Car Forum / Australian Car Forums / General Car Topics (Australian group) / September 2006
NT (//) The vote for a 110km/h maximum is this week
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Mot Adv-NSW - 27 Sep 2006 02:08 GMT THOSE NT residents, periodic visitors and industry persons who wish to maintain the speed derestriction allowance in the NT; OR have it only applied on a 'per length of road basis', MUST now call local NT members of parliament to let them know how *you* wish them to vote. NT MP's are to vote on this issue this week.
The proposal is for a blanket 110km/h default maximum speed limit, championed by Harold Scruby and 'demanded' by the Commonwealth Government..
I have made it legally clear to not impose this on (//) signposted zones.
Jeremy H. Pritchard Mot Adv-NSW
feral - 27 Sep 2006 02:22 GMT > THOSE NT residents, periodic visitors and industry persons who wish to > maintain the speed derestriction allowance in the NT; OR have it only [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Jeremy H. Pritchard > Mot Adv-NSW Remove the (//) signs? Legal then?
 Signature Take Care. ~~ Feral ( @..@) (\-- Ü--/) ((.>______<.)) ^^^ ^^^
Mot Adv-NSW - 27 Sep 2006 03:37 GMT "feral" <-
> Remove the (//) signs? > Legal then? NT need only overide its ARR25 'opt-out regulation' that merely does away with the suggested ARR 25 rural default for passenger car category.
But I have told them to NOT impose the 110km/h limit on roads where the (//) signs are physically posted. The proposal would adopt 110km/h as a maximum, and NT roads staff would set about removing the signs. They could keep them if they desire derestriction on certain lengths.
So the answer is 'yes', the signs must go, less they face the high court here, or international court of appeal in Geneva.
This change is one of many to be voted on, all part of a raft of changes by the Feds, Scruby alliance et al for 'harmonisation'.
J.
Albm&ctd - 27 Sep 2006 04:43 GMT > "feral" <- > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > J. I guess these changes to introduce 110 km/h are to eliminate that embarrassing (for eastern death states) zero NT Christmas holiday death toll from happening again. If the death toll increases after the introduction, can those who introduced it be held accountable?
I bet VIC or NSW wins the highest death toll this Christmas with Qld a close 3rd. Most of the Qld ones will most probably not be wearing a seatbelt.
Al
 Signature I don't take sides. It's more fun to insult everyone. http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html
Dan--- - 27 Sep 2006 02:25 GMT > The proposal is for a blanket 110km/h default maximum speed limit, > championed by Harold Scruby and 'demanded' by the Commonwealth > Government.. Old Harry Scruby should be f.cked and burned.
 Signature Regards Dan
atec77 - 27 Sep 2006 02:31 GMT >> The proposal is for a blanket 110km/h default maximum speed limit, >> championed by Harold Scruby and 'demanded' by the Commonwealth >> Government.. > > Old Harry Scruby should be f.cked and burned. I am certain he certainly participates regularly in one of those activities.
Albm&ctd - 27 Sep 2006 05:32 GMT In article <4519d490$0$4672$61c65585@un-2park-reader- 01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au>, atec77 <""atec77 \"@ hotmail.com"> says...
> >> The proposal is for a blanket 110km/h default maximum speed limit, > >> championed by Harold Scruby and 'demanded' by the Commonwealth [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > > I am certain he certainly participates regularly in one of those activities. I found this from 2002. http://www.abc.net.au/am/stories/s663617.htm
Al
 Signature I don't take sides. It's more fun to insult everyone. http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html
Robert Irvine - 27 Sep 2006 04:19 GMT >>championed by Harold Scruby It's almost bound to be a dumb idea then.
For a good laugh, go to the 'Pedestrian Council' website. I particularly like the "Membership of the Pedestrian Council of Australia Limited is by invitation of the Board of Directors to individuals and institutions having interests or concerns of like nature to those of the PCA. "
So it's not so much a council, as an old boys club.
I wonder if Today Tonight or ACA will run a negative story on this particular elitist Council.
Rob.
> THOSE NT residents, periodic visitors and industry persons who wish to > maintain the speed derestriction allowance in the NT; OR have it only [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Jeremy H. Pritchard > Mot Adv-NSW R.G Bhaji - 27 Sep 2006 14:21 GMT On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 03:22:33 GMT, "Robert Irvine" <Robert.Irvine@ILikeSpambigpond.com> gave aus.cars <Z7mSg.37008$rP1.15998@news-server.bigpond.net.au>.
NOW READ ON...
>>>championed by Harold Scruby >It's almost bound to be a dumb idea then. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > >Rob. Young 'Arold and its surprisingly few merrie minions are an example of what our Amurrican cousins call "astroturfing".
