Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / BMW Cars / February 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

E39 3.0 - Oil consumption and suggestions

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jeremy - 22 Feb 2007 08:02 GMT
Got my car on 64k miles, now it is at 76k all running fine. After about
6k, a message appeared "check engine oil level" (or words to that
effect) which I did - it was low - put in about 0.8 of a litre of
whatever BMW recommends. Now again, I am getting that message so it
seems that we are consuming around a litre of oil every 6k miles - is
that normal / within range of acceptable?

Also is it really essential to go for the BMW-branded oil - I know the
answer is of course NO but what should I be using instead?

   
Signature


jeremy
['01 BMW 530iA SE Touring]

admin - 22 Feb 2007 15:18 GMT
> Got my car on 64k miles, now it is at 76k all running fine. After about
> 6k, a message appeared "check engine oil level" (or words to that
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Also is it really essential to go for the BMW-branded oil - I know the
> answer is of course NO but what should I be using instead?

This level of usage is well within normal range. You may want to
actually open the hood once in a great while and if your BMW is blessed
with that old-fashioned device called a "dip-stick" - pull it out and
take a look.

I believe your '01 was so blessed. They didn't do away with the dipstick
until the past year or so (a dumb move IMHO - but I'm sure they have
their reasons..)

It might be worthwhile to price the BMW branded oil vs any other good
quality synthetic. You may find that the BMW specified 5W-30 synthetic
that they sell is less expensive than aftermarket - especially if you're
in the US and have joined the BMW Car Club of America - since most parts
departments give a discount if you show you're a member.
Jeremy - 22 Feb 2007 15:33 GMT
> This level of usage is well within normal range. You may want to
> actually open the hood once in a great while and if your BMW is blessed
> with that old-fashioned device called a "dip-stick" - pull it out and
> take a look.

The hood *opens* ??

Signature

jeremy
['01 BMW 530iA SE Touring]

Dean Dark - 22 Feb 2007 15:34 GMT
>> This level of usage is well within normal range. You may want to
>> actually open the hood once in a great while and if your BMW is blessed
>> with that old-fashioned device called a "dip-stick" - pull it out and
>> take a look.
>
>The hood *opens* ??

No, he's having you on.  Only the dealer has the special key that's
needed to open the hood.
Signature

Dan.

frischmoutt - 22 Feb 2007 20:08 GMT
> > This level of usage is well within normal range. You may want to
> > actually open the hood once in a great while and if your BMW is blessed
> > with that old-fashioned device called a "dip-stick" - pull it out and
> > take a look.
>
> The hood *opens* ??

Of course, at least twice a month for a proper and through cleaning
session. Don't you pamper your baby ?
I hate to stain my hands when I wipe the engine !
John Carrier - 22 Feb 2007 18:00 GMT
> Got my car on 64k miles, now it is at 76k all running fine. After about
> 6k, a message appeared "check engine oil level" (or words to that
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Also is it really essential to go for the BMW-branded oil - I know the
> answer is of course NO but what should I be using instead?

Any good quality synthetic in the proper weight should do.  I use Mobil 1.
If you go with the full service interval (which can be upwards of 16,000
miles), you might want to go with Redline, Amsoil, Royal Purple ...
allegedly superior in extended service.

Less than a quart in 6K is very good.  While the M54 specs would suggest up
to 1 Qt per 1000 miles is "normal" consumption I'd find that unusual for
this engine unless it was a high mileage unit AND neglected.

R / John
Dan F. - 23 Feb 2007 00:22 GMT
> "Jeremy" <jeremy0...@gmail.com> wrote in message.........
> > Also is it really essential to go for the BMW-branded oil - I know the
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> R / John
I hope you'll give careful consideration to the use of Royal Purple.
I am personally familiar with several cases where Royal Purple was
used and the engine promptly began to consume oil at an alarming
rate.  The Royal Purple Company refused to acknowledge the possibility
that their oil had somehow caused a problem and stated that using
their oil had "revealed" an existing problem.  After abandoning
cusomers early on I now understand that Royal Purple does not
recommend beginning the use of their product on engines with more than
12,000 miles (although still not admitting that the product damaged
older engines).
Regards,
Dan
John Carrier - 23 Feb 2007 03:22 GMT
>> "Jeremy" <jeremy0...@gmail.com> wrote in message.........
>> > Also is it really essential to go for the BMW-branded oil - I know the
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> Regards,
> Dan

Note the carefully chosen word "allegedly."  Sounds like RP has a
compatibility problem with seals, which used to be quite common in the early
synthetic era.

I've had good experience with Mobil 1 over several vehicles and many miles.
But I've yet to explore the 250,000+ frontier where meticulous oil service
might (or might not) prove its worth.
R / John
Dave Plowman (News) - 23 Feb 2007 09:18 GMT
> I've had good experience with Mobil 1 over several vehicles and many
> miles. But I've yet to explore the 250,000+ frontier where meticulous
> oil service might (or might not) prove its worth.

A good point. It's only at very high mileages any difference between
quality oils and the mileage you change them *might* become apparent.

Signature

*Remember not to forget that which you do not need to know.*

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Fred W - 23 Feb 2007 13:06 GMT
>>I've had good experience with Mobil 1 over several vehicles and many
>>miles. But I've yet to explore the 250,000+ frontier where meticulous
>>oil service might (or might not) prove its worth.
>
> A good point. It's only at very high mileages any difference between
> quality oils and the mileage you change them *might* become apparent.

Well, sort of.  Many of the manufacturers recommend rather extended oil
change schedules based on the use of high quality, full synthetic oils.
 If you tried to run the same engine on conventional oil using the same
change intervals, well...  You will not have to worry about reaching
those high mileages.

