 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Australian Car Forums / General Car Topics (Australian group) / March 2008From aus.aviation
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6f6_1205747736 OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace. > http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6f6_1205747736 > > OzOne of the three twins > > I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace. Mondayitis? ;-p >> http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6f6_1205747736 >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Mondayitis? ;-p and this is the first time OzOne have EVER posted anything from aus.aviation, he must have a guilty conscience after I poked him about removing them from the follow on in his aviation related posts in aus.cars :-) So what type of aircraft is it you own again OzOne ??  Signature"Calling Atheism a religion is like calling bald a hair color." Don Hirschberg >>> http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6f6_1205747736 >>> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >aus.aviation, he must have a guilty conscience after I poked him about >removing them from the follow on in his aviation related posts in aus.cars Nope...I just saw it and was in awe of the PIC and what was either supreme confidence in his aircraft or total stupidity. I thought of you when I thought of stupidity! >:-) >So what type of aircraft is it you own again OzOne ?? A very expensive one! OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace. > >and this is the first time OzOne have EVER posted anything from > >aus.aviation, he must have a guilty conscience after I poked him about > >removing them from the follow on in his aviation related posts in aus.cars Please leave AusAviation out of the bun fights re this bloke on Aus cars PLEASE! > Nope...I just saw it and was in awe of the PIC and what was either > supreme confidence in his aircraft or total stupidity. ** Any other options that spring to your mind as an aviator ? *** Especially if you have BGT or Any Turbine experience ? > >So what type of aircraft is it you own again OzOne ?? > > A very expensive one! They are ALL expensive bloke . What in particular do you own ? > OzOne of the three twins > > I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace. > Please leave AusAviation out of the bun fights re this bloke on Aus > cars PLEASE! Pit/Pits/Phil, do you like starting bun fights, or what? :-) > http://groups.google.com.au/group/aus.aviation/browse_thread/thread/c8d72e491194 3c84/b2a9252ff74e1dd7?lnk=gst&q=#b2a9252ff74e1dd7 SignatureTake Care. ~~ Feral Al ( @..@) (\- :-P -/) ((.>__oo__<.)) ^^^ % ^^^ >> >and this is the first time OzOne have EVER posted anything from >> >aus.aviation, he must have a guilty conscience after I poked him about >> >removing them from the follow on in his aviation related posts in aus.cars > >Please leave AusAviation out of the bun fights re this bloke on Aus >cars PLEASE! You may note that it was the X posting dickhead chaplain who was responsible........ OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace. > >> >and this is the first time OzOne have EVER posted anything from > >> >aus.aviation, he must have a guilty conscience after I poked him about [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace. Actually was not directed to you alone. Just a general plea to all - AA is one of the more benign and pleasurable reads on Usenet Don't take it to heart >> >> >and this is the first time OzOne have EVER posted anything from >> >> >aus.aviation, he must have a guilty conscience after I poked him [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Don't take it to heart But dear OzOne, I was just putting your Aircraft related postings in their proper group, why don't you like to talk about aviation with the people who live and breath it every day ?? To the aus.aviation group, I'm sorry if you also don't want OzOne in your newsgroup, I fully understand. Signature"Calling Atheism a religion is like calling bald a hair color." Don Hirschberg >But dear OzOne, I was just putting your Aircraft related postings in their >proper group, why don't you like to talk about aviation with the people who >live and breath it every day ?? Ummmmmm I do.......you should try it. >To the aus.aviation group, I'm sorry if you also don't want OzOne in your >newsgroup, I fully understand. Actually the comment was not directed at me alone as Pit or Pits or whatever stated. I think he may have been referring