======================================================= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroturfing
In American politics and advertising, the term astroturfing describes formal public relations (PR) campaigns which seek to create the impression of being a spontaneous, grassroots behavior. Hence the reference to the "AstroTurf" (artificial grass) is a metaphor to indicate "fake grassroots," or sometimes "fake environmentalism."
The goal of such campaign is to disguise the agenda of a political client as an independent public reaction to some political entity a politician, political group, product, service, event. Astroturfers attempt to orchestrate the actions of apparently diverse and geographically distributed individuals, by both overt ("outreach," "awareness," etc.) and subvert (disinformation) means. Contents
* 1 Word origin * 2 Techniques * 3 Examples o 3.1 Early examples o 3.2 Examples from the 1990s o 3.3 Recent examples * 4 Telecom astroturf * 5 Fictional examples * 6 See also * 7 References * 8 External links
[edit]
Word origin
The term, said to have been used first in this context by former U.S. Senator Lloyd Bentsen (Democrat-Texas), is wordplay based on "grassroots democracy" efforts, which are truly spontaneous undertakings largely sustained by private persons (not politicians, governments, corporations, or public relations firms). "AstroTurf" refers to the bright green artificial grass used in some sports stadiums, so "astroturfing" refers to artificial grassroots efforts. [edit]
Techniques This article or section does not cite its references or sources. You can help Wikipedia by introducing appropriate citations.
A form of propaganda, astroturfing attempts to selectively affect the emotions of the public, whether trying to win a campaign, be the top music record seller, the top book seller, or gain political support.
The most frequently identified cases of astroturfing are found in recent political history. The concept itself is older and was widely used by the Soviet Communists.
Astroturfing techniques usually consist of a few people discreetly posing as mass numbers of activists advocating a specific cause. Supporters or employees will manipulate the degree of interest through letters to the editor, e-mails, blog posts, crossposts, trackbacks, etc. They are instructed on what to say, how to say it, where to send it, and how to make it appear that their indignation, appreciation, joy, or hate is entirely spontaneous and independent; thus being "real" emotions and concerns rather than the product of an orchestrated campaign. Local newspapers are often victims of astroturfing, by publishing letters that are identical to letters other newspapers have received.
=====================================
...and so on.
Perhaps a body which boasts a larger number of actual members, and can demonstrate wider coverage, could be formed as the Actual Representative Pedestrian Council or some such name.
The Scroob Turkeys only hold the field as long as nobody with a greater claim to legitimacy comes along.
Beast Wishes, Ryno
 Signature ...and the sigbot says:
Make what's perfect more human -- Oblique Strategies © 1975, 1978, and 1979 Brian Eno/Peter Schmidt
Athol - 28 Sep 2006 07:53 GMT > "Robert Irvine" <Robert.Irvine@ILikeSpambigpond.com> gave aus.cars
>>For a good laugh, go to the 'Pedestrian Council' website. I >>particularly like the >>"Membership of the Pedestrian Council of Australia Limited is by >>invitation of the Board of Directors to individuals and institutions >>having interests or concerns of like nature to those of the PCA. "
> Young 'Arold and its surprisingly few merrie minions are an example of > what our Amurrican cousins call "astroturfing".
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroturfing [snip]
A most excellent description of the disgraceful actions of Harold Scruby et al. (Note, that's a lower case al, not a title case Al. :-) )
> Perhaps a body which boasts a larger number of actual members, and can > demonstrate wider coverage, could be formed as the Actual > Representative Pedestrian Council or some such name. The aus.cars road and pedestrian safety forum.
> The Scroob Turkeys only hold the field as long as nobody with a > greater claim to legitimacy comes along. No, as long as such legitimate group don't receive the level of publicity enjoyed by the disgraceful astroturfers.
Hmm. Wonder if we could get the wikipedia link to astroturfing promoted above all such organisations in google searches. :-)
 Signature Athol <http://cust.idl.com.au/athol> Linux Registered User # 254000 I'm a Libran Engineer. I don't argue, I discuss.
PhilD - 27 Sep 2006 05:38 GMT > THOSE NT residents, periodic visitors and industry persons who wish to > maintain the speed derestriction allowance in the NT; OR have it only [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Jeremy H. Pritchard > Mot Adv-NSW Where did you get this info? According to our local info, our Parliament didn't/isn't sitting this month and the next time is from Oct 10th. Apart from that, I'm not aware that it requires Parliament to vote on it. Unfortunately it's likely that the Government will impose speed restrictions and demerit points on us as they want to be seen to be doing something. A Stuart Hwy 110 limit wouldn't have saved most of those that have died this year, just like it didn't save 7 in Victoria yesterday.
Apparently the speed limit and demerit points are amongst the proposals given by our Police Commissioner to his political masters. Basically they haven't got a clue as to how to reduce the road toll and this is their way of being seen to being doing something.
