Just having reregistered my L/C troopcarrier in NSW, I found I have been hit
with an $80 extra fee for a "heavy vehicle "inspection . This inspection has
to be carried out by the RTA before next years renewal. Apparently it is
classified as a bus because it had 11 seats when first registered . They
have changed the rules this year and it now requires this new inspection .
I have never used it as a bus. Toyota call it a station wagon, but RTA don't
care saying that it is a bus.
As I have one seat missing I was thing of changing the classification to a
panel van with seats and windows, however this requires an engineers report,
probably quite expensive.
Any body else come up with an easier solution?
Another victory for the mindless bureacrats.
Bristan
Kevcat - 23 Apr 2004 11:33 GMT
all that is required is the removal of the seats and seatbelts
then have it inspected by an automotive engineer and a mod plate fitted
should cost less than $100
Kev
> Just having reregistered my L/C troopcarrier in NSW, I found I have been hit
> with an $80 extra fee for a "heavy vehicle "inspection . This inspection has
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Bristan
Mike Harding - 23 Apr 2004 12:53 GMT
>Just having reregistered my L/C troopcarrier in NSW, I found I have been hit
>with an $80 extra fee for a "heavy vehicle "inspection .
snip
>Another victory for the mindless bureacrats.
Only if you do nothing.
Oz is full of people who want to regulate other people and also
full of people who (apparently?) don't mind being regulated by
other people.
Complain - Bitch - Make a noise.
Talk to your local newspaper - your local TV company - phone
your MP - state and federal.
These things only happen because we allow them to.
Mike Harding
Bristan - 24 Apr 2004 00:19 GMT
> >Just having reregistered my L/C troopcarrier in NSW, I found I have been hit
> >with an $80 extra fee for a "heavy vehicle "inspection .
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> These things only happen because we allow them to.
True Mike , however............
Unless you can get a body of people to do it together it is just so much
wasted effort. It gets to a point where there are just better ways to spend
your time if you don't enjoy it and are upset by the frustration you get .
The last time I complained to my local MP about something, he was very
sympathetic and I even got a nasty reply from the b/cat in Canberra, however
they wouldn't budge on the point.
Neverthless I will write to the RTA and the state member.
My main complaint is that they are insisting on an approved signatory to ok
it as it apparently it is a change of adr category. I rang the closest guy
who said ,Yes I have done several of these....I have to inspect and do a
report....$175.
Charging $175 to write a letter saying that a seat has been removed seems a
rip off to me and the RTA are apparently backing it. The regs now say
anything over 10 seats is a bus.
Incidentally, when I purchased the van at auction it was missing one seat
which had been removed by the previous Gov dept owner so I have never had
the full seating.
Bristan
> Mike Harding
Biggus - 23 Apr 2004 15:29 GMT
> however this requires an engineers report, probably quite expensive.
thats your only answer, and will be $300ish
Tony Smith - 24 Apr 2004 00:08 GMT
Sorry.
Coming in late on this one.
I had a similar problem a few years back in that the VW Kombi I owned
was technically a bus due to leaving the factory with 9 seats.
I did not of course actually possess or have use for 9 seats and didn't
give it a thought until Main Roads started hassling me to have my "bus"
inspected.
The solution was to find an approved vehicle modifier, who could count
to three (the sum total of seats actually fitted during my ownership of
it) who then affixed a supplementary plate above the manufacturer's
data plate attesting to it's possession of only threes seats.
Cost $30.
I doubt that an engineers report will be necessary to simply account
for seats that are not there anymore. This issue will arise often with
some of the imported Japanese people movers that have an ex-factory
capacity greater than that which various States mandate as requiring a
Bus license to operate. Toyota for one supplies a bar fixture that is
placed behind whatever row of seats comprises the maximum that can be
operated by a "normal" sedan type license and designates anything after
the bar as "luggage space".
I'd have a talk to someone in whatever the transport Dept is named in
your State, and not the relatively un-knowledgeable and over worked
ones on a counter in a public contact office and ask them what
provisions apply for simply removing seats so that there are, on a
permanent basis, fewer than the number indicated on the manufacturer's
data plate.
