Car Forum / Antique and Collectibles / Antique Cars / January 2007
Towing with a 1956 Cadillac
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Otto Skorzeny - 18 Jan 2007 22:42 GMT Hello everyone,
I drive a 1956 Cadillac Coupe de Ville as a daily driver. I don't even own a "new" car (anything built after 1972). I am planning a 2 -3 month road trip around the country. The car is all original but will have the engine and transmission completely rebuilt before the journey. The rest of the mechanicals are in perfect shape (rebuilt brake and suspension system, etc.)
Anyway, I plan to purchase a vintage travel trailer or a new one with a vintage look. I have not been able to find any information on the maximum towing capacity or maximum tongue weight for this car. I see old photos all the time with various cars of this vintage pulling campers and boats of all sizes but cannot nail down any specifics.
Modern sedans are only rated to tow about 1000lbs -1500lbs. I believe this low number is primarily due to the fact that modern cars have no frame rather than not having the power to tow. Surely my car can do better than that?
I plan to travel primarily on secondary roads instead of interstates whenever possible. The car can cruise all day, fully loaded at 70-80mph without difficulty so I'm pretty sure it won't have trouble with a trailer. I just need to find out what size trailer I should get.
Any help or suggestions anyone can give me would be greatly appreciated.
Here are the relevant specs. for my car: Engine: 285hp 365cid V8 4bbl ohc Transmission: 4spd Hydramatic (automatic) Differential: 3.36:1
Thanks to you everyone.
myford100@yahoo.com - 19 Jan 2007 00:44 GMT >Hello everyone, > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >of the mechanicals are in perfect shape (rebuilt brake and suspension >system, etc.) You may have one of the best choices for towing among passenger cars. Though I admit my preference was Chrysler products with the three speed auto, you have some serious hardware.
Plan your engine and transmission rebuild so you can get a couple thousand miles before your trip. A missing bolt or loose nut can be unpleasant when you're far away from home. And add some serious transmission cooling to the system, while you're in there.
>Anyway, I plan to purchase a vintage travel trailer or a new one with a >vintage look. I have not been able to find any information on the [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >frame rather than not having the power to tow. Surely my car can do >better than that? I don't think it's the frame. My '61 Chrysler's unibody stood up to about anything. But cars built in the last 10-15 years are built a lot lighter than those of the good old days.
>I plan to travel primarily on secondary roads instead of interstates >whenever possible. The car can cruise all day, fully loaded at 70-80mph [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >Any help or suggestions anyone can give me would be greatly >appreciated. Here's one free suggestion: find out the towing capacity of the Chevy Suburban that weighs about what your Caddy does and see what it will tow WITHOUT a towing package. That's one place to start.
>Here are the relevant specs. for my car: >Engine: 285hp 365cid V8 4bbl ohc >Transmission: 4spd Hydramatic (automatic) >Differential: 3.36:1 > >Thanks to you everyone. You have some serious iron. The previous transmission, maybe 49-53?, where you put it in reverse for parking, was beyond bulletproof. Yours is a great second choice for this application.
Another idea--if it doesn't have a full set of gauges, get'em added. If it has them, make sure they work and are reasonably accurate. Knowing the temperature and oil pressure can limit surprises.
Good luck!
George Patterson - 19 Jan 2007 01:01 GMT > Modern sedans are only rated to tow about 1000lbs -1500lbs. I believe > this low number is primarily due to the fact that modern cars have no > frame rather than not having the power to tow. Surely my car can do > better than that? The low towing figures are because the transmissions aren't built as well these days. By 1980, you really didn't want to tow anything much with an automatic, and now, even the manual trannies in cars aren't good for much towing.
I don't unfortunately, have direct information about your car, but, if period ads are any indication, it could probably handle the Airstream trailer of that day.
George Patterson Forgive your enemies. But always remember who they are.
Grumpy AuContraire - 19 Jan 2007 01:23 GMT I've experience serious towing capacity with Caddies and would worry about a 6-10K rig.
Also, I would definitely use a synthetic tranny fluid and highly recommend Red Line high heat ATF.
Hope you're not going to drive it on salted roads though...