to you dickhead! Or should that be x posting dickhead...yeah, that's better! OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace. >> >> >and this is the first time OzOne have EVER posted anything from >> >> >aus.aviation, he must have a guilty conscience after I poked him about [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > >Don't take it to heart Thank you for not contaminating aus.aviation with the drivel that the atheist Xposting fucktard posts. Oh and if not directed to me alone..you probably should have adjusted your post as the x posting fucktard was very obviously addressing his post to me. Regards, OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace. >and this is the first time OzOne have EVER posted anything from >aus.aviation Damn...I must have missed your posts from aus.aviation...... BTW, OzOne rarely posts to aus.aviation......but I still do..... Think about it! OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace. >>> http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6f6_1205747736 >>> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > :-) > So what type of aircraft is it you own again OzOne ?? OK. I'll post something FROM aus.aviationisthepits > http://www.livevideo.com/video/A0B1D12150B84AAFA0D8FAAEE3023E41/accident-in-real time-video.aspx Can you believe that? :-P SignatureTake Care. ~~ Feral Al ( @..@) (\- :-P -/) ((.>__oo__<.)) ^^^ % ^^^ >>>> http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6f6_1205747736 >>>> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Can you believe that? :-P Those bike riders are F***in idiots - overtaking on double lines, serves him right. >>>>> http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6f6_1205747736 >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > Those bike riders are F***in idiots - overtaking on double lines, serves > him right. Especially when the road *bends* to the left. (watch for the sign with 5 seconds to go) The dickhead on the bike was actually making a right turn from the left lane. SignatureKwyj. >>>>>> http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6f6_1205747736 >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > The dickhead on the bike was actually making a right turn from the left > lane. What!!!!!!! Crikey, some of you blokes from aus.aviation are blind. The idiot on the bike was doing a *forced* left turn FFS. The sign shows a left hand T-intersection. Is that where "flying blind" originated!!!!!!! SignatureTake Care. ~~ Feral Al ( @..@) (\- :-P -/) ((.>__oo__<.)) ^^^ % ^^^ >>> Those bike riders are F***in idiots - overtaking on double lines, >>> serves him right. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Is that where "flying blind" originated!!!!!!! Just to stop a bun fight before it starts. We have T-intersections like that in Oz too, where the major road goes *with* the T. My points are: 1. The second bike *was* going to follow his mate up the minor road, until he was herded. 2. The major road *didn't bend, it turned. 3. The second rider was to occupied with overtaking, to ride to the conditions of the road. He would not have made a turn into the minor road IMHO he *should* have been travelling straight on, (but not on that side of the SUV). :-( SignatureTake Care. ~~ Feral Al ( @..@) (\- :-P -/) ((.>__oo__<.)) ^^^ % ^^^ >>>> Those bike riders are F***in idiots - overtaking on double lines, >>>> serves him right. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >> bike was doing a *forced* left turn FFS. The sign shows a left hand >> T-intersection. Seems more like your observation skills are too poor. The sign shows a left hand BEND and an advisory speed, not a T junction. >> Is that where "flying blind" originated!!!!!!! > >Just to stop a bun fight before it starts. We have >T-intersections like that in Oz too, where the major road goes >*with* the T. My points are: It is a left hand bend. It is marked as such, and the road curves to the left, as do the road markings. >1. The second bike *was* going to follow his mate up the minor >road, until he was herded. You mean, except that he totally misjudged his illegal, ill-considered, idiotic maneuver? >2. The major road *didn't bend, it turned. The sign is a left hand bend sign with an advisory speed. The road markings curve to the left. It's called a corner.... >3. The second rider was to occupied with overtaking, to ride >to the conditions of the road. He would not have made a turn >into the minor road IMHO he *should* have been travelling >straight on, (but not on that side of the SUV). :-( Which of course means that he wasn't an idiot for attempting to overtake over a double line and make a right turn in front of the car from the left.... SignatureCheers Paul Saccani Perth, Western Australia. >>>>> Those bike riders are F***in idiots - overtaking on double lines, >>>>> serves him right. