> I haven't seen it yet, but I've a friend who reportedly has a REO,
> circa 1904-1910, unrestored, model unknown, running before it was put
> under a tarp and stored many years ago. Where can I go on the Internet
> to get a general idea of the value of such a "motor car" in various
> conditions (e.g., sales, auctions)
I'd suggest adding "horseless carriage" to the search -- many of the
people interested in cars that old use that terminology. I'm hardly
any sort of expert on the make or the era, but I've always had the
impression that the REO was a nice item from the early days of the
mass-market car, not a high-performance or luxury model.
A quick look at
http://www.kruseinternational.com/results/return.asp?RESULTS=1&MAKE=REO&MODEL=&I
MGGO.x=20&IMGGO.y=5
suggests that he isn't going to retire the mortgage or send the kids
to Yale on it; but still, there might be a nice little piece of cash in
his future if he can connect with the right buyer.
I'd further speculate that much depends on condition and completeness
-- this probably isn't a car backed by a vast aftermarket of New Old
Stock or reproduction parts. My advice (which may seem painfully
obvious but is worth mentioning anyway) is that he shouldn't throw away
anything that might belong on or with that car, even if it seems
broken or hopelessly rusted. Amazing what can be repaired or at least
used as an example of how to fabricate a new one, if the machine is old
or unusual enough.
Also, he shouldn't try to fix anything unless he chooses to keep the
car and take it on as his own project all the way through. Aside from
the risk of ruining something, or repairing it in a way that an
correctness-minded collector would just have to undo, the act of
taking things apart is instructive and useful to the person who
eventually has to put it back together.
Here are some further links that might prove helpful:
http://www.hcca.org/
http://www.kettering.edu/news/archivedDetail.asp?storynum=108
http://info.detnews.com/joyrides/story/index.cfm?id=116
Best of luck,
--Joe
casteele95thbgheavy@yahoo.com - 09 Feb 2005 19:17 GMT
Joe:
Many good suggestions re the search. (I say '"duh!" to myself for not
thinking of Kruse.)
And your don't-mess-with-it-or-the-parts advice, which should have
been, but wasn't, painfully obvious, has been passed on to the owner.
Thank you *very much*, Joe, for taking the time to respond to my
post.
And you also taught me some Latin. Found your description of your
"nom de cyber." You're a very good writer. (I feel free to impart since
I used to do some freelance non-fiction many moons ago.)
Again, THANK you!
Christopher A. Steele