PhilD
feral - 27 Sep 2006 05:43 GMT > Basically they > haven't got a clue as to how to reduce the road toll and this is their way > of being seen to being doing something. What road toll old being?
 Signature Take Care. ~~ Feral ( @..@) (\-- Ü--/) ((.>______<.)) ^^^ ^^^
PhilD - 27 Sep 2006 08:26 GMT >> Basically they haven't got a clue as to how to reduce the road toll and >> this is their way of being seen to being doing something. > > What road toll old being? I guess that you are inferring that I should have said "road DEATH toll".
PhilD
feral - 27 Sep 2006 09:10 GMT >>>Basically they haven't got a clue as to how to reduce the road toll and >>>this is their way of being seen to being doing something. >> >>What road toll old being? > > I guess that you are inferring that I should have said "road DEATH toll". That'll do. :-)
Lots of dashes off the black. Aren't you yokels lucky in *most* cases there isn't much to hit of consequence (oncoming or structure).
 Signature Take Care. ~~ Feral ( @..@) (\-- Ü--/) ((.>______<.)) ^^^ ^^^
PhilD - 27 Sep 2006 15:58 GMT >>>>Basically they haven't got a clue as to how to reduce the road toll and >>>>this is their way of being seen to being doing something. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Lots of dashes off the black. Aren't you yokels lucky in *most* cases > there isn't much to hit of consequence (oncoming or structure). You must be kidding. Buff's, donkey's (some with 2 legs), wallabies/roo's, wild pigs, camels, horses, cattle, emu's, roadtrains, tourists, army convoy's, roadkill in middle of bends, birds going after the roadkill. But all good fun. Then there were the old days of narrow bitumen where you had to be prepared to put 2 wheels, and sometimes 4, in the dirt at short notice or become a mascot on a Mack/Kenworth. I took a southern tourist to Katherine and well remember their shocked reaction when I did that to overtake a full length roadtrain.
When I've seen those marks going off of the road I often wondered if they were trying to avoid wildlife that they would've been wiser to hit.
There's been some idiot up here bragging in the press that they did the Darwin Alice run in 7 1/2 hours and that they should be allowed to continue with that kind of speed. They haven't had any believers but they may well have helped to scare the politicians and dear Harold.
PhilD
feral - 27 Sep 2006 21:20 GMT > You must be kidding. > Buff's, donkey's (some with 2 legs), wallabies/roo's, wild pigs, camels, [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > with that kind of speed. They haven't had any believers but they may well > have helped to scare the politicians and dear Harold. Well, thanks for that insight into the dangers of travelling at speed up there. :-)
 Signature Take Care. ~~ Feral ( @..@) (\-- Ü--/) ((.>______<.)) ^^^ ^^^
PhilD - 28 Sep 2006 08:08 GMT >> You must be kidding. >> Buff's, donkey's (some with 2 legs), wallabies/roo's, wild pigs, camels, [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > Well, thanks for that insight into the dangers of travelling at speed up > there. :-) I could have ended the message with a :-P because it sounds worse than it really ever was. Being aware of the possibilities is a goodly amount of protection rather that some who blindly travel a high speeds, especially at night, and feel that they are invincible. There was nothing more sobering than a just before dawn trip to Katherine and seeing what at first appeared to be a lot of termite mounds near the road and then realising that they were actually a herd of buffs, and we were in the middle of it at cruising speed.
There are many people who are absolutely terrified of roadtrains that they will completely pull off of the road to keep away from them. The funniest one I ever saw was in the wide open road down around Ti Tree where there are large graded areas each side of the highway. Following a driver who veered so far off of the road that the roadtrain would have had to do a full sideways slide to have hit them.
To anyone coming up this way, I recommend trying the "Scenic route" from Adelaide River township to about the Hayes Ck wayside inn. This is an earlier Stuart Hwy section still used to get to Daly River etc. Drive it and imagine that the whole route to Katherine was like it and you shared it with roadtrains, tourists, wildlife and wet season flooding.
They've taken all the fun out of the drive and a 110 limit is just one further step.
PhilD
feral - 28 Sep 2006 09:11 GMT > They've taken all the fun out of the drive and a 110 limit is just one > further step. Yep. They're taking away the epitomy of NT road-sport - SVRO. Did you know the NT holds the record?
Research was carried out in 2002.
> http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/176_06_180302/tre10514_fm.pdf#search=%22Nort hern%20Territory%20road%20toll%22 Looks like you're about to learn what happens at the end of a lot of those off-the-black skid marks.
