Car Forum / BMW Cars / May 2009
front ABS brake caliper piston retract
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Jane Earnshaw - 19 May 2009 19:36 GMT Hi, a mate of mine has an X reg 320 and we cannot shift the front ABS caliper pistons back into their shell to allow fitting of new pads.
Do we need a special tool, like the one I have for GM, that twists the piston whilst squeezing it back in?
Any help greatlfully received - his wife wants to use the car tomorrow and he's in great danger of losing every brownie point he's ever earned (not many actually !! )
Ta! Diesel Dave
Jeff Strickland - 19 May 2009 20:32 GMT All you need do is use a C-clamp to push the pistons back inside the caliper housing.
If you are careful, you can wedge an appropriate prying device between the caliper and a brake pad, and force the caliper open by prying. (You have to be cautious so as to avoid scratching the rotor.)
Speaking of rotors, did you measure them to be sure they are not worn to the minimum spec that is printed on them?
> Hi, > a mate of mine has an X reg 320 and we cannot shift the front ABS caliper [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Ta! > Diesel Dave R. Mark Clayton - 21 May 2009 01:18 GMT > All you need do is use a C-clamp to push the pistons back inside the > caliper housing. > > If you are careful, you can wedge an appropriate prying device between the > caliper and a brake pad, and force the caliper open by prying. (You have > to be cautious so as to avoid scratching the rotor.) Or er damaging the seal, but this may depend on model.
> Speaking of rotors, did you measure them to be sure they are not worn to > the minimum spec that is printed on them? [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >> Ta! >> Diesel Dave last_permutation@yahoo.com - 21 May 2009 12:49 GMT > All you need do is use a C-clamp to push the pistons back inside the caliper > housing. Not necessarily. Back in the dark old days when I drove a Bummer (up to last year), unless the calipers were original (which I could easily push back in) these things will freeze out, and they simply won't budge. I'm a strong guy to begin with, but even a big C clamp didn't do the job with the fluid bleed open.
Oh, the memories. A list of problems over those 8 years that was literally half as long as my arm, including the shitty GM transmission they put in the "ultimate driving machines" going south at 85K miles--nearly $4 grand to replace. I drive an '09 Honda Accord now. Pure bliss and looking forward to years of bliss!
Dave Plowman (News) - 21 May 2009 13:55 GMT In article <10f4d6b2-9010-4869-bf61-4c916c4edb16@z7g2000vbh.googlegroups.com>,
> I drive an '09 Honda Accord now. Why read a BMW group then? Obviously need persuading you made the right decision by your posts...
 Signature *Some people are alive only because it's illegal to kill them *
Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound.
last_permutation@yahoo.com - 21 May 2009 14:56 GMT On May 21, 8:55 am, "Dave Plowman (News)" <d...@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:
> In article > <10f4d6b2-9010-4869-bf61-4c916c4ed...@z7g2000vbh.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Why read a BMW group then? Just thought I'd drop in. I read lots and lots of stuff. I became a bit of a Bummer expert during ownership.
This group looks like it's dying, like a lot of USENET.
>Obviously need persuading you made the right > decision by your posts... But you obviously think Bummers are great cars.
Dave Plowman (News) - 21 May 2009 15:20 GMT In article <d9793f61-fd77-4d11-8fb5-fb548065cf17@g37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
> On May 21, 8:55 am, "Dave Plowman (News)" <d...@davenoise.co.uk> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > > > Why read a BMW group then?
> Just thought I'd drop in. I read lots and lots of stuff. > I became a bit of a Bummer expert during ownership. Doesn't sound like it by your advice about calipers. If they seize as you suggest there'd be lots of other problems. And why wouldn't they be original - they have a very long life.
> This group looks like it's dying, like a lot of USENET.
> >Obviously need persuading you made the right > > decision by your posts...
> But you obviously think Bummers are great cars. BMW, like any other brand, isn't perfect. But usually enjoyable to drive - unlike most Hondas.
 Signature *The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.
Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound.
last_permutation@yahoo.com - 21 May 2009 16:08 GMT On May 21, 10:20 am, "Dave Plowman (News)" <d...@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:
> In article > <d9793f61-fd77-4d11-8fb5-fb548065c...@g37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > suggest there'd be lots of other problems. And why wouldn't they be > original - they have a very long life. Yeah, like their transmissions, and their electronic components, and their blower motors, and their cat. converters, and their rubber molding, etc., etc.,etc.
> BMW, like any other brand, isn't perfect. But usually enjoyable to drive > - unlike most Hondas. The Accord drives fine. Like most Hondas, it's very light on its feet, although it's actually a pretty heavy car--the Accord is considered a mid-sized car now. And it is a HELL of a lot more comfortable than the bummer was.
Dave Plowman (News) - 21 May 2009 17:15 GMT In article <61a23801-44ba-4a09-8e18-b11f93323e42@n19g2000vba.googlegroups.com>,
> > Doesn't sound like it by your advice about calipers. If they seize as > > you suggest there'd be lots of other problems. And why wouldn't they > > be original - they have a very long life.
> Yeah, like their transmissions, and their electronic components, > and their blower motors, and their cat. converters, and their rubber > molding, etc., etc.,etc. Not had a problem with any of these on my 10 year old E39. Except the final stage resistor - easily changed.
But hey - if reliability is the only important thing for you - you're probably right in buying a Honda. Or Toyota. Everyone has to retire and slow down some time.
 Signature *It's not hard to meet expenses... they're everywhere.
Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound.
dizzy - 22 May 2009 00:19 GMT > BMW, like any other brand, isn't perfect. But usually enjoyable to drive >- unlike most Hondas. Hondas are OK, for FWD cars. I'd love to see them do a 3-series comptetitor. I think they could hit the target better than what Lexus (and Mercedes, for that matter) has been able to do...
JRE - 22 May 2009 03:05 GMT >> All you need do is use a C-clamp to push the pistons back inside the caliper >> housing. [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > to replace. I drive an '09 Honda Accord now. Pure bliss and looking > forward to years of bliss! Try changing the brake fluid once in a while. Works for our bimmers thus far.
My '91 Accord now has over 210K miles. It also has original calipers and wheel cylinders.
 Signature JRE
Jeff Strickland - 22 May 2009 03:16 GMT > My '91 Accord now has over 210K miles. It also has original calipers and > wheel cylinders. Original calipers? Big deal.
I've been working on cars (shadetree stuff for my own fleet) for 40+ years and never replaced a caliper.
My first BMW topped 225K miles on the original calipers. I've had Hondas that were closing in on 200K miles with no reason to think the calipers were going south.
Brake fluid makes sense though ...
.
JRE - 22 May 2009 03:38 GMT >> My '91 Accord now has over 210K miles. It also has original calipers and >> wheel cylinders. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Brake fluid makes sense though ... It was an *example*. The point is this: Brake fluid is hygroscopic. If you don't change it, water vapor eventually gets past the seals (even if they are good, they are rarely perfect). When that happens, corrosion starts. I've replaced any number of calipers that were corroded, many of which would not retract. After the first time it happened to me, 30-something years ago, and I started to change brake fluid from time to time, none of them have been mine.
(So far, the record for me is 264K on a 1972 Datsun 510. The Accord and our two E46s might very well break that record handily if we don't hit too many deer with them....)
 Signature JRE
last_permutation@yahoo.com - 22 May 2009 04:07 GMT > last_permutat...@yahoo.com wrote: > >> All you need do is use a C-clamp to push the pistons back inside the caliper [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Try changing the brake fluid once in a while. Where did I say I didn't?
Dave Plowman (News) - 22 May 2009 09:29 GMT In article <9e5332f7-27a9-4eb0-8b62-08ab7d738ea5@i6g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
> > Try changing the brake fluid once in a while.
> Where did I say I didn't? If you had lots of problems with calipers seizing, it's the likely cause.
