 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Audi Cars / September 20052005 A4 reliability
I'm considering an A4 Avant (2.0 or 3.2) to replace my 94 Volvo 850 turbo wagon. My Volvo has gone about 230,000 miles and has had only one major service, which involved pulling the engine to replace the rear crankshaft oil seal. The only othr semi-expensive items to go were the front axle CV joint boots, one set, I replaced, and the other, the dealer, while they had the engine out. Can I expect a new Audi to go this far, with hard driving, without much more than regular services for the first 150,000 miles? To reply, please remove one letter from each side of "@" Spammers are VERMIN. Please kill them all. > Can I expect a new Audi to go this far, with hard driving, without > much more than regular services for the first 150,000 miles? Yes but I would avoid the 2.0 as it's not enough for the weight of car. You don't say which country you're in but perhaps the 3.0 diesel might be a good option if its available >> Can I expect a new Audi to go this far, with hard driving, without >> much more than regular services for the first 150,000 miles? > >Yes but I would avoid the 2.0 as it's not enough for the weight of car. You >don't say which country you're in but perhaps the 3.0 diesel might be a good >option if its available Have you actually driven the new 2.0 FSI in the B7 A4? >>> Can I expect a new Audi to go this far, with hard driving, without >>> much more than regular services for the first 150,000 miles? [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Have you actually driven the new 2.0 FSI in the B7 A4? Why would anyone buy a 2.0FSI when the 2.0 TFSI is out, I would go for the 1.8T B7 or 2.0T or 3.0 >>>> Can I expect a new Audi to go this far, with hard driving, without >>>> much more than regular services for the first 150,000 miles? [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >Why would anyone buy a 2.0FSI when the 2.0 TFSI is out, I would go for the >1.8T B7 or 2.0T or 3.0 Sorry, that's what I meant - the turbo 2.0 FSI engine. It's *way* different responding from the 1.8T - think "Power NOW" not "Power Soon"... >>> Have you actually driven the new 2.0 FSI in the B7 A4? >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > different > responding from the 1.8T - think "Power NOW" not "Power Soon"... Haven't driven the 2.0T FSI but I hear it's a stormer. The NA 2.0 FSI is a waste of time. It may produce 150bhp but it has to be revved like hell to make decent progress which defeats the point of having the fuel efficient FSI! > Can I expect a new Audi to go this far, with hard driving, without > much more than regular services for the first 150,000 miles? Well, it's a new car. How are we to know whether it's going to be reliable or not. Older A4s had their share of issues, some minor, some not (suspension for example). IMO, it's too early to tell whether the B7 platform addresses all these issues. It may fix some while it may introduce others. If you want a piece of mind, you should consider an extended warranty. If the history is any indication though, an Audi will not be as reliable as a Honda or Toyota, ON AVERAGE. I say on average, because my A4 (B5) was more reliable than my Honda (Accord). Dilligent regular maintenance is key to ensure good reliability. Good luck. Pete |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.