 Signature Take Care. ~~ Feral ( @..@) (\-- Ü--/) ((.>______<.)) ^^^ ^^^
reg-john - 28 Sep 2006 08:36 GMT >> You must be kidding. >> Buff's, donkey's (some with 2 legs), wallabies/roo's, wild pigs, camels, [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > Well, thanks for that insight into the dangers of travelling at speed up > there. :-) isnt it amazing that they continually have a ZERO death toll? with all those dangerous bad things out dere!
please, explain this away you mental giant.
feral - 28 Sep 2006 08:47 GMT > isnt it amazing that they continually have a ZERO death toll? with all those > dangerous bad things out dere! Do they?
> please, explain this away you mental giant. Easily, mental peanut.
> http://www.ntnews.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,7034,20210899%255E13569,00.html
> http://www.amity.org.au/papers/drinkdrive.htm The road toll has risen sharply with 10 deaths in nine crashes on roads across the Territory this month – in many of them, the contributing factors are ones that could have been avoided with compliance by road users.
> http://www.nt.gov.au/pfes/police/media/news/2006/08/20060829_appeal_road_users.html Bye bye.
 Signature Take Care. ~~ Feral ( @..@) (\-- Ü--/) ((.>______<.)) ^^^ ^^^
Athol - 28 Sep 2006 09:10 GMT > isnt it amazing that they continually have a ZERO death toll? with all those > dangerous bad things out dere!
> please, explain this away you mental giant. And when they do have deaths, the stats are adjusted against "per head of [permanent] population", skewing the stats completely. "Per average instantaneous population including tourists" would probably make the stats a little less ridiculous.
Better still would be to always correct against "per [multiplier] vehicle km travelled" or "per [multiplier] driver hours".
 Signature Athol <http://cust.idl.com.au/athol> Linux Registered User # 254000 I'm a Libran Engineer. I don't argue, I discuss.
feral - 28 Sep 2006 09:24 GMT > And when they do have deaths, the stats are adjusted against "per head of > [permanent] population", skewing the stats completely. "Per average [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Better still would be to always correct against "per [multiplier] vehicle > km travelled" or "per [multiplier] driver hours". Hey you. :-)
Every State and Territory in Oz has different "raw data" to complicate figures. OK.
But hey, *every* one has "road toll". I am not playing one against the other. But I can't let idiots say that the NT has a better road toll figure because it has no maximum limit.
That's bullshit Athol.
I have seen the skid marks, I have seen the wrecks, I have read statistics, I have read research (as I posted just before). The indigenous, the young, the ute drivers, the long distances, the alcohol, all need to go into the mix. Not that I think a lot would toe the line up in the NT. :-)
I also recommend you read a little of the research, it would appear it *is* locals who make up the bulk of the figures.
 Signature Take Care. ~~ Feral ( @..@) (\-- Ü--/) ((.>______<.)) ^^^ ^^^
Albm&ctd - 28 Sep 2006 12:03 GMT In article <451b86b4$0$501$61c65585@uq-127creek-reader- 03.brisbane.pipenetworks.com.au>, plonked@home.ru says...
> I also recommend you read a little of the research, it would > appear it *is* locals who make up the bulk of the figures. Did they die happy?
Al
 Signature I don't take sides. It's more fun to insult everyone. http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html
feral - 28 Sep 2006 21:01 GMT > In article <451b86b4$0$501$61c65585@uq-127creek-reader- > 03.brisbane.pipenetworks.com.au>, plonked@home.ru says... [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Did they die happy? I don't know Al. Do you want to ask them?
 Signature Take Care. ~~ Feral ( @..@) (\-- Ü--/) ((.>______<.)) ^^^ ^^^
Albm&ctd - 29 Sep 2006 05:36 GMT In article <451c2a08$0$482$61c65585@uq-127creek-reader- 03.brisbane.pipenetworks.com.au>, plonked@home.ru says...
> > In article <451b86b4$0$501$61c65585@uq-127creek-reader- > > 03.brisbane.pipenetworks.com.au>, plonked@home.ru says... [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > I don't know Al. Do you want to ask them? Would they have died happier at 110 Km/h.. and before you say they wouldn't have crashed...
Have you noted skid marks anywhere else except the NT or your undies, like for instance 100 km/h zones? Why, we even have wobbly old skid marks in a 70 km/h zone that defy explanation because someone left the road at that speed. Could there be some other factors apart from speed involved in accidents?
Al
 Signature I don't take sides. It's more fun to insult everyone. http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html
feral - 29 Sep 2006 06:27 GMT > Would they have died happier at 110 Km/h.. and before you say they > wouldn't have crashed... Don't know Al. Go and ask them.
> Have you noted skid marks anywhere else except the NT or your undies, Yep.
> like for instance 100 km/h zones? Yep.
Why, we even have wobbly old skid marks
> in a 70 km/h zone that defy explanation because someone left the road at > that speed. Could there be some other factors apart from speed involved > in accidents? Yep.
