 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Acura Cars / May 2008Waterproof Cover TL
Any suggestions for a waterproof cover for an 07 TL, for under $100? TIA > Any suggestions for a waterproof cover for an 07 TL, for under $100? > > TIA A simple Google search revealed: $101.95 That's almost under $100!! http://www.autoanything.com/car-covers/20A10004A1.aspx $82.87 Fair outdoor protection http://www.carcoversdirect.com/products/car_truck_covers/4/car_cover/rea dy_fit/ACURA/2007/TL//3/ short ver: http://tinyurl.com/435qph 2 Outdoor covers under $100 http://www.global-accessories.com/products/index.phtml? prod_id=wolfcovers&cust_id=zq4mw&SYSTEM=storelink&SESSIONID=none&ACTION= Short Ver: http://tinyurl.com/4sazlv Hope that helps.  SignatureI. Care Address fake until the SPAM goes away ;-} Thanks, I have done numerous searches and looked at many online. I was hoping for some recommendations based on usage/experience. >> Any suggestions for a waterproof cover for an 07 TL, for under $100? >> [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > >Hope that helps. Waiving the right to remain silent, Luca <we@qw.net> said: > Thanks, I have done numerous searches and looked at many online. I was > hoping for some recommendations based on usage/experience. You didn't say that... SignatureLarry J. - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail "A lack of common sense is now considered a disability, with all the privileges that this entails." Well if I was asking for suggestions, why would I want a suggestion of "a Google search found..."? That is absurd. >Waiving the right to remain silent, Luca <we@qw.net> said: > >> Thanks, I have done numerous searches and looked at many online. I was >> hoping for some recommendations based on usage/experience. > >You didn't say that... > Well if I was asking for suggestions, why would I want a suggestion of > "a Google search found..."? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > > >You didn't say that... You might think so, but, it is very common for people to ask for help and we find out they didn't even try to do a search. They just wanted everyone else to narrow it down for them so they wouldn't have to work too hard. Apparently then you are a victim of those other lazy people mentioned above :-) SignatureI. Care Address fake until the SPAM goes away ;-} >>Waiving the right to remain silent, Luca <we@qw.net> said: >> >>> Thanks, I have done numerous searches and looked at many online. I was >>> hoping for some recommendations based on usage/experience. >> >>You didn't say that... >Well if I was asking for suggestions, why would I want a suggestion of >"a Google search found..."? > >That is absurd. <top posting cluelessness fixed> What is even more absurd is that it apparently didn't occur to you to use Google to search for *opinions* about products, as well as the products themselves. Now, that *is* absurd. SignatureDan. >>>Waiving the right to remain silent, Luca <we@qw.net> said: >>> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > >Now, that *is* absurd. And how did you arrive at that conclusion? Maybe I wanted more opinions than I found by Googling...you think maybe that could be the case? >>What is even more absurd is that it apparently didn't occur to you to >>use Google to search for *opinions* about products, as well as the [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >Maybe I wanted more opinions than I found by Googling...you think >maybe that could be the case? As an earlier post by someone else said, "you didn't say that." Maybe it could be the case that you should learn from this little episode that you could do *much* better in how you frame your questions? Being explicit is likely to be way more productive than expecting the rest of us to be mucking findreaders... HTH, HAND, etc. SignatureDan. Waiving the right to remain silent, Dean Dark <ddrake@comcast.notthis.net> said: >>>What is even more absurd is that it apparently didn't occur to you to >>>use Google to search for *opinions* about products, as well as the [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > Being explicit is likely to be way more productive than expecting the > rest of us to be mucking findreaders... Exactly... The appropriate framing of the question would have been, "I did a search on this, but couldn't find the types of opinions I was looking for. Does anyone here have personal experience with this?" That should have avoided all this intermediate crap... SignatureLarry J. - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail "A lack of common sense is now considered a disability, with all the privileges that this entails." >Waiving the right to remain silent, Dean Dark <ddrake@comcast.notthis.net> >said: [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > >That should have avoided all this intermediate crap... OK, I should have been more clear. Let's move on. Now that you all know what I am asking and what actions I have already taken, let's see just how productive you can be in terms of my original question. >Now that you all know what I am asking and what actions I have already >taken, let's see just how productive you can be in terms of my >original question. I think it would better motivate people to help you if you could be just a bit more condescending than that... SignatureDan. > let's see just how productive you can be in terms of my > >original question. You are correct Dan. It appears he thinks he is "owed" or "entitled" to direct others in this NG to work for him. Even politicians concede their error better than he did. SignatureI. Care Address fake until the SPAM goes away ;-} Waiving the right to remain silent, Luca <we@qw.net> said: > Well if I was asking for suggestions, why would I want a suggestion of > "a Google search found..."? > > That is absurd. Perhaps, but it wouldn't be the first time that someone asks others to do their searching work for them. >>Waiving the right to remain silent, Luca <we@qw.net> said: >> >>> Thanks, I have done numerous searches and looked at many online. I was >>> hoping for some recommendations based on usage/experience. >> >>You didn't say that... SignatureLarry J. - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail "A lack of common sense is now considered a disability, with all the privileges that this entails."
|
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.