Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Australian Car Forums / General Car Topics (Australian group) / May 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Mincing words by the Press

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Scotty - 26 May 2008 10:15 GMT
(Not exactly HELD TOGETHER by Cable ties really now was it)

_______________________________________________________________

The driver of a car held together by plastic cable ties has been charged after police caught him
allegedly driving at 263kmh in southern NSW.

About 7.50pm yesterday, police were conducting speed enforcement along a 110km/h area of the Hume
Highway near Mittagong when they "clocked" the speeding white 1995 Nissan 200SX turbo.

When they stopped the car they found its body kit was held on by cable ties, its dashboard was not
secured, it had no back seats and its battery was held in place by a rag and a bracket, police said.

The car's rear compartment was filled with tyres and highway patrol officers said there was a strong
smell of fuel throughout its cabin.

The driver, a 21-year-old man from Rouse Hill in Sydney, told police he had spent the day at a
racetrack.

He was issued with a defect notice - which prohibits the car from being driven until repairs are
carried out - and charged with exceeding the speed limit.

He was granted bail and is due to appear in Moss Vale Local Court on June 116 to face a speeding
charge.
a9x5l - 26 May 2008 10:25 GMT
Here's the first version that I saw, it's even sillier...

POLICE who stopped a car for speeding were shocked to find that all that
was holding it together was cable ties.

Police said they detected the car doing 263km/h on the Hume Highway near
Mittagong in NSW last night.

When they stopped the 1995 Nissan 200SX turbo, they found its body was
held on by cable ties, its dashboard was not secured, it had no back
seats and its battery was held in place by a rag and a bracket.

The back of the car was full of tyres and police could smell fuel inside
the car.

The driver, a 21-year-old man from Rouse Hill in Sydney, told police he
had spent the day at a race track.

He was banned from driving the car until it was fixed and was issued a
speeding ticket.

He will appear in Moss Vale Local Court on June 16 on the speeding
charge.

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23740903-1242,00.html

Signature

a9x5l

hippo - 26 May 2008 10:27 GMT
OzOne May 26, 2008 at 07:44 PM wrote:


>On Mon, 26 May 2008 19:15:22 +1000, "Scotty" <scoter1@warnmail.com>
wrote:

>>(Not exactly HELD TOGETHER by Cable ties really now was it)
>>
>>_______________________________________________________________
>>
>>The driver of a car held together by plastic cable ties has bee
charged
after police caught him
>>allegedly driving at 263kmh in southern NSW.
>>
>>About 7.50pm yesterday, police were conducting speed enforcement alon
a
110km/h area of the Hume
>>Highway near Mittagong when they "clocked" the speeding white 199
Nissan
200SX turbo.

>>When they stopped the car they found its body kit was held on by cable
ties, its dashboard was not
>>secured, it had no back seats and its battery was held in place by
rag
and a bracket, police said.

>>The car's rear compartment was filled with tyres and highway patrol
officers said there was a strong
>>smell of fuel throughout its cabin.
>>
>>The driver, a 21-year-old man from Rouse Hill in Sydney, told police he
had spent the day at a
>>racetrack.
>>
>>He was issued with a defect notice - which prohibits the car from being
driven until repairs are
>>carried out - and charged with exceeding the speed limit.
>>
>>He was granted bail and is due to appear in Moss Vale Local Court o
June
116 to face a speeding
>>charge.

>Well yeah it was..Take away the cable ties and the piece of rope
>securing the steering column and it would have fallen apart.

Sorta strikes me that if the cable ties were sitll holding the body kit o
at 263 Km/H, they were doing a better job than some proprietary fastener
that I've seen over the years! Cheers

OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.


-
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutautos.com/group/aus.cars
More information at http://www.talkaboutautos.com/faq.htm
OzOne - 26 May 2008 11:17 GMT
>>Well yeah it was..Take away the cable ties and the piece of rope
>>securing the steering column and it would have fallen apart.
>
>Sorta strikes me that if the cable ties were sitll holding the body kit on
>at 263 Km/H, they were doing a better job than some proprietary fasteners
>that I've seen over the years! Cheers

They may indeed have been.....

OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
The Raven - 26 May 2008 13:33 GMT
>>>Well yeah it was..Take away the cable ties and the piece of rope
>>>securing the steering column and it would have fallen apart.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> They may indeed have been.....

Agreed.

Depending on the actual brand and size of ties used, they may actually
exceed the tensile strength of many standard 'steel' fasteners. The
materials used in quality ties is quite impressive.

Easily demonstrated in an Uni engineering lab.
Jeßus - 26 May 2008 23:38 GMT
> OzOne May 26, 2008 at 07:44 PM wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> at 263 Km/H, they were doing a better job than some proprietary fasteners
> that I've seen over the years! Cheers

Shh... don't confuse them with LOGIC!

The 'cable tie' crap is probably related to some minor piece of frp or
carbon fibre... frequently damage on the track occurs to the front
spoiler, and one guess how a quick fix is effected - duct tape and/or
cable ties.
OzOne - 26 May 2008 10:44 GMT
>(Not exactly HELD TOGETHER by Cable ties really now was it)
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>He was granted bail and is due to appear in Moss Vale Local Court on June 116 to face a speeding
>charge.

Well yeah it was..Take away the cable ties and the piece of rope
securing the steering column and it would have fallen apart.

OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
Knobdoodle - 26 May 2008 11:24 GMT
I remember reading this one and thinking "the battery was held in by a
bracket"; yes..  so...?
(and what the fukk has the back seats got to do with anything?!!?)
Signature

Knob

> (Not exactly HELD TOGETHER by Cable ties really now was it)
>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> 116 to face a speeding
> charge.
The Raven - 26 May 2008 13:46 GMT
>I remember reading this one and thinking "the battery was held in by a
>bracket"; yes..  so...?
> (and what the fukk has the back seats got to do with anything?!!?)

It's argued two ways:

1. Invalidates the ADRs with respect to the vehicle having a back seat,
which would require an engineers certificate or similar. (Technicality at
best).

2. The tonnes petrol/exhaust fumes emitted by the presumably ADR compliant
engine will choke the driver to death without them noticing.  (Possible but,
no worse than many 'legal'
vans on the road today).

The main issue here, besides the speeding, is the presumably unsecured load
in the back of the car. They've already commented the battery was held with
a bracket....which is the usual way of securing a battery. The bodykit vs
cable ties is easily argued from an engineering perspective.
The Raven - 26 May 2008 13:41 GMT
> (Not exactly HELD TOGETHER by Cable ties really now was it)
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> When they stopped the car they found its body kit was held on by cable
> ties,

As already mentioned they may be better than the normal fasteners, which
usually mount to what? More plastic!!!!

> its dashboard was not
> secured,

Can't comment beyond I had some engineer complain about the same thing on my
car. Just because it wiggled a bit. Tightening the fasteners would have
cracked the plastic 'dash' pieces. That's exactly how it came from the
factory.

> it had no back seats

Which in all reality isn't such a problem provided there is no-one in the
rear of the car.

>and its battery was held in place by a rag and a bracket, police said.

You mean he stuffed a rag down next to the factory battery bracket? Geez,
how dangerous.

> The car's rear compartment was filled with tyres

Secured or unsecured? If unsecured then I can see the issue but it's not
much worse than what some families cram into the back of the car when
heading off for a long weekend.

>and highway patrol officers said there was a strong
> smell of fuel throughout its cabin.

Which isn't hard to imagine from  a car that was at doing 263Kph WOT.

> The driver, a 21-year-old man from Rouse Hill in Sydney, told police he
> had spent the day at a
> racetrack.

Which means the car passed scrutineering......a safety inspection in
iteself (albeit not an 'official' inspection).

