Car Forum / Australian Car Forums / General Car Topics (Australian group) / March 2007
"It's Because I'm Black, I'nnit ?"
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Wise Old Man - 26 Mar 2007 10:29 GMT http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21449191-2,00.html
David Z - 26 Mar 2007 10:33 GMT Well he's actually not black, but nevermind...
> http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21449191-2,00.html Noddy - 26 Mar 2007 10:44 GMT > Well he's actually not black, but nevermind... No, he's not. He's f.cking green with yellow spots, right?
Jesus you're a f.cking moron.....
-- Regards, Noddy.
David Z - 26 Mar 2007 10:55 GMT >> Well he's actually not black, but nevermind... > > No, he's not. He's f.cking green with yellow spots, right? I mean he's not black in the normal sense of the word, as in a negro - from Africa. I think the correct term to use in this case would be 'dark'.
Wise Old Man - 26 Mar 2007 10:59 GMT >I mean he's not black in the normal sense of the word, as in a negro - from >Africa. I think the correct term to use in this case would be 'dark'. A lot of "Negroes" (even from Africa) aren't particularly black either, and Kamahl has got a VERY good suntan, so stop being stupid and pedantic.
David Z - 26 Mar 2007 11:06 GMT >>I mean he's not black in the normal sense of the word, as in a negro - >>from >>Africa. I think the correct term to use in this case would be 'dark'. > > A lot of "Negroes" (even from Africa) aren't particularly black either, > and That's from mixing with whites. It doesn't change anything.
Noddy - 26 Mar 2007 11:19 GMT > That's from mixing with whites. It doesn't change anything. It certainly doesn't. You're *still* a clueless fuckwit who's grandparents should have been gassed at Bergen Belsen.
-- Regards, Noddy.
Knobdoodle - 27 Mar 2007 09:18 GMT >> That's from mixing with whites. It doesn't change anything. > > It certainly doesn't. You're *still* a clueless fuckwit who's grandparents > should have been gassed at Bergen Belsen. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Try as I might I just can't come up with a more appropriate response than this Noddy.
 Signature Knob (Sometimes a line of conversation is just so weird that it needs to be snuffed.)
David Z - 28 Mar 2007 06:24 GMT >> That's from mixing with whites. It doesn't change anything. > > It certainly doesn't. You're *still* a clueless fuckwit who's grandparents Right... I think I should remind you of this comment you made on asians a while ago: "They're backward arsed fuckwits who don't give a sh.t about anything or anyone."
Noddy - 28 Mar 2007 08:26 GMT > Right... I think I should remind you of this comment you made on asians a > while ago: > "They're backward arsed fuckwits who don't give a sh.t about anything or > anyone." And that has to do with what exactly?
*f.ck* you're a moron....
-- Regards, Noddy.
David Z - 28 Mar 2007 08:31 GMT >> Right... I think I should remind you of this comment you made on asians >> a while ago: >> "They're backward arsed fuckwits who don't give a sh.t about anything or >> anyone." > > And that has to do with what exactly? It means you're in no position to call *me* clueless making comments like that.
Noddy - 28 Mar 2007 10:06 GMT > It means you're in no position to call *me* clueless making comments like > that. Oh.
I repeat my claim that you are a completely clueless fucktard.....
-- Regards, Noddy.
Clockmeister - 28 Mar 2007 12:17 GMT >>> Right... I think I should remind you of this comment you made on asians >>> a while ago: [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > It means you're in no position to call *me* clueless making comments like > that. 99% of people here will call you clueless, me included, so what do you make of that?
David Z - 28 Mar 2007 12:36 GMT >>>> Right... I think I should remind you of this comment you made on >>>> asians a while ago: [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > 99% of people here will call you clueless, me included, so what do you > make of that? I said he's in no position to call me that after the comment *he* made about the asians. Not *my* comment... duh.
Clockmeister - 28 Mar 2007 20:07 GMT >>>>> Right... I think I should remind you of this comment you made on >>>>> asians a while ago: [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > I said he's in no position to call me that after the comment *he* made > about the asians. Not *my* comment... duh. Didn't say it was, stupid.
Point is that your clueless regardless of any comments other people make.
Athol - 28 Mar 2007 13:34 GMT [snip some David Zuk drivel]
> 99% of people here will call you clueless, me included, so what do you make > of that? That 1% of the people in here are clueless? :-)
 Signature Athol <http://cust.idl.com.au/athol> Linux Registered User # 254000 I'm a Libran Engineer. I don't argue, I discuss.
