Oi! twevy tell me warming wot ?

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

user@domain.invalid - 07 Nov 2009 07:37 GMT

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9Q8wPkoFAU

Reply to this Message

Clocky - 07 Nov 2009 10:13 GMT

> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9Q8wPkoFAU

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/05/moncktons-deliberate-manip
ulation/

Reply to this Message

Doug Jewell - 07 Nov 2009 20:28 GMT

>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9Q8wPkoFAU
>
> http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/05/moncktons-deliberate-manip
ulation/

wotta lotta bullshit.
Even their own cherry picked graph clearly shows a levelling
off and then a dip in temp this decade, yet their "best fit"
line still continues to rise. They are liars, plain and
simple. Slowly but surely we are getting more scientists who
are recognising the scam and speaking out. Monckton gives
them a voice against the AGW religionists.

Signature

What is the difference between a duck?

Reply to this Message

Clocky - 08 Nov 2009 00:29 GMT

>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9Q8wPkoFAU
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> more scientists who are recognising the scam and speaking out. Monckton
> gives them a voice against the AGW religionists.

If you want to put it in religious terms, Moncton is like the preacher
clutching his creationist bible and argueing for intelligent design in
response to the scientific evidence behind the theory of evolution.

Reply to this Message

user@domain.invalid - 08 Nov 2009 01:38 GMT

>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9Q8wPkoFAU
>>> http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/05/moncktons-deliberate-manip
ulation/
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> clutching his creationist bible and argueing for intelligent design in
> response to the scientific evidence behind the theory of evolution.

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2009/10/20/maldives-p
resident-all-wet-on-sea-level.aspx

Reply to this Message

Athol - 08 Nov 2009 03:34 GMT

> Even their own cherry picked graph clearly shows a levelling
> off and then a dip in temp this decade, yet their "best fit"
> line still continues to rise. They are liars, plain and
> simple. Slowly but surely we are getting more scientists who
> are recognising the scam and speaking out. Monckton gives
> them a voice against the AGW religionists.

I'm wondering if all the laws, treaties, etc. made on the basis of the
assumption that anthropogenic global warming is fact will contain a
cancellation clause so that they automatically lapse if the science is
proven wrong. If AGW is fact, the clause has no effect. Are the
believers confident enough to allow it?

Signature

Athol
<http://cust.idl.com.au/athol> Linux Registered User # 254000
I'm a Libran Engineer. I don't argue, I discuss.

Reply to this Message