> He was issued with a defect notice - which prohibits the car from being
> driven until repairs are
> carried out - and charged with exceeding the speed limit.

Reasonable given the reported circumstances.

> He was granted bail and is due to appear in Moss Vale Local Court on June
> 116 to face a speeding
> charge.

June 116? Hmmm, expect he'll not have to worry if that is the official
date....

BTW this just proves the speed kills argument is a red herring. If the
safety warnings etc are to be believed, this speed should have caused the
car to vaporise killing everyone for miles.

Sure, he's an idiot but the story is merely playing into the speed kills
argument. I bet no attempt was made to verify a single fact handed to the
media by the police.
Athol - 27 May 2008 03:07 GMT
> "Scotty" <scoter1@warnmail.com> wrote in message

>> The driver of a car held together by plastic cable ties has been charged
>> after police caught him
>> allegedly driving at 263kmh in southern NSW.

Yawn.

>> About 7.50pm yesterday, police were conducting speed enforcement along a
>> 110km/h area of the Hume
>> Highway near Mittagong when they "clocked" the speeding white 1995 Nissan
>> 200SX turbo.

Idiot.  Got caught by the standard LIDAR operation on the top of the
hill just before the big dip on the Mittagong bypass AFAIK.  It's a very
well known spot.  The cop parks across the median crossover pointing the
LIDAR out the front passenger window.  Right hand curve, so can get the
reading just before you can see the front of his car...

It's certainly not a time of day that I'd consider doing that speed, and
I'd slow down for the known enforcement locations anyway...

>> When they stopped the car they found its body kit was held on by cable
>> ties,

> As already mentioned they may be better than the normal fasteners, which
> usually mount to what? More plastic!!!!

But not legal if there are "sharp" edges protruding.  Note that the body
of a cable tie would qualify as sharp for ADR purposes...

>> its dashboard was not
>> secured,

> Can't comment beyond I had some engineer complain about the same thing on my
> car. Just because it wiggled a bit. Tightening the fasteners would have
> cracked the plastic 'dash' pieces. That's exactly how it came from the
> factory.

If it was OEM, wouldn't care.  If it was just sitting there, I'd be
telling him to refit the bolts.  Unless the steering column or the pedal
frame was insecure, the dash top isn't really that critical...

>> it had no back seats

> Which in all reality isn't such a problem provided there is no-one in the
> rear of the car.

In reality, an engineering certificate can make it completely legal.

>>and its battery was held in place by a rag and a bracket, police said.

> You mean he stuffed a rag down next to the factory battery bracket? Geez,
> how dangerous.

Depends whether they've moved the battery, or whether the rag was being
used as a stressed member in securing the battery...

>> The car's rear compartment was filled with tyres

> Secured or unsecured? If unsecured then I can see the issue but it's not
> much worse than what some families cram into the back of the car when
> heading off for a long weekend.

It's a car.  No legal requirement for the manufacturer to provide load
securing points let alone actually having to secure the load...

He could have had the seat in and folded down and had the spare wheels
on top and still been legal...

>>and highway patrol officers said there was a strong
>> smell of fuel throughout its cabin.

> Which isn't hard to imagine from  a car that was at doing 263Kph WOT.

Or if there have been modifications to the fuel system.

>> The driver, a 21-year-old man from Rouse Hill in Sydney, told police he
>> had spent the day at a
>> racetrack.

> Which means the car passed scrutineering......a safety inspection in
> iteself (albeit not an 'official' inspection).

Better than RTA in some areas, worse in others.

>> He was issued with a defect notice - which prohibits the car from being
>> driven until repairs are
>> carried out - and charged with exceeding the speed limit.

> Reasonable given the reported circumstances.

Well, he would have had an on-the-spot license suspension, so a red
sticker isn't necessarily going to make any difference.

All up, this could be a massive beat-up of a handful of trivial issues,
a major safety problem or anywhere in between but we can't tell without
a proper inspection of the vehicle.

