Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Australian Car Forums / 4x4 Cars (Australian group) / February 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

New diesel Hilux dual cabs 4WD

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ron - 03 Feb 2008 02:31 GMT
Anyone here own one of these? Thinking about buying one of these to tow a
1600kg caravan around Australia and to do some exploring with.

Cheers

Ron
Daryl Walford - 03 Feb 2008 03:31 GMT
> Anyone here own one of these? Thinking about buying one of these to tow a
> 1600kg caravan around Australia and to do some exploring with.

I know someone who has one of those and he loves it, don't know if he
tows anything heavy with it though.
Looking at the engine power figures the diesel has more torque than my
petrol 3.4lt V6 so it should tow well.

Daryl
just us - 03 Feb 2008 08:19 GMT
Friends of ours bought one May last year and we went seriously bush in our
old Hilux and they were in the new one. They damaged the side steps (too
low) and the bash plate. Also they "graded" the track with the bottom of
their vehicle. We are keeping our old hilux :P
They love the "car drive" but are disappointed in its serious off road
ability. They went back to Toyota and it was going to cost them thousands to
sort out the suspension so that it was an offroad vehicle. Kind of sad to
spend all that money and still have to fork out so that you can actually go
seriously off road with it huh?
kathy
Malcolm - 03 Feb 2008 08:20 GMT
I have a diesel Xtra cab - close enough?    It's 4WD with a trayback that
usually carries a Trayon camper, so an all-up load of around 1 Tonne.    If
I stick to speed limits (which I always do of course ;-) ) the fuel
consumption is close to 10L per 100Km (11lL at worst) and windage seems to
be the biggest factor - lower speeds on dirt return about the same figure,
maybe slightly better.    I don't plan to tow and have not fitted a towbar
to keep the exit angle as high as possible so can't help you there, but
certainly I am very happy with the motor, plenty of torque and surprisingly
economical.    Had it for 8 months, done 12,000Km (about 3,000 on dirt),
just had the first service and am completely happy with it.    Only
negative: I took delivery with the standard Bridgestone tyres and they are
not good in the wet on bitchumen - care needed, but they are wearing well,
performed adequately over sand, gravel, corrugations and rocks and are not
very noisy on the tar, so it's not all bad!     I would buy another at the
drop of a hat.

Hope that helps - cheers
Malcolm

> Anyone here own one of these? Thinking about buying one of these to tow a
> 1600kg caravan around Australia and to do some exploring with.
>
> Cheers
>
> Ron
The Real Andy - 04 Feb 2008 10:31 GMT
>Anyone here own one of these? Thinking about buying one of these to tow a
>1600kg caravan around Australia and to do some exploring with.
>
>Cheers
>
>Ron

I just went through the process of buying a new 4wd. Being a Toyota
bigot, I went off the buy the hilux. However after much research and
talking to new hilux owners I decided to give them a miss because they
are not very capable off road. If you take a good look at the hilux
you will notice the appalling overhang at the front which results in
bad clearance. Also the seem to sit lower in the front than the back.
Also, the towing capacity is piss poor at just over 2tonne. In the end
I bought a Navara. Its since proved itself off road, but has developed
a few squeaks. Mechanically its good and can pull 3tonne, which means
I can buy a bigger boat now :) I get about 12l/100km out of it, don't
believe the people who say you will get 10l/100kms, its not true.

I have been told that the hilux is a great car to drive on bitumen,
and if you are not intending on going off road very often its probably
not a bad option.
Phred - 04 Feb 2008 14:20 GMT
>>Anyone here own one of these? Thinking about buying one of these to tow a
>>1600kg caravan around Australia and to do some exploring with.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>and if you are not intending on going off road very often its probably
>not a bad option.

Except that it seems to be grossly overpriced compared with
competitors.

Cheers, Phred.

Signature

ppnerkDELETE@THISyahoo.com.INVALID

brutyl - 06 Feb 2008 01:49 GMT
>> I have been told that the hilux is a great car to drive on bitumen,
>> and if you are not intending on going off road very often its probably
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Cheers, Phred.

Yeah, the SR5 is about 5k dearer than the equivalent Navara. Although on
paper the Hilux's more fuel effecient and will likely have better resale.

