Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Acura Cars / March 2009

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

2009 TSX

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Venture Rider - 07 Mar 2009 22:20 GMT
I test drove a TSX today. Nice car, but definitely not for me. I drive
a '01 TL, and my gf said that the TSX does not feel like a luxury car.
It feels more... well... like a Honda. She drives a '08 CRV and I
swear that, although more powerful, the TSX powertrain feels and
sounds pretty much like that of the CRV. And I'm sure the TSX has
great handling, but the ride is too stiff for my taste. We got bounced
about pretty badly in the TSX.

I also test drove an '09 is250 AWD today. Nice. Very nice. The gf says
that this one feels like a luxury car. I concur.

Still, neither car has the power that my '01 TL has. But the
suspension is starting to suck on my TL and I'm tempted by a new car.
I don't want a new TL. It's too big and too ugly. The TSX is not for
me. The is250 is very nice, but 30lbs of torque short of the '01 TL.
But AWD? I want that! I will have to compromise...

And I hate to compromise. But I want my next car to be a little better
on gas, too, so I will go down 30lbs of torque and about 25 horses.

Sigh...

Signature

"What, me worry?" - Alfred E. Neuman

Patrick Maloney - 11 Mar 2009 07:03 GMT
Venture Rider <dontbother@bogus.dom> wrote in news:00a21d19$0$4564$c3e8da3
@news.astraweb.com:

> I test drove a TSX today. Nice car, but definitely not for me. I drive
> a '01 TL, and my gf said that the TSX does not feel like a luxury car.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Sigh...

I drove a 2007 CR-V when they came out.  Reminded me a lot of my Acura
RSX...

New struts all around won't fix your TL?
Venture Rider - 11 Mar 2009 11:19 GMT
>New struts all around won't fix your TL?

I'm waiting for an estimate. Just might do it. I hear the KYB GR-2 are
the same as OEM, that they are what Honda actually puts on the car. So
I might go for that.

Signature

"What, me worry?" - Alfred E. Neuman

Yoda - 12 Mar 2009 03:56 GMT
> I test drove a TSX today. Nice car, but definitely not for me. I drive
> a '01 TL, and my gf said that the TSX does not feel like a luxury car.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Sigh...

The TSX and RSX are just honda civic's, slightly dolled up. As long as
you keep that perspective, they're very nice cars for what they are.
And I love my RSX.

I just spent a day in a brand new TL while my RSX was in the shop. Ugly
car from the front - always approach it from the back and you can live
with it. Nice, very comfy, drives great, goes damn fast. I wasn't blown
away though. I think if I was in the market I'd shop around even if it
was in my price range - there's a few nice contenders. BMW, Lexus. Also
give Cadillac a chance.
Signature

-----------------------------
I only talk like that in the movies

ACAR - 14 Mar 2009 07:15 GMT
> The TSX and RSX are just honda civic's, slightly dolled up.

No, the TSX is an upscale Euro/Japan home market Accord.
The old RSX/Integra were upscale Civics.
The TL is an upscale USA Accord.

I like Tokico shocks a lot more than KYBs.

> As long as
> you keep that perspective, they're very nice cars for what they are.

The new TL is priced near $40K. From that perspective an upscale
Accord hit with an ugly stick is not a good value.

The OP might want to test drive an Infiniti before settling on the
Lexus.

> I just spent a day in a brand new TL while my RSX was in the shop. Ugly
> car from the front - always approach it from the back and you can live
> with it.
Uh, no. Ugly from the back as well, if you ask me.

Accord sales are way down. You know Honda is gonna have to put SH-AWD
into the Accord to stir it up. Why waste money on a TL? From a luxury
point of view BMW, Lexus and Infiniti have it beat. From a styling
point of view the TL beats itself off. That is one fugly car!
Yoda - 14 Mar 2009 17:26 GMT
>> The TSX and RSX are just honda civic's, slightly dolled up.
>
> No, the TSX is an upscale Euro/Japan home market Accord.
> The old RSX/Integra were upscale Civics.
> The TL is an upscale USA Accord.

