Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Acura Cars / November 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Opinions on TL and RL

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
NJ Vike - 24 Nov 2005 11:22 GMT
Greetings!

I have been seriously considering both vehicles and was wondering if anyone
could provide me with their opinion on these cars as I'm also considering
the Infiniti and Lexus models.

I'm very impressed with both Acura vehicles.

What I'm looking to find out is long term results. Do they last, are there
any issues to either vehicle.

Thanks.

Ken

Signature

"Now Phoebe Snow direct can go
from thirty-third to Buffalo.
From Broadway bright the tubes run right
Into the Road of Anthracite"
Erie - Lackawanna

arat43@juno.com - 24 Nov 2005 13:54 GMT
>Greetings!
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Ken

Before deciding on the 06 TL in Anthracite I did a lot of research and
homework on the G35, BMW 330i and the TL. These were my top three
choices. I am just coming off a BMW Z3 so I know how BMW is.

I liked the G35's ride and amenities, it had plenty of power and was
priced reasonably. The 330i had that BMW ride and the cabin felt
comfortable and quiet. The problem I had was the feeling of "been
there, done that". I have been driving a BMW since 2001 and it just
didn't make me feel it. Besides that the 330i was 3500-4500 more than
either the TL or G35.

I then drove the TL and I knew it was the car for me. Ride, power and
all the bells and whistles were exactly what I wanted and the NAV
package just topped it off. I ended up paying quite a bit less that I
would have for either the BMW or G35.

In the performance department, the TL had an overall edge on the other
two, but of course it is splitting hairs and all boils down to
personal preference.

When it was all said and done and the cars being very close, it was my
wife who said, "That car fits you." It gives me the room I wanted and
the power and driveability I wanted.

The RL is a little smaller, quicker, and is very nimble. I wanted a
little more upgrade and luxury to go with the power and ride.

Hope this helps
James - 24 Nov 2005 22:16 GMT
So you think the TL is more luxurious then the RL?  I would hope that the
extra $16 000 that the RL costs would provide some added luxury...

>>Greetings!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> Hope this helps
NJ Vike - 25 Nov 2005 00:24 GMT
Thank you so much for taking the time to write. I was going to consider the
BMW but when I attempted to sit in one, the car was just too small for me as
I'm 6:2.

Both Acuras had the head and leg room and as you say, the Navigation system
was the icing on the cake.

Just down the road was an Infiniti dealer so I thought I would drop in
there. I looked at the G35 and while it provided the room I needed, I didn't
like the interior and where they placed the controls to adjust the seat so I
looked at the M. I told the dealer that the G35 wasn't for me and told me
that he could *possibly* match the price of the M with the price I was going
to be paying for the TL. I assume he will provide me a quote on a
stripped-down version, if such a thing is possible.

I like the M but it has more gizmos than I could possibly want but if the
price comes in, I will seriously consider it.

The Lexus ES330 was clumsy when cornering and has only a 218HP engine which
is a serious downgrade on performance for me so I will probably say goodbye
unless their salesperson wants to upgrade me at the same price.

Well, we shall see but I do still like the Acuras and value your opinion.

Happy Thanksgiving.

Ken

Signature

"Now Phoebe Snow direct can go
from thirty-third to Buffalo.
From Broadway bright the tubes run right
Into the Road of Anthracite"
Erie - Lackawanna

>>Greetings!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> Hope this helps
arat43@juno.com - 25 Nov 2005 13:30 GMT
>>Greetings!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
>Hope this helps

I think I forgot to answer your original question about the RL. I did
take a look, but because it was more of a luxury car and lacked the
sportiness and nimbleness of the TL, I went with the TL.

The RL is their flagship car and it is got everything except the
kitchen sink and that may be an option. If I was more inclined toward
that level of luxury it would be my first choice over the 5 or even 7
series and the Lexus (don't care for their style changes).
Alphageek - 25 Nov 2005 18:02 GMT
>>Greetings!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> Hope this helps

I had a 2000 TL and it was terrific in so many ways. When the 3 year lease
ended I lusted for something new and I turned it back in and leased a BMW
525 sport, which, like all BMWs, drives like no other car. It is terrific in
ways other than the TL. But the 3 year lease is up and I am considering the
option of buying my beloved 5 or getting into an RL. The BMW drive is a huge
attraction, but I miss the creature features found in Acuras. I think the
current TL is an awesome car, but its body style is atrocious. The same can
be said for BMWs, and most other cars. They all have big butts, and I don't
like the look. Fortunately the RL look hasn't been destroyed (yet) so it
definitely has my attention.

The Acura is the overall my first choice for a luxury car. Better than BMW,
Audi, Mercedes, Lexus, Infinity, and anything the American companies vainly
advertise as luxury cars.

So I am once again tempted by Acura, yet so fond of my 5. It has the NAV and
I added an aux input to the radio so I can play my Archos MP3 jukebox and my
XM Radio Roady, but it doesn't have Bluetooth (it is available as an add-on
for about $600-$800) so my cell phone is 'manual' (ugh). The engine is a
little small, but not without merit. The Acura can best all of that at a
more reasonable cost.

What to do? what to do?  I'll let you know if you care.
Larry J. - 25 Nov 2005 18:45 GMT
Waiving the right to remain silent, "Alphageek"
<no_email_please@uhdelfeeyuh.net> said:

> I had a 2000 TL and it was terrific in so many ways. When the 3
> year lease ended I lusted for something new and I turned it back
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> the RL look hasn't been destroyed (yet) so it definitely has my
> attention.

Before we got our 2004 TL, we had three leased BMWs, Two 540s and a
530 as the last car.

What you say about BMW handling is correct, but for creature
comforts and included options, the TL wins hands down.  I also
believe that the TL wins in the cabin design and use of materials.  
The newer BMW fit and finish is not as good as Acura's.  The TL
simply looks and feels much better.

