 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Australian Car Forums / General Car Topics (Australian group) / July 2006Ya couldn't wipe the smile off my face .....
Coming up the Kalamunda Rd hill this arvo, doing 70/70 ans spotted a bike doing >110 closing fast from behind. Moved left so there was enough room for him without jeopardising MY machine. As he whizzed past, I looked in the mirror and saw a candy car ablaze about 200m back, coming just as fast. They both disappeared from sight around the right-hander at the club/Gull servo. Came around the corner to see - apart from four vehicles stopped on the road in front of me - the HWP car in the middle of the next corner (left-hander at Stirk Cottage for those who know the area). As we crawled past, the two cops were pulling the rider out of the shrubbery. He appeared largely undamaged, unlike his bike. (He'd gone straight on at this 40-50-ish corner and hit the kerb at 45 degrees or so). HWP 1 - feckwit 0 > Coming up the Kalamunda Rd hill this arvo, doing 70/70 ans spotted a bike > doing [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > HWP 1 - feckwit 0 Excellent. Even better had he broken a collar bone or something as a reminder to not be such a cockhead. > Coming up the Kalamunda Rd hill this arvo, doing 70/70 ans spotted a bike > doing [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > As we crawled past, the two cops were pulling the rider out of the > shrubbery. What was he doing in there? Hiding? > "budgie" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message >> As we crawled past, the two cops were pulling the rider out of the >> shrubbery. > > What was he doing in there? Hiding? Probably going to the toilet! The cops spoiled it for him.  Signatureant >> "budgie" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message >>> As we crawled past, the two cops were pulling the rider out of the [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Probably going to the toilet! The cops spoiled it for him. My guess was he'd already been around 1second before hitting the bushes. >>> "budgie" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message >>>> As we crawled past, the two cops were pulling the rider out of the [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >> >My guess was he'd already been around 1second before hitting the bushes. That's my guess too ;-) >> Coming up the Kalamunda Rd hill this arvo, doing 70/70 ans spotted a bike >> doing [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > >What was he doing in there? Hiding? I always had doubts about your comprehension capability. "He'd gone straight on at this 40-50-ish corner and hit the kerb at 45 degrees or so" I don't have those doubts any more. > Coming up the Kalamunda Rd hill this arvo, doing 70/70 ans spotted a bike > doing [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > HWP 1 - feckwit 0 If he cant out run a cop car he shouldn't be riding a bike. What do you have against bikers by the way. >> Coming up the Kalamunda Rd hill this arvo, doing 70/70 ans spotted a bike >> doing [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > If he cant out run a cop car he shouldn't be riding a bike. > What do you have against bikers by the way. What do you have against cops? > What do you have against cops? They're revenue raisers and concentrate on the easy fine instead of trying to make the road safer. Hence they are at least partially responsible for some deaths. Michael >> What do you have against cops? > >They're revenue raisers and concentrate on the easy fine instead of trying >to make the road safer. Spoken like most people with absolutely no clue what goes on in the force. > Hence they are at least partially responsible for >some deaths. If you're referring to chasing baddies, I'm 100% behind that. I know they're damned if they do and damned if they don't, but IMHO if they don't chase them we'll wind up with a Mad Max world real quick. I only wish they were allowed to shoot. > Spoken like most people with absolutely no clue what goes on in the force. All you've done here is make a statement about me having no clue. You have not actually raised a point about the police at all so I don't have anything to respond to. > If you're referring to chasing baddies, I'm 100% behind that. I know > they're [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > allowed to > shoot. No, I'm not referring to that at all. Michael > If you're referring to chasing baddies, I'm 100% behind that. I know > they're damned if they do and damned if they don't, but IMHO if they > don't chase them we'll wind up with a Mad Max world real quick. I > only wish they were allowed to shoot. Paintball guns! With neon glow in teh dark paint. Signatureant >> What do you have against cops? > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Michael A so you think we would be better off with no cops, people should put their own fires out too, why should the rest of us pay taxes to support a fire department for silly people. > A so you think we would be better off with no cops, people should put > their own fires out too, why should the rest of us pay taxes to