Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / BMW Cars / November 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

E36 spinning on starter

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tony - 19 Nov 2006 19:47 GMT
My partners 97 E36 323i has just suddenly died.

She started it today and it turned over normally on the starter but then
suddenly stopped turning, on resetting the ignition key it now turns
over strangely.  It is turning the crank but seems slower than normal
and without the normal pulsations (maybe I'm just used to 4 cycls).

I know alot about other 4 cyl cars but the BMW is new ground for me.

It sounds a bit like a cam belt is broken, but the engine isn't spinning
on freely after you disengage the starter, and the manual says the
engine has a chain(s).  So I doubt this, could be a simple as a battery?
It has been replaced a few years ago.

Any suggestions would be appreciated.

--
Tony
Tony - 19 Nov 2006 22:54 GMT
I think now that the cranking speed is normal but it just sounds like
there is no or reduced compression.  Seems like some sort of mechanical
breakage.

There is alot of unusual knocking from the dashboard(engine?) after you
switch off the ignition after a start attempt.

There is plenty of power in the battery/starter, it can jump the car
forward if left in gear during a start.

--
Tony

> My partners 97 E36 323i has just suddenly died.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Tony - 20 Nov 2006 10:31 GMT
Ok I've tried it again and it seems to be sounding more like it has
compression now, more like no fuel or spark.

Where do you start with this engine, all my normal test techniques can't
be easily done, like looking for spark.

What can happen that does not cause the engine check light to come on?

> I think now that the cranking speed is normal but it just sounds like
> there is no or reduced compression.  Seems like some sort of mechanical
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>>
>> Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Dave Plowman (News) - 20 Nov 2006 10:45 GMT
> Ok I've tried it again and it seems to be sounding more like it has
> compression now, more like no fuel or spark.

> Where do you start with this engine, all my normal test techniques can't
> be easily done, like looking for spark.

> What can happen that does not cause the engine check light to come on?

Try flooring the throttle and cranking - release immediately it starts. If
they don't start immediately the system can get confused.

Signature

*I never drink anything stronger than gin before breakfast *

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Tony - 20 Nov 2006 21:57 GMT
I don't know why you didn't explain this, I'd much rather learn than be
told what to do.  I had already tried that (my standard flooding fix,
but not really necessary with modern injections), so I didn't really pay
it any attention until I had thrown in the towel and called a local
specialist to take it away.  Without charging a penny he said that these
cars need oil on the piston rings otherwise they lose compression almost
completely, and sometimes on a cold start there is too much petrol and
it washes off the oil.  So I had detected compression loss correctly,  I
just didn't think it was possible for not to be a mechanical/broken part
fault.

I had the previous night driven the car for less than a minute when cold
(moving it in the drive way) and then left it overnight.  I guess this
left excess fuel in the bores which removed some of the oil, the
remainer of which was washed away on the early morning cold start (its
about 3-4C during the long nights here now).

Anyway his suggestion was similar, but he did say it needed ages to
catch and if it didn't work, take out the plugs and pour in some oil, or
tow it (not a good idea for a catalyst car).  I topped up the oil and
used up the battery but on sticking in a replacement from the other car
I got it to catch within a few minutes.  I had to really abuse the
starter, but it sounded fine, I hope I don't have to pay for that later.
 The car is now working normally again.

The car is in general excellent condition and quite well looked after,
I do use Mobile 1 in it, but the cooling thermostat needs replacing
(stuck partially open I think) and I wonder is that combination likely
to make the problem worse.  I does get a good run each day and gets upto
the proper temp despite that. (I tried to replace it a few months ago
and only had time to figure out how to get the fan off).

I hope someone finds this useful.

--
Tony

>> Ok I've tried it again and it seems to be sounding more like it has
>> compression now, more like no fuel or spark.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Try flooring the throttle and cranking - release immediately it starts. If
> they don't start immediately the system can get confused.
Dave Plowman (News) - 21 Nov 2006 00:08 GMT
> I had the previous night driven the car for less than a minute when cold
> (moving it in the drive way) and then left it overnight.

Ah - if only you had said this. It's pretty standard that they misbehave
if you do this.

> I guess this left excess fuel in the bores which removed some of the
> oil, the remainer of which was washed away on the early morning cold
> start (its about 3-4C during the long nights here now).

I don't think it's anything to do with compression. It's just the engine
management getting all confused.

Signature

*Upon the advice of my attorney, my shirt bears no message at this time

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

admin - 21 Nov 2006 19:00 GMT
>> I guess this left excess fuel in the bores which removed some of the
>> oil, the remainer of which was washed away on the early morning cold
>> start (its about 3-4C during the long nights here now).
>
> I don't think it's anything to do with compression. It's just the engine
> management getting all confused.

Agree - it's a very nice story that the mechanic told - but it's
basically bullshit. The rings don't depend on an oil film on the
cylinder wall to seal..

Don't do that - if you start it - let it run for at least 2-3 minutes
before shutting it down. If not - learn to do the pedal to the floor
crank until it starts routine. On early Motronic systems - stopping the
cranking and starting it again will result in further flooding since the
cold-start injector is triggered each time with the starter. Later
models don't have a cold-start injector, the Motronic performs the
richening function using the standard injectors.
Tony - 21 Nov 2006 22:30 GMT
>>> I guess this left excess fuel in the bores which removed some of the
>>> oil, the remainer of which was washed away on the early morning cold
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> basically bullshit. The rings don't depend on an oil film on the
> cylinder wall to seal..