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Seems more like your observation skills are too poor. Rubbish. He was *forced* left by the SUV. Also the sign *clearly* shows the *major* road *turning* left. > The sign shows a left hand BEND and an advisory speed, not a T > junction. It does not, it shows a right-angle turn on the sign and that is clearly visible. How's your observation skills? >>> Is that where "flying blind" originated!!!!!!! >> Just to stop a bun fight before it starts. We have >> T-intersections like that in Oz too, where the major road goes >> *with* the T. My points are: > > It is a left hand bend. Turn IMHO. > It is marked as such, and the road curves to the left, as do the road > markings. *Turns* left is right. I see a distinct right-angle on the sign. >> 1. The second bike *was* going to follow his mate up the minor >> road, until he was herded. > > You mean, except that he totally misjudged his illegal, > ill-considered, idiotic maneuver? See below. Oh, you belatedly did and still didn't come back to change the above. Cool. >> 2. The major road *didn't bend, it turned. > > The sign is a left hand bend sign with an advisory speed. The road > markings curve to the left. > > It's called a corner.... The sign shows a right-angle. >> 3. The second rider was to occupied with overtaking, to ride >> to the conditions of the road. He would not have made a turn [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > overtake over a double line and make a right turn in front of the car > from the left.... Who can't read? See point 3. Hello is Paul at home? err, the minor road goes *straight* ahead. Which is where our idiot rider wanted to go. And yeah, under lawful overtaking procedure, he *would* overtake on the *left*. SignatureTake Care. ~~ Feral Al ( @..@) (\- :-P -/) ((.>__oo__<.)) ^^^ % ^^^ >>>> Those bike riders are F***in idiots - overtaking on double lines, >>>> serves him right. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >> bike was doing a *forced* left turn FFS. The sign shows a left hand >> T-intersection. Huh? You might want to wipe the cum off your monitor. It's obviously blurring things a bit. >> Is that where "flying blind" originated!!!!!!! > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > 1. The second bike *was* going to follow his mate up the minor road, until > he was herded. And, although that minor road was straight ahead, it would have legally been considered a right turn as the road he was originally on had a left bend. > 2. The major road *didn't bend, it turned. It's a left bend, dickhead. Look at the sign and the road markings. > 3. The second rider was to occupied with overtaking, to ride to the > conditions of the road. He would not have made a turn into the minor road > IMHO he *should* have been travelling straight on, Straight on (in a directional sense) was the minor road which required a right turn. SignatureKwyj. >>>>> Those bike riders are F***in idiots - overtaking on double lines, >>>>> serves him right. [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > Straight on (in a directional sense) was the minor road which required a > right turn. Here comes the cavalry. And its bullshit spreaders. See my post to Sacca. SignatureTake Care. ~~ Feral Al ( @..@) (\- :-P -/) ((.>__oo__<.)) ^^^ % ^^^ > Here comes the cavalry. And its bullshit spreaders. See my post to Sacca. Why do you feel the need to spread the evidence of your stupidity to aus.aviation? SignatureKwyj. >> Here comes the cavalry. And its bullshit spreaders. See my post to Sacca. > > Why do you feel the need to spread the evidence of your stupidity to > aus.aviation? Not guilty. Why do you feel the need to spread your bullshit in aus.cars? See my post to Sacca. SignatureTake Care. ~~ Feral Al ( @..@) (\- :-P -/) ((.>__oo__<.)) ^^^ % ^^^ >>> Here comes the cavalry. And its bullshit spreaders. See my post to >>> Sacca. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Not guilty. Liar. > Why do you feel the need to spread your bullshit in aus.cars? I'm responding to a post that was made in aus.cars, fuckwit. Too difficult for you to comprehend? > See my post to Sacca. Already saw it. It's as ridiculous now as it was the first time I read it. SignatureKwyj. >>>> Here comes the cavalry. And its bullshit spreaders. See my post to >>>> Sacca. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Liar. Strange response. >> Why do you feel the need to spread your bullshit in aus.cars? > > I'm responding to a post that was made in aus.cars, fuckwit. Too difficult > for you to comprehend? That was not the question. The question was: Why do you feel the need to spread your bullshit in aus.cars? >> See my post to Sacca. > > Already saw it. It's as ridiculous now as it was the first time I read it. You're blind. K'rist, I hope you're not a pilot. SignatureTake Care. ~~ Feral Al ( @..@) (\- :-P -/) ((.>__oo__<.)) ^^^ % ^^^ >>>>> Here comes the cavalry. And its bullshit spreaders. See my post to >>>>> Sacca. [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > You're blind. K'rist, I hope you're not a pilot. maybe ATC ?? :-) SignatureGod made me an atheist. Who are you to question his wisdom? >>> Already saw it. It's as ridiculous now as it was the first time I >>> read it. >> >> You're blind. K'rist, I hope you're not a pilot. >> > maybe ATC ?? :-) Kindly bend to the left please pilot. Err, sorry, curve to the right please. Sorry, make a right-hand turn whilst going straight on please. SignatureTake Care. ~~ Feral Al ( @..@) (\- :-P -/) ((.>__oo__<.)) ^^^ % ^^^ >>>>> Here comes the cavalry. And its bullshit spreaders. See my post to >>>>> Sacca. [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > You're blind. K'rist, I hope you're not a pilot. well, well......now that idiots unanimous is bashing bikers(and each other) may be the truckies will get a rest hehe. SignatureDon`t be sexist...........Broads hate that. >>>> Here comes the cavalry. And its bullshit spreaders. See my post to >>>> Sacca. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > >Already saw it. It's as ridiculous now as it was the first time I read it. Seems a lot more ridiculous, if you ask me. But then there is obviously something wrong with someone who posts their off topic reply in a completely different newsgroup. SignatureCheers Paul Saccani Perth, Western Australia. > Seems a lot more ridiculous, if you ask me. But then there is > obviously something wrong with someone who posts their off topic reply > in a completely different newsgroup. psst, Sacca, there are idiots in aus.aviation who x-post, so even though one of your own called it "benign", there are malignants in the group. You would be surprised how many get bagged in aus.cars, not all mind you. Maybe I'm just returning favor? Maybe I read American signs better than some? Maybe I see into the mind better than some. > http://i263.photobucket.com/albums/ii129/picjug/sign.jpg See ya. SignatureTake Care. ~~ Feral Al ( @..@) (\- :-P -/) ((.>__oo__<.)) ^^^ % ^^^ > > Seems a lot more ridiculous, if you ask me. But then there is > > obviously something wrong with someone who posts their off topic reply [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > ((.>__oo__<.)) > ^^^ % ^^^ Although some bikes do "fly" in a fashion have snipped AA My take on this discussion (given that it started out with a clip to a Russian heavy lifter) then a bike clip appeared ? So will stay with the bike . 1 It appears to be in the lands where they drive on the wrong side of the road 2 Bikes both did illegal overtakes 3 Bike 2 overtook on the wrong side bike 2 got nailed by a vehicle driver who obviously did not know or care if bike was there Can not see blinker on vehicle communicating with other road users 4 Bike two is lucky Now to throw a read herring into this "discussion" Note the road markings 2 at the very end of the clip where did bike 1 get to ? 3 Could that sharp bend sign and the fact that unbroken lines indicate that the Sharp left hander was a bit further on than the street that the vehicle turned into and hence nailed the bile ? Just another option- perhaps Here is a clip re bikes and cars good if only for the sweet sound of the car :) http://youtube.com/watch?v=2LR2rEOAiiw Then there is the other side of the coin http://youtube.com/watch?v=GT3_WEI0eLY Then there are the more expensive errors http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h847v5-8YfE > Although some bikes do "fly" in a fashion have snipped AA Oh, OK. > My take on this discussion (given that it started out with a clip to > a Russian heavy lifter) then a bike clip appeared ? > So will stay with the bike . > > 1 It appears to be in the lands