> Elaborate please. If you remove a head and require an engine rebuild,
> then I'd seriously consider the techniques used or the quality of the
> parts etc. If you do require a rebuild then it's an obvious sign that
> something is wrong.
> <mackeb@cen.prendiville.wa.edu.au> wrote in message
> I cannot tell you the number of times I've seen a perfectly usable short
> motor had it's life expectancy dramatically reduced thanks to a cylinder
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> places a load on the "used" short engine components that they can't stand
> for very long.
Jesus, this sounds extreme. What sort of engines are we taking about
here??
I replaced the heads on the HJ 253 with another set - the old heads
were as you'd expect for around 500,000k's (having a guess here - the
bore is 060 over...).
Best thing I ever did to that motor - not only could I fix the previous
owners mistakes, but I cleaned all of the carbon off the piston crowns
etc.
The engine has so much more power you could be forgiven for thinking it
was reconditioned. Pinging stopped and many of the perculiar noises
disappeared. Fuel economy was also dramatically improved.
> 99 times out of 100 very rapid ring wear will be the main side effect,
> necessitating a re-ring at the very least.
> > You wont ever have an engine that'll last for many more thousands of
> > k's if it falls apart from removing a head.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> all, and only ever fix the immediate problem if a head needs to be removed,
> such as for a blown head gasket for example.
Yeah, fair enough I suppose.
> They don't "reco" the head just because it's off, as they know the engine
> was running perfectly fine as it was, and they probably also know that if
> they reco the head they'll be needing a reco'd short to go with it before
> too long.
Hmmm, seems like a false economy to me. Just my opinion though...
Noddy - 09 Jul 2006 04:26 GMT
<mackeb@cen.prendiville.wa.edu.au> wrote in message
> Jesus, this sounds extreme. What sort of engines are we taking about
> here??
Run of the mill everyday stuff.
No engine is amune to it that I'm awarte of.
> The engine has so much more power you could be forgiven for thinking it
> was reconditioned. Pinging stopped and many of the perculiar noises
> disappeared. Fuel economy was also dramatically improved.
How many kay's has it done since? :)
> Hmmm, seems like a false economy to me. Just my opinion though...
It might do, but it's really asking for trouble.
--
Regards,
Noddy.