Hello All. We are putting together a television show "52 Favorite
Cars" which will be aired May 9th on Spike TV. What we are looking
for are some decent footage and stills of these particular classic
cars:
1932 Ford Lo-Boy
1948 Mercury Ledsled
1938 Buick Y-Job (First "Concept Car")
AMC Pacer (mid 1970's)
Jeep Original Willeys CJ5 (1950's)
Nash Ambassador and/or 600
Plymouth Roadrunner (1969)
Plymouth Fury (1956)
The Nash Ambassador (1949*)
AMC 1963 Rambler (with the fold-down front seat)
1927 Buick (Series 128 w/ Golf Club Companion)
Ford Model T
1950's Studebaker
Packard Hawk
AMC Gremlin
Dusenberg (Model A Fleetwood Sport Coupe)
1950 Saloon Jaguar
1967 Falon
1941 Chrysler Town & Country
1953 Chevrolet Corvette
1977 Chevrolet Caprice Wagon
Plymouth Belvedere Coupe
1970 Pontiac LeMans
1968 Ford Bullit
As you can see, this is quite a little wish list! So, for all of you
proud car owners, collectors and fans, this is a potential opportunity
for you to get your classic baby(s) aired on tv! If you have footage
or pictures on these cars that you would like us to use, please
respond by email or you may send us things by mail at :
52 Favorite Cars
Attn: Classic Cars- Owner Groups
1501 Broadway, Ste 611
NY,NY 10036
For digital pictures shot at 72dpi, the requirement size should be
720x480, at the least and placed on CD.
*Note: once you have released your footage to us, you will have
consented to allowing us to use it for broadcast purposes.
Thank you.
> Hello All. We are putting together a television show "52 Favorite
> Cars" which will be aired May 9th on Spike TV. What we are looking
> for are some decent footage and stills of these particular classic
> cars:
I hope this doesn't pre-empt Ren&Stimpy.
> 1967 Falon
Falcon? if so, why this year?
> 1968 Ford Bullit
No such car. 1968 fastback, in green, remove the badges, add torque-trust-D
wheels. There ya go.
On 14 Apr 2004 08:21:03 -0700, christin@52favoritecars.com (Spike TV's
52 Favorite Cars) wrote:
>1968 Ford Bullit
Are you after the specific one in the movie or one like it?
> Hello All. We are putting together a television show "52 Favorite
> Cars"
Apparently, chosen by 52 morons.
> which will be aired May 9th on Spike TV. What we are looking
> for are some decent footage and stills of these particular classic
> cars:
Only two of which are actual 'Classic' cars as defined by CCCA.
> 1932 Ford Lo-Boy
> 1948 Mercury Ledsled
> 1938 Buick Y-Job (First "Concept Car")
Apparently, you don't quite understand "Google".
> AMC Pacer (mid 1970's)
> Jeep Original Willeys CJ5 (1950's)
> Nash Ambassador and/or 600
You have *got* to be kidding! That Jeep will be a lot easier to find
if you can spell the manufacturer's name correctly.
> Plymouth Roadrunner (1969)
The most mundane of the '68-'70 'Runners. Either pick the first ('68)
or the best-looking ('70).
> Plymouth Fury (1956)
Another half-assed Mopar choice. While it was the first, the '57-'58
was a lot better.
> The Nash Ambassador (1949*)
Should be a '49 Packard. You already asked for a Nash.
> AMC 1963 Rambler (with the fold-down front seat)
Ummm, that was the Nashes above.
> 1927 Buick (Series 128 w/ Golf Club Companion)
Pointless ...
> Ford Model T
Finally some sense.
> 1950's Studebaker
> Packard Hawk
The Packard can serve as both.
> AMC Gremlin
Banished from Speedvision years ago. Rightly so.
> Dusenberg (Model A Fleetwood Sport Coupe)
Another spelling problem.
> 1950 Saloon Jaguar
This over the XK120? Frankly, I doubt that 5% of average Spike
viewers would even recognize it as a Jaguar.
> 1967 Falon
The '67 Falcon sucked. Want to guess why it was gone by '70?
> 1941 Chrysler Town & Country
> 1953 Chevrolet Corvette
Two interesting but ultimately unsatisfying cars.
> 1977 Chevrolet Caprice Wagon
Oh, come on!
> Plymouth Belvedere Coupe
A '53? A 62? A '70? Idiots.
> 1970 Pontiac LeMans
But not a GTO. Nope. Wouldn't prefer a Goat over an OHC 6-cylinder
Tempest, would we?
> 1968 Ford Bullit
Boring. How 'bout the 'Vanishing Point' Challenger?
> As you can see, this is quite a little wish list!
Quite a *dumb* little wish list! About a half hour of online work,
but that would be expecting a lot of you, wouldn't it?