support a > fire department for silly people. What the f.ck are you talking about? I never said we should have no cops, that's something you just plain made up. Michael >> A so you think we would be better off with no cops, people should put >> their own fires out too, why should the rest of us pay taxes to support a [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Michael So they aren't 100% revenue raising then? > So they aren't 100% revenue raising then? No, i never said that either. Michael >> A so you think we would be better off with no cops, people should put >> their own fires out too, why should the rest of us pay taxes to support a [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Michael Yeah - he does that... SignatureToby. quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur > >> What do you have against cops? > > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > own fires out too, why should the rest of us pay taxes to support a fire > department for silly people. Yep...had to install a fully automated fire system here,sprinklers,flashing lights and outdoor fire hoses.....all this for a privite building built in 1910,if she goes up,the fire people are going to be able to do absolutly nothing,I rely on good will passer by or my automation system, As perviously mentioned,there are no police out here,the ones that are,are f.cking usless,fully automated security systems are in place,there are no police regulating my place,I can assure you,it is out think the opponants next move or pay for the criminals next ferrari with your losses. Went away for 2 hours a few years back and someone had tried to start a fire under the foundations out front,few years on and 60k's worth of tools gone missing,what do you think? These people that do these things are legaly obligated to vote,but thats right they are innocent untill proved guilty...what a system. Lets all rip stuff off and endanger peoples lives by speeding,you are innocent,untill caught by Gov Co. >>> Coming up the Kalamunda Rd hill this arvo, doing 70/70 ans spotted a >>> bike doing [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > What do you have against cops? Nothing, so long as they don't try to pull me over. I don't have time for their egotistical authoritarianism.. me: 5 cops: 0 >>>> Coming up the Kalamunda Rd hill this arvo, doing 70/70 ans spotted a >>>> bike doing [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > me: 5 cops: 0 Want to explain what You 5 Cops 0 means? >>>>> Coming up the Kalamunda Rd hill this arvo, doing 70/70 ans spotted a >>>>> bike doing [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > > Want to explain what You 5 Cops 0 means? Chases >>> me: 5 cops: 0 >> >> Want to explain what You 5 Cops 0 means? > > Chases So you chased Cops 5 times....? SignatureKnob >>>> me: 5 cops: 0 >>> >>> Want to explain what You 5 Cops 0 means? >> >> Chases > So you chased Cops 5 times....? That doesn't deserve a reply but I will give you one anyway. f.ck Off. > That doesn't deserve a reply but I will give you one anyway. > f.ck Off. Lol :) -- Regards, Noddy. >> That doesn't deserve a reply but I will give you one anyway. >> f.ck Off. > > Lol :) "Dan---" <575hp@detroitdieselpower.com> wrote: > A worthy reply at that. > :-) "Clockmeister" <no-one@nowhere.com> wrote: > LOL "Rainbow Warrior" <pizza@sbs.com.fr> wrote: > Typical hyper-aggressive bike rider, no sense of humour, bikes are sposed > to be relaxing DILBIT! God it's sad when everyone's too scared of me to reply directly so they have to hide behind another's post. (Oh and Rainbow; it's "Dilbert". A Dil"bit" would be something that was used to drill holes into someone like you....) SignatureHyper-Aggressive-Knob > God it's sad when everyone's too scared of me to reply directly so they > have to hide behind another's post. That is such a typical reply from you. Sorry to let you down knob but people are not scared of you. Michael >> God it's sad when everyone's too scared of me to reply directly so they >> have to hide behind another's post. > > That is such a typical reply from you. Sorry to let you down knob but > people are not scared of you. Do they just hide behind eachother because they're a bit stupid then? SignatureKnob (And aren't you the bloke who changed his whole newsgroup identity because he was too chickenshit to admit he was wrong?) > Do they just hide behind eachother because they're a bit stupid then? Possibly they just don't want to talk to you directly because you are the local joke. > Knob > (And aren't you the bloke who changed his whole newsgroup identity because > he was too chickenshit to admit he was wrong?) I dropped my surname, if you call that changing my "whole newsgroup identity" then I'm guilty. As for being wrong I had the polarity back to front, big f.cking deal. You blew that one way out of proportion to make yourself feel superior. Michael >> (And aren't you the bloke who changed his whole newsgroup identity >> because he was too chickenshit to admit he was wrong?) [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > front, big f.cking deal. You blew that one way out of proportion to make > yourself feel