I'm completely new to the world of BMW but when my wife asked me to trade
my care for something larger I though about the 7 series. I have a
brother-in-law who has been driving a 728 for longet than I care to
remember, so they obviously keep going. I discissed them with the garage
that services my cars, and they said: "they don't go wrong often, but will
cost a fortune when they do".
So, what are the differences that matter between the various models from
around 1996?

Signature
Steve Swift
http://www.ringers.org.uk (Personal Webpage)
http://hedgehog.farn.uk.ibm.com (IBM Internal - restricted)
Jack Baruth - 28 Apr 2004 20:48 GMT
> I'm completely new to the world of BMW but when my wife asked me to trade
> my care for something larger I though about the 7 series. I have a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> So, what are the differences that matter between the various models from
> around 1996?
Here in the US we didn't get the 728, but offhand I would have to guess
that the 728 would be the lowest cost-of-ownership E38 possible.
The BMW V8 is fussy and expensive to repair, and the V12 even more so.
The only downsides I can see to 728 ownership are:
1) most of them probably don't have all the lux goodies;
2) I can't imagine it's a quick car around town;
3) if you debadge it the members of this NG will burn
you in effigy :)
Peter Bozz - 29 Apr 2004 07:21 GMT
>>I'm completely new to the world of BMW but when my wife asked me to trade
>>my care for something larger I though about the 7 series. I have a
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> 1) most of them probably don't have all the lux goodies;
> 2) I can't imagine it's a quick car around town;
Well, you can even get the 728iL Executive (whatever that last
predicate might mean), which does 0 to 60 in 9.5 seconds. That's
not very fast, in the eyes of the average BMW owner, but it is faster
than most "other", "normal" cars you find around town, especially
of the same size. Not sure about the lux goodies though, but one
model I saw only lacked satnav and parking sensor (it was a 1997
model). leather, heated seats, OBC, stuff like that was available.
Granted, it can't hold a candle to a 740 or even a 735, while a
750 owner will just dismiss a 728 as a wannabe. But the bottom
rung in the 7 series models' hierarchy must be the 725TDS model.
Now, *that* I don't understand. The admittedly lavish 7 series and
a frugal diesel engine together just seem so incongruous...
> 3) if you debadge it the members of this NG will burn
> you in effigy :)
>
Mark Folsom - 29 Apr 2004 04:37 GMT
> I'm completely new to the world of BMW but when my wife asked me to trade
> my care for something larger I though about the 7 series. I have a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> So, what are the differences that matter between the various models from
> around 1996?
For a few years before 1996, the 4.4 liter engine had a potential problem
with corrosion of the cylinder walls. After that, it seems to have been
much better. My '97 540i was built in late summer 1996 and it still runs
very well at 193000 miles.
Mark Folsom
Nick - 29 Apr 2004 08:49 GMT
<SNIP>
> For a few years before 1996, the 4.4 liter engine had a potential
> problem with corrosion of the cylinder walls. After that, it seems
> to have been much better. My '97 540i was built in late summer 1996
> and it still runs very well at 193000 miles.
>
> Mark Folsom
Actually, AFAIK, the 740 (E38) came with two different engins (changes
around 1996). The earlier models came with a 4.0 engine (which were prone
to the effect you mention, called the Nakasil issue - Nakasil being the
coating applied to the cylinder walls which did not react well to high
sulpher fuels). The later models of the E38 came with the 4.4 liter engine
(and again, AFAIK) none of which have the Nakasil coating.
This might not be 100% accurate but I think it's pretty much right. When
you come to look at a car spin it into a main dealer and get them to do a
compression check, shouldnt take long or cost much.
Nick.
Jeremy - 29 Apr 2004 08:54 GMT
> <SNIP>
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Nick.
Justy in case you were wanting to research this further e.g via google
just note that it is actually nikasil (not nakasil)
-
jeremy
['97 BMW 523i SE Touring]
Andrew Thomas - 29 Apr 2004 09:37 GMT
> I'm completely new to the world of BMW but when my wife asked me to trade
> my care for something larger I though about the 7 series. I have a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> So, what are the differences that matter between the various models from
> around 1996?
Depending on where you are, the 728i would be the best ownership
proposition, but ensure that an early car (1996-1998) does not have
bore wear that affected six-pot BMWs in Northern Europe (mainly
England and Scotland, although as Brits haven't generally learned
other languages it obviously didn't happen anywhere else because they
didn't read about it :)).
It's not a quick car, but mechanically more reliable, economical and
much cheaper to run than any V8. Only the electronics, generally
shared amongst all cars in the range, will give you headaches you
can't avoid :).
Terance Hall - 01 May 2004 04:59 GMT
Go to www.e38.org for all your 7 questions and www.bimmerboard.com!
> I'm completely new to the world of BMW but when my wife asked me to trade
> my care for something larger I though about the 7 series. I have a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> So, what are the differences that matter between the various models from
> around 1996?
Steve Swift - 06 May 2004 20:18 GMT
Thank you all for your helpful remarks and links. I'm glad I asked around
because I was offered a 728 by a local independant BMW dealer. The owner
has been driving it for several months, so it has nothing but trivial
faults, which they will fix. It would come with a warranty, but it might
also come with the problem that affected early 728's, and that I don't
want.
I'm not fussed about the lack of performance... anytime I need a crick in
my neck I can take a spin in my Mercedes 560SEC.
I saved that for last in case I got ostracised here. :-)