> BTW this just proves the speed kills argument is a red herring. If the
> safety warnings etc are to be believed, this speed should have caused the
> car to vaporise killing everyone for miles.

Of course.

> Sure, he's an idiot but the story is merely playing into the speed kills
> argument. I bet no attempt was made to verify a single fact handed to the
> media by the police.

Why would they?  Plausible deniability could be damaged and they might
have to print something more truthful.

Signature

Athol
<http://cust.idl.com.au/athol>   Linux Registered User # 254000
I'm a Libran Engineer. I don't argue, I discuss.

Jason James - 26 May 2008 22:27 GMT
> The car's rear compartment was filled with tyres and highway patrol officers said there was a strong
> smell of fuel throughout its cabin.

The fuel smell is probably exhaust. The car had the rear seats out, and if
the boot lid is not sealing well,.the lack of back-seats will make the
ingress of ex-smell into the cabin worse. 160 mph is pretty fast. Dont like
his chances in front of the beak.

Jason
Jeßus - 26 May 2008 23:32 GMT
> (Not exactly HELD TOGETHER by Cable ties really now was it)
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> He was granted bail and is due to appear in Moss Vale Local Court on June 116 to face a speeding
> charge.

I don't think the press is capable of accuracy, they're all a bunch of
arselickers.

Apart from that... I thought my 220KM/H on the Midland Hwy was pushing
it a little last Sunday, but 260kmh on the HUME is really asking for it :)
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
George W. Frost - 30 May 2008 02:14 GMT
>> (Not exactly HELD TOGETHER by Cable ties really now was it)
>>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> I don't think the press is capable of accuracy, they're all a bunch of
> arselickers.

The media reporters creed is:

"Never let the truth get in the way of a good story"

> Apart from that... I thought my 220KM/H on the Midland Hwy was pushing it
> a little last Sunday, but 260kmh on the HUME is really asking for it :)
> ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
GrassyNoel - 30 May 2008 02:29 GMT
> Apart from that... I thought my 220KM/H on the Midland Hwy was pushing
> it a little last Sunday, but 260kmh on the HUME is really asking for it :)

I've only ever done 190 on the Hume, but that was in a Camira so I
deserve a bit of danger money :)
Dan--. - 30 May 2008 02:33 GMT
> I've only ever done 190 on the Hume, but that was in a Camira so I
> deserve a bit of danger money :)

You deserve a medal on getting a Camira-n-fix it to go that fast.
Let alone doing it without breaking down. :-)

Signature

Regards
Dan

GrassyNoel - 30 May 2008 02:40 GMT
> You deserve a medal on getting a Camira-n-fix it to go that fast.
> Let alone doing it without breaking down. :-)

It was a rental - they always go faster!
Dan--. - 30 May 2008 07:33 GMT
>> You deserve a medal on getting a Camira-n-fix it to go that fast. Let
>> alone doing it without breaking down. :-)
>
> It was a rental - they always go faster!

Yeah they seem to be very well run in. :-)

Signature

Regards
Dan

Noddy - 30 May 2008 02:55 GMT
> I don't think the press is capable of accuracy, they're all a bunch of
> arselickers.

Oh, they're capable. Just that they're capability is limited to telling you
what *they* want you to know.

Truth and journalism is fantasy concept that died many, many years ago.

--
Regards,
Noddy.
Athol - 30 May 2008 05:43 GMT
> Oh, they're capable. Just that they're capability is limited to telling you
> what *they* want you to know.

> Truth and journalism is fantasy concept that died many, many years ago.

Ain't that the truth!  Global warming hype is proof of that.  There are
even regulars here who apparently believe that garbage.

Signature

Athol
<http://cust.idl.com.au/athol>   Linux Registered User # 254000
I'm a Libran Engineer. I don't argue, I discuss.

