 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / BMW Cars / June 2007NUDE MODELS
Models for life drawing classes are often entirely nude, apart from inconspicuous personal items such as small jewelry. In a job advertisement seeking nude models, this may sometimes be referred to as being "undraped". In Western countries, there is generally no prohibition on the sexes posing nude for or drawing members of the opposite gender, although this was not always the case in the past. http://modelsnude.blogspot.com/ I think this belongs in talk.origins ! > I think this belongs in talk.origins > > ! Well, one can understand how or why it was cross-posted to "rec.models.scale" (even if one does not excuse the posting), but what does it have to do with a group such as "alt.food.barbecue?"...lol  SignatureGreg Heilers Registered Linux user #328317 - SlackWare 10.2 (2.6.13) AUS ..... He gets it from your side of the family, you know. No monsters on my side. -- Homer Simpson Treehouse of Horror II >> I think this belongs in talk.origins >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >posting), but what does it have to do with a group >such as "alt.food.barbecue?"...lol ok, thanks for putting *that* imagery in my head 8-P >> I think this belongs in talk.origins >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >posting), but what does it have to do with a group >such as "alt.food.barbecue?"...lol i want to smother that girl in chocolate syrup and f.ck her till the cows come home. -frank zappa >>>I think this belongs in talk.origins >>> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > till the cows come home. > -frank zappa ...I think it's "boogie till the cows come home"... ..."only 14, and she knows how to nasty?" Signature- Rufus >> In article <pan.2007.06.23.18.57.16.476375@earthNOSPAMlink.net>, Greg Heilers > <gNOSPAMheilers@earthNOSPAMlink.net> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > >...."only 14, and she knows how to nasty?" his wife's attending an orchid show she squealed for a week to get him to go but back in the bed his teenage queen is rocking and rolling and acting obscene baby, baby. the type 1 pressing has f.ck her as well as the backward palyed lines in the first song. the type 2 was "cleaned up" and sells for $40-200 less depending on condition. >>>In article <pan.2007.06.23.18.57.16.476375@earthNOSPAMlink.net>, Greg Heilers >> [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > the type 2 was "cleaned up" and sells for $40-200 less > depending on condition. Ah-ha!..I've only heard the one version... ...but it's the thought that counts. Signature- Rufus >>>>In article <pan.2007.06.23.18.57.16.476375@earthNOSPAMlink.net>, Greg > Heilers [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > >....but it's the thought that counts. there is one other early moms with slight changes, lumpy gravy. price difference is nil because of same number pressed. i guess the record co learned something. >>>>>In article <pan.2007.06.23.18.57.16.476375@earthNOSPAMlink.net>, Greg >> [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > gravy. price difference is nil because of same number > pressed. i guess the record co learned something. Record companies...are they still around? Don't think I've actually bought any music since I got a cable modem and net-radio. They've even got a net-enabled juke at my local... Besides, these days any serious and seriously smart band ought to be producing and distributing thier own stuff direct to the public and not have to give up a cut. All a band needs a promoter for anymore is to back a tour. Signature- Rufus >>>>>>In article <pan.2007.06.23.18.57.16.476375@earthNOSPAMlink.net>, Greg >>> [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] >have to give up a cut. All a band needs a promoter for anymore is to >back a tour. music co's are still around and more evil than ever. their toilet spoke's scum, the riaa are busy locking up gramma, (this is no joke.) for stealing music. band's continue to earn millions and receive nothing because of the slime. there are some copywright changes that make it worse. the consumer is taking it in the shorts and congress f.cks bands. yeah, they're around. sadly. you would think bands don't need them, but try to get your product in a store. over 90% of music sales are store based, even is they are electronic. and despite the fact i have uploaded and downloaded terrabytes of tunes, i still spend in excess of $300 per month on music. so it's my fault piracy has given the music industry record profits for 11 years running. is all this clear? >>>>>>>In article <pan.2007.06.23.18.57.16.476375@earthNOSPAMlink.net>, Greg >>>> [quoted text clipped - 60 lines] > industry record profits for 11 years running. > is all this clear? Bands need to get wise and realize they need neither the companies, the RIAA, nor the stores...they can direct sell their own stuff to the fans from any web host these days. They can even set up their own net radio stations and grab their own ad profits if they want...musicians really need to get a clue and start exploring the coop net-biz model...that's what the pron venders do, and look at that profit margin. Signature- Rufus >>>>>>>>In article <pan.2007.06.23.18.57.16.476375@earthNOSPAMlink.net>, Greg >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 67 lines] >need to get a clue and start exploring the coop net-biz model...that's >what the pron venders do, and look at that profit margin. web radio may be dead shortly. the riaa is asking for fee hikes that are retarded. evensatellite radio won't be able to play, never mind college radio. the majority of consumers by from stores. you have to change them. porn vendors are smart...musicians are..... musicians. most need good business agents. most of them work for recors co's. we need the chinese model here to eradicate the cp's. >>Bands need to get wise and realize they need neither the companies, the >>RIAA, nor the stores...they can direct sell their own stuff to the fans [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > for recors co's. > we need the chinese model here to eradicate the cp's. Yeah...I know the vote on net radio is coming soon...wouldn't mind seeing the net flooded with porn in a backlash if something as legit as net radio gets quashed. It's all about advertizing dollars...remember when they promised that cable would be ad free because it would be a subsciption service? Even at 12 years old I knew they were jerking us... Signature- Rufus >>>Bands need to get wise and realize they need neither the