While Holden yesterday announced a fuel saving for its biggest-selling model
in the new Commodore range, the new Camry's consumption remains the same as
the model it replaced.
The new Camry's fuel rating label shows an average consumption of 9.9 litres
per 100km, even though it is now available with a five-speed automatic
transmission, which is designed to provide better economy at highway speeds.
``The car is a little heavier about 30kg than the old model, we've added a
lot of safety equipment, and the body is stronger for better occupant
protection,'' said Toyota's executive director of sales and marketing, David
Buttner.
The new Camry's main rivals are more fuel-efficient. The Honda Accord Euro
has a fuel rating label showing 9.4 litres per 100 kilometres and the Mazda6
and Subaru Liberty 2.5 have fuel rating labels displaying 8.9 litres per 100
kilometres.
It's an embarrassing move for the maker which prides itself on fuel economy.
The Camry is a globally-developed car, manufactured around the world, and
the product of a much bigger development budget than the Commodore.
A week ago, Toyota claimed that its V6 Commodore rival (called the Aurion
and due on sale in November) would be more fuel-efficient than the new
Holden Commodore. Toyota also is the world's biggest seller of
petrol-electric hybrid vehicles and is a pioneer in that technology.
However, the Camry hybrid, sold in North America, is not likely to be sold
in Australia until 2009 at the earliest.
The new Camry is available only with a 2.4-litre four-cylinder engine; the
V6 will be exclusive to the Aurion.
There are six models in the new Camry range, which starts at about $30,000
for the base model with five-speed automatic transmission.

Signature
Regards
Dan
Heaven is Hell.
David Z - 25 Jul 2006 07:48 GMT
> While Holden yesterday announced a fuel saving for its biggest-selling
> model in the new Commodore range, the new Camry's consumption remains the
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> has a fuel rating label showing 9.4 litres per 100 kilometres and the
> Mazda6
Actually the Camry's rival is the Accord VTi , which has a figure of 9.3L.
atec77 - 25 Jul 2006 07:54 GMT
> While Holden yesterday announced a fuel saving for its biggest-selling model
> in the new Commodore range, the new Camry's consumption remains the same as
> the model it replaced.
>
> The new Camry's fuel rating label shows an average consumption of 9.9 litres
> per 100km, even though it is now available with a five-speed automatic
So when does the rwd v8 model arrive ?
Dan--- - 25 Jul 2006 08:02 GMT
>> While Holden yesterday announced a fuel saving for its biggest-selling
>> model in the new Commodore range, the new Camry's consumption remains the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> automatic
> So when does the rwd v8 model arrive ?
Oh...... never unless you buy a Lexus.

Signature
Regards
Dan
Heaven is Hell.
mark jb - 25 Jul 2006 13:00 GMT
> The new Camry's main rivals are more fuel-efficient. The Honda Accord Euro
> has a fuel rating label showing 9.4 litres per 100 kilometres and the
> Mazda6 and Subaru Liberty 2.5 have fuel rating labels displaying 8.9
> litres per 100 kilometres.
Neither the Mazda6 or Liberty will achieve that.
My mazda6 gets 9.8/100, and my old Forester drank 10.3/100. Confirmed at
several dozen fills each.
The mazda will drink up to 11/100 when giving it a fair bit of stick, didn't
matter how much throttle you used in the forester, always drank the same
amount whether pottering around or getting the cobwebs out.
-mark
VYBerlinaV8 - 26 Jul 2006 03:09 GMT
The figures manufacturers quote are developed from a standardised test.
Unfortunately, that test doesn't necessarily correspond to how cars will
be driven. Also, manufacturers are not above setting gear ratios and
tyre sizes to maximise results on the test, not the road.
I have doubts as to how reliable, or even comparable, these tests are.

Signature
VYBerlinaV8
Katharine & Paul - 30 Jul 2006 11:43 GMT
I drive Camrys and Commodores in the fleet at work. The driving is nearly
all highway.
I am sure the Commodore uses less fuel. I really cant see the point of the
Camry at all.
> While Holden yesterday announced a fuel saving for its biggest-selling
> model in the new Commodore range, the new Camry's consumption remains the
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> There are six models in the new Camry range, which starts at about $30,000
> for the base model with five-speed automatic transmission.
Just JT - 31 Jul 2006 03:36 GMT
>I drive Camrys and Commodores in the fleet at work. The driving is nearly
>all highway.
~~~~~~~~~~
But most people drive around town and less in highway conditions.
> I am sure the Commodore uses less fuel. I really cant see the point of the
> Camry at all.
~~~~~~~~~~
Around town, perhaps the Camry uses less fuel.
--
Four_cylinder_consumes_less_than_Six_Hello!