Noddy - 30 May 2008 07:06 GMT
> Ain't that the truth!  Global warming hype is proof of that.  There are
> even regulars here who apparently believe that garbage.

Well, considering that there are some regulars who think hybrid cars are a
good idea I'm not really surprised by that :)

--
Regards,
Noddy.
Dan--. - 30 May 2008 07:23 GMT
>> Oh, they're capable. Just that they're capability is limited to telling
>> you what *they* want you to know.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Ain't that the truth!  Global warming hype is proof of that.  There are
> even regulars here who apparently believe that garbage.

Its funny how some people are consumed on scaremongering other people
about the global warming and the end of the world.

OK it might be the end of the world but f.ck it what people are going to
do hide under their beds all their lives or actually live it up before
the Almighty bang!. Doomsday Sayer's and dreary people make other people
feel like sh.t. Scaremongering is a big hit these days.

Its DOOMSDAY STAY AT HOME!!!!!

Dont get out of bed because your all f.cked!

Next day

A normal typical day begins and ends as usual.

:-)

Signature

Regards
Dan

John McKenzie - 30 May 2008 10:04 GMT
> >> Oh, they're capable. Just that they're capability is limited to telling
> >> you what *they* want you to know.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> A normal typical day begins and ends as usual.

It's (disturbingly) analogous to the various fruit loops (well they are
case closed for falling prey to any religious dogma, but I digress) who
have made a 'breakthrough' and determined when the 'end times' are and
when the rapture would happen.

And when it doesn't do they conclude it's horseshit? Nope, they just got
the date wrong.

It's no wonder some people said Jesus wasn't the Messiah - for f.cks
sake - they _knew_ it since they made up the story that there ever would
be a messiah - there was no legitimate prophecy to fulfil.

Signature

John McKenzie

tosspam@aol.com  abuse@yahoo.com abuse@hotmail.com abuse@earthlink.com
abuse@aol.com vice.president@whitehouse.gov president@whitehouse.gov
sweep.day@accc.gov.au uce@ftc.gov admin@loopback abuse@iprimus.com.au
$LOGIN@localhost  world's #1 sardine whisperer root@mailloop.com
$USER@$HOST $LOGNAME@localhost -h1024@localhost abuse@msn.com
abuse@federalpolice.gov.au fraudinfo@psinet.com  abuse@asio.gov.au
$USER@localhost abuse@sprint.com abuse@fbi.gov abuse@cia.gov

Dan--. - 31 May 2008 00:36 GMT
>> A normal typical day begins and ends as usual.
>
> It's (disturbingly) analogous to the various fruit loops (well they are
> case closed for falling prey to any religious dogma, but I digress) who
> have made a 'breakthrough' and determined when the 'end times' are and
> when the rapture would happen.

Yup.

> And when it doesn't do they conclude it's horseshit? Nope, they just got
> the date wrong.

LOL its more the joke is on them really. :-)

> It's no wonder some people said Jesus wasn't the Messiah - for f.cks
> sake - they _knew_ it since they made up the story that there ever would
> be a messiah - there was no legitimate prophecy to fulfil.

Amen!

Signature

Regards
Dan

Scotty - 30 May 2008 11:20 GMT
: OK it might be the end of the world but f.ck it what people are going to
: do hide under their beds all their lives or actually live it up before
: the Almighty bang!. Doomsday Sayer's and dreary people make other people
: feel like sh.t. Scaremongering is a big hit these days.
:
: Its DOOMSDAY STAY AT HOME!!!!!

Hmmm, at what point do you start to beleive it all?

One of the guys at work pointed me towards a few sites that beleive that " December 21 2012 THE END
" is where it all ends.

I thought that Id take a look out of curiousity and boy O boy! are there a few people that beleive
this or WHAT!??!?!?!!?

Well, after playing around for a while I can see why theres cause for concern, hell even the Dawgie
would take meds to get this idea from his head.

