Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Acura Cars / April 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

2004 TL Battery Replaced

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Russell Lombardo - 20 Jan 2008 00:17 GMT
I have a 2004 TL with less than 30,000 miles and already had to replace the
battery.

Have others had similar experiences?  It seems to me, Acura/Honda chose an
inexpensive Delco battery to save money, just like the terrible Bridgestone
OEM tires.

- Russ
Bob - 20 Jan 2008 01:25 GMT
> I have a 2004 TL with less than 30,000 miles and already had to replace the
> battery.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>  - Russ

4 years for a battery is just about right. If you live in areas of
extreme temperature, you'll be lucky to get 4 years.

Bob
RLL - 20 Jan 2008 15:15 GMT
Hi Bob,

I should have noted that I live in perhaps the most moderate climate in the
US-- Santa Barbara, California.  It never gets hot, nor cold here.

In addition, I have other cars where the battery has nearly seven years.

With respect to the other question regarding the VIN, I think only cars made
in Japan start with a J.  I think all TLs are manufactured in Ohio.

- Russ in Santa Barbara

>> I have a 2004 TL with less than 30,000 miles and already had to replace
>> the
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Bob
Bob - 21 Jan 2008 04:43 GMT
> Hi Bob,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>  - Russ in Santa Barbara

Russ,

Having lived in Texas and Florida for the past 25 years, I've never
gotten more than 4 years out of a batter, OEM or replacement.

Bob
Dave L - 21 Jan 2008 17:32 GMT
>> Hi Bob,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Bob

Bob,

Texas and Florida?  I'm not surprised.  Hotter climates are harder on the
batteries.  There was a chart I ran across online yesterday showing the
lifespan of auto batteries and the hotter the climate the shorter the
lifespan.  I have an '05 Accord here in Maryland and the OEM battery is
supposed to have a green eye if it is in good condition.  Right now, it's
clear and the car has 34k miles and 2.5 years old.  Dealer did a test on it
and it's showing 377 CCA, and it's rated for 410 CCA.  Haven't had any
trouble starting the car but the eye showing the condition of the battery
makes me nervous..

Russ,
Correct - the 1st position of the vin# does show the country it was made.

J - Japan
K - Korea
S - England
W - Germany
Z - Italy
1 - United States
2 - Canada
3 - Mexico
4 - United States

Those are the ones I can think of...

-Dave

-Dave
Larry in AZ - 21 Jan 2008 17:56 GMT
Waiving the right to remain silent, "Dave L" <davelieuREMOVEME@yahoo.com>
said:

>>> Hi Bob,
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> the lifespan of auto batteries and the hotter the climate the shorter
> the lifespan.

We had a new Volvo wagon in 95.  Before the car was 3 years old, the
battery was kaput.  We lived in the SF bay area, which is a Mediterranean
climate, never very cold or hot, and the car was garaged all the time.
Don't remember what the OEM battery type was, but it must have been
crap...

Signature

 Larry J. - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail

 "A lack of common sense is now considered a disability,
  with all the privileges that this entails."

motsco_ - 21 Jan 2008 18:48 GMT
> We had a new Volvo wagon in 95.  Before the car was 3 years old, the
> battery was kaput.  We lived in the SF bay area, which is a Mediterranean
> climate, never very cold or hot, and the car was garaged all the time.
> Don't remember what the OEM battery type was, but it must have been
> crap...

--------------------

I owned a few Volvos. In my heavily-biased opinion, it wasn't likely the
battery that was crap. More likely the Bosch charging circuit cooked the
battery prematurely.

'Curly'
tww1491 - 20 Jan 2008 12:26 GMT
2004 TL Battery Replaced
 I have a 2004 TL with less than 30,000 miles and already had to replace the battery.

 Have others had similar experiences?  It seems to me, Acura/Honda chose an inexpensive Delco battery to save money, just like the terrible Bridgestone OEM tires.

  - Russ

 We have replaced the battery on our 03 Pilot twice so far.  Where we live, the Summer heat kills them.
Tegger - 20 Jan 2008 14:59 GMT
> I have a 2004 TL with less than 30,000 miles and already had to
> replace the battery.
>
> Have others had similar experiences?  It seems to me, Acura/Honda
> chose an inexpensive Delco battery to save money, just like the
> terrible Bridgestone OEM tires.

Honda installed the Delco battery and the Bridgestone tires most likely to
help meet the government's local-content regulations.

Does your car's VIN start with a "J" or something else?