Believe it or not, the TL has a bit more interior space than our
last 530.  The official cabin measurements bore that out.

Option for option, the current 530 is at least $15,000 more than a
similarly equipped TL.

If you're main interest is racing on back roads, get the BMW.  If
you want a daily-driver that will put a smile on your face, and
leave you with many thousands of dollars in your pocket, get the
TL.

Signature

 Larry J. - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail

 "I've come here to enjoy nature.  Don't talk to me
 about the environment!" - 'Denny Crane'

Troy Lumley - 28 Nov 2005 04:06 GMT
I'm an Extremely Happy 2006 Acura TL owner! I just returned from a round
trip from Phoenix to San Diego for the Thanksgiving holiday. It felt like I
was sitting in a 'sporty' leather recliner the whole time. Excellent ride,
power and creature comforts, including a surround sound stereo that will
knock your socks off!

I've been reading this string of replies and found that the opinions were in
line with mine, right up until I read the posting that included the
following comment:

"I think the current TL is an awesome car, but its body style is atrocious."

Did the person who wrote this bump their head? How can they be serious about
the body style being atrocious? Why would they think it's awesome (which it
is) based on their opinion of the body style? That's confusing. It's a
chiseled thing of beauty!! The 'butt' as he or she puts it is in perfect
proportion to the rest of the car. Add a deck lid spoiler and wah-la! Sexy
butt!

What to do? Don't know what to tell you. I didn't drive an RL, but if it's
anything like a TL and you like the style better, I'd say get it!

>>>Greetings!
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 65 lines]
>
> What to do? what to do?  I'll let you know if you care.
Alphageek - 29 Nov 2005 04:49 GMT
> I'm an Extremely Happy 2006 Acura TL owner! I just returned from a round
> trip from Phoenix to San Diego for the Thanksgiving holiday. It felt like
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> What to do? Don't know what to tell you. I didn't drive an RL, but if it's
> anything like a TL and you like the style better, I'd say get it!

I thank you for your kind concern, but I did not bump my head, nor any other
body part. I am pleased to know that you think the TL is a thing of beauty.
To each his own taste. I still think it is homely. My present car is a 2003
BMW 5 series. I think it is a thing of beauty. I feel the current BMW body
style is big butt, and I don't particularly like it. I similarly feel that
the recent body style changes on many cars are unappealing. Perhaps not as
unappealing as the PT Crusiser or the Chrysler 300M, but unappealing to me
nonetheless. Did I just start another war?

The unappealing look does not detract from the excellence of the TL, nor any
other Acura with which I am familiar. The description of awesome as I
applied it to the TL was not with respect to its appearance, but the quality
of the car otherwise. It is awesome in many respects, but simply not
attractive to me. The Acuras have great comfort and creature features, and
highly commendable reliability. The fit and finish of the interiors are
second to none.

If you believe that atrocious was too strong a word, let me rephrase. Big
a.s car. May I have my opinion even though it isn't yours?
Troy Lumley - 30 Nov 2005 04:40 GMT
Of course you can have you're own opinion. I just replied because I thought
your statement was contradictory. Now I understand. I don't agree of course,
but that doesn't necessarily matter. Everyone has there own taste. However,
I must say, I haven't run in to many people who didn't think the TL's body
style was very attractive. Yours was the first.

I do like the look of the 5 series. I think the latest generation body style
is even better than the previous. It looks more aggressive. Overall I've
liked most BMW body styles. It's just the interior ergonomics don't do much
for me when compared to Acura models.

Anyway. No offense taken. Good luck with your decision making.

>> I'm an Extremely Happy 2006 Acura TL owner! I just returned from a round
>> trip from Phoenix to San Diego for the Thanksgiving holiday. It felt like
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> If you believe that atrocious was too strong a word, let me rephrase. Big
> a.s car. May I have my opinion even though it isn't yours?
Lee Florack - 26 Nov 2005 22:37 GMT
>The RL is a little smaller, quicker, and is very nimble. I wanted a
>little more upgrade and luxury to go with the power and ride.

The RL is not smaller than the TL (or G35).  I've owned both TL's
('03 and '04) and now an '05 RL.  The RL is larger, more
luxurious and approximately $15,000 more than the TL.
arat43@juno.com - 27 Nov 2005 01:34 GMT
>>The RL is a little smaller, quicker, and is very nimble. I wanted a
>>little more upgrade and luxury to go with the power and ride.
>
>The RL is not smaller than the TL (or G35).  I've owned both TL's
>('03 and '04) and now an '05 RL.  The RL is larger, more
>luxurious and approximately $15,000 more than the TL.

Yea, yea, I know, I already corrected my error in a previous posting.
Always one out there
Lee Florack - 27 Nov 2005 03:44 GMT
>>>The RL is a little smaller, quicker, and is very nimble. I wanted a
>>>little more upgrade and luxury to go with the power and ride.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Yea, yea, I know, I already corrected my error in a previous posting.
>Always one out there

"Always one out there" ??

My intention was to correct an error I saw for the original
poster and for all those reading this thread.

Sorry it seems to have upset you.
Humma Kavula - 27 Nov 2005 03:52 GMT
>>>>The RL is a little smaller, quicker, and is very nimble. I wanted a
>>>>little more upgrade and luxury to go with the power and ride.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>Sorry it seems to have upset you.

He'll get over it.

Signature

"Man who shoot off mouth, must expect to lose face."
- Confucious

Humma Kavula - 24 Nov 2005 22:26 GMT
>Greetings!
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Ken

I have a 2001 TL. The car still looks and drive like new.

Signature

"Man who shoot off mouth, must expect to lose face."
- Confucious

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.