Spent the morning comparison driving the RX330, MDX, and X3. Amazed at how
different they were.
The RX330 was by far the most impressive. Smooth, nice handling, good
storage, and very comfortable. About the only negative that really jumped
out were the lack of side bolstering in the seats. My wife loved this car.
The MDX was surprising in that I expected it to be a somewhat larger version
of the RX330. In fact, it seemed like a smaller version of our Yukon XL.
Felt a lot bigger than the RX330 and much more truck-like to drive. The
seats felt really strange. Just uncomfortable. Storage space was great. It
made the worst impression.
The X3 was the one I wanted to like and hoped my wife would. First thing I
noticed was the upholstery looked like leatherette. The salesman said it was
leather. Most vinyl-like looking leather I have seen. The auto tranny was
strange shifted slowly and unexpectedly, like there was something wrong with
it. This was the 3-liter (like my 330i E46), so it good power, but the
transmission screwed up the effect. Seats had the same weird last two inches
of the seat missing near the seat back that my E46 has, but were otherwise
fine.Storage space looked comparable to the RX330. I think the new 325ix
Touring when it comes out in a couple of months would be a better choice
than the X3 unless one really is going off-road.
The RX330 walked away from the others, in our opinion.
- GRL
fbloogyudsr - 07 Sep 2005 05:43 GMT
> Spent the morning comparison driving the RX330, MDX, and X3. Amazed at how
> different they were.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> The RX330 walked away from the others, in our opinion.
My wife went shopping a year ago, and came to the same conclusion
(although she bought a Highlander, which is very similar to the RX 330.)
The MDX is about 400lbs heavier and 6" wider and longer than the others;
not surprised it felt heavy. She hated the X3's steering, and didn't really
like the interior.
Floyd
CFL - 07 Sep 2005 11:59 GMT
> Spent the morning comparison driving the RX330, MDX, and X3. Amazed at how
> different they were.
We thought the same. Bought an RX330. Very nice Mom grocery getter.
The problem is she won't drive it and drives the BMW E-39.
> The RX330 was by far the most impressive. Smooth, nice handling, good
> storage, and very comfortable. About the only negative that really jumped
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> - GRL
GRL - 08 Sep 2005 01:41 GMT
You have an enthusiast "mom".
- GRL
>> Spent the morning comparison driving the RX330, MDX, and X3. Amazed at
>> how different they were.
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>>
>> - GRL
GRL - 08 Sep 2005 01:45 GMT
Forgot to mention that when I told the BMW salesman that my wife liked the
RX better and that the X3 was just too "masculine" for her taste, he replied
that they've sold 40 X3's in the last couple of months and most go to women.
Guys prefer the X5.
Go figure.
- GRL
> Spent the morning comparison driving the RX330, MDX, and X3. Amazed at how
> different they were.
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> - GRL
CFL - 09 Sep 2005 16:05 GMT
Now my E39 driving wife did not like the X3 or X5. She is a long time
member of BMW CCA. She really dislikes the Lexus GS 300/400.
\
> Forgot to mention that when I told the BMW salesman that my wife liked the
> RX better and that the X3 was just too "masculine" for her taste, he replied
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>The RX330 was by far the most impressive. Smooth, nice handling, good
>>storage, and very comfortable. About the only negative that really jumped
>>out were the lack of side bolstering in the seats. My wife loved this car.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>>
>>- GRL
stu - 16 Sep 2005 21:33 GMT
Watch out for the bad transmission.
> Spent the morning comparison driving the RX330, MDX, and X3. Amazed at how
> different they were.
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> - GRL
GRL - 19 Sep 2005 00:26 GMT
Test drove several used 2004's. None had any indication of transmission
weirdness.
> Watch out for the bad transmission.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>>
>> - GRL