> 52 Favorite Cars
> Attn: Classic Cars- Owner Groups
> 1501 Broadway, Ste 611
> NY,NY 10036
About what I'd expect of car-ignorant New Yorkers ...
--
C.R. Krieger
"Fix the lighter." - Jake Blues
G.R. Patterson III - 21 Apr 2004 03:04 GMT
> You have *got* to be kidding! That Jeep will be a lot easier to find
> if you can spell the manufacturer's name correctly.
It would also probably help if he were aware that the CJ-5 is nowhere near the
"original" Jeep.
George Patterson
This marriage is off to a shaky start. The groom just asked the band to
play "Your cheatin' heart", and the bride just requested "Don't come home
a'drinkin' with lovin' on your mind".
dreas - 21 Apr 2004 12:57 GMT
> > 1967 Falon
>
> The '67 Falcon sucked. Want to guess why it was gone by '70?
The Falcon was gone by '70 to make room on assembly lines for
all those really great Pintos and Mavericks...
-'dreas
Brent P - 21 Apr 2004 15:28 GMT
>> christin@52favoritecars.com (Spike TV's 52 Favorite Cars) wrote in
> message news:<20aaa2c9.0404140721.4225022f@posting.google.com>...
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> The Falcon was gone by '70 to make room on assembly lines for
> all those really great Pintos and Mavericks...
Other than not getting alot of the performance goodies (in the USA, it
got them in other parts of the world) the maverick is essentially the
same as an early mustang under the skin.
Stephen H. Westin - 21 Apr 2004 20:42 GMT
> >> christin@52favoritecars.com (Spike TV's 52 Favorite Cars) wrote in
> > message news:<20aaa2c9.0404140721.4225022f@posting.google.com>...
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> got them in other parts of the world) the maverick is essentially the
> same as an early mustang under the skin.
Which was essentially the same as a Falcon :)

Signature
-Stephen H. Westin
Any information or opinions in this message are mine: they do not
represent the position of Cornell University or any of its sponsors.
Bernard Farquart - 22 Apr 2004 05:58 GMT
> > >> The '67 Falcon sucked. Want to guess why it was gone by '70?
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Which was essentially the same as a Falcon :)
I had a 1968 falcon, 170 cid 6cyl. That car
was one tough beast. I was driving between
Eugene and Seattle once a month or so
(I had just moved out, and went to visit)
this car made it over and over, with
250,00 mi. and missing second gear
but still did fine for quite a few trips,
while getting reasonable mileage.
sure beats the sh.t Detroit was putting
out in the 80's
dreas - 23 Apr 2004 15:34 GMT
> >> christin@52favoritecars.com (Spike TV's 52 Favorite Cars) wrote in
> > message news:<20aaa2c9.0404140721.4225022f@posting.google.com>...
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> got them in other parts of the world) the maverick is essentially the
> same as an early mustang under the skin.
The early Mustang was also basically a Falcon under the skin! So's my
'68 Montego but it has a bigger trunk and rides a bit higher...
-'dreas
Brent P - 23 Apr 2004 15:47 GMT
>> >> christin@52favoritecars.com (Spike TV's 52 Favorite Cars) wrote in
>> > message news:<20aaa2c9.0404140721.4225022f@posting.google.com>...
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> The early Mustang was also basically a Falcon under the skin! So's my
> '68 Montego but it has a bigger trunk and rides a bit higher...
The basic unitbody is the same for compacts and intermediates. The
cross sections scaled up and down as required.
Nate Nagel - 22 Apr 2004 13:58 GMT
> > 1950's Studebaker
> > Packard Hawk
>
> The Packard can serve as both.
Well... I would personally vote for the '56 Golden Hawk as it's a
much better looking car than the Packard Hawk... and it has a Packard
engine... or maybe a '55 Caribbean which is a hell of a lot more car
than any of the Studebaker Packards... or maybe a '53 Studillac...
gotta give 'em props for at least trying to have a real car on the
list :)
nate
DBurch7672 - 07 May 2004 22:42 GMT
a '53 Studillac...
What is this? (Feel PROUD, you JUST STUMPED A SOUTH BEND BOY! )
G.R. Patterson III - 07 May 2004 23:03 GMT
> a '53 Studillac...
>
> What is this? (Feel PROUD, you JUST STUMPED A SOUTH BEND BOY! )
In the early '50s, Cadillac had a reputation for having the most powerful engines on
the market. Many people would install a Caddy engine in another make. These were
usually referred to by this sort of name. Basically, this is a Studebaker with an
engine swap. Fordillacs were also popular at this time 'cause the Ford rear end would
handle the extra power.
George Patterson
If you don't tell lies, you never have to remember what you said.
1950's Studebaker
Packard Hawk
Have you tried the National Studebaker Museum here in South Bend, Indiana? (Or
was the Hawk a pre-merger model?) Sorry, I don't happen to know the
geographical or Web address or phone number; but a good search engine and/or
the South Bend phone book/information should set you up!