superior. Except for the fact that I told you you had the polarity wrong for two weeks (while you kept making half-smart "not as stupid as YOU") posts I might believe you Micheal. Good to see that you've finally grown sufficient backbone to admit you were wrong though.... (almost). SignatureKnob (so; why did you disappear and then return with a new identity then?) > Except for the fact that I told you you had the polarity wrong for two > weeks (while you kept making half-smart "not as stupid as YOU") posts I > might believe you Micheal. Damn you are a self serving knob. For 2 weeks you did everything but. If you'd said, yes you've got it right but the polarity is back to front then the whole issue would have been avoided but you strung it out in attempt to make yourself feel superior. > Good to see that you've finally grown sufficient backbone to admit you > were wrong though.... (almost). As I said waaaay back then I had the polarity back to front. > Knob > (so; why did you disappear and then return with a new identity then?) You're beating things up again. I dropped my surname simply because I thought it wasn't a good idea not to use my full name in a newsgroup. I did not change my identity but whatever makes you feel better. Michael >> Except for the fact that I told you you had the polarity wrong for two >> weeks (while you kept making half-smart "not as stupid as YOU") posts I [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > then the whole issue would have been avoided but you strung it out in > attempt to make yourself feel superior. Sure you can pretend and try to revise what actually happened Micheal, but you were told on 13/9/04 (one day into the thread) that you had it backwards. http://groups.google.com.au/group/aus.cars/msg/0e2880fc165b6c73?dmode=source&hl=en and you were still trying the "You're stupid" comebacks 10 days later: http://groups.google.com.au/group/aus.cars/msg/485341b3cecd58f9?dmode=source&hl=en >> Good to see that you've finally grown sufficient backbone to admit you >> were wrong though.... (almost). > > As I said waaaay back then I had the polarity back to front. As you finally conceded to as an attempt to save face after making a collosal fool of yourself you mean. >> (so; why did you disappear and then return with a new identity then?) > > You're beating things up again. I dropped my surname simply because I > thought it wasn't a good idea not to use my full name in a newsgroup. I > did not change my identity but whatever makes you feel better. Wow; and it just happened to coincide with me saying you should be a man and apologise! http://groups.google.com.au/group/aus.cars/msg/2aa9e0cd29a932ae?dmode=source You must hate Google Michael. SignatureKnob > Wow; and it just happened to coincide with me saying you should be a man > and apologise! > http://groups.google.com.au/group/aus.cars/msg/2aa9e0cd29a932ae?dmode=source > > You must hate Google Michael. You actually *bothered* wasting time to find that, yet can have the *audacity* to tell anyone *else* to get a f.cking life? Jesus Christ..... -- Regards, Noddy. >> Wow; and it just happened to coincide with me saying you should be a man >> and apologise! [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Jesus Christ..... Which bit of "I like to stir up stupid car-drivers" is it that you keep on having so much trouble understanding Noddy? SignatureKnob > Which bit of "I like to stir up stupid car-drivers" is it that you keep on > having so much trouble understanding Noddy? The bit about you whinging about what a chore it is :) -- Regards, Noddy. >> Which bit of "I like to stir up stupid car-drivers" is it that you keep >> on having so much trouble understanding Noddy? > > The bit about you whinging about what a chore it is :) Err yeah... (confused face) P'raps that bit got snipped... SignatureKnob > Err yeah... (confused face) > P'raps that bit got snipped... You post that much crap that you forget most likely. -- Regards, Noddy. >> Err yeah... (confused face) >> P'raps that bit got snipped... > > You post that much crap that you forget most likely. You'd know mister 50-a-day! SignatureKnob > Sure you can pretend and try to revise what actually happened Micheal, but > you were told on 13/9/04 (one day into the thread) that you had it > backwards. > http://groups.google.com.au/group/aus.cars/msg/0e2880fc165b6c73?dmode=source&hl=en > and you were still trying the "You're stupid" comebacks 10 days later: > http://groups.google.com.au/group/aus.cars/msg/485341b3cecd58f9?dmode=source&hl=en You really are an idiot knob. Seriously, there is something wrong with you to still be going on about this 2 years later. I'm sure you consider that post to be one the high points in your sad life. I suggested right from the start this was a classic bad earth problem. I was correct except that in this case except the "earth" was the feed back to the positive terminal instead of the negative. Instead of just pointing that out right from the start you strung it out and did your best to twist things. Yes I was wrong in that I didn't realise the polarity was back to front but I was correct to said this was a classic bad earth problem. With