Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Australian Car Forums / General Car Topics (Australian group) / October 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

im not anti holden

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mmal380vrx@hotmail.com - 27 Oct 2007 20:01 GMT
the vl was the only decent commodore ever made
Jason James - 27 Oct 2007 21:01 GMT
> the vl was the only decent commodore ever made

Well, lets say after the VK, it was not a hard act to follow. OTOH Brocky's
05 VK was a great car,..tho it was only a VK shell.

Jason
Dan--- - 27 Oct 2007 22:19 GMT
>> the vl was the only decent commodore ever made
>
> Well, lets say after the VK, it was not a hard act to follow. OTOH
> Brocky's 05 VK was a great car,..tho it was only a VK shell.

VK/VL/VN *gags*
All should of been crushed! :-p

Signature

Regards
Dan

Athol - 27 Oct 2007 23:31 GMT
> VK/VL/VN *gags*
> All should of been crushed! :-p

Best VK I ever certified had a 1JZ-GTE.  Best VL had a 350.  :-)

Signature

Athol
<http://cust.idl.com.au/athol>   Linux Registered User # 254000
I'm a Libran Engineer. I don't argue, I discuss.

Dan--- - 27 Oct 2007 23:41 GMT
>> VK/VL/VN *gags*
>> All should of been crushed! :-p
>
> Best VK I ever certified had a 1JZ-GTE.  Best VL had a 350.  :-)

A slight improvement I suppose. ;-)

Signature

Regards
Dan

Marts - 28 Oct 2007 07:04 GMT
Jason James wrote...

> Well, lets say after the VK, it was not a hard act to follow. OTOH Brocky's
> 05 VK was a great car,..tho it was only a VK shell.

Not really. Group C cars back then were pretty well production line models,
unlike the V8s today that are assembled on a 'spit' from panels that are welded
around a roll cage which forms a part of the car's structure.
Noddy - 28 Oct 2007 10:03 GMT
"Marts" <marts_57@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message

> Not really. Group C cars back then were pretty well production line
> models,

Very heavily modified versions of production line models  anyway.....

--
Regards,
Noddy.
Marts - 29 Oct 2007 09:11 GMT
Noddy wrote...

> > Not really. Group C cars back then were pretty well production line
> > models,
>
> Very heavily modified versions of production line models  anyway.....

I would suggest that they were closer to stock than the current crop of
"touring" cars are. They ran stock internal trim, seats. If A/C was fitted it
stayed in the car. Engine mods were extensive but had to be homologated. I can't
recall the rest, ie. drivetrain, gearbox, suspension, etc.. But I think that
they ran standard axles, maybe modded geometry, rose joint components. But the
bodywork had to be chopped and arches installed to accomodate the by-then huge
tyres that they were running.

One Bathurst, one of the HDT cars was pranged. Brock collared one of the HDT
display cars (they looked identical to the race cars but ran standard
mechanicals). They ripped out the engine etc. and replaced it with race gear. I
forget how he went. He might've broken an axle on the start line ('81).

Signature

I must confess, I was born at a very early age. - Groucho Marx

Jeßus - 27 Oct 2007 22:16 GMT
> the vl was the only decent commodore ever made

For once, you're right.
Klompmeester - 28 Oct 2007 01:59 GMT
>> the vl was the only decent commodore ever made
>
> For once, you're right.

LOL, good one :-)
Jeßus - 28 Oct 2007 05:17 GMT
>>> the vl was the only decent commodore ever made
>> For once, you're right.
>
> LOL, good one :-)

Heh, well, I always thought that Nissan engine was the best thing Holden
ever did :)
Dan--- - 28 Oct 2007 05:28 GMT
>>>> the vl was the only decent commodore ever made
>>> For once, you're right.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Heh, well, I always thought that Nissan engine was the best thing Holden
> ever did :)

Only half best thing Holden did with the VL was the Nissan turbo 6 other
than that the VL was a pussbox.

Signature

Regards
Dan

Jeßus - 29 Oct 2007 02:13 GMT
>>>>> the vl was the only decent commodore ever made
>>>> For once, you're right.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Only half best thing Holden did with the VL was the Nissan turbo 6 other
> than that the VL was a pussbox.

That could well be (puss-box).
I always remembered taking a VL turbo for a drive and thinking just how
much better the engine felt over all the others offered by Holden.