My old man just bought one. The only things that swayed him from the
Navara was that the engine is more effecient, quieter and less stressed,
and that there's room under the bonnet for a second battery.

He plans to own it for a long time so really wanted the most solid engine.
The Real Andy - 06 Feb 2008 09:40 GMT
>>> I have been told that the hilux is a great car to drive on bitumen,
>>> and if you are not intending on going off road very often its probably
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>He plans to own it for a long time so really wanted the most solid engine.

I researched the resale value as well, and the hilux is not better. If
you take into consideration that you actually pay more for the hilux
then the resale is actually worse.

As for the motor, horses for courses these days. Look after it and it
will look after you.

The second battery is too true though, the only place to fit a decent
one in the navara is in the tray.

As for efficency, i assume you mean fuel.
4x4 turbo deisel auto:
Nissan: 105
Toyota: 13.1

I can assure you that I dont get 10.5 though, closer to 12, but both
are tested to same standard.
Daryl Walford - 06 Feb 2008 11:20 GMT
>>>> I have been told that the hilux is a great car to drive on bitumen,
>>>> and if you are not intending on going off road very often its probably
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> I can assure you that I dont get 10.5 though, closer to 12, but both
> are tested to same standard.

Those figures sound high for diesels, my 3.4lt petrol V6 2003 Hilux
averages 12.5lts/100klm.

Daryl
Biggus :) - 06 Feb 2008 21:33 GMT
>As for the motor, horses for courses these days. Look after it and it
>will look after you.
Just ask 3.0 GU owners...
brutyl - 07 Feb 2008 09:12 GMT
>>>> I have been told that the hilux is a great car to drive on bitumen,
>>>> and if you are not intending on going off road very often its probably
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> I can assure you that I dont get 10.5 though, closer to 12, but both
> are tested to same standard.

Curious as to where you got your figures? Dad looked at the actual
stickers on the windscreens. It was for Auto TD as well.
The Real Andy - 07 Feb 2008 10:19 GMT
>>>>> I have been told that the hilux is a great car to drive on bitumen,
>>>>> and if you are not intending on going off road very often its probably
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>Curious as to where you got your figures? Dad looked at the actual
>stickers on the windscreens. It was for Auto TD as well.

Figures straight from the websites.

I did spend a lot of time researching the two, including dealership
visits. I had a hardtime justifying the cash spent on a new 4wd, but
the accountant decided for me!!! So when I did take the plunge, I made
sure I was getting value for money, even though I wanted the toyota.
The Real Andy - 07 Feb 2008 10:28 GMT
>>>>>> I have been told that the hilux is a great car to drive on bitumen,
>>>>>> and if you are not intending on going off road very often its probably
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>the accountant decided for me!!! So when I did take the plunge, I made
>sure I was getting value for money, even though I wanted the toyota.

Sorry screwed up, must have picked the petrol. Toyota is actually 9.3
on the website.
brutyl - 08 Feb 2008 07:06 GMT
>>>>>>> I have been told that the hilux is a great car to drive on bitumen,
>>>>>>> and if you are not intending on going off road very often its probably
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> Sorry screwed up, must have picked the petrol. Toyota is actually 9.3
> on the website.

I was starting to worry that my father based a 55k decision on the wrong
info! We would have looked foolish...
The Real Andy - 08 Feb 2008 10:45 GMT
>>>>>>>> I have been told that the hilux is a great car to drive on bitumen,
>>>>>>>> and if you are not intending on going off road very often its probably
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>I was starting to worry that my father based a 55k decision on the wrong
>info! We would have looked foolish...

At the end of the day, its stuff all difference. But I highly
recommend that you drop the "toyota is more robust" argument and go
spend the time looking at the vehicles and test driving them. There is
stuff all differences between the quality of different manufacturers
these days.

For example, if you can handle the ugly triton body, then I would
honestly say that this is one of the best 'bang for buck' cars on the
market at the moment.

Also, dont forget about dealership service. I have dealt with toyota
for many years now with commercials and I can honestly say that their
service sucks. Not only that, but all the dealers I have personally
dealt with in Brisbane are arrogant pricks.
Phred - 08 Feb 2008 13:37 GMT
[snip]
>Also, dont forget about dealership service. I have dealt with toyota
>for many years now with commercials and I can honestly say that their
>service sucks. Not only that, but all the dealers I have personally
>dealt with in Brisbane are arrogant pricks.