JT
> Hello everyone, > [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > > Thanks to you everyone. Otto Skorzeny - 19 Jan 2007 14:33 GMT > I've experience serious towing capacity with Caddies and would worry > about a 6-10K rig. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > JT Definitely No Salty Roads. I'm planning the trip to span spring / summer or summer / fall. As for the synthetic fluid, I'll check the compatibility with the Hydramatic's requirements. Just as some transmissions require DexronII and won't function correctly with say Type F, the Hydramatic is finicky about it's fluid.
Thanks.
Otto
Grumpy AuContraire - 19 Jan 2007 16:41 GMT >>I've experience serious towing capacity with Caddies and would worry >>about a 6-10K rig. [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Otto I have driven my Studebakers cross country countless times and still drive a '64 T Cab pickup as a daily driver. In fact, I'm preparing a '55 President State sedan to replace it as the '55 is one of the most streamlined cars Studebaker ever built plus it gets good mileage in the high 20mpg area. Besides, in a crash, it will take advantage of everyone else's "crush zone."
<G>
JT
Stude - 22 Jan 2007 08:42 GMT > I have driven my Studebakers cross country countless times and still > drive a '64 T Cab pickup as a daily driver. In fact, I'm preparing a [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > JT\\ JT: You have salesman books for those era Studebakers / Packards don't you?
What do the books say about towing weight for the larger sedans of the S and P lines? We could expect the Studes to be less than the Caddys,, I expect, but the Packards, with their modern suspension, would probably have a higher rating.
Robin Banks - 19 Jan 2007 17:15 GMT > Anyway, I plan to purchase a vintage travel trailer or a new one with a > vintage look. I have not been able to find any information on the > maximum towing capacity or maximum tongue weight for this car. I have a '53 Cadillac Series 62 sedan, and I've wondered the same thing. If you do it, please pass along how things went.
I'm also picking up a 1959 Edsel Villager wagon which I'd like to get a vintage travel trailer for. I'm wondering about it's towing ability as well. As you, I've seen plenty of pictures of them towing trailers, but then again, those pictures were taken when the car was brand new.
I don't want to tow anything huge, just something like a small Shasta or Scottie.
It's a puzzler, to be sure.
-- ~~R.Banks
George Patterson - 19 Jan 2007 17:39 GMT > I'm also picking up a 1959 Edsel Villager wagon which I'd like to get a > vintage travel trailer for. I'm wondering about it's towing ability as well. Ford products made in '58 and '59 had relatively poor transmissions. That was one of the biggest reasons for the failure of the Edsel line. We had a '58 Ford (not the Edsel) with a manual transmission and had many problems with the transmission. I recall that once my mother got rear-ended because the car refused to go into gear when she tried to shift and she had to stop. The guy behind didn't expect her to do that. On another occasion, she stripped all the teeth off second gear.
Transmissions for 1959 were the same as '58.
George Patterson Forgive your enemies. But always remember who they are.
Robin Banks - 21 Jan 2007 06:04 GMT > > I'm also picking up a 1959 Edsel Villager wagon which I'd like to get a > > vintage travel trailer for. I'm wondering about it's towing ability as well. > > Ford products made in '58 and '59 had relatively poor transmissions. That was > one of the biggest reasons for the failure of the Edsel line. Umm, I gotta disagree with you here George. It wasn't one of the "biggest reasons for the failure of the Edsel line". I belong to one of the bigger Edsel clubs. I've rarely heard of anyone talking about transmission problems, let alone them being part of the demise of the Edsel line.
The "biggest reason" for it's "failure" were probably these:
- The USA was in a recession in 57/58. A pretty bad time to introduce a new car company/division. (Edsel was it's own division, like Lincoln or Mercury.)
- Robert MacNamara never fully backed Edsel, and tried to kill it before it started. When the '58 didn't sell at the highly inflated target figures, he used that as his sword to cut it off. The 58 Edsels were one of the most successful new car introductions at least up until that time, sales wise. (I talked with a fellow who started an Edsel dealership in 1957. He told me he couldn't keep them on the lot, they sold so well. The 59's was where he started seeing the sale slow down, and he bailed out JUST before the announcement of the end of production. Lucky for him, since he got a pretty penny for it... two months later, he couldn't have given it away.)
