pointless ignition system
that
used a flip flop to switch between 2 transitor to cut the Pd in half.
But
that system was expossed directly  to the airstream.  Of the people
I know who have had igniter failurs, Honda or Toyota, it has always
been in >90F weather, most frequently in stop and go traffic on the way
home.
Except for one that failed in ~-25F weather on startup. I can't prove
it, but I suspect if we could reduce the temp 20 or even 10 degrees F,
the failure rate would drop "way down".  Another failure mode that is
only slightly heat related is the piezo effect on the junction when it
switches.
I had a early JBL switch mode power amp that ate switching transistors
at fairly regular intervals. I had built, and still have, a ultrasonic
down
converter and you could plainly hear the transitors screaming at 40KHz.
I supsect that heat, plus current stress, plus the piezo effect could
explain
most igniter failures. One could always attempt to place it remotly, in
front
of the radiator to breath cool air, but I suspect the lead inductanc
would
kill you and the RFI would be "interesting".

When I needed to align my R2000 SW I needed an "ignition like"
noise source "with harmonics extending up too beyond 30MHz"
I pulled my 1991 Civic under my "long" wire antenna, and adjusted
the noise blanker. Worked much better then the puilse generator
at the shop where I work.

Terry
jim beam - 18 Jun 2005 02:17 GMT
> I don't think the heat is too great for the ignitor. There apparently
> aren't
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
> it, but I suspect if we could reduce the temp 20 or even 10 degrees F,
> the failure rate would drop "way down".

no proof required - it's true.  google for fick's laws and the arrhenius
equation.  i too have considered cooling options for my civic's igniter,
even remote mounting in a location where it's not in the air stream
heated by the exhaust or getting thermal conduction from a nice warm
cylinder head, but so far, i've just not had an appetite for the work
involved.  i'm also worried about electrical noise.  electrically, it
makes so much sense to have the igniter mounted in close proximity to
the coil - nice clean signal, faster switching, etc.  but the reality is
that the igniter is kept so toasty warm located where it is, it's always
going to fry in short order, unless you live up in the frozen north of
course, [tegger].  i now carry a spare.

>  Another failure mode that is
> only slightly heat related is the piezo effect on the junction when it
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Terry
jim beam - 18 Jun 2005 01:59 GMT
>>One important point is that it looks like Honda skimps on teh heat sink
>>compound.  Of course the engine runs hotter then the igniter, so I am
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> junction. That spot gets hotter and eventually melts, leading to the device
> being shorted.

the "blurring" is diffusion - the operating temp doesn't even get close
to melting - but diffusion is powerful stuff and it definitely destroys
semiconductors.

> But the heat required to melt the junction without the voltage stress is
> much higher than your engine compartment - the melting point of silicon is
> over 2500 degrees F. The silicon chips are typically soldered to the heat
> sink internally, and I have personally soldered a UHF power transistor to a
> large copper heatsink with an acetylene torch.

the two factors at play are temperature & time.  if the device was
physically big enough and you solderd quick enough, there's no reason
you couldn't do it - afterall, what temperature does a silcon foundry
work at?  but you got to be /quick/ if you go to high temps.  or best
not at all if you want good service life.

> Mike
Jim Yanik - 18 Jun 2005 18:08 GMT
>>>One important point is that it looks like Honda skimps on teh heat
>>>sink compound.  Of course the engine runs hotter then the igniter, so
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
>> Mike

Even the best heat sink does not conduct all the heat away from a
semiconductor junction.The semi junction temp increase is probably faster
than what the HS can conduct away,and having a higher base temp would make
that occur faster.

Signature

Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

TeGGeR® - 15 Jun 2005 03:41 GMT
One more update:
http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/igniter-operation/index.html

This has been a most interesting thread, I must say.

Signature

TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

Jim Yanik - 13 Jun 2005 17:05 GMT
> http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/igniter-operation/index.html
>
> Hopefully this is correct now.

Looks good!

> Thanks to all for their help, especially Jim Yanik.

"flyback" voltage;when the coil is charged,the magnetic field builds
up,then when the charging current is removed,the collapsing magnetic field
generates a voltage in the opposite direction of the charging current.

The flyback voltage IS the HV pulse that the spark plugs get.

The mag field is generated by the primary,12V side of the coil,but the
collapsing magnetic field induces the flyback pulse in both the primary and
secondary of the coil,that's how the HIGH voltage is generated;the
secondary has many more turns of a finer wire(finer to fit more turns in
the same space);more turns,the higher the voltage induced.In the automotive
ignition coil,the primary is connected to the secondary,and the HV current
also travels through the primary.

That is why there's a bypass diode,it shunts the flyback current around the
Darlington,to keep it from breaking it down from over-voltage.It's part of
the path for the flyback voltage.

Signature

Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.