 Signature *I'm out of my mind, but feel free to leave a message.
Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound.
dizzy - 27 May 2009 02:55 GMT >Oh, the memories. A list of problems over those 8 years that was >literally half as long as my arm, including the shitty GM transmission they put >in the "ultimate driving machines" going south at 85K miles--nearly $4 >grand to replace. Was that a "Steptronic"?
Dave Plowman (News) - 27 May 2009 09:26 GMT > >Oh, the memories. A list of problems over those 8 years that was > >literally half as long as my arm, including the shitty GM transmission > >they put in the "ultimate driving machines" going south at 85K > >miles--nearly $4 grand to replace.
> Was that a "Steptronic"? Doubt it makes much difference to the replacement cost.
Any guesses as to why BMW used GM transmissions on US cars, but ZF pretty well everywhere else? Especially if the GM wasn't reliable?
 Signature *One nice thing about egotists: they don't talk about other people.
Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound.
Scott M - 27 May 2009 12:01 GMT > Any guesses as to why BMW used GM transmissions on US cars, but ZF pretty > well everywhere else? Especially if the GM wasn't reliable? ISTR reading that engine/gearbox combos had to be type approved in the US which cost mucho-wonga. Perhaps using a home grown box got round this somehow.
Alternatively, perhaps the ratios were better suited to US driving. Fifth on my ZF boxed 325 was so long that it probably wouldn't have got into it at 55mph[1].
[1] Don't forget, this is 15+ years ago. I know limits are higher now.
 Signature Scott
Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?
Dean Dark - 27 May 2009 13:42 GMT >> Any guesses as to why BMW used GM transmissions on US cars, but ZF pretty >> well everywhere else? Especially if the GM wasn't reliable? > >ISTR reading that engine/gearbox combos had to be type approved in the >US which cost mucho-wonga. Perhaps using a home grown box got round this >somehow. I believe it had to do with reducing tariffs and/or import taxes, where the greater the "local content" of a product, the cheaper it was.
Dave Plowman (News) - 27 May 2009 14:05 GMT > >> Any guesses as to why BMW used GM transmissions on US cars, but ZF > >> pretty well everywhere else? Especially if the GM wasn't reliable? > > > >ISTR reading that engine/gearbox combos had to be type approved in the > >US which cost mucho-wonga. Perhaps using a home grown box got round > >this somehow.
> I believe it had to do with reducing tariffs and/or import taxes, where > the greater the "local content" of a product, the cheaper it was. I did wonder, but IIRC that GM was made in France.
 Signature *Everybody lies, but it doesn't matter since nobody listens*
Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound.
dizzy - 27 May 2009 23:41 GMT >> >Oh, the memories. A list of problems over those 8 years that was >> >literally half as long as my arm, including the shitty GM transmission [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Doubt it makes much difference to the replacement cost. That's not why I asked...
>Any guesses as to why BMW used GM transmissions on US cars, but ZF pretty >well everywhere else? Especially if the GM wasn't reliable? The (meager) evidence I've gathered is that it's the ZF that's less reliable.
Dave Plowman (News) - 28 May 2009 09:32 GMT > >> >Oh, the memories. A list of problems over those 8 years that was > >> >literally half as long as my arm, including the shitty GM transmission [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > > >Doubt it makes much difference to the replacement cost.
> That's not why I asked... Are you implying there's a difference in reliability between Steptronic and non Steptronic autos? Would seem unlikely to me since it's only a change to the control gear.
> >Any guesses as to why BMW used GM transmissions on US cars, but ZF > >pretty well everywhere else? Especially if the GM wasn't reliable?
> The (meager) evidence I've gathered is that it's the ZF that's less > reliable. Some early 4 speed ZF did fail early when subjected to a US emission test which IIRC involved prolonged revving in neutral. But think this was fixed by the time the 5-speed arrived. Only 'straw poll' I have is that the 5HP19 as fitted to my 528 doesn't go for much on Ebay - so there can't be much of a demand.