Who say's there isn't Al? Point the bastards out to me.
:-)
 Signature Take Care. ~~ Feral ( @..@) (\-- Ü--/) ((.>______<.)) ^^^ ^^^
mathew@NOauroraSPAM.vm.bytemark.co.uk - 29 Sep 2006 08:38 GMT In article <451caeb0$0$491$61c65585@uq-127creek-reader-03.brisbane.pipenetworks.com .au>,
> > Would they have died happier at 110 Km/h.. and before you say they > > wouldn't have crashed... [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > Who say's there isn't Al? Point the bastards out to me. > :-) Better point 'em out so GovCo can re-educate them.
Everyone knows that exceeding the speed limit by 5km/h means certain death, just ask GovCo, they'll tell ya :)
Albm&ctd - 30 Sep 2006 05:23 GMT In article <mathew-62D937.17381629092006@un-2park-reader- 01.sydney.pipenetworks.com>, mathew@NOauroraSPAM.vm.bytemark.co.uk says...
> In article > <451caeb0$0$491$61c65585@uq-127creek-reader-03.brisbane.pipenetworks.com [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > Everyone knows that exceeding the speed limit by 5km/h means certain > death, just ask GovCo, they'll tell ya :) I had a look at austroads 2004 figures that were handy and had a quick calculation and unless I've farked up.... NT 22,046 km of roads and 53 deaths = 1 fatality every 415 km NSW 182,074 km of roads and 539 deaths = 1 fatality every 337 km
Well there you go, my skewed results, not like gov that tries to make a small number of lost lives look worse than a larger number of lost lives.
Al
 Signature I don't take sides. It's more fun to insult everyone. http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html
Ben Thomas - 30 Sep 2006 05:35 GMT > I had a look at austroads 2004 figures that were handy and had a quick > calculation and unless I've farked up.... > NT 22,046 km of roads and 53 deaths = 1 fatality every 415 km > NSW 182,074 km of roads and 539 deaths = 1 fatality every 337 km 182,074 km of roads, but that's not kms travelled right?
Isn't the number of fatalaties/km travelled the rate that matters?
> Well there you go, my skewed results, not like gov that tries to make a > small number of lost lives look worse than a larger number of lost lives.
 Signature Ben Lyric of the week: "This the eighties and I'm down with the ladies"
Albm&ctd - 30 Sep 2006 06:36 GMT > > I had a look at austroads 2004 figures that were handy and had a quick > > calculation and unless I've farked up.... [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Isn't the number of fatalaties/km travelled the rate that matters? Not if you are picking up dead bodies off the road or likely to become one.
Al
 Signature I don't take sides. It's more fun to insult everyone. http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html
feral - 30 Sep 2006 07:04 GMT >>>I had a look at austroads 2004 figures that were handy and had a quick >>>calculation and unless I've farked up.... [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Not if you are picking up dead bodies off the road or likely to become > one. Did you both read the research URL's I posted? OK.
I did not compare states. I merely stated that the NT toll went up 54% in 2005.
Research showed:
alcohol is a factor, youth is a factor, utes/one tonners is a factor, SVRO accidents is a factor, speed on the open road is a factor.
And yes Al, I have seen skid marks in other states/territories in other speed zones. But *none* as frequent or as articulate as the ones in the NT. I could have taken hundreds of pics to show you but didn't have the time to spare (otherwise I would have had to speed). You can bet London to a brick on that a lot didn't stay on their wheels when they crossed the verge and headed bush.
Of the four related factors above which one can immediately be utilised to *attempt* to lower the SVRO problem? Bearing in mind that they need utes and you can't reason with youth (especially if they're full of piss).
Oh, how far is it from Darwin to Katherine - at least half a slab.
 Signature Take Care. ~~ Feral ( @..@) (\-- Ü--/) ((.>______<.)) ^^^ ^^^
Albm&ctd - 30 Sep 2006 07:28 GMT In article <451e08e7$0$496$61c65585@uq-127creek-reader- 03.brisbane.pipenetworks.com.au>, plonked@home.ru says...
> >>>I had a look at austroads 2004 figures that were handy and had a quick > >>>calculation and unless I've farked up.... [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > Oh, how far is it from Darwin to Katherine - at least half a slab. That joke's a little old. Here is another.. The problem with remote areas and drink driving? Unlikely to be caught. Speed limits and speed cameras won't detect or deter someone from driving impaired but only send them a *speeding* fine in the mail.
Al
 Signature I don't take sides. It's more fun to insult everyone. http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html
feral - 30 Sep 2006 07:37 GMT > That joke's a little old. Here is another.. > The problem with remote areas and drink driving? Unlikely to be caught. > Speed limits and speed cameras won't detect or deter someone from driving > impaired but only send them a *speeding* fine in the mail. And then next time. And then when they lose their licence. That is, if they don't lose their life (or someone elses) first.