a bad earth one headlight feeds power to the other and creates a circuit running through both headlights. This is exactly what was happening. In a DC circuit with something as simple as lights the polarity is irrelevant anyway. > Wow; and it just happened to coincide with me saying you should be a man > and apologise! > http://groups.google.com.au/group/aus.cars/msg/2aa9e0cd29a932ae?dmode=source I have no idea if dropping my last name (changing my entire newsgroup identity as you called it :-) coincided with your post or not. Quite possibly I though I didn't want fuckwits like you knowing my last name. Michael >> Sure you can pretend and try to revise what actually happened Micheal, >> but you were told on 13/9/04 (one day into the thread) that you had it [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > DC circuit with something as simple as lights the polarity is irrelevant > anyway. Michael are you really that weak that you can still deny that it was explained to you clearly and repeatedly in the first couple of days and not admit that all your stupid cheap shots deserved a bit of derision? >> Wow; and it just happened to coincide with me saying you should be a man >> and apologise! [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > identity as you called it :-) coincided with your post or not. Quite > possibly I though I didn't want fuckwits like you knowing my last name. So I was wrong when I thought that after two years you might've grown enough backbone to apologise for all your smart-arse comments then? OK. That's your choice. Of course; that means you have no reason to complain when I point out how pissweak you are. SignatureKnob > Michael are you really that weak that you can still deny that it was > explained to you clearly and repeatedly in the first couple of days and > not admit that all your stupid cheap shots deserved a bit of derision? There is no such thing as a cheap shot when it is aimed at a fuckwit like you. > So I was wrong when I thought that after two years you might've grown > enough backbone to apologise for all your smart-arse comments then? > OK. That's your choice. > Of course; that means you have no reason to complain when I point out how > pissweak you are. The funny thing was it was you who was wrong, you just managed to twist things pretty well to make it look the other way round. Straight off I said it was a classic bad earth problem but it took you 2 weeks to get it. I must admit you are much better with words than me and really did manage to twist things around. It's a classic that you are so pathetic as to still be going on about this 2 years later and even go to the trouble to google back to the post. Michael >> Michael are you really that weak that you can still deny that it was >> explained to you clearly and repeatedly in the first couple of days and [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Michael Why don't you seriously consider ignoring fatboy ? no audience and it dies.. or go into his office and smack it in the mouth.( not the gut 'cause you will be eaten) > Why don't you seriously consider ignoring fatboy ? no audience and it > dies.. or go into his office and smack it in the mouth.( not the gut > 'cause you will be eaten) That is a very good point. :-) Michael > That is a very good point. :-) The problem is that if you start ignoring all the whack jobs around here, there'd be very little else to do. All the decent people have obviously left because of it. Except for my good self mind you. I only stay around here because I actually *enjoy* teasing retards :) -- Regards, Noddy. > I only stay around here because I actually *enjoy* teasing retards :) Me too Noddy! SignatureKnob > Me too Noddy! You are one of the retards :) -- Regards, Noddy. >> Me too Noddy! > > You are one of the retards :) And you're just a bit of a fool who is trying desperately to cover up how stupid he's been. So long as you wanna' keep making an idiot of yourself I'm here to play. SignatureKnob > The funny thing was it was you who was wrong, you just managed to twist > things pretty well to make it look the other way round. He's world champion at that, and has been for the last 7 consecutive years. The *really* funny thing is that while *he* thinks it makes him look clever and that he's baiting the rest of us, he's actually only making *himself* look like an incomprehensible, clueless fuckwit. Oh well... :) -- Regards, Noddy. >> The funny thing was it was you who was wrong, you just managed to twist >> things pretty well to make it look the other way round. > > He's world champion at that, and has been for the last 7 consecutive > years. That appears to be his only skill in life, although I must admit he is very good at that one skill. > The *really* funny thing is that while *he* thinks it makes him look > clever and that he's baiting the rest of us, he's actually only making > *himself* look like an incomprehensible, clueless fuckwit. He does seem to get the least respect out of anyone here, even pesty. Michael >>> The funny thing was it was you who was wrong, you just managed to twist >>> things pretty well to make it look the other way round. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > He does seem to get the least respect out of anyone here, even pesty. Both you and I know the truth about how pissweak you are Michael. SignatureKnob >> The funny thing was it was you who was wrong, you just managed to twist >> things pretty well to make it look the other way round. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > clever and that he's baiting the rest of us, he's actually only making > *himself* look like an incomprehensible, clueless fuckwit. Yeah; that's why I spend so much time posting 50 whiney denials trying to defend myself....... SignatureKnob > Yeah; that's why I spend so much time posting 50 whiney denials trying to > defend myself....... Yeah, well, the world needs sh.t kickers too pal. -- Regards, Noddy. >> Yeah; that's why I spend so much time posting 50 whiney denials trying >> to defend myself....... > > Yeah, well, the world needs sh.t kickers too pal. Eh? You're making such a dick of yourself out of a sense of public duty?!!? SignatureKnob >> Yeah; that's why I spend so much time posting 50 whiney denials trying to >> defend myself....... > > Yeah, well, the world needs sh.t kickers too pal. Take atec's advice Noddy and ignore it. I am. Michael >>> Yeah; that's why I spend so much time posting 50 whiney denials trying >>> to defend myself....... >> >> Yeah, well, the world needs sh.t kickers too pal. > > Take atec's advice Noddy and ignore it. I am. I'm DEFINITELY on a winner when taking atec's advice is your only escape! SignatureKnob >>>> Yeah; that's why I spend so much time posting 50 whiney denials trying >>>> to defend myself....... [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >> > I'm DEFINITELY on a winner when taking atec's advice is your only escape! There's no winners in this battle. Signaturea9x5l >>>>> Yeah; that's why I spend so much time posting 50 whiney denials >>>>> trying [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > There's no winners in this battle. Look around a9x5l. Only one left standing! SignatureKnob > Look around a9x5l. > Only one left standing! Grow a chest so we can pin a medal on you. -- Regards, Noddy. >> Look around a9x5l. >> Only one left standing! > > Grow a chest so we can pin a medal on you. Yaay; you're still biting little fishie! SignatureKnob (I was starting to think you'd grown a brain....) > Yaay; you're still biting little fishie! If I stopped you'd have no one to talk to..... -- Regards, Noddy. >> The funny thing was it was you who was wrong, you just managed to twist >> things pretty well to make it look the other way round. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > clever and that he's baiting the rest of us, he's actually only making > *himself* look like an incomprehensible, clueless fuckwit. f.ck; how stupid must the fools who keep getting sucked in to stupidly replying, look then?! SignatureKnob On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:14:08 GMT, "Knobdoodle" <knobdoodle@hotmail.com>, after considering some belly-button fluf, wrote: [...] >f.ck; how stupid must the fools who keep getting sucked in to stupidly >replying, look then?! Somewhat less stupid than the idiot who gets a feeling of superiority from starting the whole mess in the first place. Neil --- Neil Fisher / Bob Young Thundercords personal opinion unless otherwise noted. Looking for spark plug leads? Check out http://www.magnecor.com.au > On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:14:08 GMT, "Knobdoodle" > <knobdoodle@hotmail.com>, after considering some belly-button fluf, [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Somewhat less stupid than the idiot who gets a feeling of superiority > from starting the whole mess in the first place. So the guy with the line is stupider than the one on the hook, is he Neil? Yeah; just keep trying to convince yourself of that..... SignatureKnob (Besides; I didn't start it. Noddy was already madly baying like a loon at Pesty's trolling; I just stepped in and diverted him so I could have a play too.) On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:46:46 GMT, "Knobdoodle" <knobdoodle@hotmail.com>, after considering some belly-button fluf, wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:14:08 GMT, "Knobdoodle" >> <knobdoodle@hotmail.com>, after considering some belly-button fluf, [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >> >So the guy with the line is stupider than the one on the hook, is he Neil? That'd be pretty hard, since it looks to me like you made a big cast and hooked yourself in the arse. Which is incredibly funny to watch. >Yeah; just keep trying to convince yourself of that..... Did too! >Noddy was already madly baying like a loon at >Pesty's trolling; I just stepped in and diverted him so I could have a play >too.) Leave your genitalia out of this, please. Neil --- Neil Fisher / Bob Young Thundercords personal opinion unless otherwise noted. Looking for spark plug leads? Check out http://www.magnecor.com.au "Special Neil" <NeilFisher@_NOSPAM_magnecor.com.au> wrote: >>So the guy with the line is stupider than the one on the hook, is he >>Neil? > > That'd be pretty