- Ford didn't really take the Edsel launch as serious as they could have. You had the line in Louisville making a Ford, then an Edsel, then a Ford. This caused quality control problems when the Ford parts appeared at the line when an Edsel was being built, and confused or frustrated the workers. This meant the dealers were expected to fix things that came off the line wrong. The Edsel should have had it's own lines, or at least exclusive production runs.
- As some say, it was the wrong car at the wrong time at the wrong price. It was supposed to be "mid-priced", but ended up being priced higher than it's intended marketplace.
The only real "transmission problem" that I've heard of is with the Teletouch shifter, which was only on the 58's. That though was a problem with the relays or motors, not with the actual trans itself. The 58 was pushbutton, but it was truly electrically shifted by the motor moving the linkage, unlike other "push-button" shifters. The 59's and 60's had standard shift levers like any other car. There -were- a few "shift lever" type 58's, but they're very, very rare.
> We had a '58 Ford (not the Edsel) with a manual transmission and had many problems with the > transmission. I have a friend with a '59 Fairlane, and his had quite a few shifting problems. After a complete rebuild, his runs perfectly. He doesn't tow anything though, so that doesn't help me with my wondering about the trans ability to do so. :-/
-- ~~R.Banks
Otto Skorzeny - 19 Jan 2007 20:35 GMT Hi Robin,
I've received a lot of really good information from this newsgroup about my towing question. I posted the same question in another google newsgroup and got more good advice. I'd suggest you go check it out. One guy gave me a website for people who do nothing but tow vintage trailers with vintage cars.
Here's the newsgroup: rec.outdoors.rv-travel@googlegroups.com
Here is the link to Tin Can Tourists. www.tincantourists.com
These guys also run a Q&A forum dealing with old cars, old trailers and towing one with the other. There's probably somebody in the group who has an Edsel.
I won't be taking my trip for another year or two. I have alot of preperation to do before I take 3 months off work. My spare transmission is being completely rebuilt right now. I'm going to have to bite the bullet and take my car in next winter to have the engine rebuilt. It works perfectly now and probably would make the trip without trouble. I just don't want to take any chances. Since I plan a total restoration on this car anyway, I might as well do the engine before the trip. When I get back, the body and interior will get the treatment.
It will still be my daily driver, though. I love my car.
Your '53 Cadillac was the last year of the "new" post war style. What color is it? I don't have a website but if anyone wants to see a picture of my car I can email it. There's probably not a way to post apicture on the newsgroup is there?
> > Anyway, I plan to purchase a vintage travel trailer or a new one with a > > vintage look. I have not been able to find any information on the [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > -- > ~~R.Banks Robin Banks - 21 Jan 2007 06:17 GMT > I've received a lot of really good information from this newsgroup > about my towing question. I posted the same question in another google [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Here's the newsgroup: rec.outdoors.rv-travel@googlegroups.com Thanks, I'll check that out.
> Here is the link to Tin Can Tourists. www.tincantourists.com > > These guys also run a Q&A forum dealing with old cars, old trailers and > towing one with the other. > There's probably somebody in the group who has an Edsel. Good idea... I didn't think of asking there.
> I won't be taking my trip for another year or two. I have alot of > preperation to do before I take 3 months off work. My spare > transmission is being completely rebuilt right now. I'm going to have > to bite the bullet and take my car in next winter to have the engine > rebuilt. I'm doing that on my Edsel now. After 50 years, he's finally starting to smoke a little. So, he's getting a complete overhaul.
> Since I plan a total restoration on this car anyway, I might as well do the engine > before the trip. When I get back, the body and interior will get the > treatment. I want to do an some resto on my Caddie too. The interior is all original. It's nice, no rips or anything, but could use a little freshening. I plan to go over the body and freshen the paint too. She's *just* starting to get a few bubbles under the paint now. My biggest pain is that my bumpers need rechroming. There's more bumper to the 53 than there is steel in most new cars, so this will probably be the most expensive part of the resto. I dread the thought of it. :-/
> It will still be my daily driver, though. I love my car. If you can't drive 'em anytime you want, why bother having 'em. I have little to no respect for those that own trailer queens, unless it's something very, very rare.