Your input is exceedingly negative in regard to human life on the NT roads IMO. Shame Al, shame.
 Signature Take Care. ~~ Feral ( @..@) (\-- Ü--/) ((.>______<.)) ^^^ ^^^
Albm&ctd - 30 Sep 2006 12:13 GMT In article <451e1096$0$496$61c65585@uq-127creek-reader- 03.brisbane.pipenetworks.com.au>, plonked@home.ru says...
> > That joke's a little old. Here is another.. > > The problem with remote areas and drink driving? Unlikely to be caught. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Your input is exceedingly negative in regard to human life on > the NT roads IMO. Shame Al, shame. Yeah, different if they were cuddly koalas. LOL. I love the shame bit.. Derryn (sp)
Al
 Signature I don't take sides. It's more fun to insult everyone. http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html
Athol - 29 Sep 2006 00:02 GMT > But hey, *every* one has "road toll". I am not playing one > against the other. But I can't let idiots say that the NT has > a better road toll figure because it has no maximum limit.
> That's bullshit Athol. It would be if that's what I'd said. I'm concerned that the deliberate misuse of statistics has been used to prove quite the extreme opposite. Per capita, NT has massively worse figures than anywhere else in the country.
Got that?
Their crash rates are fairly moderate but their population is so small that the numbers effectively get amplified compared to the stats for a less mobile but higher population state.
I really don't see any value in using per capita as a normalising factor for road crash stats. The number of people sitting in nursing homes, for example, make no contribution to the stats.
> I have seen the skid marks, I have seen the wrecks, I have > read statistics, I have read research (as I posted just > before). The indigenous, the young, the ute drivers, the long > distances, the alcohol, all need to go into the mix. Not that > I think a lot would toe the line up in the NT. :-) Indeed, these issues would certainly contribute. So obviously, the solution is to focus on the problems, not on something that is predominantly a minor exacerbating factor. What's the point in ignoring alcohol, failure to wear seatbelts, etc. and forcing the travel speed down to increase fatigue?
> I also recommend you read a little of the research, it would > appear it *is* locals who make up the bulk of the figures.
 Signature Athol <http://cust.idl.com.au/athol> Linux Registered User # 254000 I'm a Libran Engineer. I don't argue, I discuss.
feral - 29 Sep 2006 01:08 GMT >>But hey, *every* one has "road toll". I am not playing one >>against the other. But I can't let idiots say that the NT has [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > It would be if that's what I'd said. Don't take things as a personal affront when it *clearly* isn't. Read it again. It is what a lot of ill informed posters are saying. There is *no* proof to back it up.
I'm concerned that the
> deliberate misuse of statistics has been used to prove quite the > extreme opposite. Per capita, NT has massively worse figures > than anywhere else in the country. > > Got that? I don't believe it's deliberate at all. Did you get that the "death toll" figure for 2005 was up *54%* (to 54)from the 2004 figure. Did you read the research from AAMI about SVRO and the death and severe injury caused. And you guessed it, speed on the open road showed up in the research together with alcohol, youth and utes/one tonners. No surprise ALL these should be targetted.
I was merely having a go at the clowns who are saying everything is OK with "open limits", saying that it is *not* a factor at all. It is IMHO.
> Their crash rates are fairly moderate but their population is > so small that the numbers effectively get amplified compared to [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > factor for road crash stats. The number of people sitting in > nursing homes, for example, make no contribution to the stats. No. But in my book it's part of the toll.
>>I have seen the skid marks, I have seen the wrecks, I have >>read statistics, I have read research (as I posted just [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > in ignoring alcohol, failure to wear seatbelts, etc. and forcing > the travel speed down to increase fatigue? Fatigue on the open roads in NT is a factor but it's distance combined with idiocy mainly causing the problem. Plan your trip and pull over if you're tired. Simple? Nah. They're tough up there. :-P
>>I also recommend you read a little of the research, it would >>appear it *is* locals who make up the bulk of the figures. Good show on TV last night about frontal lobe injury. Did you see it?
 Signature Take Care. ~~ Feral ( @..@) (\-- Ü--/) ((.>______<.)) ^^^ ^^^
Albm&ctd - 29 Sep 2006 05:46 GMT In article <451c63f8$0$502$61c65585@uq-127creek-reader- 03.brisbane.pipenetworks.com.au>, plonked@home.ru says...
> Good show on TV last night about frontal lobe injury. Did you > see it? It was two part. I actually had a report after a drunk hit us in 1981 that states I have no neurological deficit. What do you think?
