Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Alfa Romeo Cars / April 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Selespeed

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Sharknose - 22 Apr 2005 08:49 GMT
Here's my dilemma. I'm thinking of buying a GT and my preference would be a
manual. Problem is, my wife can only drive an auto. My question is, is
Selespeed a good system? I like to drive my cars quite hard but have found
semi-automatic systems in other makes to be a hindrance rather than a help
as they are unresponsive and clunky. What is Selespeed like? Do I tell my
wife to learn to drive properly (!) or keep the peace and go for
Selespeed?!!

Thanks for any replies.

SN
Richard Fantom - 25 Apr 2005 10:08 GMT
Selespeed is quite effective, and can be used in "automatic" mode which is
great for traffic, or in manual mode where you use buttons on the dash to
change up and down the 'box.

However, personally I wouldn't touch it as I know of some reliability issues
particularly on earlier versions.

Perhaps someone can comment on whether these are resolved with later
production or are there ongoing reliability issues?

> Here's my dilemma. I'm thinking of buying a GT and my preference would be a
> manual. Problem is, my wife can only drive an auto. My question is, is
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> SN
Dom - 25 Apr 2005 12:14 GMT
My salesman told me to stay well clear when I was looking at the 156 a few
years back...

--
Thanks,
Andrew Makinson

www.evcomputing.com
www.iowcomputers.net/websiteforum/index.php

> Selespeed is quite effective, and can be used in "automatic" mode which is
> great for traffic, or in manual mode where you use buttons on the dash to
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> >
> > SN
david_dance - 25 Apr 2005 13:52 GMT
> My salesman told me to stay well clear when I was looking at the 156 a few
> years back...

I have just bought a 147 Selespeed to replace my 166 Sportstronic.

The first thing that you have to accept is that, even when in gear, it will
roll back on inclines.  Also, you need to apply the throttle to move the
car, there is no creep.

The gap between 1st and 2nd is quite pronounced, although the other changes
are fairly good.  Kickdown works well in City mode.

I am not ecstatic about it, but no doubt will learn to live with it.
Mick Sheppard - 27 Apr 2005 15:30 GMT
I've had a 156 Selespeed for almost 2 years now. I would say that it
takes a couple of months to get used to the gearshift. It is neither
an automatic nor a manual gearbox and should not be mistaken for
either.

The thing to do is to read the manual and not try to to drive it like
an auto. Its not as smooth as a full auto and never is going to be.
You can get close but that's all. If you look at the manual, at least
on mine for the 156, the gear ratios are the same as the manual. So
any gap between gears is purely because of that. The splits between
the gears are constant. It hits the redline and upshifts at 30 mph
intervals all the way up (1/30, 2/60, 3/90, 4/120).

I hardly ever use it in City mode. The only exceptions are stuck in
stop/start traffic (mostly on motorways). I do let it change down when
braking, except heading onto roundabouts when it is potentially
dangerous to do so (search in the group for descriptions of this fun).

All in all I'm happy with it. I just hope AR match it to the V6
6-speed gearbox for when I come around to changing my car.

<rant>
I reckon that all motoring journalists should be forced to drive
around in a Selespeed, or similarly operated car, for at least 6
months. Whenever they review these cars they always bitch about the
gearchange. In reality the majority of the problem is between seat and
steering wheel. The this applies to the dealer who recommended against
it too.
</rant>

--
Mick
156 Selespeed Veloce, ex 146 1.8TS, ex Alfasud 1.5 Ti
Eddie Smith - 28 Apr 2005 16:12 GMT
> I've had a 156 Selespeed for almost 2 years now. I would say that it
> takes a couple of months to get used to the gearshift. It is neither
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> Mick
> 156 Selespeed Veloce, ex 146 1.8TS, ex Alfasud 1.5 Ti

Mick,  I'd have to say I agree with most or all of the above.  
I had a Selespeed from new for three years and I AB-SO-LUTELY _LOVED_
it.  I thought it was the best thing since sliced bread.  But, and it's
a big butt (as my wife would say),  it's a truely crap automatic.  As
you say, it's not really an auto-box at all, and I don't think it's
intended to be.  I personally never used the 'city' mode unless I was
_very_ bored, and looking to amuse myself.
It is, though, a brilliant drivers' tool, giving the control of a
manual with the safety of two hands on the wheel at all times.
As for the point about the motoring journos, I could hardly agree more!

Ed.
Sharknose - 29 Apr 2005 08:35 GMT
>> I've had a 156 Selespeed for almost 2 years now. I would say that it
>> takes a couple of months to get used to the gearshift. It is neither
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>
> Ed.

Many thanks for all the replies. On the whole I think I'm persuaded towards
Selespeed and will most likely get my GT armed with it!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.