>> "Passenger Side" foot well is relative, I assumed a USA car. Sorry. I'm
>> still on the resistor pack, but I don't know if it changes sides in a
>> metric car.
>
> 'Metric'? The 'home' of metric tends to be Europe and all of Europe except
> the UK is LHD.
> >> "Passenger Side" foot well is relative, I assumed a USA car. Sorry.
> >> I'm still on the resistor pack, but I don't know if it changes sides
> >> in a metric car.
> >
> > 'Metric'? The 'home' of metric tends to be Europe and all of Europe
> > except the UK is LHD.
> That's Colony Humor, Dave.
Right. It near always needs explaining. Although it might work rather
better about a car that didn't originate as LHD -
and is totally metric. ;-)
> Technically, the "home" of metric is pretty much anyplace that is not
> the USA. America is not unique in its refusal to go metric, but there
> are far more places that are metric than use fractions.
The UK is officially metric, but we still use miles per gallon when
talking fuel consumption and feet and inches when describing someone's
height. Even although imperial hasn't been taught in schools for many a
year.
> I can't imagine the location of the resistor pack would change, but I
> have no actual knowledge that it does not change, so the OP has to
> adjust what I had told him to suit his reality.
It's actually more awkward on a RHD car because the steering column is in
the way - and the cover above it is much more difficult to remove than the
one above the passenger well.

Signature
*I like cats, too. Let's exchange recipes.
Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
Jeff Strickland - 24 May 2008 18:48 GMT
>> >> "Passenger Side" foot well is relative, I assumed a USA car. Sorry.
>> >> I'm still on the resistor pack, but I don't know if it changes sides
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> height. Even although imperial hasn't been taught in schools for many a
> year.
Really! I thought you used 100Km/L, or whatever. I didn't know you used MPG.
I also did not know you used ft/in to describe the stature of a person, I
expected CM.
>> I can't imagine the location of the resistor pack would change, but I
>> have no actual knowledge that it does not change, so the OP has to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> the way - and the cover above it is much more difficult to remove than the
> one above the passenger well.
Yeah, that makes sense.
Yvan - 24 May 2008 20:33 GMT
Nedavno Jeff Strickland napisa:
> Really! I thought you used 100Km/L, or whatever. I didn't know you
> used MPG.
It's liters per 100 kilometer [lit/100km]. I believe that US and
Imperial gallons are not the same (someone will correct me if I am
wrong):
10 lit/100km = 28.25 mpg (Imperial) = 23.52 mpg (US)

Signature
___ ____
/__/ / \ ** Registrovani korisnik Linuksa #291606 **
/ / \/ /\ \ ** Registered Linux user #291606 **
/__/\____/--\__\ ** http://counter.li.org/ **
Jeff Strickland - 24 May 2008 21:42 GMT
> Nedavno Jeff Strickland napisa:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> 10 lit/100km = 28.25 mpg (Imperial) = 23.52 mpg (US)
You are correct, a US gallon and an Imperial gallon are not the same.
hsg@h-gee.co.uk - 25 May 2008 09:37 GMT
>Nedavno Jeff Strickland napisa:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>10 lit/100km = 28.25 mpg (Imperial) = 23.52 mpg (US)
5 imperial gallons = 6 US gallons (close enough)
The difference was brought about by taxation of "George?" who realised if you
called the measure the same name but made the standard smaller you - the people
- would have to buy more "gallons" to get the same quantity as before.
So where you were buying say 5 gallons of imperial liquid measure for say $5 now
you would have to buy 6 gallons to get the same amount costing you $6. As duty
or tax increased per gallon so the gov' got about 20% more. Hence the
Independence Day 6/4/1776.
Funnily enough we quote MPG (imp) but buy fuel in Litres. Our currency is
decimal. Road distance is signposted in miles my Sat Nav give me distances in
Miles. My Speedo is in Miles but it has to have KPH shown by law yet Euro cars
do not have to have MPH shown.
Speed limits are posted in MPH and the Highway Code (driving manual for rules of
the road for all road users) gives braking distances in Feet and inches/yards +
metres and other measurements are duplicated.
Tape measures have feet and inches + metres and centimeters etc yet I go to
Spain and can only get metric measures.
I will stick my neck out and say that I recon 100% of all vehicles built within
the last 10 years (or maybe 20) have metric fastenings( nuts, bolts etc).
Hugh

Signature
Sir Hugh of Bognor
The difference between men and boys is the price of their toys.
Intelligence is not knowing the answer but knowing where and how to find it!
Hugh Gundersen
hsg@h-gee.co.uk
Bognor Regis, W.Sussex, England, UK
Mike G - 24 May 2008 21:52 GMT
>>> >> "Passenger Side" foot well is relative, I assumed a USA
>>> >> car. Sorry.
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> you used MPG. I also did not know you used ft/in to describe
> the stature of a person, I expected CM.
Both are commonly used. Academics almost invariably quote
distances or a persons hight in metres. Ie, 1.828 metres for
someone 6ft tall, whereas Joe Public still uses feet and inches.
It's a similar story when it comes to someones weight. Academics
tend to use Kg, most of the rest of us still use stones and
pounds.
Containers of milk come in multiples of pints, but it's sold in
litres.
Like a 2.272 litre container, telling you it's 4 pints on the
label.
We're supposed to have converted to metric, but we haven't
really. We just have two systems in use now instead of one. :-)
Mike.
>>> "Passenger Side" foot well is relative, I assumed a USA car. Sorry. I'm
>>> still on the resistor pack, but I don't know if it changes sides in a
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>no actual knowledge that it does not change, so the OP has to adjust what I
>had told him to suit his reality.
You mean that there really is an alternative reality as in Stargate SG-1?
Actually it has been known for manufacturers to mirror image dash construction
for LHD/RHD vehicles and even transfer the foot brake arrangements to LHD/RHD by
fitting a dammed great twisting tube from the right side brake pedal to the left
side fitted hydraulics.
One time the Olds Toronardo FWD juggernaut was changed to RHD by fitting a chain
drive to the LHD steering shaft that was cut off as it went into the bulkhead
and the wheel assembly was fitted on brackets on the right hand side - brakes
were modified as before.
Never really caught on here in the UK and other marques that drive on the left
still regard the US cars etc as authentic with LHD.
Rudd Speed did a RHD Mustang conversion using a UK Ford Zephyr steering box and
modified drop linkage but I believe RHD versions were made in a Canadian factory
as I had a six pot '66 Mustang Conv' that was all factory.
Many of the LHD Fords were converted in Australia and built there and several
companies imported the Aussie parts to convert US cars for the UK market.
Just my 2p worth.

Signature
Sir Hugh of Bognor
The difference between men and boys is the price of their toys.
Intelligence is not knowing the answer but knowing where and how to find it!
Hugh Gundersen
hsg@h-gee.co.uk
Bognor Regis, W.Sussex, England, UK