Nothing changes then!  My Tojo [LC ute] dates from 1976.  When bought
from the local dealer here in the deep north I wanted to have decent
tyres fitted.  I was told to eff off -- take it as is or not at all.  
So I took it.  (In those days there was no serious option anyway.)

Those original tyres lasted nearly 12,000 km.

On the other hand, I'm still driving the beast 30 years later, so I
can't complain about the vehicle itself.  (Apart from it being rough
as guts, noisy, and bloody hard to steer in parking lots. :)

On the other other hand, a number of friends who drive seriously
offroad as part of their survey work tell me the latest Hiluxes and
LCs aren't worth a pinch of sh.t as they come bog standard.  (The mag
reviews seem to agree, at least WRT the new Hilux dual cab TDs.)

Cheers, Phred.

Signature

ppnerkDELETE@THISyahoo.com.INVALID

Richard Puller - 08 Feb 2008 21:59 GMT
> Also, dont forget about dealership service. I have dealt with toyota
> for many years now with commercials and I can honestly say that their
> service sucks. Not only that, but all the dealers I have personally
> dealt with in Brisbane are arrogant pricks.

Gotta agree there.
Thats the main reason why I bought a Nissan last year

DP
Biggus :) - 09 Feb 2008 07:24 GMT
Boy are you in for a terrifying shock if you have chagned to find
better service!

>Also, dont forget about dealership service. I have dealt with toyota
>for many years now with commercials and I can honestly say that their
>service sucks. Not only that, but all the dealers I have personally
>dealt with in Brisbane are arrogant pricks.
brutyl - 10 Feb 2008 13:39 GMT
> Boy are you in for a terrifying shock if you have chagned to find
> better service!

Yes, there are just as many and [as far as we can find, more] horror
stories/whinges RE Nissan dealers.
The Real Andy - 11 Feb 2008 10:00 GMT
>Boy are you in for a terrifying shock if you have chagned to find
>better service!
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>service sucks. Not only that, but all the dealers I have personally
>>dealt with in Brisbane are arrogant pricks.

Look, none are perfect and all can improve. In brisbane I have never
had good service from toyota, both in buying new cars and in service
departments. This is both in service and sales.

TO be honest, the last two personal cars i bought were largely based
on dealership service. I made web enquiries via website and the only
manufacturer that never responded in both circmstances was toyota.
brutyl - 10 Feb 2008 13:47 GMT
> At the end of the day, its stuff all difference. But I highly
> recommend that you drop the "toyota is more robust" argument and go
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> service sucks. Not only that, but all the dealers I have personally
> dealt with in Brisbane are arrogant pricks.

Quite a lecture. For your information he test drove both vehicles and
decided the hilux felt a surer bet. There's little to base the choice on
given the fact that the models and most new owners haven't yet done that
many k's in either to form a definitive consensus as to which is better.
The happy buyers are pretty much split evenly Niss/Toyo as far as we've
been able to find, which really boils the decision down to which you
feel more comfortable driving. For him it was   worth the extra.

As for the triton, no, I've not met anyone that can stand it. And
normally I'm not one to be put off too much by unconventional styled
gear so long as it's tough and does masses of hard k's without falling
apart.

As for your dealers gripe, as far as I can see, both have their fair
share of sh.t dealers. Equal once again.

But thanks anyway...
Tricky - 07 Feb 2008 04:48 GMT
> Anyone here own one of these? Thinking about buying one of these to tow a
> 1600kg caravan around Australia and to do some exploring with.
>
> Cheers
>
> Ron

I was going to buy one myself,so I rang a mate who brought one to tow a van
around Australia,and asked him how it was travelling.he said that after
having a bull bar fitted he had to have the front springs reset because they
were sagging,and now he is in Tassie (only travelled from the Gold Coast)
and the clutch is completely stuffed,and will be fixed under warranty,the
gearing is wrong so he is either revving the guts out of it or its
struggling,and very heavy on fuel.He recons he wont have it much longer.I
brought a Nissan Navara instead.
Biggus :) - 07 Feb 2008 11:32 GMT
> .he said that after having a bull bar fitted he had to have the front springs reset because they were sagging,
pretty standard issue on most 4wds.

