Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Audi Cars / December 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Looking for A3 "Real World" Impressions

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
BRH - 17 Dec 2005 21:40 GMT
I test drove an Audi A3 (new model in USA) a few months ago, and liked
it (but didn't buy one at the time).

I'm starting to seriously consider a new car at this time and would be
interested in hearing people's real-world experiences with the A3
(particularly the DSG Automatic Transmission) - both positive and negative.

The main negatives for me at the time were: a) Turbo engine requires
premium gas (Gas prices were spiking at the time) and b) the cargo space
was smallish.  (ie-My golf bag wouldn't fit in the back without folding
the rear seat down. - That's a relatively minor gripe though....)

I've since read reports - some say that you CAN use regular gas with
engines that require premium gas per the manufacturer recommendations
(although "performance" would suffer, while others say that you'd be
risking engine damage by doing so.  (ie - pinging and knocking).

Which is the case with the A3?  I'm an average driver that like the A3's
practicality.  So at most times, I probably wouldn't be pushing the
engine too hard.  However I do like the "fun factor" that the A3 can
provide on occassion, especially those paddle shifters.  (I drive a
Subaru Forester now and see the A3 as a smaller, more luxurious, more
"fun to drive" car that would provide similar practicality.)

So any info on overall impressions and on the regular vs premium
gasoline question would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!
Chris Bartram - 18 Dec 2005 19:11 GMT
> I test drove an Audi A3 (new model in USA) a few months ago, and liked
> it (but didn't buy one at the time).
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> was smallish.  (ie-My golf bag wouldn't fit in the back without folding
> the rear seat down. - That's a relatively minor gripe though....)

Can you get a TDi in the US? If fuel costs are a problem it will provide
great performance and execellent economy. Anyway, your gas is cheap ;-)

> I've since read reports - some say that you CAN use regular gas with
> engines that require premium gas per the manufacturer recommendations
> (although "performance" would suffer, while others say that you'd be
> risking engine damage by doing so.  (ie - pinging and knocking).

I would doubt you'd get damage- look in the broochure for the minumum
octane rating. I'd imagine the engine managment would cope with it and
you'd just lose a bit of performance. That's the case with most cars
these days.
> Which is the case with the A3?  I'm an average driver that like the A3's
> practicality.  So at most times, I probably wouldn't be pushing the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Thanks!
Dave - 18 Dec 2005 21:10 GMT
> I've since read reports - some say that you CAN use regular gas with
> engines that require premium gas per the manufacturer recommendations
> (although "performance" would suffer, while others say that you'd be
> risking engine damage by doing so.  (ie - pinging and knocking).

You may pay more for higher octane fuel but the general consensus seems to
be that any extra cost is covered by improved fuel consumption that you'll
get over regular petrol.

HTH
Dano58 - 21 Dec 2005 14:22 GMT
Chris, no Audi TDI engines in the US, unfortunately......

BRH, I have run my 1.8T on mid-grade a couple of times. For a while,
when prices were over $3 I would run 2 tanks of mid-grade then a tank
of premium. Frankly, I did not notice any difference in either gas
mileage or performance. However, 90% of my driving is in-town, so it's
not like I'm winding it out at all..... I haven't tried a regular grade
in it, and now that prices are back to around $2/gallon for premium, I
probably won't. I've been doing every third tank of mid-grade.

On the A3 - I haven't driven it but took an extensive look on the
showroom floor a couple weeks back. Personally, I would wait until I
could get the 2.0T with quattro and 6-speed (some piont next year,
perhaps?). It's definitely a little tighter than my A4 inside, but I
like the style and interior.

Dan D
'04 A4 1.8Tq MT-6
Central NJ USA
Peter - 22 Dec 2005 08:51 GMT
>On the A3 - I haven't driven it but took an extensive look on the
>showroom floor a couple weeks back. Personally, I would wait until I
>could get the 2.0T with quattro and 6-speed (some piont next year,
>perhaps?).

