>Oh I don't know
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>roads are and the surfeit of scameras, there are few places off track to
>drive a big manual, so I will stick with autos!
Well, to be brutally honest, you've always driven big fat pigs of cars, so stick
vs. automatic didn't make a whole lot of difference.
>So should you.
The OP at least drives somewhat smaller, lighter cars, so stands to gain a lot
more enjoyment from a manual if he's inclined that way. So why tell him what he
*should* do?
Some of us derive great enjoyment from driving manuals.
I have owned automatics, but only in trucks and vans whose purpose was to
trailer horses or race cars. I've never owned a car that weighed over 2900
pounds (and probably never will) -- all but two under 2500 pounds, actually --
and all my cars have been manual. Even my wife wouldn't have anything but a
manual in her 3-series.
Oh, BTW, we're well inside the Beltway, too.
-- Larry (but then I'm only 60, so who knows?)
R. Mark Clayton - 29 Apr 2007 12:36 GMT
>>Oh I don't know
>>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> stick
> vs. automatic didn't make a whole lot of difference.
At 2025mm (6'8" in the Olde English units the US still uses), so I just
don't fit inside a lot of small cars. A manual 735 was an enjoyable drive.
With the exception of the X5, I wouldn't call any BMW [saloon] a "big fat
pig", although this epiphet is entirely aposite for the vast majority of
cars produced in the USA in the last half century - very large, resource
hungry, inferior performance and [desperately] poor handling.
>>So should you.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> what he
> *should* do?
Perhaps there is more road space in the US (missed the 'DC area' in the OP)
and less enforcement, so a manual big engined manual can be driven with some
enthusiam. Here in the UK finding an open road is not easy.
> Some of us derive great enjoyment from driving manuals.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> -- Larry (but then I'm only 60, so who knows?)