>I just purchased a '94 540i. It has the M60 engine with the Nikasil
> issues. Mileage is 83,000. Seems to be running fine.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> short of replacing the engine block (which is probably more than the
> value of the car)? Thanks
> The Nikasil problem developed as a result of fuel with a high sulfer
> content. Today's fuels don't ordinarily have a high fuel content.
Er the fuel content is given by the RON number, I think you meant sulphur.
> If your engine hasn't suffered the "Nikasil" damage by now, its not
> likely to do so. Do a Google search for Nikasil and BMW for a lot of
> detailed information.
If it does go wrong the onset is gradual.
> LMcD
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>> short of replacing the engine block (which is probably more than the
>> value of the car)? Thanks
sfred - 10 Jan 2007 23:34 GMT
Thanks for the info. Any warning signs for this gradual onset?
On Jan 10, 8:39 am, "R. Mark Clayton" <nospamclay...@btinternet.com>
wrote:
> > The Nikasil problem developed as a result of fuel with a high sulfer
> > content. Today's fuels don't ordinarily have a high fuel content.Er the fuel content is given by the RON number, I think you meant sulphur.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> >> short of replacing the engine block (which is probably more than the
> >> value of the car)? Thanks
Dave Plowman (News) - 10 Jan 2007 23:42 GMT
> Thanks for the info. Any warning signs for this gradual onset?
First signs are an uneven idle. On a V-8, more uneven than usual.

Signature
*Why is 'abbreviation' such a long word?
Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.