Tony Smith
Bristan - 24 Apr 2004 00:25 GMT
(snip)>
> I'd have a talk to someone in whatever the transport Dept is named in
> your State, and not the relatively un-knowledgeable and over worked
> ones on a counter in a public contact office and ask them what
> provisions apply for simply removing seats so that there are, on a
> permanent basis, fewer than the number indicated on the manufacturer's
> data plate.
Have talked with the technical section RTA and advice is that only an
approved private signatory can do it. Quote 1 is $175.
Bristan
> Tony Smith
Tony Smith - 24 Apr 2004 02:02 GMT
> Have talked with the technical section RTA and advice is that only an
> approved private signatory can do it. Quote 1 is $175.
> Bristan
Sorry to hear that.
The next conversation I'd be having would be to see if certain types of
vehicles are statutorily or by way of regulation, excluded from the
ambit of the legislation. I admit it doesn't happen too often, but
sometimes parliaments pass legislation that has un-intended
"side-effects". If the legislative draftsman who knocked this one up
was any good, he/she/it/they will have included a means to exclude
certain vehicles or owners of certain vehicles from the the effect of
the Act.
Have a yarn with them again in terms of "does this actually apply to my
vehicle?", and in the alternative, "are there any clauses, provisions
or regulations that allow a vehicle of the same class of mine to be
excluded from the effects of the Act?"
It is not particularly likely, BUT if there is something there, you
just hit the jackpot and don't get to pay anyone anything for the
privelige of driving your truck.
Tony Smith
Bristan - 25 Apr 2004 00:32 GMT
> > Have talked with the technical section RTA and advice is that only an
> > approved private signatory can do it. Quote 1 is $175.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Tony Smith
Unfortunately the troopy has got caught up in the legislation to regulate
small buss's simply because it can seat 11 and it can be and is sometimes
used for this purpose.
The only way out apparently is to convert it to the "panel van with windows"
classification (change of adr) which requires the engineers inspection.
Bristan
Mick - 26 Apr 2004 23:44 GMT
Did the troopy come ou in different variants? I have seeb a 5 (6?)
seater version with a seat behind the front seats (RV I think) and then
there is the troop carrier (11 seater) and the standard 3 seater.
Different models hae the spare in different locations, ie the dual tank
model has the spare on the back door while a single tank model has the
spare inside, thus taking upa seating position if it were one, so from
that one wouls assume that the tyre would be fitted outside if the
troopy was a 11 seater variant.
Check the plate, I'm sure it should show how many it seats
Ps this is all based on my imited knowledge of the 75 troopy
Mick
>>>Have talked with the technical section RTA and advice is that only an
>>>approved private signatory can do it. Quote 1 is $175.
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> classification (change of adr) which requires the engineers inspection.
> Bristan
Bristan - 27 Apr 2004 00:06 GMT
> Did the troopy come ou in different variants? I have seeb a 5 (6?)
> seater version with a seat behind the front seats (RV I think) and then
> there is the troop carrier (11 seater) and the standard 3 seater.
Yes this is correct.
The RTA claim that toyota may have built each variant differently to suit
the ADR applying to each particular variant. (highly unlikely IMO).
Therefore if changing to another ADR category you need an engineer to check
that the change complys with new ADR in all aspects, not just the seating.
eg side impact barriers etc. etc....This is how they justify the cost.
John W - 27 Apr 2004 08:11 GMT
An 11 seat troopy in NSW is now lumped in with other "buses", vehicles
for fare paying passengers, and heavy vehicles and requires a
QUARTERLY inspection BY RTA - the inspections cost, bookings for
inspections cost, failing to show costs......no show results in
cancellation of registration........
My Troopy hasn't had seats in the back for years, but being originally
registered by the dealer as an 11 seat bus required the new
inspections. On the advice of the RTA I got a "blue slip" from an RTA
recognised engineer (less than $30 from memory) took it back to the
RTA and my 11 seat bus is now a 3 seat panel van just like it has
actually been for years - registration requirements are back to
normal. (annual inspection by the local servo just like always.)
Talk to the RTA - I found them uncharacteristically helpful.
John
>Just having reregistered my L/C troopcarrier in NSW, I found I have been hit
>with an $80 extra fee for a "heavy vehicle "inspection . This inspection has
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Bristan