I stand corrected. I had forgotten about the euro accord connection. I
was bamboozled because I recently drove behind a canadian tsx which
looks almost identical to an older civic.

>> As long as
>> you keep that perspective, they're very nice cars for what they are.
>
> The new TL is priced near $40K. From that perspective an upscale
> Accord hit with an ugly stick is not a good value.

I was referring to the TSX/RSX, not the TL at that point. Although I
was wrong about the tsx, so never mind.

> The OP might want to test drive an Infiniti before settling on the
> Lexus.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> with it.
> Uh, no. Ugly from the back as well, if you ask me.

Actually you're right - Honda seems to have lost the ability to do
anything decent stylingwise.

Signature

-----------------------------
I only talk like that in the movies

Venture Rider - 16 Mar 2009 02:58 GMT
>> No, the TSX is an upscale Euro/Japan home market Accord.
>> The old RSX/Integra were upscale Civics.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>was bamboozled because I recently drove behind a canadian tsx which
>looks almost identical to an older civic.

The way it was explained the me, there are no Acuras in Europe. The
TSX, which is by all means an Acura, it simply sold as a Honda over
there.

Signature

"What, me worry?" - Alfred E. Neuman

Tegger - 16 Mar 2009 13:11 GMT
>>> The TSX and RSX are just honda civic's, slightly dolled up.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> was bamboozled because I recently drove behind a canadian tsx which
> looks almost identical to an older civic.

You may be thinking of the CSX, not the TSX. The CSX was Civic-based, and
superseded the EL. Both the CSX and the EL were just Civics with different
details, created to give Canadian Acura dealers something cheap to sell.

The Canadian TSX is identical to the US one.

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

Yoda - 17 Mar 2009 02:41 GMT
>>>> The TSX and RSX are just honda civic's, slightly dolled up.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> The Canadian TSX is identical to the US one.

Yes, you're right, and I realized that very soon after posting. No
undoing on usenet. It was a csx. Never mind, nothing to see here. Move
along.
Signature

-----------------------------
I only talk like that in the movies

Tegger - 15 Mar 2009 02:33 GMT
ACAR <gmwohl@gmail.com> wrote in news:38263d50-9a3b-46a6-aa12-
b943577f3549@c11g2000yqj.googlegroups.com:

>> The TSX and RSX are just honda civic's, slightly dolled up.
>
> No, the TSX is an upscale Euro/Japan home market Accord.

Correct.

With the demise of the RSX/EL/CSX, Acura no longer markets any Civic-
based vehicles at all.

> The old RSX/Integra were upscale Civics.
> The TL is an upscale USA Accord.
>
> I like Tokico shocks a lot more than KYBs.

Showa (Honda OEM) is best of all. Lasts for ages.

>> As long as
>> you keep that perspective, they're very nice cars for what they are.
>
> The new TL is priced near $40K. From that perspective an upscale
> Accord hit with an ugly stick is not a good value.

Acuras are awfully expensive for what you get. When I bought mine
(1991), there was a recession in progress and the automakers were
hurting bad. I could get a base Integra for less than a loaded Civic, so
I bought the Integra. Deals like that are hard to find these days.

<snip>

> Accord sales are way down. You know Honda is gonna have to put SH-AWD
> into the Accord to stir it up. Why waste money on a TL? From a luxury
> point of view BMW, Lexus and Infiniti have it beat. From a styling
> point of view the TL beats itself off. That is one fugly car!

Personally, I'm not happy with the styling of most new cars. To me
they're mostly all pretty homely. Bulbous "safety" noses, heavy grilles,
fat-a.s rear ends... it's sort of a reprise of the early-'70s, when
brilliant late-'60s designs became grotesque caricatures of themselves
by 1971, and only got worse as time went on.
1970 Mustang vs. 1971 Mustang. Need I say more?

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.