Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / BMW Cars / February 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Engine problems associated with sludge.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
grinder - 16 Feb 2007 15:56 GMT
BMW wasn't mentioned but Mercedes was.

http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F30611F63E5B0C778CDDAB0894DF404482

TECHNOLOGY; Engine Sludge: When Good Oil Goes Bad

FOR people buying a used car, there is a very important but rarely checked
factor to consider that goes beyond kicking the tires: original sin. Some
best-selling models appear to have an increased risk of serious mechanical
problems, particularly if scheduled oil changes were not made during the
vehicle's ...
Pete - 16 Feb 2007 16:18 GMT
"grinder"
> particularly if scheduled oil changes were not made during the vehicle's
> ...

Even if they were made, the schedules themselves these days may be the cause
of the problem.  Ever since BMW started offering "free" maintenance, the
schedules were greatly extended... what is it now... around 15K miles when
the light comes on on the dashboard?  Depending on the circumstances, that
may be too long.  If you're only planning to keep the car until the lease is
up, then I guess you'll be OK, but if you want to hold on to it longer, you
may want to cut these intervals in half.  Shorter still if you're using
mineral oil.

Pete
Jeff Strickland - 16 Feb 2007 16:32 GMT
> "grinder"
>> particularly if scheduled oil changes were not made during the vehicle's
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> longer, you may want to cut these intervals in half.  Shorter still if
> you're using mineral oil.

Actually, if the circumstance makes 15000 too long, then the light comes on
sooner. The light seems to be aware of the "circumstances." It knows engine
start cycles, and if the trips are stop-n-go or freeway travel. All of this
feeds into the algorithm that tells the light to come on. With advances in
oil and metal over the past few decades, running oil for 15000 is okay.
Pete - 16 Feb 2007 16:45 GMT
"Jeff Strickland"
> Actually, if the circumstance makes 15000 too long, then the light comes
> on sooner. The light seems to be aware of the "circumstances." It knows
> engine start cycles, and if the trips are stop-n-go or freeway travel. All
> of this feeds into the algorithm that tells the light to come on. With
> advances in oil and metal over the past few decades, running oil for 15000
> is okay.

On many BMWs the algorythm is a simple measurement of amount of fuel burned,
but it is a clever one nonetheless.  But even if the circumstances are
severe, it usually doesn't come on sooner than say 10-12k miles.  I've seen
UOAs of the BMW Castrol 5w-30 oil after 10K miles - it didn't look all so
great.  I agree that there are better oils out there that can go the
distance though.

Pete
John Carrier - 16 Feb 2007 18:58 GMT
>> "grinder"
>>> particularly if scheduled oil changes were not made during the vehicle's
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> advances in oil and metal over the past few decades, running oil for 15000
> is okay.

It depends upon the car.  BMW settled on a system that measures fuel burned
only on the E39 and E46.  It trips a light every so many liters.  Evidently
MPG relates quite closely to engine service.  So a highway miles car gets
the oil change around 16K+ (my 530 around 16.5) and an around-town 8 cyl
around 12-13.5K.

Probably not as good as adding a cold-start count, average trip miles, etc
into the equation.  Allegedly, some cars examine the oil for condition
(opacity?  More junk in suspension, more chance the filter and additive
package are near their limits? ... Don't know).  Evidently the newer cars,
E60, 90, 92 etc work a more elaborate analysis ... whether they do or not,
they display a countdown mileage to oil change vice just a sequence of
lights.

I'd agree 15K with lots of long trips is fine.  OTOH, 7.5K with lots of
short trips might be a wiser change interval.  I'm inclined to think that
short duty cycles reduces the oil service interval more than anything else.

R / John
joe_tide - 16 Feb 2007 19:57 GMT
<major snippage>

"Evidently the newer cars,
E60, 90, 92 etc work a more elaborate analysis ... whether they do or not,
they display a countdown mileage to oil change vice just a sequence of
lights."

The later E46's also have a count down mileage indicator. My '05 is
presently sitting on 1,823 miles until Inspection 1...and there is only 24k
on the odometer.
Tom K. - 16 Feb 2007 23:13 GMT
> <major snippage>
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> presently sitting on 1,823 miles until Inspection 1...and there is only
> 24k on the odometer.

Not just the later ones as my '99 328i (1st year E46) has the mileage
countdown.  Mine starts on 15,250, and calls for service after 15,500 to
17,500 miles with mixed city, suburban and highway miles.

Tom K.
Jeff Strickland - 16 Feb 2007 23:03 GMT
>>> "grinder"
>>>> particularly if scheduled oil changes were not made during the
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> R / John

I agree, but the mfg. offers and supports a warranty based on the longer
miles. If there was going to be a problem that shows up within the
0.warranty period then I am confident they would shorten the interval to
reduce the warranty exposure.

I would not be comfortable on first noticing that the oil change interval
was so long, but after finding out that the oils today are not the oils used
when I was a kid and that the metal technology was remarkably improved, and
taking into account that the mfg supports the warranty based on the longer
intervals, I'd not be concerned.

In any case, I would NOT change the oil every 3000 miles, like I learned to
do as a kid. I have no problem today with a 7500 mile change interval, or
longer. Your mileage may vary.
Maurice - 17 Feb 2007 14:09 GMT
on a related note, my recently acquired '95 E38 (103,000 kms) had regular
oil changes by the past owner but I'm considering switching to Mobil1 or
Amsoil synthetics in the spring.  First do you think this a good idea and if
I do should I flush the engine before the new stuff goes in.  I wonder too
if I should stay with what the engine 'knows'
your thoughts?
thanks

Maurice

>>>> "grinder"
>>>>> particularly if scheduled oil changes were not made during the
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
> to do as a kid. I have no problem today with a 7500 mile change interval,
> or longer. Your mileage may vary.
grinder - 17 Feb 2007 16:16 GMT
> on a related note, my recently acquired '95 E38 (103,000 kms) had regular
> oil changes by the past owner but I'm considering switching to Mobil1 or
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Maurice

First, I have no real evidence to back up my position but I was always told
"start with non-synthetic - stay with non-synthetic."  At least if the
non-synthetic was used for 15k-20k miles.
Pete - 17 Feb 2007 20:00 GMT
> First, I have no real evidence to back up my position but I was always
> told "start with non-synthetic - stay with non-synthetic."  At least
> if the non-synthetic was used for 15k-20k miles.

Urban legend.

Pete
grinder - 18 Feb 2007 17:02 GMT
>> First, I have no real evidence to back up my position but I was always
>> told "start with non-synthetic - stay with non-synthetic."  At least if
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Pete

So deposits caused by using non-synthetic oil will  not be removed by
synthetic oil?
Tom K. - 18 Feb 2007 18:14 GMT
>>> First, I have no real evidence to back up my position but I was always
>>> told "start with non-synthetic - stay with non-synthetic."  At least if
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> So deposits caused by using non-synthetic oil will  not be removed by
> synthetic oil?

IIRC, that was an issue some 50 years ago with detergent vs. non-detergent
oils.

Tom K.
Pete - 18 Feb 2007 18:46 GMT
> So deposits caused by using non-synthetic oil will  not be removed by
> synthetic oil?

They might be, but I don't see a reason why not to switch to synthetic
because of it.  Afterall, do you want to keep sludge inside your engine?

Also, modern day mineral oils also contain additives/detergents that
prevent deposit buildup.

Pete
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.