Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Audi Cars / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Looking to buy a brand new car

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Oslo - 25 Jan 2006 22:44 GMT
Torn between the A4 and BMW S3.

Nearly every magazine puts the BMW ahead, but I drove an Audi 80 for 10
years and loved it.

Any advice?

O.
Ed Pirrero - 26 Jan 2006 01:09 GMT
> Torn between the A4 and BMW S3.
>
> Nearly every magazine puts the BMW ahead, but I drove an Audi 80 for 10
> years and loved it.
>
> Any advice?

Drive them both and select the one you like best.  Who cares what
magazine writers say?  Unless they are putting money down toward your
car, only *your* opinion matters.

Never heard of an S3.  Europe only?

E.P.

'95 UrS6
Chris D'Agnolo - 26 Jan 2006 04:37 GMT
Agreed, I've long said that just because one cars specs add up better on
paper or that one cars performance advantage is perceivable when two cars
are driven back to back, doesn't mean that it's the better car for you.

Get in them and drive them, I bet you'll know.

Chris

>> Torn between the A4 and BMW S3.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> '95 UrS6
Dano58 - 26 Jan 2006 13:11 GMT
It's kind of hard to give advice without knowing your driving habits,
environment or pocketbook! But if you need/want all-wheel drive, I
don't think the 3-Series is available with AWD yet, is it?

Dan D
'04 A4 1.8Tq MT-6
Central NJ USA
Dennis Wyatt - 26 Jan 2006 13:18 GMT
Do you mean M3? If so you should consider the S4 not A4. Looking at resale value should help you make a decision.
Ed Pirrero - 26 Jan 2006 17:41 GMT
> Do you mean M3? If so you should consider the S4 not A4.

True.

> Looking at resale value should help you make a decision.

Why?  Buying a car is not an investment decision.  Cars cost money, and
the amount of marginal loss on the end of the life cycle of the car
(life cycle as defined by the purchaser) will be very small in
comparison to the original depreciation.

How a car drives, how it fits your driving style, and what your
expectations of reliability are make much more difference.

E.P.
Dave - 27 Jan 2006 16:19 GMT
> Why?  Buying a car is not an investment decision.  Cars cost money, and
> the amount of marginal loss on the end of the life cycle of the car
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> How a car drives, how it fits your driving style, and what your
> expectations of reliability are make much more difference.

To a certain extent your second paragraph is true but when spending my own
money I was as much back as possible when I sell on.

e.g. in the UK a Vauxhall Vectra or Ford Mondeo will loose approximately 50%
of their initial purchase price in the first year alone. The A4 in
comparison only looses around 30% and by the time it's 3 years old it's lost
around 50% while the others are worth about 25% of their initial price. The
GM and Ford products aren't even that much cheaper once you've spec'd up the
car the way you want it.

So I end up with a better built car that is maybe not quite as nice to drive
as a Mondeo but will be worth substantially more when I sell it.

Dave
news@macclancy.demon.co.uk - 27 Jan 2006 17:00 GMT
Yes, but you might have paid more for it in the first place so the
actual depreciation  might not be much different. i.e. 75% of 17k is
12.75k, 50% of 25k is 12.5k.  It's the actual cash that counts, not the
%age depreciation.
Ed Pirrero - 27 Jan 2006 18:39 GMT
> > Why?  Buying a car is not an investment decision.  Cars cost money, and
> > the amount of marginal loss on the end of the life cycle of the car
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> To a certain extent your second paragraph is true but when spending my own
> money I was as much back as possible when I sell on.

So, under your definition of life cycle, the price difference means
something.  I don't look to sell my cars.  I look to *drive* them.  And
will drive them until their resale value is about 5-10% of the orginal
purchase price.  And at that resale value level, there is really not
much difference.

E.P.
Guy King - 27 Jan 2006 18:49 GMT
The message <1138387152.202045.38380@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
from "Ed Pirrero" <gcmschemist@gmail.com> contains these words:

> I look to *drive* them.  And
> will drive them until their resale value is about 5-10% of the orginal
> purchase price.  

Why stop then? I run 'em into the ground - when I've finished you can't
even give 'em away.

Signature

Skipweasel
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.

daytripper - 27 Jan 2006 21:11 GMT
>The message <1138387152.202045.38380@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
>from "Ed Pirrero" <gcmschemist@gmail.com> contains these words:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Why stop then? I run 'em into the ground - when I've finished you can't
>even give 'em away.

You should try to time their demise so they die on the lot. These days if you
can just get the smoldering hulk to the dealer the marque will toss in at
least a grand extra off the price of a new vehicle, even if the old one is
destined to the crusher...

Cheers

/daytripper
'00 s4 6spd
Guy King - 27 Jan 2006 21:37 GMT
The message <fm2lt1554pt0tf8snc6t4i1mhiv7esbsap@4ax.com>
from daytripper <day_trippr@REMOVEyahoo.com> contains these words:

> >Why stop then? I run 'em into the ground - when I've finished you can't
> >even give 'em away.

> You should try to time their demise so they die on the lot. These days
> if you
> can just get the smoldering hulk to the dealer the marque will toss in at
> least a grand extra off the price of a new vehicle, even if the old one is
> destined to the crusher...

Dealer? I've never bought a car from a dealer and I don't intend to
start now! Then again I've never taken a car to a garage apart from for
tyres and exhausts.

Signature

Skipweasel
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.

Ed Pirrero - 28 Jan 2006 01:10 GMT
> The message <1138387152.202045.38380@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
> from "Ed Pirrero" <gcmschemist@gmail.com> contains these words:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Why stop then? I run 'em into the ground - when I've finished you can't
> even give 'em away.

I've found that the last six months of the life of a car is often the
time you seem to MOST need a reliable vehicle.  And that last six
months is when it really heads downhill.

:)

So I try and get rid of the thing BEFORE it has that slide into the
automotive grave, but after I've gotten the best years of its life out
of it.

My Audis seem to reach about 250-300k before I take $800-$2000 for
them.  :)

E.P.
Guy King - 28 Jan 2006 09:30 GMT
The message <1138410604.628445.15610@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
from "Ed Pirrero" <gcmschemist@gmail.com> contains these words:

> My Audis seem to reach about 250-300k before I take $800-$2000 for
> them.  :)

That's about where I come /in/!

Signature

Skipweasel
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.