Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Acura Cars / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

270 HP vs. 258 HP?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jim Tiberio - 16 Feb 2006 19:38 GMT
Hi all, I picked up my '06 TL last week and have a question that wasn't
answered to my satisfaction by the sales guy.  Why was 2005 TL rated at
270HP while the '06 is rated at 258HP?  The dealer says they implemented a
new policy that all car companies will have to adhere to at some point when
disclosing HP, he didn't explaim the policy.  Are they rating it from a
point other than the crank?  Did they ever measure from the crank.  I assume
more than 12 HP would be lost in the drive train.
Ghislain - 16 Feb 2006 21:22 GMT
258 HP is certified to SAE J1349.

> Hi all, I picked up my '06 TL last week and have a question that wasn't
> answered to my satisfaction by the sales guy.  Why was 2005 TL rated at
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> assume
> more than 12 HP would be lost in the drive train.
Mike Drechsler - SPAM PROTECTED EMAIL - 17 Feb 2006 08:49 GMT
> Hi all, I picked up my '06 TL last week and have a question that wasn't
> answered to my satisfaction by the sales guy.  Why was 2005 TL rated at
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> point other than the crank?  Did they ever measure from the crank.  I assume
> more than 12 HP would be lost in the drive train.

The HP of the car has not changed.  Only the way they are allowed to
measure it.  ie. using oil that would void the warranty and other
cheating methods to boost the number are no longer allowed.  The 2005
would likely be given the same rating on the new system.

Signature

WARNING!  Email address has been altered for spam resistance.
Please remove the -deletethispart-. section before replying directly.
Mike Drechsler (mike-newsgroup@-deletethispart-.upcraft.com)

Sam - 18 Feb 2006 00:16 GMT
Good explanation.

However, most Honda models got HP boost from the new measuring system, I
doubt TL was cheating.

> The HP of the car has not changed.  Only the way they are allowed to
> measure it.  ie. using oil that would void the warranty and other cheating
> methods to boost the number are no longer allowed.  The 2005 would likely
> be given the same rating on the new system.
Gordon McGrew - 18 Feb 2006 20:04 GMT
>Good explanation.
>
>However, most Honda models got HP boost from the new measuring system, I
>doubt TL was cheating.

Is that true?  I heard that the new Civic Si would have been over 200
with the old method, now it is 197(?)

>> The HP of the car has not changed.  Only the way they are allowed to
>> measure it.  ie. using oil that would void the warranty and other cheating
>> methods to boost the number are no longer allowed.  The 2005 would likely
>> be given the same rating on the new system.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.