Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Audi Cars / September 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Artificially high speedo reading on new Audis??

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Pete Stolz - 18 Sep 2005 03:30 GMT
Hi guys,
I got my new '04 S4 last March.  I noticed that at speeds that I was
normally keeping up with traffic or going slightly faster in my old car, I
was now being passed quite regularly in my S4.  So, I do the natural
response and speed up.  I figured the speedo was reading about 5% high, so I
asked the service guy at the dealership.  He said it's a new federal mandate
that speedos on cars 2004 and new must read 5-10% high.  He didn't really
have an explanation and was not happy about it either because he has to tell
people that there's nothing he can do to fix it.  The only thing he said was
that it was so that people will think they're going faster than they really
are so that if the speedo's reading 70, they'll really be going closer to
65.  What a load of crap!  Do the stupid politicians actually think people
won't figure it out?  If not just by driving, but if they do get a ticket or
go by one of those speed readout boards, people will figure it out.  Has
anybody heard about this?
Pete
Peter - 18 Sep 2005 04:29 GMT
>I got my new '04 S4 last March.  I noticed that at speeds that I was
>normally keeping up with traffic or going slightly faster in my old car, I
>was now being passed quite regularly in my S4.  So, I do the natural
>response and speed up.  I figured the speedo was reading about 5% high, so I
>asked the service guy at the dealership.  He said it's a new federal mandate
>that speedos on cars 2004 and new must read 5-10% high.

<snip>

Interesting that you should say this. I bought an '02 A4 in April. I'm
in the UK. I've been wondering if my speedo was overreading as well.
Is it possible that it's been done worldwide?

Peter.
David Nesbitt - 18 Sep 2005 09:37 GMT
>>I got my new '04 S4 last March.  I noticed that at speeds that I was
>>normally keeping up with traffic or going slightly faster in my old car, I
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>in the UK. I've been wondering if my speedo was overreading as well.
>Is it possible that it's been done worldwide?

Nothing has changed, nor is it unusual. Maybe the US has just caught up.

AIUI, legislation in the UK has required (for years now - maybe came
from a European regulation) that speedometers read between +1% and +11%
at 70mph.  In other words, by law speedometers must never under-read.
It's an obvious safety provision, as well as protecting manufacturers
from frivolous claims by motorists who are being prosecuted for speeding
and want to blame somebody else.

It happens that my old A3 over-read by about 5mph at 70mph, but my new
A3 over-reads by about 1-2mph at 70mph.  When I first got the car, I
double-checked the speedometer against the speed reading from a GPS.  I
want to be confident about my actual speeds.

The reason that I'm anal about speedometers is because I bought a new VW
Golf in 1998 which did have an under-reading speedometer.  Needless to
say, the dealer refused to believe me and tried hard to patronise me as
someone suffering from delusions.  When I became insistent enough for
them to check, they were forced to replace it PDQ especially after I had
pointed out to them that they had sold me a car which was illegal to use
on a road.  It was under-reading by about 10%, and it was obvious when
driving in traffic on a motorway.

If you carry out the same calibration yourself, you might also find it
very educational to watch how much other cars slow down for speed
cameras or around traffic cars, when you know they're already doing less
than the speed limit.  A reduction of 11% at 70mph means they are
actually doing less than 63mph.  It seems that many cars' speedometers
over-read by near to the maximum, if only the owners realised it.

Yes, I have had a traffic car tuck in behind me after I had sailed past
them and everyone else doing 65mph, only for them to leave me alone
after following me for a couple of miles.  I like to think that it would
have been plain to them that I did know what speed I was doing, unlike
most others on the road it seems, but who knows?

Signature

David Nesbitt

N.B. Email sent to "nospam" will be rejected. Please use Reply-To address.

Anthony R. Gold - 18 Sep 2005 11:22 GMT
> AIUI, legislation in the UK has required (for years now - maybe came
> from a European regulation) that speedometers read between +1% and +11%
> at 70mph.

A law that they must always read at least 1% high?  Rubbish!

Tony
David Nesbitt - 18 Sep 2005 15:05 GMT
>> AIUI, legislation in the UK has required (for years now - maybe came
>> from a European regulation) that speedometers read between +1% and +11%
>> at 70mph.
>
>A law that they must always read at least 1% high?  Rubbish!

Thank you for your correction.

Signature

David Nesbitt

N.B. Email sent to "nospam" will be rejected. Please use Reply-To address.

Anthony R. Gold - 18 Sep 2005 11:31 GMT
> Interesting that you should say this. I bought an '02 A4 in April. I'm
> in the UK. I've been wondering if my speedo was overreading as well.
> Is it possible that it's been done worldwide?

The Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986, as amended,
allows the use of speedometers that meet the requirements of EC Community
Directive 75/443(97/39) or ECE Regulation 39. Both the EC Directive and
the ECE Regulation lay down accuracy requirements to be applied at the
time of vehicle approval for speedometers. These requirements are that the
error in the indicated speed must not be more than 10 per cent of the true
speed plus 4 km/h.  The requirements are also that the indicated speed
must never be less than the true speed.

Tony
Peter - 18 Sep 2005 14:49 GMT
>The Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986, as amended,
>allows the use of speedometers that meet the requirements of EC Community
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>speed plus 4 km/h.  The requirements are also that the indicated speed
>must never be less than the true speed.

Interesting, thanks.

Hmmm... haven't I seen you before somewhere... like yesterday on
uk.media.home-cinema? It's a small world!

Peter.
Anthony R. Gold - 18 Sep 2005 15:56 GMT
> Hmmm... haven't I seen you before somewhere... like yesterday on
> uk.media.home-cinema? It's a small world!

Hi Peter, yes I am an owner of both an allroad and a Sony RDR-HX710.

Speaking of which, does anyone know whether the DVD drive in the Audi Nav+
RNS-E is intended to be able to play DVD movies, or is it only a DVD ROM
drive for navigation map files and MP3s?

I just tried putting a film DVD into mine and the disk was not recognised.

Happy trails.

Tony
Peter Bell - 19 Sep 2005 10:18 GMT
> does anyone know whether the DVD drive in the Audi Nav+ RNS-E is
> intended to be able to play DVD movies, or is it only a DVD ROM drive
> for navigation map files and MP3s?

The drive built in to the RNS-E will play normal Audio CDs, data CDs
containing MP3s and will read the navigation DVDs.  For anything else
you will need a separate drive.

Signature

Peter Bell  (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with 'bellfamily')

Anthony R. Gold - 19 Sep 2005 11:14 GMT
> The drive built in to the RNS-E will play normal Audio CDs, data CDs
> containing MP3s and will read the navigation DVDs.  For anything else
> you will need a separate drive.

Thanks; glad to learn that my system is just limited and not faulty.

Tony
Rusty NAilz - 23 Sep 2005 09:12 GMT
Gad-Zoots!! watch a movie whist motoring an Audi. Sounds like an American
feat.

> > The drive built in to the RNS-E will play normal Audio CDs, data CDs
> > containing MP3s and will read the navigation DVDs.  For anything else
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Tony
Anthony R. Gold - 18 Sep 2005 11:21 GMT
> He said it's a new federal mandate
> that speedos on cars 2004 and new must read 5-10% high.

There's another federal law which says people should not post stories
about fictitious federal laws on Internet News :-)

Tony
Oldun - 18 Sep 2005 11:43 GMT
There is no such thing as an "accurate" speedometer that used engine speed
and gear ratios to calculate speed. Your indicated speed varies according to
amount of tyre wear and whether the tyre is over or under inflated.
You the driver would certainly sue the manufacturer if booked for speeding
when your speedometer indicated you were travelling within the speed limit.
For that reason all car makers have sold cars with over-reading
speedometers, long before any law made them do such a thing.
A GPS system is certainly much more accurate as it is not affected by things
like tyre condition. Obviously such a system cannot replace the cars
speedometer as it cannot work anywhere the satellites cannot be seen.
It would also help if some smart-alecs would shut-up instead of writing
bullshit on things they obviously know nothing about.

Oldun
Anthony R. Gold - 18 Sep 2005 12:12 GMT
> Oldun

And grumpy too.

Tony
Pete Stolz - 18 Sep 2005 16:13 GMT
That makes sense, but then why does my 2002 Durango read right on the nuts
when I pass one of those speed boards they put by the side of the road?  I
wonder if they calibrate those wrong too.
Pete

> There is no such thing as an "accurate" speedometer that used engine speed
> and gear ratios to calculate speed. Your indicated speed varies according
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Oldun
Steve Thompson - 18 Sep 2005 17:06 GMT
> That makes sense, but then why does my 2002 Durango read right on the nuts
> when I pass one of those speed boards they put by the side of the road?  I
> wonder if they calibrate those wrong too.

I wondered that too. My 2002 A4 also reads exactly the same as those speed
boards at all kinds of different speeds. I tested the speedo by driving at
exactly 60mph between two mile markers and timing the run using a
stop-watch; time was within a tenth of 60 seconds. I repeated the test at
70mph and 80 mph. That also gave an accurate result. So, as long as the
mile markers are accurate, the speed boards and my speedo are within 1% of
the true speed. My '95 Passat was within 2%. Then again, I once used a
radar gun to clock an airplane hanger at Sebring at 57 mph :-)

Steve
Pete Stolz - 18 Sep 2005 18:18 GMT
Hurricanes can blow a person holding a radar gun at just about that speed.
Not much holding back the breeze at Sebring.  :)

>> That makes sense, but then why does my 2002 Durango read right on the
>> nuts
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Steve
Oldun - 18 Sep 2005 19:47 GMT
OK, you've had your fun, now can any of you find me a maker who guarantees
their cars speedometers are 100% accurate all of the time?

