
Signature
Steve H 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
http://www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - MZ ETZ300
VW Golf GL Cabrio - Alfa 75 TS - Alfa 155 TS Lusso - COSOC KOTL
BoTAFOT #87 - BoTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #
In news:1gnpvbn.qxd7z912h3eteN%steve@italiancar.co.uk,
SteveH <steve@italiancar.co.uk> decided to enlighten our sheltered souls
with a rant as follows
>>> Have a look (and register if you like) on www.alfa145.com/forum. A
>>> member has just said they are selling their black, T-registered,
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> just a Fiat with stick-on Alfa bits. Not a patch on the 33 it
> replaced.
No, Steve, you've failed to understand reality again. Alfa 33s were
something that should really never have happened. They're a total mess,
they're horrible to drive, badly built, look awful, and are nowhere near as
much fun as a 145 Cloverleaf. The Cloverleaf is fun, at least.
> I'd be looking at a 'widebody' 155 V6 or 8v T-Spark if I were you.
>
> <whispers>
> Not a lot of people know this, but the 'widebody' 155s are more or
> less
> a 156 without the flashy styling.
Aye, but avoid a narrow body 155 like the plague. They're cheap for a
reason.

Signature
Pete M - "Hater of FWD Vauxhalls"
Mercedes 260E
Ford Capri (ressurection starts soon)
COSOC #5
Scouse Git extraordinaire. Liverpool, Great Britain
SteveH - 23 Nov 2004 22:07 GMT
> >> Thanks for the info. I'll have a look around. Is the 145 a car to
> >> put a smile back on my face?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> they're horrible to drive, badly built, look awful, and are nowhere near as
> much fun as a 145 Cloverleaf. The Cloverleaf is fun, at least.
I just can't agree on this.
Having had 2 33s, I'd agree that they're pretty shoddily built, but they
are massive fun to drive. Especially the 16v, which is a real screamer.
> > I'd be looking at a 'widebody' 155 V6 or 8v T-Spark if I were you.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Aye, but avoid a narrow body 155 like the plague. They're cheap for a
> reason.
Again, I'll disagree, my narrowbody is fine, althought I beleive there
were 2 revisions of the narrowbody, with mine being the later one.

Signature
Steve H 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
http://www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - MZ ETZ300
VW Golf GL Cabrio - Alfa 75 TS - Alfa 155 TS Lusso - COSOC KOTL
BoTAFOT #87 - BoTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #
Pete M - 24 Nov 2004 00:53 GMT
In news:1gnq5ej.x37hgn1er2brxN%steve@italiancar.co.uk,
SteveH <steve@italiancar.co.uk> decided to enlighten our sheltered souls
with a rant as follows
>>>> Thanks for the info. I'll have a look around. Is the 145 a car to
>>>> put a smile back on my face?
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> Again, I'll disagree, my narrowbody is fine, althought I beleive there
> were 2 revisions of the narrowbody, with mine being the later one.
the earlier ones, however, were a bloody disgrace to the Alfa name. I admit
to not having driven a very early 155, but having had a 155 Q4 as a company
car - which I loved almost as much as I enjoyed the 164 Q4, and having
driven a couple of later narrow body ones I have to say that the wider body
155s were *much* better cars. To the extent I'd very happily have a widebody
2.0. The V6 ones were unfortunately a bit "bobbly" at the front.

Signature
Pete M - "Hater of FWD Vauxhalls"
Mercedes 260E
Ford Capri (ressurection starts soon)
COSOC #5
Scouse Git extraordinaire. Liverpool, Great Britain