> and now he is in Tassie (only travelled from the Gold Coast) and the clutch is completely stuffed,and will be fixed under warranty,
interesting, Id be suprised if they replaced it under warranty. but
stranger things have happened.

>gearing is wrong so he is either revving the guts out of it or its struggling,and very heavy on fuel.
Is it standard? eg stock tires, canopy etc changed?

> He recons he wont have it much longer.I brought a Nissan Navara instead.
Couple of the nissans havin issues bending chassis. I could only find
one thread at the moment, too tired.

http://www.exploroz.com/Forum/Topic/53867/Bent_chassis_on_d40.aspx?ky=chassis&p=
%2fForum%2fDefault.aspx%3fs%3d1%26sd%3d01%252f01%252f2008%26ky%3dchassis%26pn%3d
1

The Real Andy - 08 Feb 2008 10:50 GMT
>> .he said that after having a bull bar fitted he had to have the front springs reset because they were sagging,
>pretty standard issue on most 4wds.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>http://www.exploroz.com/Forum/Topic/53867/Bent_chassis_on_d40.aspx?ky=chassis&p=
%2fForum%2fDefault.aspx%3fs%3d1%26sd%3d01%252f01%252f2008%26ky%3dchassis%26pn%3d
1

A mate of mine had a toyota a few years back and bent a chassis. HE
also sheared the brake lines, the tail light wiring and snapped the
prop shaft CV bearing cross member. Do you think he would get
warranty?
Biggus :) - 08 Feb 2008 12:04 GMT
>A mate of mine had a toyota a few years back and bent a chassis. HE
>also sheared the brake lines, the tail light wiring and snapped the
>prop shaft CV bearing cross member. Do you think he would get
>warranty?
mate of mines grenade did 2 engines, one was hole in #4, crack in 1 2
3 pistons, the flywheel, clutch at 60,000klms, idler bearings, AC
compressor sh.t itself few times, 3-4 mass air flow sensors,
intercooler hose bursting do you think he got warranty? Not sure why
anyne is asking but a clutch is a consumable, I woudlnt expect
warranty
Lushy - 07 Feb 2008 22:00 GMT
>> Anyone here own one of these? Thinking about buying one of these to tow a
>> 1600kg caravan around Australia and to do some exploring with.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> or its struggling,and very heavy on fuel.He recons he wont have it much
> longer.I brought a Nissan Navara instead.

Then theres sh.t house drivers too! I am a Jeep man and my next rig will be
the JK Unlimited Turbo, so like all arguments which is best is like aresole
everyone has one. Bring on the flame throwers LOL, I am the owner now of a
wragler 4 litre fuel gusseller but it at least does the 4x4 stuff well!
Lushy
Ron - 10 Feb 2008 01:19 GMT
Thanks everyone for your input. Sounds like the Nissan diesel dual cab
navara is the better buy then.

Cheers

Ron

> Anyone here own one of these? Thinking about buying one of these to tow a
> 1600kg caravan around Australia and to do some exploring with.
>
> Cheers
>
> Ron
Kev - 10 Feb 2008 03:48 GMT
> Thanks everyone for your input. Sounds like the Nissan diesel dual cab
> navara is the better buy then.
>
> Cheers
>
> Ron

Of course it is
of course if you believe that
I have a Bridge you may be interested in
they are all so much alike I doubt you will find one better than the other
ever since Toyota went the gay softroader IFS route they lost a lot of
customers(for both the Hilux and cruiser wagons)
the Nissan Navara being cheaper and having the same pissweak front end
suspension type

I am still betting the few problems(everyone has all these stories about
all these so called major problems) the Toyota has they will still be
going as long if not longer as the others

the new Hilux and cruisers use a variable geometry turbo
there have been a few issues with these but I would think Toyota will
have these issues sorted in time

Kev
brutyl - 10 Feb 2008 13:54 GMT
>> Thanks everyone for your input. Sounds like the Nissan diesel dual cab
>> navara is the better buy then.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I have a Bridge you may be interested in
> they are all so much alike I doubt you will find one better than the other

I agree with this.
Daryl Walford - 10 Feb 2008 11:23 GMT
> Thanks everyone for your input. Sounds like the Nissan diesel dual cab
> navara is the better buy then.