Maybe it would be wise to search Google before trying to redicule someones
statement first. Or as they say "engage brain before pressing keys".

Have a nice day.

Oldun
BBO - 18 Sep 2005 19:53 GMT
> OK, you've had your fun, now can any of you find me a maker who guarantees
> their cars speedometers are 100% accurate all of the time?

It's not a car, but my Ducati have a 100% accurate speedo. Tested and
veryfied with a GPS.

Cheers,

Signature

azoth@dod.no
------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Wenn im Zweifel, Volleistung!                                 DoD#2101
  '90 BMW 318i '93 Audi 100 2.3E                When in doubt, floor it!

Rusty NAilz - 23 Sep 2005 09:14 GMT
I never look down when flying a Ducati

> > OK, you've had your fun, now can any of you find me a maker who guarantees
> > their cars speedometers are 100% accurate all of the time?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Cheers,
BBO - 26 Sep 2005 10:58 GMT
> > > OK, you've had your fun, now can any of you find me a maker who
> guarantees
> > > their cars speedometers are 100% accurate all of the time?
> >
> > It's not a car, but my Ducati have a 100% accurate speedo. Tested and
> > veryfied with a GPS.

> I never look down when flying a Ducati

As with any pilots my helmet is equipped with a HUD... ;-)

Signature

azoth@dod.no
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wenn im Zweifel, Volleistung!                                 DoD#2101
 '93 Audi 100 2.3E                             When in doubt, floor it!

Pete Stolz - 18 Sep 2005 22:35 GMT
OK Oldun, maybe we're just a little too defensive here.  I was just asking
you a fricking question.  The first thing I wrote in that message was "That
makes sense...."  Geez, relax.

> OK, you've had your fun, now can any of you find me a maker who guarantees
> their cars speedometers are 100% accurate all of the time?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Oldun
Oldun - 19 Sep 2005 00:58 GMT
All is forgiven, I did not intend to offend anyone just trying to make a
point.

Oldun
Pete Stolz - 19 Sep 2005 01:11 GMT
At the risk of myself now being accused of being too defensive, I didn't do
anything that needed to be forgiven.  I wasn't messing with you; it was a
serious question about whether the speed board are purposely calibrated to
be inaccurate.

> All is forgiven, I did not intend to offend anyone just trying to make a
> point.
>
> Oldun
Dano58 - 19 Sep 2005 13:51 GMT
I don't think those speed board's are particularly accurate. I was once
clocked at 20 mph by one near my parents house - and I was walking! I
mean, I'm a fast walker but not THAT fast.....

My $.02 on this issue is that since the regulations generally state
that a speedo cannot read LOW, the manufacturers tend to calibrate them
to read higher so they don't read low.

Dan D
'04 A4 1.8Tq MT-6
Central NJ USA
Anthony R. Gold - 19 Sep 2005 15:26 GMT
> I tested the speedo by driving at
> exactly 60mph between two mile markers and timing the run using a
> stop-watch; time was within a tenth of 60 seconds. I repeated the test at
> 70mph and 80 mph. That also gave an accurate result.

My allroad's speedo reads 75mph at 70 and 32 at 30 (as calibrated by GPS).

Tony
Ronny - 20 Sep 2005 23:27 GMT
>> I tested the speedo by driving at
>> exactly 60mph between two mile markers and timing the run using a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Tony

My 1.8T quattro reads 75mph at 70mph as well :)

Those new signs in the UK that say slow down are set below 30mph but I think
they are more of a "speed Aware" device than speed cameras are, I would
prefer to see more of them on the road, people actually make a conscious
effort to slow down then.
Hairy One Kenobi - 23 Sep 2005 00:54 GMT
> > I tested the speedo by driving at
> > exactly 60mph between two mile markers and timing the run using a
> > stop-watch; time was within a tenth of 60 seconds. I repeated the test at
> > 70mph and 80 mph. That also gave an accurate result.
>
> My allroad's speedo reads 75mph at 70 and 32 at 30 (as calibrated by GPS).

My TT reads accurately, but starts to drift over about 115mph. At 155mph
indicated, the GPS (accuracy of 1mph) read just over 147mph.

Pretty much on the money.

A stopwatch gives the same results (but at a lower speed - in the UK 100mph
= bye bye license)

Signature

Hairy One Kenobi

Disclaimer: the opinions expressed in this opinion do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of the highly-opinionated person expressing the opinion
in the first place. So there!

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.