Al
 Signature I don't take sides. It's more fun to insult everyone. http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html
feral - 29 Sep 2006 06:29 GMT > In article <451c63f8$0$502$61c65585@uq-127creek-reader- > 03.brisbane.pipenetworks.com.au>, plonked@home.ru says... [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > It was two part. I actually had a report after a drunk hit us in 1981 > that states I have no neurological deficit. What do you think? Do you love me?
:-)
 Signature Take Care. ~~ Feral ( @..@) (\-- Ü--/) ((.>______<.)) ^^^ ^^^
Albm&ctd - 30 Sep 2006 05:42 GMT In article <451caf20$0$491$61c65585@uq-127creek-reader- 03.brisbane.pipenetworks.com.au>, plonked@home.ru says...
> > In article <451c63f8$0$502$61c65585@uq-127creek-reader- > > 03.brisbane.pipenetworks.com.au>, plonked@home.ru says... [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Do you love me? > :-) Of course, remember.. I lent you my cock sucking frog.
Al
 Signature I don't take sides. It's more fun to insult everyone. http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html
feral - 30 Sep 2006 06:09 GMT > In article <451caf20$0$491$61c65585@uq-127creek-reader- > 03.brisbane.pipenetworks.com.au>, plonked@home.ru says... [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Of course, remember.. I lent you my cock sucking frog. You have frontal lobe trauma. The frog never came. :-P
 Signature Take Care. ~~ Feral ( @..@) (\-- Ü--/) ((.>______<.)) ^^^ ^^^
Albm&ctd - 30 Sep 2006 06:47 GMT In article <451dfbfb$0$495$61c65585@uq-127creek-reader- 03.brisbane.pipenetworks.com.au>, plonked@home.ru says...
> > In article <451caf20$0$491$61c65585@uq-127creek-reader- > > 03.brisbane.pipenetworks.com.au>, plonked@home.ru says... [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > You have frontal lobe trauma. The frog never came. :-P Hitch hiking to your place, probably fell in love with a truckie.
Al
 Signature I don't take sides. It's more fun to insult everyone. http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html
feral - 30 Sep 2006 07:07 GMT > Hitch hiking to your place, probably fell in love with a truckie. You better hope frogs don't believe in karma.
 Signature Take Care. ~~ Feral ( @..@) (\-- Ü--/) ((.>______<.)) ^^^ ^^^
Athol - 29 Sep 2006 06:51 GMT
> It was two part. I actually had a report after a drunk hit us in 1981 > that states I have no neurological deficit. What do you think? No neurological defecate? Sounds like they're saying that you're not full of shite. :-)
 Signature Athol <http://cust.idl.com.au/athol> Linux Registered User # 254000 I'm a Libran Engineer. I don't argue, I discuss.
Ben Thomas - 27 Sep 2006 05:45 GMT > Where did you get this info? > According to our local info, our Parliament didn't/isn't sitting this month [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > haven't got a clue as to how to reduce the road toll and this is their way > of being seen to being doing something. I think they have a clue, but it would be political suicide.
 Signature Ben Lyric of the week: "This the eighties and I'm down with the ladies"
atec77 - 27 Sep 2006 10:12 GMT >> Where did you get this info? >> According to our local info, our Parliament didn't/isn't sitting this [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > I think they have a clue, but it would be political suicide. I just emailed the brother in law about this , will be interesting to see what he says ... he has a some pull up that way and often drive the Alice to Darwin in sfa time
matt vk3zmw - 27 Sep 2006 10:47 GMT >> THOSE NT residents, periodic visitors and industry persons who wish to >> maintain the speed derestriction allowance in the NT; OR have it only [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > PhilD Ed Zachery.
As a long-time former resident I can tell you that it isn't whether the limit is introduced, its only when and by whom.
Pollies on both sides and at both levels want to be seen 'to be doing something', yet all are wary of being seen as the Boegyman who took away everyones freedoms.
What IS clear is that even if the Martin government voted in favour of keeping the status quo, the Feds can veto it as a purely executive action. Unlike everywhere else, the NT has no 'state's rights'.
Neil Gerace - 27 Sep 2006 06:26 GMT We'd all better get up there while there's still an incentive. Because if you never-never go, ...
Albm&ctd - 28 Sep 2006 06:20 GMT In article <451a0b5d$0$15646$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader- 01.iinet.net.au>, geracen@iinet.net.au says...
> We'd all better get up there while there's still an incentive. Because if > you never-never go, ... you'll become a full of sh.t, politician?
Al
 Signature I don't take sides. It's more fun to insult everyone. http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html
John McKenzie - 27 Sep 2006 07:43 GMT > THOSE NT residents, periodic visitors and industry persons who wish to > maintain the speed derestriction allowance in the NT; OR have it only [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > The proposal is for a blanket 110km/h default maximum speed limit, > championed by Harold Scruby I hope he get's offered a state funeral when he dies. Great bloke that he is (as far as absolute c.nts go).