> Your '53 Cadillac was the last year of the "new" post war style. What > color is it? "Pastoral Blue", which is a pretty rare color from what I'm told. I guess not many people ordered that one. It's got a white roof, but I can't remember what Cadillac's fancy name for the white was. It's really a pearl white, which I didn't notice until I'd owned it two weeks. <laugh>
> I don't have a website but if anyone wants to see a picture of my car I can email it. > There's probably not a way to post a picture on the newsgroup is there? Not in a text group like this.
Here's my Caddie:
http://www.vector11.com/rbanks/cad-front.jpg http://www.vector11.com/rbanks/cad-back.jpg
Have you joined the Cadillac-LaSalle Club yet? I was a member, but I let it lapse last year. I need to get around to resubscribing.
-- ~~R.Banks
Otto Skorzeny - 21 Jan 2007 16:25 GMT > > I've received a lot of really good information from this newsgroup > > about my towing question. I posted the same question in another google [quoted text clipped - 64 lines] > -- > ~~R.Banks Hi Robin,
I looked at your pics. That is a pretty color blue. I can't tell from the photos but your top appears to be slightly off- white. It looks about the same as mine. In 1956 it was called "Alpine White."
My car is Alpine White over Camelot Grey. The interior is aqua leather with black fabric. It's called Sonic Blue. I emailed you a picture but you might not have gotten it.
Anyway the little plate under the hood will have the serial number and all the paint and interior codes for your car. To decypher it, I'd suggest buying an specifications and options manual from this company: Crank'en Hope Publications (724) 459-8853. They're usually only about$20.00 or so.
It's a reprint but it will be very useful when you start the restoration of the interior.It shows all the the available upholsery patterns, fabrics, etc. It lists all the colors available that year and in what combinations for the various models. It gives the codes for the various options, colors, etc. so you can figure out what your car originally came with. Even if you don't need it, it makes for interesting reading. They also reprint owners' manuals. You should also try to locate a shop manual for your car. They're pretty common on ebay for under $30.00. Reprints are about $75.00.
Anyway, I'm glad you responded to George about the Edsel. I was going to write pretty much the same thing this morning untiI saw your post. I too have never heard any talk of bad transmissions in 58,59 Fords. I'm pretty much of an old car nut and my area of interest spans all makes and models so I'm by no means an expert on any one car. I do however know a lot about a lot of cars and that's something I've never heard of or experienced.
The key with any old car (and new ones, too) is to make sure you do everything you can to make sure all components are in the best possible shape they can be. Be religious about regular and preventive maintenance.
I've been driving my my car, The Bismarck, for over 5 years as my sole transportation. It has never once left me stranded or even acted like it might. I just returned from a 1200 mile round trip Florida without any problems. Old cars are so much simpler and easier to work on, that even if there is a problem you can usually jigger around with it enough to get home. No master computer to fizzle out on you.
I share your sentiment on trailer queens. If I owned a Duesenberg I'd be driving it around, too. There's a man who lives near me with a 1930 Packard 740 Roadster. It's one of only 12 made and one of only 6 or 7 that survive. It's the only one that has all of it's original factory installedparts (headlights, etc.) It's also completely restored. If this car isn't is a candidate for trailer queen status, I don't know what is, yet he drives his car all the time. He even took it on the History Channel tour around America and put 17,000+ miles on it.
You are absolutely right to dread the rechroming of your Cadillac. First of all, it is getting harder and harder to find competent, first rate chrome shops. Don't get me wrong, there are plenty of people out there doing it but the quality is often lacking. I've seen parts come back with scratches, bends, waves, etc. from so-called experts. The restoration shop I use here in Georgia often has to send parts back to be redone.
Anyway, a good estimate on the cost to rechrome all the chrome parts on my car (interior and exterior) is between $12,000.00 and $15,000.00. Yours will probably be similar. Fortunately mine still looks presentable but it'll have to be done eventually.
Regarding the Cadillac-LaSalle Club: I met the treasurer (Jerry Nestlehutt) of the Peach State Chapter (Georgia) at a local car show. He has a 1946 Continental, a 1931 V12 Cadillac, a 1927 LaSalle, another V12 Cadillac, and others. In all of these vehicles he has installed new Corvette engines!