No, I really think the compression was lost and that is why it won't
start.  You can hear the engine just turning without any oscillation.
, just more of a whirr.  My initial impression was something seriously
mechanical like a broken cam belt, I've been working on cars for 20
years, I know what no compression sounds like and I'm an Engineer, it
makes perfect sense, I too didn't believe it was possible in a modern
car, but hearing how the starting note changed convinced me.

How sure are you the compression doesn't depend on the oil?

--
Tony
Floyd Rogers - 22 Nov 2006 01:20 GMT
> admin wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> perfect sense, I too didn't believe it was possible in a modern car, but
> hearing how the starting note changed convinced me.

It's much more likely that the vanos solenoid or hydraulic piston
was stuck that caused the valves to remain open/overlapped and
caused the compression loss.

> How sure are you the compression doesn't depend on the oil?

It doesn't.  The mechanic was talking about the fact that, if the
rings are worn *badly*, adding oil to the cylinder will momentarily
help them seal and allow you to diagnose worn rings.  But we're talking
about several ounces (1/8 cup?) to do this.

FloydR
Tony - 22 Nov 2006 08:58 GMT
>> admin wrote:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> was stuck that caused the valves to remain open/overlapped and
> caused the compression loss.

I thought about the Vanos system, but surely it doesn't have that much
range?  Why would running the starter over and over get it started
eventually?  The starter revs will easily build enough oil pressure.  It
doesn't just suddenly get better its very gradual.

Why would only happen if you run the engine for a minute when cold?
Apparently this happens alot with that cause.

>> How sure are you the compression doesn't depend on the oil?
>
> It doesn't.  The mechanic was talking about the fact that, if the
> rings are worn *badly*, adding oil to the cylinder will momentarily
> help them seal and allow you to diagnose worn rings.  But we're talking
> about several ounces (1/8 cup?) to do this.

I don't agree, liquids really help sealing.  I know mechanics aren't the
most qualified of people in general and will tell their favouite theory
even if it doesn't stack up, but I'm still not convinced he was wrong.

So if adding oil (small amount) down the plug holes where to fix this
particular symptom/cause would you believe it then?

--
Tony
Floyd Rogers - 23 Nov 2006 20:19 GMT
> Floyd Rogers wrote:

>>> How sure are you the compression doesn't depend on the oil?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> So if adding oil (small amount) down the plug holes where to fix this
> particular symptom/cause would you believe it then?

If oil was used for the seal between the piston and cylinder, oil would
be introduced into the combustion chamber, *AND* burned fuel/air
would be introduced into the crankcase.  The former is what happens to
old/worn engines and increases pollution and reduces power.  The latter
causes contamination of the oil and leads to lubrication failure.

http://www.totalseal.com/howdoo.html explains the typical ring
configuration, and implicitly mentions the prevention of the above
problems, while stressing the containment of compression with
the top and second rings.

From :  http://auto.howstuffworks.com/engine1.htm
------------------
Piston rings
Piston rings provide a sliding seal between the outer edge of the piston and
the inner edge of the cylinder. The rings serve two purposes:
 a.. They prevent the fuel/air mixture and exhaust in the combustion
chamber from leaking into the sump during compression and combustion.
 b.. They keep oil in the sump from leaking into the combustion area, where
it would be burned and lost.
Most cars that "burn oil" and have to have a quart added every 1,000 miles
are burning it because the engine is old and the rings no longer seal things
properly.
---------------------

Again, similar reasoning.  Bottom line:  an oil film doesn't (normally)
contribute
to compression.  If you Google "oil ring piston", you will find these and
other postings that support this.

FloydR
Dave Plowman (News) - 22 Nov 2006 10:16 GMT
> >>> I guess this left excess fuel in the bores which removed some of the
> >>> oil, the remainer of which was washed away on the early morning cold
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> > basically bullshit. The rings don't depend on an oil film on the
> > cylinder wall to seal..

> No, I really think the compression was lost and that is why it won't
> start.  You can hear the engine just turning without any oscillation.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> makes perfect sense, I too didn't believe it was possible in a modern
> car, but hearing how the starting note changed convinced me.

> How sure are you the compression doesn't depend on the oil?

If you're used to only a four cylinder it could well be the BMW 6 turns
over on the starter rather like there's no individual compressions. Only
way to prove this to yourself would be to try another one.

Signature

*I'm not being rude. You're just insignificant

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Tony - 22 Nov 2006 13:04 GMT
>>>>> I guess this left excess fuel in the bores which removed some of the
>>>>> oil, the remainer of which was washed away on the early morning cold
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> over on the starter rather like there's no individual compressions. Only
> way to prove this to yourself would be to try another one.

I am comparing it to when it is working, not to a 4 cyl, it did have me
confused initially.  I got it going again BTW.  Sometimes when it is
faulty and you are cranking it starts to puff a little (increased
compression) after this it starts to run a bit and if you can make about
2000rpm it will then start, sometimes it just whirrs in a constant way
(reduced compression).  After a good run the starting sound normal (ie
with compression IMO).

I think the only way to prove it would be to make it go faulty again and
then use a compression tester.  But now I know how to avoid it, I'm not
going to make work for myself.

--
Tony
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.