Please don't take away the biggest reason I have for considering moving to the N.T.
 Signature John McKenzie
tosspam@aol.com abuse@aol.com abuse@yahoo.com abuse@hotmail.com abuse@msn.com abuse@sprint.com abuse@earthlink.com fraudinfo@psinet.com sweep.day@accc.gov.au uce@ftc.gov power corrupts, but I need my hair dryer to work admin@loopback $LOGIN@localhost $LOGNAME@localhost $USER@localhost $USER@$HOST -h1024@localhost root@mailloop.com president@whitehouse.gov vice.president@whitehouse.gov abuse@iprimus.com.au abuse@cia.gov abuse@fbi.gov abuse@asio.gov.au abuse@federalpolice.gov.au
ant - 28 Sep 2006 13:26 GMT > The proposal is for a blanket 110km/h default maximum speed limit, > championed by Harold Scruby It's about time we kicked him off the pension so the useless old turd had to get a job and stopped bothering everyone.
 Signature ant Don't try to email me; I'm borrowing the spammer du jour's addy
Jason James - 28 Sep 2006 23:42 GMT > THOSE NT residents, periodic visitors and industry persons who wish to > maintain the speed derestriction allowance in the NT; OR have it only [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > I have made it legally clear to not impose this on (//) signposted zones. The thing that amazes me is that some city drivers who get out in the west of NSW, dont seem to know that especially at dusk and beyond, Fauna can and often do, wander out onto the road especially where there is bushes /trees on the side of the road.
The "Kangaroo sign" does not impart enough detail, such as "also watch for stock/pigs/horses etc at night. Depending on the state of the perpetual drought,..the danger varies considerabley. More signs to impart this message? Well, perhaps at those roadside parking areas, as its a little difficult to educate them within the bounds of a sign flicking past.
Jason
Athol - 29 Sep 2006 00:35 GMT > The "Kangaroo sign" does not impart enough detail, such as "also watch for > stock/pigs/horses etc at night. Depending on the state of the perpetual > drought,..the danger varies considerabley. More signs to impart this > message? Well, perhaps at those roadside parking areas, as its a little > difficult to educate them within the bounds of a sign flicking past. You'd probably need the signs at every servo in the region, too. That's the only place a lot of people stop...
 Signature Athol <http://cust.idl.com.au/athol> Linux Registered User # 254000 I'm a Libran Engineer. I don't argue, I discuss.
Neil Gerace - 29 Sep 2006 01:35 GMT > The "Kangaroo sign" does not impart enough detail, such as "also watch for > stock/pigs/horses etc at night. Depending on the state of the perpetual > drought,..the danger varies considerabley. More signs to impart this > message? Well, perhaps at those roadside parking areas, as its a little > difficult to educate them within the bounds of a sign flicking past. Which is why, in my day, they educated people about stuff like that in primary school.
feral - 29 Sep 2006 01:46 GMT > Which is why, in my day, they educated people about stuff like that in > primary school. I'll bet it was a country primary school, it was a local initiative (not part of the curriculum), therefore not widely based demographically. Good on those caring enough to do it.
 Signature Take Care. ~~ Feral ( @..@) (\-- Ü--/) ((.>______<.)) ^^^ ^^^
Neil Gerace - 29 Sep 2006 02:00 GMT >> Which is why, in my day, they educated people about stuff like that in >> primary school. > I'll bet it was a country primary school, it was a local initiative (not > part of the curriculum), therefore not widely based demographically. Good > on those caring enough to do it. Suburban Perth. Science class, nocturnal animals.
feral - 29 Sep 2006 02:20 GMT > Suburban Perth. Science class, nocturnal animals. I knew WA was a bit behind but...... I learnt that in Infants. :-P
I was eleven. ;-)
 Signature Take Care. ~~ Feral ( @..@) (\-- Ü--/) ((.>______<.)) ^^^ ^^^
Jason James - 29 Sep 2006 02:29 GMT > "feral" <plonked@home.ru> wrote in message news:451c6cc2$0$482$61c65585@uq-127creek-reader-03.brisbane.pipenetworks.com.au...
> >> Which is why, in my day, they educated people about stuff like that in > >> primary school. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Suburban Perth. Science class, nocturnal animals. True, altho the horse that I nearly collected one night coming back from Brewarrina to Bourke,as it ran full pelt across the front of me, must have had insomnia.
Then you have the dead Emu which some trucky cleaned-up and left it there in the table-drain for the next car 'rounding the bend. Made a mess of the Cortina front-end.
In those days the tabledrain on many gibber surfaced roads, was as smooth as silk in comparison. I kid you not, the local councils or whom ever was responsible for road mantenance, used to use egg-sized rocks as a surface.
Jason
|
|
|