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

akheel - 21 Jan 2008 01:43 GMT
> I have a 2004 TL with less than 30,000 miles and already had to
> replace the battery.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>  - Russ

I have a 2005 with about 50,000 miles. Had to replace the battery a few
months ago. I've never had an OEM battery in any car I've owned, foreign or
domestic, go more than 3 years. They alwasy use cheap batteries.
Sid Schweiger - 24 Jan 2008 01:19 GMT
>> I have a 2004 TL with less than 30,000 miles and already had to
>> replace the battery.
>>
>> Have others had similar experiences?  It seems to me, Acura/Honda
>> chose an inexpensive Delco battery to save money, just like the
>> terrible Bridgestone OEM tires.

58,000 miles on my 2004 TL...still using the original battery, which never
fails to start the car, even with temps in the single digits.
Larry in AZ - 24 Jan 2008 03:16 GMT
Waiving the right to remain silent, "Sid Schweiger" <spam@this.cretin> said:

>>> I have a 2004 TL with less than 30,000 miles and already had to
>>> replace the battery.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> 58,000 miles on my 2004 TL...still using the original battery, which never
> fails to start the car, even with temps in the single digits.

Happy to hear that.  I also have a 2004 TL, but mine has less than 16,000
miles.  ;-)

Signature

 Larry J. - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail

 "A lack of common sense is now considered a disability,
  with all the privileges that this entails."

Ramapo - 24 Jan 2008 19:37 GMT
>Waiving the right to remain silent, "Sid Schweiger" <spam@this.cretin> said:
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>Happy to hear that.  I also have a 2004 TL, but mine has less than 16,000
>miles.  ;-)

Batteries have two key design criteria that largely determine their
life in normal usage:
1.  The initial thickness of the lead plates.
2.  The amount of space designed in between the bottom of the case and
the bottom of the plates.

As lead sulfate accumulates over time in the battery, eventually, it
will touch the bottom of one or more set of plates in the cells and
short the cell.  It is also possible to have the plates get so thin
they crack from thermal stresses with normal use,.

In any case, you now have a battery with low voltage and low cranking
power.  Manufacturers who offer battery warranties have these
parameters adjusted so that a given battery is likely to need
replacing somewhat short of the end of the warranty.  Being in
warranty, you go back for the credit (a few bucks at that point) and
get another battery from them.

Some things that can dramatically upset the life expectancy can be
driving up and down, or parking up or down steep hills, all of which
can shift the lead sulfate deposits and short a cell; or very heavy
loads from high heat or very low temps.  Improperly set charging
systems can also overheat the battery and damage it.  As can low water
levels.

I'm just happy if it holds a charge and voltage to within a few months
of the advertised life.  

Paul
DennyCrane@MadCow.net - 21 Jan 2008 21:42 GMT
>I have a 2004 TL with less than 30,000 miles and already had to replace the
>battery.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> - Russ

I live in Wisconsin and years ago was in the gm parts business.  

From what I learned watching other batteries fail, I make it a rule to
replace it every 4 years, no matter what.  

I don't want to know how well it tests, just put a new one in.

DC
apdicenzo - 25 Jan 2008 21:42 GMT
What is OEM?..I have a 2003 TL with almost 69,000 with original
battery...When will I know when I need to replace

>>I have a 2004 TL with less than 30,000 miles and already had to replace
>>the
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> DC
Tegger - 25 Jan 2008 23:20 GMT
> What is OEM?

"OEM" means from the Acura dealer.

It is not necessary to buy your batteries from the Acura dealer. Your
Owner's Manual gives all the necessary battery specs. All you need to do is
locate an aftermarket battery that meets (or exceeds) those specs and is
the correct size with the terminals the right way around.

I recommend either Interstate or Wal-Mart's Eveready brand.

>..I have a 2003 TL with almost 69,000 with original
> battery...When will I know when I need to replace
> battery?

The most obvious sign will be when the engine doesn't crank over as fast as
you're used to it cranking. It is important to pay attention to your car
each time you start it. This is how you become aware of untoward changes in
behavior, such as slow cranking due to a weakening battery.

Another obvious sign is your headlights noticeably brightening and dimming
when you repeatedly rev the engine and let it settle back down to idle.
Park near a wall or another car so you can see the dimming more readily.

You'll probably see the dimming problem well before you sense any slower
cranking.

Either problem can also be caused by corrosion between the battery cables
and their connections, so you need to make sure all your electrical
connections are good so as to avoid being fooled.

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

Frank - 27 Jan 2008 19:23 GMT
I have a 2004 TL with less than 30,000 miles and already had to replace the
battery.

Have others had similar experiences?  It seems to me, Acura/Honda chose an
inexpensive Delco battery to save money, just like the terrible Bridgestone
OEM tires.

