>I rather liked the look of the 2009 TSX in the pictures I've seen, but
> when I saw one on the way home from work with dealer plates on it, I
> decided I really don't like it. It looks too much like the angles were
> just stuck on the car.
>
> Guess I'll stick with my '06 TSX.
Exactly, who is considered to be the market for the TSX? If you are going to
spend 30+ for an entry level luxury car, why not spend a little more for the
TL.
Bob - 20 May 2008 01:21 GMT
> >I rather liked the look of the 2009 TSX in the pictures I've seen, but
> > when I saw one on the way home from work with dealer plates on it, I
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> spend 30+ for an entry level luxury car, why not spend a little more for the
> TL.
I guess it depends upon your definition of 'a little more'. I believe
the difference in price is almost 20% and I don't need the larger
vehicle or the V6 engine. I'm very happy with my 30+ MPG on my daily
commute.
Bob
ACAR - 21 May 2008 12:26 GMT
> In article <Z%WXj.2462$yP7.1...@newsfe18.lga>, twau...@cox.net says...
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Bob
Currently the TL is heavily discounted since an updated car is about
to come to market. The TL's 18/26 mpg doesn't lag the much less
powerful TSX's 21/30 by a whole lot but the new 268 HP Accord V6 at
19/29 puts the TSX to shame. Rumors have been circulating re. new
engine for the TSX (www.vtec.net).
tww1491 - 22 May 2008 01:15 GMT
>> In article <Z%WXj.2462$yP7.1...@newsfe18.lga>, twau...@cox.net says...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> 19/29 puts the TSX to shame. Rumors have been circulating re. new
> engine for the TSX (www.vtec.net).
Good point. As a former Prelude owner, I had hoped the "TSX" would be the
European Accord R.