I've heard there were some tensioners that failed early. Some have been
know to seize ... which is worse as this can jam the belt ...
The problem we have is that the belts should really be changed at least
3 years, not 5. The higher figure was to keep servicing costs down for
fleets ... the recent 3 year "inspection" has been added probably to
try and avoid breakages and expensive engine rebuilds, but to check the
belt properly it has to be taken off. And you never, ever but a used
cam belt back!!!
Dealers have differing views on this .. some seen to have taken the
view that 36000 or three years is the max, while others stick to the
72000/5-years. And Alfa themselevs don't seem to have a consistent
message. Down-under the dealers have been told to change at the earlier
interval ... due to the "harsh conditions" apparently.
If they are happy to do it under warranty, let them. But some dealers
take the view this is a "wear & tear" item and often owners have to
resort to pressing Alfa UK to get something done.
Gazza
> Hi All
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> Regards
> Ross
cupra - 06 May 2005 13:58 GMT
> I've heard there were some tensioners that failed early. Some have
> been know to seize ... which is worse as this can jam the belt ...
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Gazza
So, is 36K in a year a signal for change?
simon - 06 May 2005 17:09 GMT
My dealer told me, but would not put into writing.
We check at 36K, visually.
If it then fails before the specified change interval we'd stand the cost.
(minus cost of belt and usual
componets associated with a routine change)
Make what you will of that
cupra - 06 May 2005 18:56 GMT
> My dealer told me, but would not put into writing.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Make what you will of that
I'll see what they say next month when I take it in for the 36K....
Paul Woodsford - 06 May 2005 18:58 GMT
I would seriously consider it.

Signature
Paul Woodsford
Remove NOSPAM to reply.
>> I've heard there were some tensioners that failed early. Some have
>> been know to seize ... which is worse as this can jam the belt ...
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> So, is 36K in a year a signal for change?
cupra - 06 May 2005 19:38 GMT
> I would seriously consider it.
I'm going to bring it up when I take it in - but seeing as I'll get to 72K
before the (unlimited) warranty runs out, I feel like I've got some
insurance should anything fail!
Ross - 10 May 2005 16:46 GMT
> ... the recent 3 year "inspection" has been added probably to
try and avoid breakages and expensive engine rebuilds, but to check the
belt properly it has to be taken off. And you never, ever but a used
>cam belt back!!!
It's not *that* recent, it lists the procedure in my handbook. As I
understand it from my dealer, the concern isn't over the belt but the
tensioner, which can be checked with the belt in place. As you say, if the
belt had to come off you wouldn't put the old one back on.
Regards
Ross