hard, since it looks to me like you made a big cast > and hooked yourself in the arse. Which is incredibly funny to watch. Whoop it up Special-Neil! (I know I am!!) What's REALLY funny is watching previous losers like you and Spineless-Michael, trying to provide support to the current victim! SignatureKnob (Best you just move over and make some room in the "tool"box!) >> Michael are you really that weak that you can still deny that it was >> explained to you clearly and repeatedly in the first couple of days and >> not admit that all your stupid cheap shots deserved a bit of derision? > > There is no such thing as a cheap shot when it is aimed at a fuckwit like > you. So that's a "yes I AM that weak" then? >> So I was wrong when I thought that after two years you might've grown >> enough backbone to apologise for all your smart-arse comments then? [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > to still be going on about this 2 years later and even go to the trouble > to google back to the post. Hah hah; that's a classic! You have really pushed "denial" past all previous bounds Michael. SignatureKnob. Spineless-Michael wrote: > The funny thing was it was you who was wrong, you just managed to twist > things pretty well to make it look the other way round. Show us where I was wrong Micheal. C'mon you bleating spineless weasel; show us. > it was a classic bad earth problem but it took you 2 weeks to get it. Is that why I was explaining it to you from about my first post? > I must admit you are much better with words than me and really did manage > to twist things around. Twist things? By clearly and repeated explaining it to you? > It's a classic that you are so pathetic as to still be going on about > this 2 years later and even go to the trouble to google back to the post. I actually only mentioned it as a question as to who you were; YOU then spurted all your childish lies and revisions so the only way to be fair was to post a link to the original thread. How much would you be bleating if I told it from my side!!!? SignatureKnob > Show us where I was wrong Micheal. C'mon you bleating spineless weasel; > show us. Aaaaahahahahahhaa! You're getting desperate huh? You have to throw senseless insults now? Pathetic really. Sad and pathetic. >> Show us where I was wrong Micheal. C'mon you bleating spineless weasel; >> show us. > > Aaaaahahahahahhaa! You're getting desperate huh? You have to throw > senseless insults now? Pathetic really. Sad and pathetic. Naah; I was just trying to provoke him into doing that hilarious "you're twisting my words" whinge again. Him being a bleating spineless weasel is already a matter of record! SignatureKnob >> God it's sad when everyone's too scared of me to reply directly so they >> have to hide behind another's post. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Michael Just don't think he deserves the direct attention he performs for. >>> God it's sad when everyone's too scared of me to reply directly so they >>> have to hide behind another's post. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Just don't think he deserves the direct attention he performs for. [sigh] Still following everything I say are you Rainbow Plonker? You really have to get over this starry-eyed hero-worship..... SignatureKnob > God it's sad when everyone's too scared of me to reply directly so they > have to hide behind another's post. Scared? Of you? :) For f.ck's sake, it'd be like being scared of santa :) > Hyper-Aggressive-Knob Lol :) I'd imagine when you go totally postal you'd be *almost* scary enough to frighten a hairdresser :) -- Regards, Noddy. >> God it's sad when everyone's too scared of me to reply directly so they >> have to hide behind another's post. > > Scared? Of you? :) > > For f.ck's sake, it'd be like being scared of santa :) Is there another reason then? Is it 'cause they're too embarrassed by your stupidity to support you directly? >> Hyper-Aggressive-Knob > > Lol :) > > I'd imagine when you go totally postal you'd be *almost* scary enough to > frighten a hairdresser :) Heh he; you agree that Rainbow's a fool too then. SignatureKnob > Is there another reason then? Is it 'cause they're too embarrassed by > your stupidity to support you directly? You're not a native of this planet, are you Knob old boy? > Heh he; you agree that Rainbow's a fool too then. Somewhere in the remotest parts of deep, dark Africa there are as yet undiscovered tribes who have no comprehension of English as a language, but even *they* couldn't come to this f.cking conclusion from what I said. Congratulations. You've achieved the impossible. -- Regards, Noddy. >> Is there another reason then? Is it 'cause they're too embarrassed by >> your stupidity to support you directly? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > but even *they* couldn't come to this f.cking conclusion from what I > said. How could they; you keep snipping out the bits that I refer to (and which show you to up). You must imagine people have very short memories..... SignatureKnob > Is there another reason then? Is it 'cause they're too embarrassed by > your stupidity to support you directly? People simply don't like you and don't want to talk to you. Michael >> Is there another reason then? Is it 'cause they're too embarrassed by >> your stupidity to support you directly? > > People simply don't like you and don't want to talk to you. And yet they keep on replying.... Weird eh? SignatureKnob > That doesn't deserve a reply but I will give you one anyway. > f.ck Off. A worthy reply at that. :-) SignatureRegards Dan Heaven is Hell. >>>>> me: 5 cops: 0 >>>> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > That doesn't deserve a reply but I will give you one anyway. > f.ck Off. LOL >>>>> me: 5 cops: 0 >>>> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > That doesn't deserve a reply but I will give you one anyway. > f.ck Off. Typical hyper-aggressive bike rider, no sense of humour, bikes are sposed to be relaxing DILBIT! Drive a car before you hate someone, oh too late, you hate evreyone. >>>>>> me: 5 cops: 0 >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > to be relaxing DILBIT! > Drive a car before you hate someone, oh too late, you hate everyone. You got the relaxing thing wrong. Nothing like the rush you get in that split second when the blue lights come on and you make the decision you are not gonna stop The blood starts pumping and the ride gets better from there on. I ride a bike for a thrill not to relax. I do drive a car when it is wet only so I don't go arse up on all the oil the cars dump all over the streets in Perth. >>>>>>> me: 5 cops: 0 >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > I do drive a car when it is wet only so I don't go arse up on > all the oil the cars dump all over the streets in Perth. So you're an ASPRO cyclist. You disolve in the wet huh? >>>>>>>> me: 5 cops: 0 >>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > So you're an ASPRO cyclist. You disolve in the wet huh? He can't handle the thrill :P >>>>>>>>> me: 5 cops: 0 >>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > He can't handle the thrill :P No thrill in going arse up ya dickhead. >>>>>>>>>> me: 5 cops: 0 >>>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > No thrill in going arse up ya dickhead. Ahh you can't handle the bike then either. :P <CYMBAL> >>>>>>>>>>> me: 5 cops: 0 >>>>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > Ahh you can't handle the bike then either. :P What a dickhead. Nobody can save a bike in a slide on a wet oily road. Even the motogp riders go arse up if there is oil on the track. You obviously don't ride a bike, just a big mouth wannabe. >>>>>>>>>>>> me: 5 cops: 0 >>>>>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > Even the motogp riders go arse up if there is oil on the track. > You obviously don't ride a bike, just a big mouth wannabe. LOL, probably don't drive a car in the rain either in case it spins out :P >>>>>>>> me: 5 cops: 0 >>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > So you're an ASPRO cyclist. You disolve in the wet huh? Call it what you want but on Perth's oil soaked streets I call it safe. >>>>>>>>> me: 5 cops: 0 >>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > Call it what you want but on Perth's oil soaked streets I call > it safe. They can't be any more oil soaked than Sydney's. I actually enjoy riding in the rain. Keeps you alert and is usually just the right temperature too. Shane PS... Except for the day a hail stone bounced off the chin of my helmet and chipped my tooth. I could live with the bruised knuckles but the tooth incident made me pull over and wait it out. > They can't be any more oil soaked than Sydney's. I actually enjoy riding > in the rain. Keeps you alert and is usually just the right temperature > too. Why don't you just stand in your shower with your clothes on? Much less risk involved. > Shane > PS... Except for the day a hail stone bounced off the chin of my helmet > and chipped my tooth. I could live with the bruised knuckles but the tooth > incident made me pull over and wait it out. Wimp :) -- Regards, Noddy. >> They can't be any more oil soaked than Sydney's. I actually enjoy riding >> in the rain. Keeps you alert and is usually just the right temperature >> too. > > Why don't you just stand in your shower with your clothes on? The jig is up................. > Much less risk involved. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Wimp :) I didn't cry. Mind you, someone nearby must have been BBQing because I'm sure I could detect cut onions around that time. > I didn't cry. You did better than me, as I would have slipped into a coma :) > Mind you, someone nearby must have been BBQing because I'm sure I could > detect cut onions > around that time. Not good. -- Regards, Noddy. >>>>>>>>>> me: 5 cops: 0 >>>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > and chipped my tooth. I could live with the bruised knuckles but the tooth > incident made me pull over and wait it out. You wouldn't have had that problem if you didn't have to wear a helmet :P :) <snip> >>>>>>>>>>> me: 5 cops: 0 >>>>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > You wouldn't have had that problem if you didn't have to wear a helmet :P > :) And if I'd been going 10ks faster I'd