Not recommended.

My own car is an A4 (with a six-speed manual box). When I had it
serviced a couple of months ago, the garage lent me an A3 2.0T quattro
with the six-speed manual gearbox. I drove it quite a bit that day.
Now, I'm used to manual gearboxes - I've been driving for 30 years,
and never owned anything else. On the whole, the car was excellent.
But it was badly let down by that gearbox, which was quite he worst
I've had to use for many years. It was so stiff as to be barely
manageable. It simply did not bear comparison with the one in my own
car (which is pretty good, though not perfect). If I was to buy an A3
(which I would seriously consider doing), there is no way at all that
I'd get one with a manual gearchange.

Peter.
Graham - 23 Dec 2005 22:06 GMT
>>On the A3 - I haven't driven it but took an extensive look on the
>>showroom floor a couple weeks back. Personally, I would wait until I
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> (which I would seriously consider doing), there is no way at all that
> I'd get one with a manual gearchange.

Horses for courses.  I've had 2 A3's and have never had any problems
with the gearbox.  Of all the cars I've driven, I've found it to have
the best gearbox, nice slick and solid change.  YMMV :-)
Peter - 26 Dec 2005 11:59 GMT
>Horses for courses.  I've had 2 A3's and have never had any problems
>with the gearbox.  Of all the cars I've driven, I've found it to have
>the best gearbox, nice slick and solid change.  YMMV :-)

I don't think that we can be talking about the same gearbox. There's
no way that I could imagine anyone describing a gearchange that takes
all of the strength in my arm to shift as 'slick'. OK, so you've had
manual A3s, but are you sure that they have the same six-speed box as
is fitted to the current 2.0Tq? It's certainly not the same six-speed
box as I have in my A4.

Even the garage acknowledged that this box 'isn't Audi's best' and
reckoned that the DSG was a better option for this particular car.

Peter.
Wolfgang Pawlinetz - 26 Dec 2005 20:02 GMT
>Even the garage acknowledged that this box 'isn't Audi's best' and
>reckoned that the DSG was a better option for this particular car.

It could be quite simply broken.

Regards

Wolfgang
Graham - 26 Dec 2005 21:07 GMT
>>Horses for courses.  I've had 2 A3's and have never had any problems
>>with the gearbox.  Of all the cars I've driven, I've found it to have
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> no way that I could imagine anyone describing a gearchange that takes
> all of the strength in my arm to shift as 'slick'.

I have a 6 speed gearbox in my A3.  I don't know whether its the same
one as in the 2.0TQ.  Certainly the box shift is slick and painless.  It
is extremely comfortable in use and I haven't any issues. I suspect the
one you had trouble with was broken.

> Even the garage acknowledged that this box 'isn't Audi's best'

Thats their opinion, of course.

> and
> reckoned that the DSG was a better option for this particular car.

DSG is an excellent box, no doubt about it, but there was nothing wrong
with any of the A3's I've driven.
Peter - 27 Dec 2005 08:49 GMT
>I have a 6 speed gearbox in my A3.  I don't know whether its the same
>one as in the 2.0TQ.  Certainly the box shift is slick and painless.  It
>is extremely comfortable in use and I haven't any issues. I suspect the
>one you had trouble with was broken.

Possible, of course, but:
(a) it didn't feel broken - just very, very stiff; and
(b) I can't see an Audi franchised dealer offering a car with a broken
gearbox as a service loan car without first repairing that gearbox.

Peter.
Dano58 - 28 Dec 2005 13:44 GMT
Well, it IS a different transmission than the A4 - the A3 has a
transverse-mounted engine, the A4 is longitudinal, so the transmission
is necessarily a different one. It also uses a different quattro system
than the A4, being the 'FWD until slip detected' type like the TT
versus the 'AWD all the time' type in the A4. They are both called
'quattro', however.

Dan D
'04 A4 1,8Tq MT-6
Central NJ USA
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.