where they drive on the wrong side of > the road Tick. :-) > 2 Bikes both did illegal overtakes Tick. > 3 Bike 2 overtook on the wrong side Cross. I think you mean he should not have attempted to overtake given the conditions. He should have gone to the right side of the lane to go straight on. > bike 2 got nailed by a vehicle driver who obviously did not know or > care if bike was there Tick. > Can not see blinker on vehicle communicating with other road users Tick. No, but I think I see brake lights, very late. > 4 Bike two is lucky To be alive? We don't know that he was unscathed, do we. > Now to throw a read herring into this "discussion" Why not. > Note the road markings Noted. Double line (blurry in vid, but there), major road going left, minor road going straight on, possible speed advisory but can't make it out. > 2 at the very end of the clip where did bike 1 get to ? Straight ahead along the secondary/minor road. How many times does everyone get overtaken only to see vehicle turn off within a kilometre? > 3 Could that sharp bend sign Right-angle T-intersection sign. and the fact that unbroken lines indicate > that the Sharp left hander was a bit further on than the street > that the vehicle turned into and hence nailed the bile ? Don't think so. I don't think rider 2 had eyes for anything except the *overtake*. Just another > option- perhaps > > Here is a clip re bikes and cars good if only for the sweet sound of > the car :) http://youtube.com/watch?v=2LR2rEOAiiw Some KNob. > Then there is the other side of the coin http://youtube.com/watch?v=GT3_WEI0eLY Scary. > Then there are the more expensive errors http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h847v5-8YfE Boring. SignatureTake Care. ~~ Feral Al ( @..@) (\- :-P -/) ((.>__oo__<.)) ^^^ % ^^^ > Don't think so. I don't think rider 2 had eyes for anything except the > *overtake*. He was following 'the leader' - that was his intent, his posture on the road and nothing else mattered. He is a stupid. QED SignatureToby >> Don't think so. I don't think rider 2 had eyes for anything except the >> *overtake*. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > QED You got it son. But you're wrong about the signed road being further on. Have a look at the road ahead just before the vehicle obscures it (where the first bike is). SignatureTake Care. ~~ Feral Al ( @..@) (\- :-P -/) ((.>__oo__<.)) ^^^ % ^^^ > > Although some bikes do "fly" in a fashion have snipped AA > [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] > ((.>__oo__<.)) > ^^^ % ^^^ Thanks teach -what's the pass mark in here ? > Thanks teach -what's the pass mark in here ? Don't know Phil. I'm still learning. ;-) Maybe we should ask Paul? After all, he came over two days before you (as Pit) on 26/11/2007. Then as Pits603 and then Pits8. No marks for cheaters. :-P SignatureTake Care. ~~ Feral Al ( @..@) (\- :-P -/) ((.>__oo__<.)) ^^^ % ^^^ > > Thanks teach -what's the pass mark in here ? > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > ((.>__oo__<.)) > ^^^ % ^^^ HUH / ? All my posts with the different addies come from different locs ? if you are saying Paul is Pits ??? Huge wrongun -------- he is another animal all together a a whole lot smarter >>> Thanks teach -what's the pass mark in here ? >> Don't know Phil. I'm still learning. ;-) [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > if you are saying Paul is Pits ??? Huge wrongun -------- > he is another animal all together a a whole lot smarter Crikey fella, that's five days old and it's early morn. You bin out on the turps or something. ;-) I know you're not Sacca. You're Pit, Pits8, Pits60............ The reference was to "cheating" by changing your name. :-) And speaking of changing names, that is not *our* Noddy in the other post you ventured into about Dawg you twit, it's that idiot "GordonLightfootIII". Wakey wakey. SignatureTake Care. ~~ Feral Al ( @..@) (\- :-P -/) ((.>__oo__<.)) ^^^ % ^^^ > >>> Thanks teach -what's the pass mark in here ? > >> Don't know Phil. I'm still learning. ;-) [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > ((.>__oo__<.)) > ^^^ % ^^^ Bit of work happening out this way 14-18 days last 7 weeks I do not know of this Lightfoot person and don't think I want to even after 5 hours sleep he still reads like something very unpleasant . > Bit of work happening out this way 14-18 days last 7 weeks Working a little less than 3 days a week is hard? :-P > I do not know of this Lightfoot person and don't think I want to > even after 5 hours sleep he still reads like something very > unpleasant . He is. And he pretends to be other people (like "Noddy"). Watch the *headers* Phil. :-) SignatureTake Care. ~~ Feral Al ( @..