Take a google at it and tell me that at some point on your site travels that the idea doesnt past
throught your head as plausible.

I dont take it as Gospel but its food for thought.
Snapper - 31 May 2008 04:16 GMT
Noddy wrote...

> Oh, they're capable. Just that they're capability is limited to telling you
> what *they* want you to know.

Sometimes. But often they'll be pressed to get it to press first, so whatever
story sounds the best gets the nod.

Plus they like to get "eye witness" accounts of events, even though the so
called eye witness may not have a clue as to what actually occured.
Noddy - 31 May 2008 08:08 GMT
> Sometimes. But often they'll be pressed to get it to press first, so
> whatever
> story sounds the best gets the nod.

99 times out of 100 they'll go with whatever slant they want the story to
have. All they need to do is satisfy their legal department with regards to
names, places and dates, and the rest is up to their own poetic licence.

> Plus they like to get "eye witness" accounts of events, even though the so
> called eye witness may not have a clue as to what actually occured.

They're often "invented" people who were not even at the scene :)

--
Regards,
Noddy.
Jeßus - 26 May 2008 23:43 GMT
> (Not exactly HELD TOGETHER by Cable ties really now was it)
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> He was granted bail and is due to appear in Moss Vale Local Court on June 116 to face a speeding
> charge.

I don't think the press is capable of accuracy, they're all a bunch of
arselickers.

Apart from that... I thought my 220KM/H on the Midland Hwy was pushing
it a little last Sunday, but 260kmh on the HUME is really asking for it :)
jackbadger56 - 26 May 2008 23:50 GMT
> (Not exactly HELD TOGETHER by Cable ties really now was it)
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> He was granted bail and is due to appear in Moss Vale Local Court on June 116 to face a speeding
> charge.

I've been waiting for a post to pop up that kinda relates to my
current pet gripe!
Whatever happened to using the words increase and decrease (or cut)?
These have been junked by the press it seems.......examples;
"The Commonwealth Bank has HIKED interest rates" (a line from a story
about a 0.1% increase in it's lending rate); or "The abolishing of GST
on top of the excise rate will result in petrol prices being SLASHED
by 4c a litre!". FFS, 4c!!!
[end gripe] ;-))
Jeßus - 27 May 2008 00:02 GMT
>> (Not exactly HELD TOGETHER by Cable ties really now was it)
>>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> by 4c a litre!". FFS, 4c!!!
> [end gripe] ;-))

It's like a disease...

First one slimy journo uses it - therefore so do the rest.
The precedent is set and there's no going back as far as they're
concerned. They think it grabs the attention of the reader/viewer better.

I mean, what more can you expect when even the U.S prez uses terms such
as "evil-doers"?
jackbadger56 - 30 May 2008 04:34 GMT
> >> (Not exactly HELD TOGETHER by Cable ties really now was it)
>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> The precedent is set and there's no going back as far as they're
> concerned. They think it grabs the attention of the reader/viewer better.

Awesome quote on 'The Gruen Transfer' the other night, relating to the
advertising industry - "You can't polish a turd, but you *can* roll it
in glitter" ;-p

> I mean, what more can you expect when even the U.S prez uses terms such
> as "evil-doers"?
atec77 - 30 May 2008 05:19 GMT
>>>> (Not exactly HELD TOGETHER by Cable ties really now was it)
>>>> _______________________________________________________________
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>> I mean, what more can you expect when even the U.S prez uses terms such
>> as "evil-doers"?

The only thing really wrong with that show apart from being on the abc
is willy being an utter fuckstick
Knobdoodle - 30 May 2008 11:30 GMT
Awesome quote on 'The Gruen Transfer' the other night, relating to the
advertising industry - "You can't polish a turd, but you *can* roll it
in glitter" ;-p
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yep; good one!
That show was unexpectedly quite good.  A bit clunky in places and a few of
the "dirty jokes" were a bit awkward but on the whole very promising!
Signature

Knob

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.