> Front wheel drive cars wear out the front tires
> significantly faster than it's rear tires. You'll be replacing the
> front tires at nearly a ratio of 2:1 in comparison to the rear tires.
>
> The reverse holds true for rear wheel cars (of which many cars are
> still made that way).
Not necessarily.
FWD cars have the front wheels doing all the driving, the steering, and
the braking. Compare that to RWD cars, where the front wheels aren't
doing the driving--they're just turning and braking.
Tire wear is more likely to be more even on a RWD car because of this
division of duties.
Max - 03 Feb 2008 14:08 GMT
>> Front wheel drive cars wear out the front tires
>> significantly faster than it's rear tires. You'll be replacing the
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>Tire wear is more likely to be more even on a RWD car because of this
>division of duties.
Front wheel drives are also the drive wheels. That creates additional
stress on the rubber. Pulling foward and being pulled forward cause
much different wear on a tire.
Grumpy AuContraire - 04 Feb 2008 04:07 GMT
>>Front wheel drive cars wear out the front tires
>>significantly faster than it's rear tires. You'll be replacing the
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Tire wear is more likely to be more even on a RWD car because of this
> division of duties.
I've found that all of my rear wheel drive vehicles still wear the front
tires first due to engine weight/braking and steering also takes its
toll. OTOH, I have found front end wheel alignments duration much more
durable on the rear drive cars.
Of course, I'm living in the past...
<G>
JT
>> the reason behind this is the move to FWD and the newer train of thought in
>> fitting different size/width wheels at each end. My new E65 has wider wheels at
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Rotate them and you'll get longer life out of all four tires.
actually, that's not correct. each time you rotate, the tires have to
scrub to the wear pattern of their new position, so overall average can
be worse. your statement is the common belief based on people tending
to notice tire wear more when not rotated simply because there will
always be one or two wearing more than the others.
> Otherwise, you'll be constantly changing a set of tires.
no, just one or two. tire dealers love to sell sets though.
> And many
> manufacturers don't make the same exact tire every year. You'll
> end up with two different sets of treads and/or manufacturers if you
> constantly only buy one set of tires.
and? what about cars that have different sizes front/rear? as long as
you have decent rubber front and rear, and the same tires on each axle,
you'll be fine.
> Also, maybe you mean moving front to back/back to front but you don't
> actually take the tires off the *rims* when you rotate. You merely
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> different sizes, the ONLY rotation you can do is left/right and not
> front/back.
which on a performance vehicle is immediately noticeable with inferior
traction. and you can't even do that if the tires have a rotation
direction, which many do.