have been 23m past that particular stone so everything would have been ok :) Now I see what they're all talking about . > <snip> > [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > stone so everything would have been ok :) Now I see what they're all talking > about . Hmm, extra 10K would have netted more stones into the gob due relative angle of their attack on ya. SignatureToby. quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur >> And if I'd been going 10ks faster I'd have been 23m past that >> particular stone so everything would have been ok :) Now I see what >> they're all talking about . > > Hmm, extra 10K would have netted more stones into the gob due relative > angle of their attack on ya. Riding with gob closed would be quite effective too, AND there'd be no need to clean bugs out of teeth after each ride. Signatureant >>>>> me: 5 cops: 0 >>>> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > That doesn't deserve a reply but I will give you one anyway. > f.ck Off. Hah ha; got another one! f.ck they're easy here... SignatureKnob > Coming up the Kalamunda Rd hill this arvo, doing 70/70 ans spotted a bike doing >> 110 closing fast from behind. Moved left so there was enough room for him [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > HWP 1 - feckwit 0 Yes the rider was not making good decisions , the fact he didn't smoke the coppa indicates low riding skills , the fact you took pleasure in his physical pain is very poor. >> Coming up the Kalamunda Rd hill this arvo, doing 70/70 ans spotted a bike >> doing [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > coppa indicates low riding skills , the fact you took pleasure in his > physical pain is very poor. Ahh so it's ok to laugh at idiots getting karmic payback in cars but not bikes? :P >>> Coming up the Kalamunda Rd hill this arvo, doing 70/70 ans spotted a bike >>> doing [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > Ahh so it's ok to laugh at idiots getting karmic payback in cars but not > bikes? :P It is fine to laff but personal injury as described is not a laughing matter...and taking pleasure in another near death is poor sportsmanship. >> Coming up the Kalamunda Rd hill this arvo, doing 70/70 ans spotted a bike doing >>> 110 closing fast from behind. Moved left so there was enough room for him [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >the coppa indicates low riding skills , the fact you took pleasure in >his physical pain is very poor. Nah, I think the major feeling he had was severe embarrassment at his errors - firstly in being the ferkwit he had been, and secondly at not being able to judge the corner. I somehow feel this wasn't his best day. >>> Coming up the Kalamunda Rd hill this arvo, doing 70/70 ans spotted a bike doing >>>> 110 closing fast from behind. Moved left so there was enough room for him [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > firstly in being the ferkwit he had been, and secondly at not being able to > judge the corner. I somehow feel this wasn't his best day. and that . > HWP 1 - feckwit 0 Had a similar situation a couple of weeks ago on my way to Brisbane. Pulled out of Rocky about 8.45am and got stuck in a line of traffic following a caravan, who was admittedly doing pretty well at about 95 - 98kph. Got down around Ambrose and there's a clear stretch and I'm now 2 cars behind the van. Still double lines but close to singles. Next minute there's an idiot goes zipping past and after a couple more dubious overtaking movements he's in front of the van and gone. Probably sitting about 140kph from the way he started to disappear into the distance. It's the first Saturday of school holidays and at this point I hadn't seen any HWP on the road having left Mackay at 5am. Get about 1km down the road and there he is on the left stopped with a bright red monaro with christmas tree ablaze on the right. Monaro did a u-turn after I passed and pulled in behind stopped vehicle. I must admit I chuckled. > Coming up the Kalamunda Rd hill this arvo, doing 70/70 ans spotted a bike > doing [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > this > 40-50-ish corner and hit the kerb at 45 degrees or so). Perhaps they were the Cops who say "Ni". I think he was on a mission. To find a shrubbery or be made cut down the mightiest tree in the forest with a herring? >> Coming up the Kalamunda Rd hill this arvo, doing 70/70 ans spotted a bike >> doing [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] >I think he was on a mission. To find a shrubbery or be made cut down the >mightiest tree in the forest with a herring? I'm only glad: (a) that he didn't score an oncoming car at the left-hander where he went straight on (aka off); and (b) it happened before the local lads started their work-to-rules campaign. "Knobdoodle" <knobdoodle@hotmail.com> wrote: (3 days ago) > Ooh ooh; have I been mean to poor little Noddy have I? > Oh you poor thing...... Hello [knock knock]....?!!? Damn; have I lost another fishie? And I was being as gentle as I could too.... SignatureKnob (He'll be back in 6 weeks when the smarting fades) |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.