companies, the >>>RIAA, nor the stores...they can direct sell their own stuff to the fans [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] >when they promised that cable would be ad free because it would be a >subsciption service? Even at 12 years old I knew they were jerking us... never heard that one. wouldn't have believed either. >>>>Bands need to get wise and realize they need neither the companies, the >>>>RIAA, nor the stores...they can direct sell their own stuff to the fans [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] >> > never heard that one. wouldn't have believed either. I remember that. (I didn't believe it either) >>>>>Bands need to get wise and realize they need neither the companies, the >>>>>RIAA, nor the stores...they can direct sell their own stuff to the fans [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > I remember that. (I didn't believe it either) I remember that too. There may have been a short period where it was partially true in the very early days of cable. Back when all there was Showtime, HBO, and The Movie Channel, but even then there was rebroadcast local television which did have commercials. David On Jun 24, 10:52 am, some...@some.domain.invalid wrote: > >some...@some.domain.invalid wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > never heard that one. wouldn't have believed either. Back in the day, Satellite Television Service was suppossed to be beamed directly into every subscriber's home via a dish. Then a buncha "entrepenuers" got together and petitioned the government with the mission statment of "You don't want all those ugly satellite receivers on top of everyone's home. Let us set up a receiver somewhere wher it won't be seen and transmit the signals into their homes via cable." And the dipstick politicans in charge signed the bill into law with the only exceptions being (A) those who already had a dish or (B) those who lived in an area with no cable service. In our area (Western New York) deals were quickly made to ensure exclusive rights (aka Monopoly) in any given township or city. Then we had to dance to their tune. Fortunately Dishnet and DirecTV fought that law in court and won, allowing home satellite service (which I have and LOVE!!!!) The dipstick that signed the cable bill into law was Ronnie Ray-gun. >On Jun 24, 10:52 am, some...@some.domain.invalid wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] >won, allowing home satellite service (which I have and LOVE!!!!) >The dipstick that signed the cable bill into law was Ronnie Ray-gun. i got dish 10 years ago when i lived in the desert. the town had cable, 11 whole channels for 39 buck a month. dish had 49 for 25 bucks. a no brainer. i stayed with them even when cable was around because they are loyal to me and give me new stuff including dvr's and a long term customer discount. screw cable. > On Jun 24, 10:52 am, some...@some.domain.invalid wrote: > mission statment of "You don't want all those ugly satellite receivers > on top of everyone's home. Let us set up a receiver somewhere wher it Did they have the small dishes back then or were they concerned about the huge ones? >> On Jun 24, 10:52 am, some...@some.domain.invalid wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Did they have the small dishes back then or were they concerned about the > huge ones? That would be the huge ones. > <Braung...@verizon.net> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Did they have the small dishes back then or were they concerned about the > huge ones? The dishes back then WERE the six footers, but the 32" dishes have been around about fifteen years, so I think that if allowed earlier, they would have been developed earlier as well. I know a guy that HAD a six-footer in his back yard; we used to go to his house sometimes to watch different sporting events that were blacked out in our region. He lost the dish in a major storm a few years back (a tree limb smashed it) and switched to DirecTV. Picture is better, if anything and he still gets about 200 channels, just not the blacked-out events. I think his wife breathed a sigh of relief over that part. someone@some.domain.invalid wrote: > his wife's attending an orchid show > she squealed for a week to get him to go [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > the type 2 was "cleaned up" and sells for $40-200 less > depending on condition. However, if they believe that leaning the body it bore) yet it was only thinking in terms of indenture were fulfilled, and I'm thinking it's the concept. It's best to ignore this idiot. For your own actions. someone@some.domain.invalid wrote: > his wife's attending an orchid show > she squealed for a week to get him to go [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > the type 2 was "cleaned up" and sells for $40-200 less > depending on condition. However, if they believe that leaning the body it bore) yet it was only thinking in terms of indenture were fulfilled, and I'm thinking it's the concept. It's best to ignore this idiot. For your own actions. > >> I think this belongs in talk.origins > >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > till the cows come home. > -frank zappa Great, I can't have chocolate. Lessee, whipped cream is too sweet, honey's out; peanut butter - uh, no. Rats! I can't think of anything that's not inimical to my existence except the girl. Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr > > >> I think this belongs in talk.origins > > >> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Bill Banaszak, MFE Sr Pineapple Yogurt!! SignatureBrick(Enforce the law now: Change it later) >>>>>I think this belongs in talk.origins >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Pineapple Yogurt!! Peach, please... Signature- Rufus >>I think this belongs in talk.origins >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > posting), but what does it have to do with a group > such as "alt.food.barbecue?"...lol ...naked lunch? Signature- Rufus >>>I think this belongs in talk.origins >>> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >...naked lunch? Well I use a topless model --- 335 convertible but is isn't NUDE only shows it's seat tips or is that tits. On Jun 23, 2:43?pm, Greg Heilers <gNOSPAMheil...@earthNOSPAMlink.net> wrote: > Well, one can understand how or why it was cross-posted > to "rec.models.scale" (even if one does not excuse the > posting), but what does it have to do with a group > such as "alt.food.barbecue?"...lol "IT'S A COOKBOOK!!!"
|
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.