> > In article <15f4n4t5nu82rqr88qksuag6027ccnigse@4ax.com>,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> brilliant. In sport mode, it picks better shift points than I
> do, and I would quite happily drive one for the rest of my life.
DSG has superior control and efficiency compared to most automatics but
it is no manual. The shifting speed is terrible. It can transition
from one gear shaft to the other in a few milliseconds but actually
changing the gears takes more like 500ms each. Going from 5th to 3rd
takes one second. Moving the gear shift from "D" to "S" puts my A3 in
neutral for about 2 seconds. A hard stop at 30 MPH leaves me in neutral
while the transmission clicks down to 1st. That's pretty bad.
The "S" mode reduces lag by making the other shaft a lower gear when it
can. It's responsive but the cost is clumsy upshifting that's not good
for normal driving.
> > Traffic is also bad
> > enough that your left leg gets really tired.
>
> Not where I live, but if it were, that would be another nod to
> the DSG.
Lucky you. It's painful to have fast car that's only good for staring
at the back of an unbroken stream of slow cars.

Signature
Google is a pro-spamming service. I will not see your reply if you use Google.
Dano58 - 19 Jan 2009 17:15 GMT
> DSG has superior control and efficiency compared to most automatics but it is no manual.
It absolutely IS a manual transmission, it just has an automated
clutch. No torque converter, which is what automatics have.
I read somewhere that the 2.0T (which I believe is just starting to be
available in the US) WILL be available with the 6-speed conventional
manual. I suspect that Audi would like to have the DSG as the only
manual available.
BMW has a much longer record of 'sporting driving', meaning that they
really have to offer a conventional manual, although I suspect that
they would like to eliminate that and go to their version of the
automated manual as well. Cut down on the number of combinations.
We only have 1 automatic in our household, out of 5 cars, our Honda
Odyssey van. But it very aggressively downshifts, so it's almost like
driving a manual!
Dan D
'04 A4 1.8Tq 6-speed
Central NJ USA
daytripper - 19 Jan 2009 18:38 GMT
>> DSG has superior control and efficiency compared to most automatics but it is no manual.
>
>It absolutely IS a manual transmission, it just has an automated
>clutch. No torque converter, which is what automatics have.
[...]
I suspect you misunderstood the nature of that comment: I believe it was aimed
at the degree of control provided by a conventional manual transmission verses
that of the DSG, rather than being a declarative statement concerning the
pedigree of the DSG...
/daytripper
'00 s4 6spd
Ronny - 19 Jan 2009 19:32 GMT
On Jan 18, 2:23 am, Kevin McMurtrie <kevin...@sonic.net> wrote:
> DSG has superior control and efficiency compared to most automatics but it
> is no manual.
>It absolutely IS a manual transmission, it just has an automated
>clutch. No torque converter, which is what automatics have.
It has no clutch which is engaged when you depress a foot pedal, how it does
it's trickery makes no difference it's still an automatic.
G-man uk - 20 Jan 2009 13:09 GMT
> DSG has superior control and efficiency compared to most automatics but
> it is no manual. The shifting speed is terrible. It can transition
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> can. It's responsive but the cost is clumsy upshifting that's not good
> for normal driving.
I must admit I haven't had those problems with my S-tronic. The
shifting speed is very good although it doesn't get it right on the odd
occasion. Definitely don't get the 2 second neutral issue.
Steve Daniels - 21 Jan 2009 02:01 GMT
> In article <nih5n4prie2auo69o9lbn7ep3pmrfa9fa3@4ax.com>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> > > Ed H. <nospam@myaddress.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > Nobody in the US knows how to drive a manual.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> DSG has superior control and efficiency compared to most automatics but
> it is no manual.
Didn't say it was.
> The shifting speed is terrible.
It shifts faster than I am willing to.
> It can transition
> from one gear shaft to the other in a few milliseconds but actually
> changing the gears takes more like 500ms each. Going from 5th to 3rd
> takes one second. Moving the gear shift from "D" to "S" puts my A3 in
> neutral for about 2 seconds. A hard stop at 30 MPH leaves me in neutral
> while the transmission clicks down to 1st. That's pretty bad.
If I have to make a hard stop from 30 MPH, chances are I'll be
spending those two seconds gathering my wits and checking my
shorts for unwelcome emissions.
>
> The "S" mode reduces lag by making the other shaft a lower gear when it
> can. It's responsive but the cost is clumsy upshifting that's not good
> for normal driving.
S mode is not for normal driving.
If I have a complaint, it's that S mode is over the top. I don't
want to wind it out in every gear on its way to the top speed.
There should be a Poser mode, which would be more aggressive than
normal mode, but not a banshee run to redline in every gear.
>
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Lucky you. It's painful to have fast car that's only good for staring
> at the back of an unbroken stream of slow cars.
I'll bet. My commute is seventeen miles of two lane country
highway, and I usually have the road to myself. The downside is
that there are few roads, so the concentration of cops is high on
the roads that do exist. And, to my sorrow, I've found that they
do not accept Because It's Fun as an acceptable excuse.

Signature
Real men don't text.