In article <3e4e8de3-fb8e-49d7-8a95-
2e3f8609565f@j20g2000hsi.googlegroups.com>, the_dawggie@hotmail.com
says...
> There is no way in hell I'd drive more than around 65
> on most of it.
Rather than beg for lowered speed limits on this 100 km/h limited road,
I'd suggest pointing out this road.. to claim that the speed limit is
*SAFE* and that other far better roads could have limits of 200 km/h.
The end result would be nobody speeding and breaking the 'law'. It's only
when you break the speed limit that bad things happen... Sorry, years of
brainwashing speed kills conditioning may have caused that statement.
Al

Signature
When schools of fish were studied, it was found that the leaders had
brain damage.
We, the public should therefore demand a similar study be carried out on
our leaders.
http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html
>> Pretty sure it's actual 100 signs, which is fine on the straighter
>> parts...
> It is not a straight road. You've driven it and know it.
Yep. The straightish part near the T intersection at Mullion
Creek was absolutely fine at speed...
IIRC, it had a lower limit, which was kinda stupid (and duly
ignored :-) ).
> Conditions on it are also very variable. Oh, there is also
> a winding road sign before getting to my place on a
> close to 80 degree corner on a 5 metre - yep, that
> is both lanes, corner.
That's fine. The width limit on normal vehicles is 2.5m, which
would inevitably include some side overhang, so no problem. :-)
> There is no way in hell I'd drive more than around 65
> on most of it.
Yeah, but you're in a diesel hilux 4WD. :-)
> I know you would, I've been with you in a car, and
> felt uncomfortable - yes you are an excellent driver
> however I was was getting the heebie jeebies with
> you sliding the arse end of it around corners on dirt
> roads :-p
I don't consider myself an excellent driver. I'm an average
driver IMO. Of course, I consider anyone who claims to be a
good driver to be a totally sh.t driver...
If the back of the vehicle is not drifting sideways through
the corners on a gravel road, you're not going fast enough. :-)
IIRC, I didn't get it really sideways or use opposite lock with
you in the car, so I don't know what you're complaining about.
Oh, and I don't recall going particularly fast with you in the
car, either. About 130km/h on tar was about it. I've done
110MPH on gravel, but the Falcon's not really set up right for
that...
> It is a curious example of speed limits although.
> I don't believe that road is capable of 100, then there
> are other roads rated at a lot less and are better roads,
> and I'm going along at 50 when 100 would be OK.
Politics sometimes has a bigger say than common sense...
> I'm not really making a reference to the the Steven
> King novel, Pet Sematary however you gotta
> ask this stuff.
Wouldn't have a clue what you're on about here, and frankly
don't care after 2 days wasted in Sydney waiting for a court
case to start, then a 4-day trip to Canberra...
Now I need at least a weekend and I've gotta start catching up
on an unknown work backlog. :-(

Signature
Athol
<http://cust.idl.com.au/athol> Linux Registered User # 254000
I'm a Libran Engineer. I don't argue, I discuss.