> i prefer 4-door cars. i quite like the economical 318 engine, i'm
> guessing a 2.8L 6cyl would be a lot more thirsty than a 318iS..? i'm
> mainly concerned about the long term reliability of the engines which i
> don't know much about, and i guess is pretty hard to tell at any rate ;)
> my mechanic says it looks great for its years but who knows.
All BMWs engines will last to silly mileages IF looked after.
The 328i isn't bad in fuel due to it's higher gearing. I easily average
30+ mpg (Imperial) and I have a heavy right foot. Even managed 40 a few
times!

Signature
Who needs a life when you've got Unix? :-)
Email: john@unixnerd.demon.co.uk, John G.Burns B.Eng, Bonny Scotland
Web : http://www.unixnerd.demon.co.uk - The Ultimate BMW Homepage!
Need Sun or HP Unix kit? http://www.unixnerd.demon.co.uk/unix.html
www.Strathspey.co.uk - Quality Binoculars at a Sensible price
MW de Jager - 04 Dec 2006 07:03 GMT
My wife's 316 (1800) is much less thirsty in town. (About 25-30%)
My 328 only just manages to equal the 316 on the open road, but only if I
drive very conservatively.
If you are looking for economy around town, stay away form a 328.
MW
>> i prefer 4-door cars. i quite like the economical 318 engine, i'm
>> guessing a 2.8L 6cyl would be a lot more thirsty than a 318iS..? i'm
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> 30+ mpg (Imperial) and I have a heavy right foot. Even managed 40 a few
> times!