Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / BMW Cars / January 2009

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

BMW engines

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
dizzy - 15 Jan 2009 00:08 GMT
I read a recent report that BMW will drop the high-revving engines
used in their M-cars and replace them with smaller, lower-revving
turbocharged motors.  The claim is that this is a more-efficient,
"greener" path to high performance.  Another claim is that peak HP may
suffer, but low- and mid-range torque will increase, resulting in
similar performance.

How would they separate the "standard" turbocharged cars, like the
335i, from the M-cars?

Personally, I would lament the loss of the high-revving engines.
Ironically, I do not really think that high rpm's are "the best way to
go" (as opposed to adding displacement).  However, the engineering
aspect of it appeals to me.  To me, there is something particularly
"bad" (in a good way) about a really hot I6, the epitome of which was
realized in the 3.8L I6 in the E34 M5, and the 3.2L in the E46 M3.

Only once did I see (and hear, up close) an E34 M5.  That thing was
f.cking badass, I'm telling you.
Sebastian - 16 Jan 2009 09:43 GMT
They're going the same route that Alpina have been going. My B3 Biturbo
(based on the 335i) is just a bit better than the M3.

Seb

> I read a recent report that BMW will drop the high-revving engines
> used in their M-cars and replace them with smaller, lower-revving
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Only once did I see (and hear, up close) an E34 M5.  That thing was
> f.cking badass, I'm telling you.
dizzy - 18 Jan 2009 23:54 GMT
>They're going the same route that Alpina have been going. My B3 Biturbo
>(based on the 335i) is just a bit better than the M3.

Well, that's what's got me wondering - how will an M3 differ from a
"chipped" 335?

I've no doubt that Alpina goes a bit further...
GFRC - 23 Jan 2009 17:14 GMT
>I read a recent report that BMW will drop the high-revving engines
> used in their M-cars and replace them with smaller, lower-revving
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Only once did I see (and hear, up close) an E34 M5.  That thing was
> f.cking badass, I'm telling you.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.