Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Audi Cars / May 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Audi vs BMW vs Volvo

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
koumer@yahoo.com - 15 May 2007 07:15 GMT
I'm short and retired. I polish my cars frequently. So, when
looking for a low (I can polish it without having to get up on a
ladder), short, functional car, I've narrowed my shopping to three
wagons - the Audi A4 2.0T, the BMW 325i and the Volvo V50 2.4i or T5.
    I don't have the reactions any more for sporty driving. And I
lean away from harsh suspensions. Alhough I like the Audi and Volvo
turbos,  But I doubt they're low maintenance nor long lived. I had a
regularly aspirated Volvo before for 8 years, but a friend who bought
a Volvo turbo at the same time only got three trouble free years out
of his car.
    Any insights about the suspensions or the turbos would be welcome
in helping me decide.

BOB
Kevin McMurtrie - 15 May 2007 08:34 GMT
>      I'm short and retired. I polish my cars frequently. So, when
> looking for a low (I can polish it without having to get up on a
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> BOB

I'd go with a midrange Japanese car if pillowy handling and mundane
styling aren't a problem.  They're cheaper, more comfortable, and
usually very easy to maintain.

Based on my personal experience, I'd stay clear of the Honda hybrids.
Dave - 15 May 2007 10:17 GMT
>     I'm short and retired. I polish my cars frequently. So, when
> looking for a low (I can polish it without having to get up on a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>     Any insights about the suspensions or the turbos would be welcome
> in helping me decide.

There's no reason why the turbo engines won't be long-lived and reliable if
they're maintained properly. However a NA engine has one less thing to go
wrong so I'd expect it to be more reliable.

I'd have thought that you'd be able to get a 3.2 A4 for similar price to the
325i if you'd rather have a NA engine. The Volvo is a step down in terms of
quality
Dave - 15 May 2007 10:18 GMT
"Dave" <dave@nobody.com> wrote in message news:...
>>     I'm short and retired. I polish my cars frequently. So, when
>> looking for a low (I can polish it without having to get up on a
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> the 325i if you'd rather have a NA engine. The Volvo is a step down in
> terms of quality

I'll try finishing my post before sending it!

Can't speak for BMW or Volvo but there isn't much difference between the
maintenance programs of Audi NA and turbo engines.

The Volvo is a step down in terms of quality but maybe that doesn't bother
you too much

HTH
Dave LaCourse - 15 May 2007 11:02 GMT
> I'm short and retired. I polish my cars frequently. So, when
>looking for a low (I can polish it without having to get up on a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>     Any insights about the suspensions or the turbos would be welcome
>in helping me decide.

Audi has been "doing" turbos for many years.  I've had three and none
of them gave me any problems.  Audi is noted for its trouble free
turbos.  I have put more than 100k miles on two (1990 200T wagon and
1994 S4) and currently drive an RS6 with twin turbos.

Dave
G-man uk - 15 May 2007 21:43 GMT
>      I'm short and retired. I polish my cars frequently. So, when
> looking for a low (I can polish it without having to get up on a
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> a Volvo turbo at the same time only got three trouble free years out
> of his car.

Perhaps your friend was not aware of how to let the turbo cool down
correctly?  Or maybe he just got a bad 'un.
Pete - 16 May 2007 03:04 GMT
"G-man uk" wrote>
> Perhaps your friend was not aware of how to let the turbo cool down
> correctly?  Or maybe he just got a bad 'un.

There was a time in the US when Volvo dealers would put mineral oil in
turbocharged Volvo engines (like the T5) and suggested keeping it there
for the duration of the oil change interval which was something like
7.5k miles.  I could see where the turbos wouldn't fancy it.

Pete
Miguel De Anda - 22 May 2007 08:27 GMT
>>      I'm short and retired. I polish my cars frequently. So, when
>> looking for a low (I can polish it without having to get up on a
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Perhaps your friend was not aware of how to let the turbo cool down
> correctly?  Or maybe he just got a bad 'un.

My TT's turbo cools itself when you shutdown the motor. At least I think
that's what the manual says.

I had a 2001 1.8T Jetta for 5 years and I didn't have any turbo problems
(other than the speeding tickets).

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Dano58 - 16 May 2007 13:23 GMT
On May 15, 2:15 am, kou...@yahoo.com wrote:
>      I'm short and retired. I polish my cars frequently. So, when
> looking for a low (I can polish it without having to get up on a
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> BOB

Why wouldn't you consider something like the Mazda6 wagon? It's got a
nice V6 and being Japanese, should give you many years of trouble-free
motoring. It's a great-looking car as well, and certainly less
expensive than the ones you list.

Dan D
'04 A4 1.8Tq MT-6
Central NJ USA
Pete - 16 May 2007 14:37 GMT
"Dano58" wrote> Why wouldn't you consider something like the Mazda6 wagon?
It's got a
> nice V6 and being Japanese,

Doesn't it use Ford engines (not that they're bad or anything)?  Or is it
only the 4 cylinder ones that come from Ford?

Pete
Dano58 - 17 May 2007 14:39 GMT
>  "Dano58" wrote> Why wouldn't you consider something like the Mazda6 wagon?
> It's got a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Pete

I think it was co-developed by them, since Ford owns a chunk of Mazda,
I believe. But I think it's primarily a 'Mazda' engine.

Dan D
'04 A4 1.8Tq MT-6
Central NJ USA
KLS - 17 May 2007 22:58 GMT
>>  "Dano58" wrote> Why wouldn't you consider something like the Mazda6 wagon?
>> It's got a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>I think it was co-developed by them, since Ford owns a chunk of Mazda,
>I believe. But I think it's primarily a 'Mazda' engine.

Can we get this in a manual tranny?  The other half is lusting after
the Lexus RX300, and I really want to avoid buying a SUV, but she's
not really interested in getting another Subaru (we've got a 1999
Legacy OBW, which is fine with me), so this is a point of contention.
One advantage the Lexus does offer is a hybrid version, so ....

Me: I just want a TT sooner or later.  I love my 98.5 A4 and will keep
driving and feeding it, but ultimately I need my little sportscar.
koumer@yahoo.com - 20 May 2007 03:42 GMT
> On May 15, 2:15 am, kou...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> '04 A4 1.8Tq MT-6
> Central NJ USA

Thanks for the suggestion. The Mazda6's are a bit long. Unfortunately,
I live in Hawaii, where the garages are absurdly small (most people
park on the street and use their tiny garages for storage). I can
barely shoe-horn in my two cars.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.