I should add I'm certainly no fan of Fords either - although I have
owned a few, so I guess I have a slight preference for Fords, generally
speaking.
Noddy - 28 Oct 2007 05:37 GMT
> Heh, well, I always thought that Nissan engine was the best thing Holden
> ever did :)

It wasn't in the Commodore, that's for sure :)

--
Regards,
Noddy.
Klompmeester - 28 Oct 2007 07:39 GMT
>>>> the vl was the only decent commodore ever made
>>> For once, you're right.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Heh, well, I always thought that Nissan engine was the best thing Holden
> ever did :)

Aside from the turbo model, it was an expensive dud in the Commodore.
Dan--- - 28 Oct 2007 08:00 GMT
> Aside from the turbo model, it was an expensive dud in the Commodore.

Yeah especially the heads the ol 3800's and ecotecs wasn't the smoothest
of all engines but nothing much really went wrong with them though. They
just didn't like LPG much. :-)

One big thing you notice from going from a VP/VR to a VS is how much
smoother the 3800 became and in all reality it wasn't all that hard on
fuel either.

Oh sh.t sorry I shouldn't say anything good about Holdens because the
Mitsu clowns will get all upsettypoo's. :-p

Signature

Regards
Dan

OzOne - 28 Oct 2007 10:30 GMT
>One big thing you notice from going from a VP/VR to a VS is how much
>smoother the 3800 became and in all reality it wasn't all that hard on
>fuel either.
>
>Oh sh.t sorry I shouldn't say anything good about Holdens because the
>Mitsu clowns will get all upsettypoo's. :-p

Jesus Dan, If you thought a VS was smooth you should have test driven
a Magna.
Compared to a Magna, the VS was a rattly POS with less power.

Oh and I actually know this as a fact becuase I owned both....I still
have the Magna and it needs a CV joint and has hasd both globes
replaced in the headlights.
The VS...well it had a gearbox, rear shocks, a host of electrical
faults and leaked like a sieve.
Jeßus - 29 Oct 2007 02:16 GMT
>> Aside from the turbo model, it was an expensive dud in the Commodore.
>
> Yeah especially the heads the ol 3800's and ecotecs wasn't the smoothest
> of all engines but nothing much really went wrong with them though. They
> just didn't like LPG much. :-)

I had a VN work vehicle on gas... it used to cough and splutter every
time I went past the local communications tower :)
Jeßus - 29 Oct 2007 02:16 GMT
>>>>> the vl was the only decent commodore ever made
>>>> For once, you're right.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Aside from the turbo model, it was an expensive dud in the Commodore.

Hmm, no-one seems to like the non-turbo engine by the looks of it!
Daryl Walford - 28 Oct 2007 13:02 GMT
>> the vl was the only decent commodore ever made
>
> For once, you're right.

If thats the case you don't have a high opinion of Commodores in general:-)
The list of known faults with VL's is long.

Daryl
Jeßus - 29 Oct 2007 02:08 GMT
>>> the vl was the only decent commodore ever made
>>
>> For once, you're right.
>
> If thats the case you don't have a high opinion of Commodores in general:-)

Never been a huge fan to be honest :)

> The list of known faults with VL's is long.

That could well be... I just liked the engine really (the turbo one at
least) - and I always liked the look of the VL Calais...  I always
loathed the interior of the commodores though... really cheap and
plasticy looking.
Daryl Walford - 29 Oct 2007 02:29 GMT
>>>> the vl was the only decent commodore ever made
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Never been a huge fan to be honest :)

Me either:-)

>> The list of known faults with VL's is long.
>
> That could well be... I just liked the engine really (the turbo one at
> least) - and I always liked the look of the VL Calais...  I always
> loathed the interior of the commodores though... really cheap and
> plasticy looking.

Whilst the engine performs better than the black motor it replaced it
still had lots of problems.
I'm no expert on the subject but I know they a known for head and head
gasket failures due partly to the location of the radiator, crank angle
sensors fail often and try changing the middle two spark plugs which is
IMO a pita.

Daryl
Klompmeester - 29 Oct 2007 19:32 GMT
>>>>> the vl was the only decent commodore ever made
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> sensors fail often and try changing the middle two spark plugs which is
> IMO a pita.

Piece of piss actually and you forgot air flow meter failures which are
common and expensive.
Daryl Walford - 30 Oct 2007 06:03 GMT
>>>>>> the vl was the only decent commodore ever made
>>>>> For once, you're right.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Piece of piss actually and you forgot air flow meter failures which are
> common and expensive.

Changing those 2 plugs might be easy for someone who has done it many
times, I've done it twice that I can remember and it was a pita both times.

Daryl
Klompmeester - 30 Oct 2007 21:33 GMT
>>>>>>> the vl was the only decent commodore ever made
>>>>>> For once, you're right.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> times, I've done it twice that I can remember and it was a pita both
> times.

Remove duct 1 minute + time it takes to replace 6 plugs on any other car.

It's not a question of how many times ;-)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.