 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Australian Car Forums / General Car Topics (Australian group) / July 2009New Vehicle Suspension Rules
I have it on very good authority, that the new rules for altering the ride height of vehicles will be deferred until some common sense prevails for vehicles where height is altered by no more than 50mm Announcement should be made tomorrow. OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace. > I have it on very good authority, that the new rules for altering the > ride height of vehicles will be deferred until some common sense > prevails for vehicles where height is altered by no more than 50mm > > Announcement should be made tomorrow. "very good authority"???? = another mate at Mitzi ???? HTFWYK; you don't even know when the 380 AWD is due out. :-P  SignatureTake Care. ~~ Feral Al ( @..@) (\- :-P -/) ((.>__oo__<.)) ^^^ % ^^^ >> I have it on very good authority, that the new rules for altering the >> ride height of vehicles will be deferred until some common sense >> prevails for vehicles where height is altered by no more than 50mm >> Announcement should be made tomorrow. > "very good authority"???? = another mate at Mitzi ???? > HTFWYK; you don't even know when the 380 AWD is due out. :-P Oz might have something right for a change. One of my customers rang me this afternoon and told me that he had an email from the RTA to say that the new rules are going to be deferred but there is no indication anywhere as to what the period of the deferral will be or what changes are being considered. I haven't had any independant confirmation as yet. Somehow, I suspect that I'll be the last person that officially gets told. :-) SignatureAthol <http://cust.idl.com.au/athol> Linux Registered User # 254000 I'm a Libran Engineer. I don't argue, I discuss. >Oz might have something right for a change. Jeeez I'll bet that hurt! OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace. >>Oz might have something right for a change. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace. yeah I hope you recover from the pain ;-) Signature[This comment is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Church of Scientology International] "I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. They are so unlike your Christ." Gandhi >> Oz might have something right for a change. > > Jeeez I'll bet that hurt! Oi, I dangle a fresh prawn on my sharpest wide mouthed hook and you ignore it. You prick. :-P You can all GAGF, I'm goin ta sleep. SignatureTake Care. ~~ Feral Al ( @..@) (\- :-P -/) ((.>__oo__<.)) ^^^ % ^^^ >> Oz might have something right for a change. > Jeeez I'll bet that hurt! Yeah, you're the proverbial "wolf crier". You bullshit and twist so often that most disbelieve you even when it's possible you may, for once, be correct. SignatureDyna All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged. > > Oz might have something right for a change. > > Jeeez I'll bet that hurt! If you put an infinite number of narcissistic liars in front of an infinite number of keyboards, eventually one of them will accidentally get something right. -- >>> I have it on very good authority, that the new rules for altering the >>> ride height of vehicles will be deferred until some common sense [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Oz might have something right for a change. HTFWYK. Oh that's right, you're in the business. :-( > One of my customers rang me this afternoon and told me that he had an > email from the RTA to say that the new rules are going to be deferred > but there is no indication anywhere as to what the period of the > deferral will be or what changes are being considered. More good authority! > I haven't had any independant confirmation as yet. > > Somehow, I suspect that I'll be the last person that officially gets > told. :-) Depends what you want to be told, we might be able to accommodate ...... :-P SignatureTake Care. ~~ Feral Al ( @..@) (\- :-P -/) ((.>__oo__<.)) ^^^ % ^^^ >> Oz might have something right for a change. > HTFWYK. Oh that's right, you're in the business. :-( The coalition and the shooters party (who hold the balance of power in the NSW Legislative Council) have indicated opposition. The pressure on the government is fairly significant. The minister may have to name and sack person(s) within the RTA in order to save his own career. >> One of my customers rang me this afternoon and told me that he had an >> email from the RTA to say that the new rules are going to be deferred >> but there is no indication anywhere as to what the period of the >> deferral will be or what changes are being considered. > More good authority! That's why I didn't start this thread. The strength of that call wasn't really enough proof for me to announce it, but with oz having made a statement that was consistent with it, and the timing looking like it would fit, I figured that I'd mention it. >> Somehow, I suspect that I'll be the last person that officially gets >> told. :-) > Depends what you want to be told, we might be able to > accommodate ...... :-P LOL. AIUI, there have been several hundred emails to the minister with a link to my blog and asking him to respond to the issues I raised. I'm pretty certain that the RTA staff concerned know about it... I expect that the only communication I'll get about this will be the official announcement of the change, because I'm on a mailing list. SignatureAthol <http://cust.idl.com.au/athol> Linux Registered User # 254000 I'm a Libran Engineer. I don't argue, I discuss. >> HTFWYK. Oh that's right, you're in the business. :-( > > The coalition and the shooters party (who hold the balance of power in > the NSW Legislative Council) have indicated opposition. The pressure on > the government is fairly significant. The minister may have to name and > sack person(s) within the RTA in order to save his own career. A pathway common almost anywhere. Seen the procedure in action many times. Just think, many decades ago, some "backyard injunear or mechaniac", made up some blocks, got out his oxy and caused all this trouble. >> More good authority! > > That's why I didn't start this thread. The strength of that call wasn't > really enough proof for me to announce it, but with oz having made a > statement that was consistent with it, and the timing looking like it > would fit, I figured that I'd mention it. I *was* having a lend of you both. :-) > AIUI, there have been several hundred emails to the minister with > a link to my blog and asking him to respond to the issues I raised. I'm > pretty certain that the RTA staff concerned know about it... > > I expect that the only communication I'll get about this will be the > official announcement of the change, because I'm on a mailing list. Maybe not for long. :-\ SignatureTake Care. ~~ Feral Al ( @..@) (\- :-P -/) ((.>__oo__<.)) ^^^ % ^^^ |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.