Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Australian Car Forums / General Car Topics (Australian group) / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Move over Golf GTi & even R32! The HotHatch benchmark arrived...[for now]

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mf1@project1221.com中华人民共和国<המוסד למודיעין ולתפקידים מיוחדיםPT-141& P2 Member - 05 Jul 2006 04:04 GMT
WOW 190kW, Mazspeed etc can fettle that to well over 200kW with ease

IS the class leader in std. trim with near XR6 Turbo like performance

Does NOT look all stupid and boy racer, almost stealth like in a dark
colour

http://editorial.carsales.com.au/car-review/1877474.aspx
Ben Thomas - 05 Jul 2006 04:50 GMT
mf1@project1221.com中华人民共和国<המוסד למודיעין ולתפקידים
מיוחדיםPT-141& P2 Member wrote:
> WOW 190kW, Mazspeed etc can fettle that to well over 200kW with ease
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> http://editorial.carsales.com.au/car-review/1877474.aspx

If they want to sell them they will need to look more boy racer IMHO.

Ben
Fraser Johnston - 05 Jul 2006 04:59 GMT
> mf1@project1221.com???????<????? ???????? ????????? ???????PT-141& P2
> Member wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> If they want to sell them they will need to look more boy racer IMHO.

The sedan is quite a nice looking car and will probably steal a lot of WRX
sales.  The new WRX is f.cking ugly.

Fraser
Ben Thomas - 05 Jul 2006 05:20 GMT
>> mf1@project1221.com???????<????? ???????? ????????? ???????PT-141& P2
>> Member wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Fraser

But the 3 MPS is a hatch.

Ben
Fraser Johnston - 05 Jul 2006 05:23 GMT
>>> mf1@project1221.com???????<????? ???????? ????????? ???????PT-141& P2
>>> Member wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> But the 3 MPS is a hatch.

Look at the photos again.  Last pic is of the sedan and the hatch.

Fraser
Ben Thomas - 05 Jul 2006 06:05 GMT
>>>> mf1@project1221.com???????<????? ???????? ????????? ???????PT-141& P2
>>>> Member wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Fraser

The mazda website says it's hatch only.

Ben
SPA - 05 Jul 2006 06:35 GMT
>>>> mf1@project1221.com???????<????? ???????? ????????? ???????PT-141& P2
>>>> Member wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Fraser

The sedan in the last photo is a Mazda 6 MPS.
Fraser Johnston - 05 Jul 2006 06:42 GMT
>>>>> mf1@project1221.com???????<????? ???????? ????????? ???????PT-141& P2
>>>>> Member wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> The sedan in the last photo is a Mazda 6 MPS.

I stand corrected.

Fraser
Fraser Johnston - 05 Jul 2006 05:24 GMT
>>> mf1@project1221.com???????<????? ???????? ????????? ???????PT-141& P2
>>> Member wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> But the 3 MPS is a hatch.

I just read the article again.  Front wheel drive.  Looks like the WRX is
safe for a while yet.  So near yet so far.

Fraser
VYBerlinaV8 - 05 Jul 2006 05:36 GMT
I love it!

Signature

VYBerlinaV8

Not an ASIO Plant (Honest) - 05 Jul 2006 05:49 GMT
OK. Lets add it up.

190 kilowatts + Front wheel drive + cheap price = lots of dead
youngsters, when the Torque steer comes into play on a wet corner.

Sounds great value on paper. But will those that can afford it have the
skills to drive it..

For the same money, Id say a WRX would be safer and just as fast.
Ben Thomas - 05 Jul 2006 06:25 GMT
> OK. Lets add it up.
>
> 190 kilowatts + Front wheel drive + cheap price = lots of dead
> youngsters, when the Torque steer comes into play on a wet corner.

Less would be killed if it was RWD right, when oversteer comes into play?

The current FWD cars do not torque steer badly, because they are built
not to fall off the road whenever you jump on the gas.

> Sounds great value on paper. But will those that can afford it have the
> skills to drive it..

> For the same money, Id say a WRX would be safer and just as fast.

WRX will be much more exxy to insure though.
Ben
Neil Gerace - 05 Jul 2006 06:35 GMT
> WRX will be much more exxy to insure though.

To say nothing of the Focus RS when it comes here :-)
Lohn J. Deister - 05 Jul 2006 06:49 GMT
> OK. Lets add it up.
>
> 190 kilowatts + Front wheel drive + cheap price = lots of dead
> youngsters, when the Torque steer comes into play on a wet corner.

Yep, 190kw front wheel drive is crazy.

And it looks like a girl car, esp from the back.

> Sounds great value on paper. But will those that can afford it have the
> skills to drive it..
>
> For the same money, Id say a WRX would be safer and just as fast.
Just JT - 05 Jul 2006 07:02 GMT
> OK. Lets add it up.
>
> 190 kilowatts + Front wheel drive + cheap price = lots of dead
> youngsters, when the Torque steer comes into play on a wet corner.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Traction control (TC) will help address steering issues.

--
TCisIntegratedToSubeyAWDsystem
Fraser Johnston - 05 Jul 2006 07:05 GMT
>> OK. Lets add it up.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> --
> TCisIntegratedToSubeyAWDsystem

There is no Traction Control no the Subaru AWD system.

Fraser
Just JT - 05 Jul 2006 07:14 GMT
> There is no Traction Control no the Subaru AWD system.
~~~~~~~~~~
There isn't. When I took a Subey Liberty test drive some months ago, the
dealer told me that TC is integrated in the AWD system.

--
IntegratedIsGood
D Walford - 05 Jul 2006 07:49 GMT
> OK. Lets add it up.
>
> 190 kilowatts + Front wheel drive + cheap price = lots of dead
> youngsters, when the Torque steer comes into play on a wet corner.

Maybe not.
"Featuring an innovative torque control system which senses steering
angle in the first two gears to help eliminate torque steer (the bugbear
of high-powered front-wheel drive cars), the 3 easily out-powers the
current hot hatch crop".

> Sounds great value on paper. But will those that can afford it have the
> skills to drive it..
>
> For the same money, Id say a WRX would be safer and just as fast.

AWD would be a good idea with that power to weigh ratio.

Daryl
Ben Thomas - 05 Jul 2006 21:45 GMT
>> OK. Lets add it up.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> AWD would be a good idea with that power to weigh ratio.

AWD would reduce the power to weight ratio. Peak torque at 3000 RPMs
sounds like it will be a bit laggy too, so a fast launch will require
clutch frying dumps. I couldn't possibly be wrong. :)

Ben
D Walford - 05 Jul 2006 07:46 GMT
> mf1@project1221.com中华人民共和国<המוסד למודיעין ולתפקידים
> מיוחדיםPT-141& P2 Member wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> If they want to sell them they will need to look more boy racer IMHO.

The fact that its got about 40kw more than any of the opposition for the
same price or less has to help it sell.
Too bad its a POS Mazda:-)

Daryl
Dan--- - 05 Jul 2006 08:28 GMT
"mf1@project1221.com???????<????? ???????? ????????? ???????PT-141& P2
Member" <auscars@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1152068685.931114.320420@j8g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> WOW 190kW, Mazspeed etc can fettle that to well over 200kW with ease
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> http://editorial.carsales.com.au/car-review/1877474.aspx

After the mrs having a shitbox SP23 I would rather to have the Golf.

Signature

Regards
Dan
Heaven is Hell.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.