I was so sick to my stomach, I couldn't talk to him after I saw the butchery performed on his Lincoln and hearing about the destruction wrought upon the two V12 Cadillacs. I was pretty turned off to the idea of joining a club that would let this bone head hold an official position in their organization.
Well, that's probably a long enough letter. And yes, The Bismarck is named after the battleship. They're both big and grey.
Forrest Ward
Robin Banks - 21 Jan 2007 20:29 GMT > I looked at your pics. That is a pretty color blue. I can't tell from > the photos but your top appears to be slightly off- white. It looks > about the same as mine. In 1956 it was called "Alpine White." I think that's what my white was called also.
> My car is Alpine White over Camelot Grey. The interior is aqua leather > with black fabric. It's called Sonic Blue. I emailed you a picture but > you might not have gotten it. Didn't get it. Did you remove the "REMOVE" from my email address before sending?
> Anyway the little plate under the hood will have the serial number and > all the paint and interior codes for your car. Yep, I know. Mine is the original colors.
> You should also try to locate a shop manual for your car. They're pretty common on ebay > for under $30.00. Reprints are about $75.00. I have an original 53 shop manual. I was lucky, it was mint cond, and only cost me $15. To top it off, there was no shipping, since the guy was local to me. (10 miles away)
> Anyway, I'm glad you responded to George about the Edsel. I like George, I just had to disagree with him on that topic. :-)
> The key with any old car (and new ones, too) is to make sure you do > everything you can to make sure all components are in the best possible > shape they can be. Be religious about regular and preventive > maintenance. You've got to.
> I've been driving my my car, The Bismarck, for over 5 years as my sole > transportation. It has never once left me stranded or even acted like > it might. I just returned from a 1200 mile round trip Florida without > any problems. Old cars are so much simpler and easier to work on, that > even if there is a problem you can usually jigger around with it enough > to get home. No master computer to fizzle out on you. It's nice when the most complicated piece of "electronics" is the fusebox, or perhaps the old tube radio, isn't it?
> Anyway, a good estimate on the cost to rechrome all the chrome parts on > my car (interior and exterior) is between $12,000.00 and $15,000.00. <gurgle> I didn't want to hear that. Lucky (?) for me, I only need the bumpers done, and perhaps the beltline trim pieces, but those could wait. The stainless is nice. Wait, I lied. I need to put my headlight eyebrows back to chrome too. Someone painted them ages ago before I owned her.
> Regarding the Cadillac-LaSalle Club: I met the treasurer (Jerry > Nestlehutt) of the Peach State Chapter (Georgia) at a local car show. > He has a 1946 Continental, a 1931 V12 Cadillac, a 1927 LaSalle, another > V12 Cadillac, and others. In all of these vehicles he has installed new > Corvette engines! To each their own, I suppose. It's not something _I'd_ ever do, to be sure. I do know that I've gotten far more of an "open arms" type feel from the International Edsel Club than I ever got from the Cadillac-LaSalle Club.
I've had Edsellers just GIVE me a needed part, or sell it to me dirt cheap. That's never happened with the Cadillac group. Heck, sometimes I can't even get any decent answers from any of them. There's certainly a different mind set in the IEC, it's a lot more friendly and "down home".
-- ~~R.Banks
Otto Skorzeny - 21 Jan 2007 23:56 GMT Hi Robin,
You were right about the email address. I re-sent it. You're also quite right about the Cadillac folks to a certain extent. I belong to no clubs so I can't speak from experience. My restoration guy tells me all the time that he pays through the nose for parts simply because they're for a Cadillac.
Sometimes the same part is available for an Oldsmobile, Pontiac, etc for less money even though it's interchangable and may even be made by the same company.
Regarding friendly enthusiasts; A man with a 1957 Cadillac who saw mine at the shop gave the mechanic an original gas cap to give to me. That was pretty nice, since new ones are about $45 (probably $20 if you tell them it's for a Chevy)
Here's another towing related question:
Does anybody still sell those west coast style mirrors that strap on the front fenders of cars? I don't want to bolt or screw anything on the car.
Forrest
|
|
|