Noddy - 28 Mar 2007 14:43 GMT > That 1% of the people in here are clueless? :-) Lol :)
-- Regards, Noddy.
Clockmeister - 28 Mar 2007 20:05 GMT > [snip some David Zuk drivel] > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > That 1% of the people in here are clueless? :-) hehe, care to guess who that 1% might be?
DAvid - 30 Mar 2007 03:54 GMT >> [snip some David Zuk drivel] >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > hehe, care to guess who that 1% might be? Obviously, you're referring to that fuckwit Noddy, so what a stupid question. No doubt, he's the only one who needs reminding.
DAVO
atec 77 - 28 Mar 2007 08:34 GMT >>> That's from mixing with whites. It doesn't change anything. >> It certainly doesn't. You're *still* a clueless fuckwit who's grandparents [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > "They're backward arsed fuckwits who don't give a sh.t about anything or > anyone." I can see the comment is very Germain to you weazelzyke
Noddy - 26 Mar 2007 11:18 GMT > I mean he's not black in the normal sense of the word, as in a negro - > from Africa. I think the correct term to use in this case would be > 'dark'. You think wrong, as usual.
-- Regards, Noddy.
Atheist Chaplain - 26 Mar 2007 10:51 GMT Wise Old Man - 26 Mar 2007 10:56 GMT And you had to start a new thread by putting your comment in the header BECAUSE.....?
Atheist Chaplain - 26 Mar 2007 13:39 GMT > And you had to start a new thread by putting your comment in the header > BECAUSE.....? I can
 Signature "Calling Atheism a religion is like calling bald a hair color." Don Hirschberg
Jeßus - 26 Mar 2007 11:32 GMT > http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21449191-2,00.html I can't find the 'quote' in your subject header anywhere in the story, you stupid white c.nt.
 Signature /J/ I haven't slept for ten days, because that would be too long - Mitch Hedberg
Wise Old Man - 26 Mar 2007 11:40 GMT >> http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21449191-2,00.html > >I can't find the 'quote' in your subject header anywhere in the story, you >stupid white c.nt. You just don't get it do you, troll boy ?
RainbowWarrior - 26 Mar 2007 11:46 GMT > http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21449191-2,00.html Well if he didn't want it in the paper he would have just paid the $75 fine in the mail. But the court costs are possibly a tax detuction anyway under promotional expenses :)
Poxy - 26 Mar 2007 12:03 GMT > http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21449191-2,00.html That's pretty a stupid observation.
He was caught by a speed camera doing 12km over the 80k limit and took it to court because he wanted to avoid losing the points, just like anyone could if they chose to.
And the correct quote, you sad, racist cretin, is "It's 'cos I is black, innit?"
David Z - 26 Mar 2007 13:46 GMT >> http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21449191-2,00.html > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > And the correct quote, you sad, racist cretin, is "It's 'cos I is black, > innit?" And to correct your correction, it's "racialist", not "racist".
hoot - 26 Mar 2007 14:10 GMT >>> http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21449191-2,00.html >> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > And to correct your correction, it's "racialist", not "racist". Not really.
Online Etymology Dictionary racist 1932 as a noun, 1938 as an adjective, from race (n.2); racism is first attested 1936 (from Fr. racisme, 1935), originally in the context of Nazi theories. But they replaced earlier words, racialism (1907) and racialist (1917), both often used at first in a British or South African context.
David Z - 26 Mar 2007 14:17 GMT Oh dear...
>>>> http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21449191-2,00.html >>> [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > theories. But they replaced earlier words, racialism (1907) and racialist > (1917), both often used at first in a British or South African context. hoot - 26 Mar 2007 14:39 GMT > Oh dear... I wasn't being argumentative David, ...i thought it was funny.
>> "hoot" <ratat@tat.com> wrote in message > news:4607c620$0$9770$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] >> theories. But they replaced earlier words, racialism (1907) and racialist >> (1917), both often used at first in a British or South African context. Wise Old Man - 27 Mar 2007 02:37 GMT >> http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21449191-2,00.html > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >And the correct quote, you sad, racist cretin, is "It's 'cos I is black, >innit? Another humourless, brainless troll who just didn't get it.....
|
|
|