How much heavy duty off roading are you planning on doing?
If its a lot I wouldn't buy either a Hilux or a Navara, a Patrol or
Landcruiser would be much better.

Daryl
brutyl - 10 Feb 2008 13:59 GMT
>> Thanks everyone for your input. Sounds like the Nissan diesel dual cab
>> navara is the better buy then.
>
> How much heavy duty off roading are you planning on doing?
> If its a lot I wouldn't buy either a Hilux or a Navara, a Patrol or
> Landcruiser would be much better.

Just bigger and tougher, or better built you reckon?
[Looking into one for myself and the missus. Has to be a single cab so I
can put a canopy over her to cover a matress, fridge and big toolbox]

Hilux's seem to be on the expensive side, although I've only really
looked at ebay and carsales at this stage to get a general idea. Later
model turbo diesels seem difficult to get - noone seems to want to part
with them.

I'd probably not want less than a 3.0 in the hilux - don't want it to be
a total slug. [That said, being a diesel I don't want nor expect sports
car pickup].

As far as I can see, buying a hilux and spending a couple of k to give
it more grunt would put it in the realm of landcruiser prices. But then,
how comfy is the ute on long distances through the rough roads?

So many questions, so poorly written [its late] Heh.
Daryl Walford - 11 Feb 2008 04:26 GMT
>>> Thanks everyone for your input. Sounds like the Nissan diesel dual
>>> cab navara is the better buy then.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Just bigger and tougher, or better built you reckon?

Doubt if they are better built but they are certainly built for harder work.
IMO Hilux's have always been a light duty 4WD, despite that the early
ones seem to stand up very well to very harsh treatment off road but
they suffered badly on road where they handled poorly, later models like
my 03 Xtra Cab handle much better on road but aren't as good in severe
off road conditions so like everything you have to decide if the loss of
off road ability is worth it for the big gains on road and what suits
your particular needs.

> [Looking into one for myself and the missus. Has to be a single cab so I
> can put a canopy over her to cover a matress, fridge and big toolbox]
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> model turbo diesels seem difficult to get - noone seems to want to part
> with them.

When I bought mine just over 3 yrs ago the Holden Rodeo was more
expensive than the Hilux and the Navara was slightly cheaper.
I originally wanted a dual cab Turbo diesel but ended up with a V6
petrol Xtra Cab, 18mth old dual cab diesels were selling for only
slightly less than a new ones so IMO they were overpriced.

Daryl
Kev - 11 Feb 2008 09:53 GMT
>>> Thanks everyone for your input. Sounds like the Nissan diesel dual
>>> cab navara is the better buy then.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> So many questions, so poorly written [its late] Heh.

Both the Landcruiser and Patrol utes are quite comfortable onroad these days
The Patrol having all coil springs and the cruiser having coils in the
front(leaf rears on the cruiser can handle heavy loads better than the
Patrols coils)

The lighter Hilux/Navara etc are rougher due to them being light but
having 1 tonne suspension, along with them being rougher they also skip
across corrugations and which can trow them offline when cornering

I have had Hiluxen for years, both IFS and solid front axle type
the solid front type are rough to drive but are much better offroad
because of the leaf springs being simple and sturdy
while the IFS can't handle the rough offroading as they are too soft and
don't allow enough suspension travel(lifting a wheel over small ruts and
losing traction)
this goes for any IFS from all makers, not just Toyota
ask "Rod Outback" about his experience with the Navara and the roads
around Longreach, not a good picture for Nissan

Kev
The Real Andy - 11 Feb 2008 09:49 GMT
>Thanks everyone for your input. Sounds like the Nissan diesel dual cab
>navara is the better buy then.
>
>Cheers
>
>Ron

I wouldnt say that. I would say go check out all of them. They all
have the pro's and cons, you need to decide which are more important.
For me being a toyota biggot was a tough call buying a nissan, but I
swallowed my pride and chose based upon what I thought best fitted my
needs and what i though was best value for money. Your needs may be
very different, do yourself a favour and go check out all
manufacturers.

>> Anyone here own one of these? Thinking about buying one of these to tow a
>> 1600kg caravan around Australia and to do some exploring with.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Ron
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.