@) (\- :-P -/) ((.>__oo__<.)) ^^^ % ^^^ > > Bit of work happening out this way 14-18 days last 7 weeks > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > ((.>__oo__<.)) > ^^^ % ^^^ Will do . Re work there is *plenty* out here as one MD said "again" the other day We are so short of people if they have a heart beat we will employ/ train and be able to use them . Streets are paved with gold for any one that wants to really work . > Will do . Re work there is *plenty* out here as one MD said "again" > the other day [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Streets are paved with gold for any one that wants to really > work . Well, that's not me (too old). And I know folk that have made heaps of money in WA, and blown it and/or have bad health. SignatureTake Care. ~~ Feral Al ( @..@) (\- :-P -/) ((.>__oo__<.)) ^^^ % ^^^ > 3 Could that sharp bend sign and the fact that unbroken lines indicate > that the Sharp left hander was a bit further on than the street that > the vehicle turned into and hence nailed the bile ? Just another > option- perhaps Go to the top of the ckass. SignatureToby >> 3 Could that sharp bend sign and the fact that unbroken lines indicate >> that the Sharp left hander was a bit further on than the street that >> the vehicle turned into and hence nailed the bile ? Just another >> option- perhaps > > Go to the top of the ckass. The road straight ahead turned to sh.t and was narrow. Do you wear glasses Tobe? If you do, get new ones. :-P SignatureTake Care. ~~ Feral Al ( @..@) (\- :-P -/) ((.>__oo__<.)) ^^^ % ^^^ >> Seems a lot more ridiculous, if you ask me. But then there is >> obviously something wrong with someone who posts their off topic reply [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > >See ya. Apparently not - advisory bend signs have arrow heads, junction signs do not. See the "Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices". If you can't see the arrow head indicating a bend advisory, you really do need your eyes checked. SignatureCheers Paul Saccani Perth, Western Australia. > http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6f6_1205747736 Those crazy Russians:-) Daryl >> http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6f6_1205747736 >> > Those crazy Russians:-) > > Daryl My bet is they had none and buckleys getting away with a takeoff in the other direction.. SignatureToby >>> http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6f6_1205747736 >>> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >My bet is they had none and buckleys getting away with a takeoff in the >other direction.. You see a windsock? OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace. >>>> http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6f6_1205747736 >>>> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace. Nope didn't even look for one but I reckon two things. Opposite direction appears to be a tad uphill. Opposite direction has ye olde waay better than 50 Ft obstacle a few K's out - the runway looks like it's in a sort of valley though I'm guessing there - that Il waddled into the air, and only the ground actually receding made it look anything but dead dangerous:-) Natch, we're assuming that the takeoff was *not* an exercise in brinksmanship. SignatureToby >>> http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6f6_1205747736 >>> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > My bet is they had none and buckleys getting away with a takeoff in the > other direction.. Why is there houses in the opposite direction? That video reminds me of a similar stunt many years ago in Melb with a big Antonov cargo plane, at the time a neighbour was "Environment Officer" with the CAA in Melb, he was responsible for looking after aircraft noise complaints. The Antonov was attempting a record distance with max payload, after it took off the neighbour got a call from a house owner in the flightpath asking if he could send someone around to clean the tyre marks from his roof:-) It flew over densely populated areas at a very low altitude and it struggled to reach 1000ft before it was over Port Philip Bay. Daryl > http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6f6_1205747736 The controller said it: "he needs to be going faster than that" Jason |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.