> >>> I bought a set of Sava's about 18 months ago and they wear very
> > abnormally
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Kev
Kev and Atec: yep all 4 tyres, but worse on the front.
Alignment is spot on, they are 31-10.5R15 which is exactly the same as std
fitment though about 10mm larger dia. Std is 265/70/15 from memory.
The shoulders are scalloped both inside and out... that is a bit of an
indication that something is amiss.... certainly not a toe or camber
problem.
Thus no, it is not mechanical.
From the trailing edge of one block to the leading edge of the other is
about 4mm difference in height!!!
As I said they are noisier than a BFG or Cooper muddie (Not super swampers
obviously) and vibration can be felt right down to about 5kph if on smooth
road. You can imagine what it feels like on corners at highway speeds.....
Spoke to the shop, they said they'd qualify for warranty (they haven't
looked at the tyres yet though) BUT it is pro rata. 50% tread = 50% refund.
That is bullshit I reckon, it takes a long time for the fault to become
apparent so that is whay I wish to identify other people with the same
problem and hit them up for 100% as it is obviously a buggered design, or
one batch of tyres with a buggered compound
atec77 - 14 Dec 2007 13:29 GMT
>>>>> I bought a set of Sava's about 18 months ago and they wear very
>>> abnormally
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> problem and hit them up for 100% as it is obviously a buggered design, or
> one batch of tyres with a buggered compound
SOunds very much like crook inflation advice.
Kev - 14 Dec 2007 14:46 GMT
>>>>> I bought a set of Sava's about 18 months ago and they wear very
>>> abnormally
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> problem and hit them up for 100% as it is obviously a buggered design, or
> one batch of tyres with a buggered compound
Hmm maybe you should have spent the extra $75/tyre and got a better
brand, lessons learnt I guess
ok so what are the sidewalls like at each scalloped out section
does it look rippled around the tyre sidewalls
it still sounds like an inflation problem though, although 32psi isn't
too low for most 4WD tyres for normal running but with these tyres maybe
they needed to be up around the 40psi mark
Hate for the tyre dealer to say you ran them under inflated and not give
you anything back which they or the Sava rep might try on with you
Kev
Tsunami - 14 Dec 2007 23:30 GMT
> >>>>> I bought a set of Sava's about 18 months ago and they wear very
> >>> abnormally
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
>
> Kev
Dudes they can't be underinflated when (1) the OE tyre was same size and
running same pressure (or 2psi less) they wore normally.
(2) getting a 3psi pressure increase on the highway. if they were
underinflated to any degree which would cause damage, the pressure increase
would be 5-6psi at least. (4psi rule)
The sidewalls are normal..... as is the reat of the tyre for that matter it
is just the tread blocks on inner and outer shoulder that are scalloped.
Daryl Walford - 15 Dec 2007 00:34 GMT
> Spoke to the shop, they said they'd qualify for warranty (they haven't
> looked at the tyres yet though) BUT it is pro rata. 50% tread = 50% refund.
> That is bullshit I reckon, it takes a long time for the fault to become
> apparent so that is whay I wish to identify other people with the same
> problem and hit them up for 100% as it is obviously a buggered design, or
> one batch of tyres with a buggered compound
Did you see my reply about balance?
It sounds exactly like what happens to out of balance truck steer tyres.
I had Yokohama, Bridgestone and Michelin on an Isuzu I used to drive and
the only tyres that didn't "scallop" were the Michelins, balancing the
last set of Bridgestones every 20,000klms reduced the problem significantly.
Daryl
RainbowWarrior - 15 Dec 2007 04:25 GMT
>> >>> I bought a set of Sava's about 18 months ago and they wear very
>> > abnormally
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
> problem and hit them up for 100% as it is obviously a buggered design, or
> one batch of tyres with a buggered compound
Sava/Remington? Never heard of them, I'm guessing they were cheap?
Probably same people who used to make Kelly's and Barums.
50% refund sounds more than fair, many places will just say no way at 50%.