- Russ

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Just saw your post. I've own various cars over a period of about 40 years,
and the only premature battery failures were on my two Acuras that were
purchased new. I'm in the Bay Area so that isn't much difference from San
Diego relative to climate conditions. Each car is driven about 10,000 miles
per year. On other new cars, my OEM batteries lasted 5 or more years but on
the Acuras, it only lasted about 2 to 3 years. Last year I'd purchased a new
Honda but don't expect the battery to last much longer than 2 years
either -we'll see. I have a 2000 Camry purchased new and its on the original
battery.

If my Acuras were not driven for more than a couple of weeks, those cars
sometimes won't start - batteries too small or there is a design problem in
the electrical system. I always have a 12V charger ready in my garage. On
the other hand, I could leave my other cars a couple of weeks or more and it
would start right away.

Strangely, the replacement batteries purchased at Costco for the Acuras only
lasted around two years as well so I suspect either the battery was designed
to Honda's poor specifications or something not right with Honda's charging
system. Costco batteries, however, for other cars lasted 7 years or more.  I
had one of the OEM batteries replaced at the Acura dealership under warranty
but they still charged me $50 after its prorated.  I had a Costco battery
for the Acura replaced at Costco under warranty without costing me a dime -
I think it had a full refund police within two years and prorated
afterwards.

The oldest Acura I have is 1998 with this battery issue and seems like Honda
haven't fixed the batter/charging problem. I always leave a jumper cable in
the trunk.
NoMoreRGS - 27 Jan 2008 22:07 GMT
>I have a 2004 TL with less than 30,000 miles and already had to replace the
>battery.
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>haven't fixed the batter/charging problem. I always leave a jumper cable in
>the trunk.

I'm not sure this problem is as wide spread as you think.  There are
Acura owners changing out the battery after only a couple of years but
they aren't the only ones doing having premature failures.

My 2005 TL is using the original battery.

In 2005 I traded in my 2001CL-S for the TL.  It had the original
battery at almost five years old.

Last year I sold my 1991 Accord after replacing the battery two times.
The original battery lasted eight years, the replacement (from Sams
Club) lasted seven years, and the second replacement (also from Sams
Club) was about one year old when the new buyer took it.

My luck with Honda/Acura batteries has been quite good.  But the Delco
in my 1979 Sunbird didn't make it to two years old.
Larry in AZ - 28 Jan 2008 02:13 GMT
Waiving the right to remain silent, "          Frank"
<noreplay@nothome.net> said:

> Just saw your post. I've own various cars over a period of about 40
> years, and the only premature battery failures were on my two Acuras
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> to last much longer than 2 years either -we'll see. I have a 2000 Camry
> purchased new and its on the original battery.

Battery in my 2005 Pilot crapped out two days before the warranty expired at
36 months.  Car had been driven only 7,000 miles.

Signature

 Larry J. - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail

 "A lack of common sense is now considered a disability,
  with all the privileges that this entails."

John Horner - 16 Apr 2008 03:38 GMT
> Battery in my 2005 Pilot crapped out two days before the warranty expired at
> 36 months.  Car had been driven only 7,000 miles.

That kind of use is really hard on a battery.  Either the vehicle is
sitting for very long periods of time unused or it is only used for
very, very short trips.

Either is actually much harder on a battery than is more normal use
patterns.

John
ACAR - 31 Jan 2008 12:31 GMT
> I have a 2004 TL with less than 30,000 miles and already had to replace the
> battery.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>  - Russ

I just replaced a 5.5 year-old Delco battery in one of my cars. It
gave me plenty of warning that it was weakening. I've had other
batteries fail all at once. I can't complain about Delco but I put in
an Interstate battery as replacement.

OEM tires: bad to awful seems to be range for most cars. Replacement
tire costs factor into my car buying decisions.
Chris - 06 Feb 2008 17:47 GMT
> I have a 2004 TL with less than 30,000 miles and already had to replace the
> battery.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>  - Russ

My 2002 Accord still has the original battery which works good.  But
like everyone else has been saying, 3-4 years is the usual life of a
battery.
John Horner - 16 Apr 2008 03:34 GMT
> Have others had similar experiences?  It seems to me, Acura/Honda chose
> an inexpensive Delco battery to save money, just like the terrible
> Bridgestone OEM tires.

Delco hasn't made batteries in years.  I do think, however, that Johnson
Controls bought the Delco factory and supplies Honda.

Use, climate and luck all play a big role in battery life.

If you ever let your battery go stone cold dead by leaving on lights,
etc. then it's lifetime will be compromised.  Many people don't seem to
know this.

John
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.