One problem I have with Mobil 1 is that it is a very different oil in
the different labels and viscosities.  And over time the formulations
have changed several times.  Red cap/Blue cap, Silver cap...  I tried
running the 10w30 in my BMW 325i and the vanos did not like it at all.
Too thin even though 10w30 is the recommended summer weight oil.

Lately I have been using only Shell Rotella-T full synthetic in my cars
(and motorcycles) that require synthetic oil.  It is a 5W40 weight and I
have yet to find a situation for which it isn't the right stuff.

SAAB recommends the use on Mobile 1 0W40  for the late model 9-3 Sport
Sedans (this is what they use in their dealerships), but when my
daughter's went off warranty (over 50k miles) I switched it over to the
Rotella.

Oh, it can be had for ~ $15 a gallon at Walmarts in the US.

Signature

-Fred W

John Carrier - 23 Feb 2007 20:42 GMT
>>>I've had good experience with Mobil 1 over several vehicles and many
>>>miles. But I've yet to explore the 250,000+ frontier where meticulous
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Oh, it can be had for ~ $15 a gallon at Walmarts in the US.

Close, about $22-25 for the 5 qt jug.

R / John
Fred W - 23 Feb 2007 23:58 GMT
>>Oh, it can be had for ~ $15 a gallon at Walmarts in the US.
>
> Close, about $22-25 for the 5 qt jug.

No, Rotella is only available in 4 qt (gallon) jugs and it is the price
I mentioned.

Signature

-Fred W

John Carrier - 24 Feb 2007 02:34 GMT
>>>Oh, it can be had for ~ $15 a gallon at Walmarts in the US.
>>
>> Close, about $22-25 for the 5 qt jug.
>
> No, Rotella is only available in 4 qt (gallon) jugs and it is the price I
> mentioned.

Sorry, I misread and thought we were talking about Mobil 1.

R / John
frischmoutt - 22 Feb 2007 20:03 GMT
Z3 3.0 coupé

I think you need figures to compare !
0.26 liter / 1000 km, except when driving on mountain roads,  widely using
engine brake. The consumption may be 2 times more as usual. I assume that
it's due to the suction through the valve seals and the piston rings.
There's 85000 km on it and the value didn't varied for 6.5 years.

It was exactly of the same order whith my old 316i E30 18 years ago :-)

During the winter I also noticed a sligth increase of oil consumption (on
both as well). Probably due to the clearances not setteling perfectly on
short daily commuting by highway.

> Got my car on 64k miles, now it is at 76k all running fine. After about
> 6k, a message appeared "check engine oil level" (or words to that
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> jeremy
> ['01 BMW 530iA SE Touring]
tommy - 23 Feb 2007 17:10 GMT
do you want to keep the car?

A couple of months iod fine with a crap oil change otherwise get decent il
R. Mark Clayton - 23 Feb 2007 18:13 GMT
> Got my car on 64k miles, now it is at 76k all running fine. After about
> 6k, a message appeared "check engine oil level" (or words to that
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Also is it really essential to go for the BMW-branded oil - I know the
> answer is of course NO but what should I be using instead?

Sounds acceptable, but check for leaks onto the garage floor, or from the
around the filter housing.  Oil was probably fairly low when you bought it.
Pashlipops - 24 Feb 2007 08:52 GMT
> Got my car on 64k miles, now it is at 76k all running fine. After about
> 6k, a message appeared "check engine oil level" (or words to that
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> jeremy
> ['01 BMW 530iA SE Touring]

My E46 330ci uses about the same.  It used to use more when using
Castrol 0W-30 LL01 (dealer recommended), however by using Motul BMW
Specific LL01 5W-30 the usage reduced by about 20%.
Bill - 24 Feb 2007 16:48 GMT
> > Got my car on 64k miles, now it is at 76k all running fine. After about
> > 6k, a message appeared "check engine oil level" (or words to that
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Castrol 0W-30 LL01 (dealer recommended), however by using Motul BMW
> Specific LL01 5W-30 the usage reduced by about 20%.

--------
I ran into a similar problem after some seal work with my '86 535i. I wanted
to take advantage of the longer life and possibly better lube qualities of
synthetic. It sprung a leak almost immediately. I went to 20w50 non-synth
and problem solved. I was trying 10w40 synth. I have also heard that older
engines are better off with a heavier weight oil and a non-synth. For 172k
miles, mine is very well sealed and burns/leaks nothing. Between 3-4k mile
oil changes, it uses leass than half a quart.

Bill in Omaha
'86 535i
Jack - 25 Feb 2007 19:44 GMT
I have not as yet been convinced of the virtues of synthetic oil and have
been waiting for some evidence that it will extend the life of my engine.  I
have had excellent experience using conventional oil and am not willing to
give that up without a little more evidence than advertising hype.  I am
writing to ask if anyone knows of any scientifically solid studies comparing
engine wear rates between conventional and synthetic lubricants.

>> > Got my car on 64k miles, now it is at 76k all running fine. After about
>> > 6k, a message appeared "check engine oil level" (or words to that
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> Bill in Omaha
> '86 535i
Dave Plowman (News) - 26 Feb 2007 00:27 GMT
> I have not as yet been convinced of the virtues of synthetic oil and
> have been waiting for some evidence that it will extend the life of my
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> scientifically solid studies comparing engine wear rates between
> conventional and synthetic lubricants.

From what I've read its only major advantage is a longer service life.

Signature

*It sounds like English, but I can't understand a word you're saying.

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.