>> mf1@project1221.com中华人民共和国<המוסד למודיעין ולתפקידים מיוחדים>GO:PT-141
>> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> No its real, will be released at the Geneva MotorShow tommorow
As a concept car or as a production vehicle?
> by the looks of it would make an even better
>> solar oven than current designs -
>
> Well thats what happens when you become a slave to cd, now solar panels
> wonder if they are thinking of those?
Almost all modern cars are designed by people who live in cold climates. The
smaller they are the worse they get as the surface/volume ratio increases.
And you can have low cd without sky facing windows - see for example the
Citroen DS, and that could have been bettered by simple use of vortex
generators to break the airflow away at key locations.
> how effective is the aircon?
>
> Wind down the window, not sure about A/C, no worse than a motorcycle:-)
Yes - worse than a motorcycle because you have a sheet of glass over the top
of you. But the worst situation is when parked and locked - with the
temperature in the shade in the low forties, and January sunshine, I can
see the inside temperature when you return to your car easily reaching
cooking temperatures - precooked groceries?
> Does it meet
>> all ADRs?
>
> Exceeds them, EC has extreme strict regs. for compliance
Yes, but their rules are not the same as Australia! Emissions are not the
only ADRs. Key problems may be such things as child restraint anchorages,
which are peculiar to Australia.
> While the narrow tyres may well provide a good grip, will they
>> stand the roads round here?
>
> Dont know, dont see why not
Less space for deflection of tyres before the sidewall is pinched between
the tread and the rim. The defining characteristic of Australian drivers
seems to be that nowhere else do they drive so fast and so far on such
rough roads, so we are looking at the impact of potholes and bumps at high
speed, for long periods (and add at high temperatures compared to Europe)
> Quite possibly if it is light enough, but what
>> sort of a ride will it provide over them,
>
> Dont know imagine it will be bouncy because of light weight?
The major problem with lightweight vehicles is providing springing that is
soft enough with driver only and hard enough with a full load. The bigger
the ratio of disposable load to empty mass the worse the problem - and with
this car they are trying to minimise the empty mass. It can easily be
solved by using air or hydropneumatic suspension, but there is no mention
of that. At least it should not need power steering.
> and how long will the lightweight
>> body/chassis last on rough roads?
>
> Being German engineered longer than most already on the road
You have greater faith in the ethnicity of the engineering than I do!
> Lets wait and see in 2009 before we formulate a opinio
By all means - I am just raising questions that need answering - the answers
may well be satisfactory. I just have problems with getting excited when
there are so many promising designs that look good on paper but turn out to
be disasters in reality - if they ever appear on the market. But I think it
would be good to have some really light cars on the market - even the
smallest cars sold today are a lot heavier than comparable cars of thirty
years ago, largely because of demand for performance, comfort, features,
safety and durability, many of which have become enshrined in ADRs.
>> JD