Signature
Steve Swift
http://www.ringers.org.uk (Personal Webpage)
http://hedgehog.farn.uk.ibm.com (IBM Internal - restricted)
Fred W. - 06 May 2004 20:31 GMT
> I'm not fussed about the lack of performance... anytime I need a crick in
> my neck I can take a spin in my Mercedes 560SEC.
>
> I saved that for last in case I got ostracised here. :-)
No flame for owning the wimpy Merc, but did you know it is spelled
"ostracized"?
;-)
-Fred W
J Oat - 06 May 2004 22:24 GMT
only if you are from the states
> > I'm not fussed about the lack of performance... anytime I need a crick in
> > my neck I can take a spin in my Mercedes 560SEC.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> -Fred W
Somebody - 06 May 2004 22:24 GMT
> only if you are from the states
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> > No flame for owning the wimpy Merc, but did you know it is spelled
> > "ostracized"?
I'm as loyal a bimmerhead as the next, but by what criteria can a 560SEC be
considered "wimpy"?
-Russ.
Ignasi Palou-Rivera - 06 May 2004 22:39 GMT
> I'm as loyal a bimmerhead as the next, but by what criteria can a 560SEC be
> considered "wimpy"?
Certainly not by its heft!

Signature
Ignasi.
'90 325is
(using SPAM trap e-mail address)
Richard Sexton - 06 May 2004 23:48 GMT
>I'm as loyal a bimmerhead as the next, but by what criteria can a 560SEC be
>considered "wimpy"?
US spec smogged motor? :-)

Signature
Usenet special: on cases of any filters for BMW: http://u.bmwz.org
http://www.mbz.org | Mailing lists: http://lists.mbz.org
633CSi 250SE/C 300SD | Orkut:RS79 Classifieds: http://ads.mbz.org
2 X 280SE 350SLC | Watches list: http://watches.list.mbz.org
Steve Swift - 07 May 2004 06:08 GMT
> US spec smogged motor? :-)
In the UK, I have neither that nor the need to spell ostracised with a "z"
:-)
Thanks, chaps!

Signature
Steve Swift
http://www.ringers.org.uk (Personal Webpage)
http://hedgehog.farn.uk.ibm.com (IBM Internal - restricted)
Scott M - 07 May 2004 12:09 GMT
> In the UK, I have neither that nor the need to spell ostracised with
> a "z" :-)
Just you wait until Dubya gets bored of making sandcastles - he'll be
sailing up the Thames next having declared a war on incorrect English!
;-)

Signature
Scott
Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?
Fred W. - 07 May 2004 12:19 GMT
> I'm as loyal a bimmerhead as the next, but by what criteria can a 560SEC be
> considered "wimpy"?
It's obviously not and was said tongue in cheek... Doesn't show well in
type-face. ;-)
-Fred
Fred W. - 07 May 2004 12:24 GMT
> > No flame for owning the wimpy Merc, but did you know it is spelled
> > "ostracized"?
> only if you are from the states
Ah, you are correct... my pseudo-flame has gone up in flames...
Oh well.
-Fred