 Signature *That's it! I‘m calling grandma!
Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound.
dizzy - 29 May 2009 04:07 GMT >Are you implying there's a difference in reliability between Steptronic >and non Steptronic autos? Would seem unlikely to me since it's only a >change to the control gear. I don't know that's the case. I think that Step=ZF. Maybe.
Dave Plowman (News) - 29 May 2009 09:49 GMT > >Are you implying there's a difference in reliability between Steptronic > >and non Steptronic autos? Would seem unlikely to me since it's only a > >change to the control gear.
> I don't know that's the case. I think that Step=ZF. Maybe. In the UK Steptronic was an option with the ZF box. I thought the same applied to the GM in the US.
 Signature *Why is a boxing ring square?
Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound.
dizzy - 29 May 2009 23:57 GMT >> >Are you implying there's a difference in reliability between Steptronic >> >and non Steptronic autos? Would seem unlikely to me since it's only a [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >In the UK Steptronic was an option with the ZF box. I thought the same >applied to the GM in the US. AFAIK, it was an abrupt switch, on a per-model basis. Up to a certain time, if you got an auto with a certain model, it was not a Step, with no "add Step option" available. The Step auto was phased-in, not coincidentally about the same time that ZF was phased-in.
Dave Plowman (News) - 30 May 2009 10:02 GMT > >In the UK Steptronic was an option with the ZF box. I thought the same > >applied to the GM in the US.
> AFAIK, it was an abrupt switch, on a per-model basis. Up to a certain > time, if you got an auto with a certain model, it was not a Step, with > no "add Step option" available. The Step auto was phased-in, not > coincidentally about the same time that ZF was phased-in. I have a fairly early E39 - '97 - and that has Steptronic. Think it was an option here from release. Of course in the UK there were base models not available in other countries - and plenty of those don't have Steptronic.
I thought all 6 cylinder E39s started off with the GM transmission in the US.
 Signature *Heart attacks... God's revenge for eating his animal friends
Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound.
dizzy - 01 Jun 2009 00:08 GMT >> >In the UK Steptronic was an option with the ZF box. I thought the same >> >applied to the GM in the US. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >I thought all 6 cylinder E39s started off with the GM transmission in the >US. If it had a GM then it was not a Step. That's my theory that I think it true.
Any USA early E39 owners care to chime-in?
Scott M - 20 May 2009 22:07 GMT > a mate of mine has an X reg 320 and we cannot shift the front ABS > caliper pistons back into their shell to allow fitting of new pads. As said, it just shoves back in but the recommended way of doing ABS equipped cars is to open the bleed nipple and force the fluid out of there rather than back through the master cylinder. Also makes it easier to push back in by hand, though an assistant is helpful to stop you drawing air back into the system.
 Signature Scott
Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?
Alan Mac Farlane - 21 May 2009 17:28 GMT As others have suggested, use a C clamp and screw the clamp down on the piston top to settle it back down into the shell (brake housing we say in the colonies).
The brake fluid squeezed it down that way as the brake pad linings wore away from use.
Sooooooo ... you have to give the brake fluid a place to go back up the pipe it came back down (some people loosen the brake fluid filler cap), and drain out ALL the old brake fluid.
Flush out the system, the pipes and all down to the refurbished brake shoes ... it is full of dirt and rust, makes for pitting in the master cylinder miles later ... so use DOT 3 or what ever BMW recommendes as brake fluid ... get a whole liter or quart ... save off what you expend and recycle it. Rather toxic so be mindful.
Go slow, don't scratch things, clean it up nicely, and follow the steps in the shop manual you zeroxed out of the public library ... and it will do rather nicely.
Penny wise is dollar foolish on a BMW ... so use good parts and use all the BMW stuff they say to use or better if it is on the shelf.
Sumbuddie hopes this helps
:?
> Hi, > a mate of mine has an X reg 320 and we cannot shift the front ABS [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Ta! > Diesel Dave
|
|
|